Quantifying non-stabilizerness in mixed states is provably intractable, as any strict monotone requires superexponential time. We propose a linear Stabilizer Entropy that acts as a proper non-stabilizerness monotone with overwhelming probability when restricted to non-adaptive Clifford channels acting on flat mixed stabilizer states. Analytical and numerical results for Haar-random states, Clifford orbits, and random matrix product states show that monotonicity violation probabilities decay as $\exp-ηN$. We also prove the validity of Stabilizer Entropy in specific many-body systems undergoing partial measurements, where the amount of resource never increases for each measurement outcome as well as when averaged over outcome probabilities. Given the hardness of strict alternatives, Stabilizer Entropy emerges as a practical and theoretically justified resource measure.
Quantifying non-stabilizerness in mixed states is provably intractable, as any strict monotone requires superexponential time. We propose a linear Stabilizer Entropy that acts as a proper non-stabilizerness monotone with overwhelming probability when restricted to non-adaptive Clifford channels acting on flat mixed stabilizer states. Analytical and numerical results for Haar-random states, Clifford orbits, and random matrix product states show that monotonicity violation probabilities decay as exp−ηN. We also prove the validity of Stabilizer Entropy in specific many-body systems undergoing partial measurements, where the amount of resource never increases for each measurement outcome as well as when averaged over outcome probabilities. Given the hardness of strict alternatives, Stabilizer Entropy emerges as a practical and theoretically justified resource measure.
Classical and quantum states can be distinguished by entanglement entropy, which can be viewed as a measure of quantum resources. Entanglement entropy also plays a pivotal role in understanding computational complexity in simulating quantum systems. However, stabilizer states formed solely by Clifford gates can be efficiently simulated with the tableau algorithm according to the Gottesman-Knill theorem, although they can host large entanglement entropy. In this work, we introduce the concept of non-stabilizerness entanglement entropy which is basically the minimum residual entanglement entropy for a quantum state by excluding the contribution from Clifford circuits. It can serve as a new practical and better measure of difficulty in the classical simulation of quantum many-body systems. We discuss why it is a better criterion than previously proposed metrics such as Stabilizer Rényi Entropy. We also show numerical results of non-stabilizerness entanglement entropy with concrete quantum many-body models. The concept of non-stabilizerness entanglement entropy expands our understanding of the ``hardness`` in the classical simulation of quantum many-body systems.
Stabilizer entropies (SEs) are measures of nonstabilizerness or "magic" that quantify the degree to which a state is described by stabilizers. SEs are especially interesting due to their connections to scrambling, localization and property testing. However, applications have been limited so far as previously known measurement protocols for SEs scale exponentially with the number of qubits. Here, we efficiently measure SEs for integer Rényi index n>1 via Bell measurements. The SE of N-qubit quantum states can be measured with O(n) copies and O(nN) classical computational time, where for even n we additionally require the complex conjugate of the state. We provide efficient bounds of various nonstabilizerness monotones that are intractable to compute beyond a few qubits. Using the IonQ quantum computer, we measure SEs of random Clifford circuits doped with non-Clifford gates and give bounds for the stabilizer fidelity, stabilizer extent, and robustness of magic. We provide efficient algorithms to measure Clifford-averaged 4n-point out-of-time-order correlators and multifractal flatness. With these measures we study the scrambling time of doped Clifford circuits and random Hamiltonian evolution depending on nonstabilizerness. Counterintuitively, random Hamiltonian evolution becomes less scrambled at long times, which we reveal with the multifractal flatness. Our results open up the exploration of nonstabilizerness with quantum computers.
The non-stabilizerness, or "magic", of a quantum state is a common metric for the hardness of simulation on a classical computer, and is often quantified by the stabilizer Rényi entropy (SRE). We show how random superpositions of classically simulable states saturate the SRE to the symmetry-restricted Haar-random maximum. For any large-N random pure-state ensemble satisfying the conditions of Schur's lemma, the average SRE of the m-component superposition ⟨M2(m)⟩=N−log2[⟨W(m)⟩] is governed by an average witness ⟨W(m)⟩ that universally decomposes into a Haar floor and an ensemble-specific excess. As the number of components m increases, the excess is suppressed, resulting in a logarithmic scaling of the SRE before plateauing at the Haar-valued maximum. We derive a general closed form for ⟨W(m)⟩ in the thermodynamic limit, and numerically verify our result for random stabilizer states and random Gaussian states.
Magic-state resource theory is a fundamental framework with far-reaching applications in quantum error correction and the classical simulation of quantum systems. Recent advances have significantly deepened our understanding of magic as a resource across diverse domains, including many-body physics, nuclear and particle physics, and quantum chemistry. Central to this progress is the stabilizer Rényi entropy, a computable and experimentally accessible magic monotone. Despite its widespread adoption, a rigorous operational interpretation of the stabilizer entropy has remained an open problem. In this work, we provide such an interpretation in the context of quantum property testing. By showing that the stabilizer entropy is the most robust measurable magic monotone, we demonstrate that the Clifford orbit of a quantum state becomes exponentially indistinguishable from Haar-random states, at a rate governed by the stabilizer entropy M α ( ψ ) and the number of available copies. This implies that the Clifford orbit forms an approximate state k -design, with an approximation error exp ( − Θ ( M α ( ψ ) ) ) for α ≥ 2 . Conversely, we establish that the optimal probability of distinguishing a given quantum state from the set of stabilizer states is also governed by its stabilizer entropy. These results reveal that the stabilizer entropy quantitatively characterizes the transition from stabilizer states to universal quantum states, thereby offering a comprehensive operational perspective of the stabilizer entropy as a quantum resource.
Abstract We introduce a nonstabilizerness monotone which we name basis-minimized stabilizerness asymmetry (BMSA). It is based on the notion of G-asymmetry, a measure of how much a certain state deviates from being symmetric with respect to a symmetry group G. For pure states, we show that the BMSA is a strong monotone for magic-state resource theory, while it can be extended to mixed states via the convex roof construction. We discuss its relation with other magic monotones, first showing that the BMSA coincides with the recently introduced basis-minimized measurement entropy, thereby establishing the strong monotonicity of the latter. Next, we provide inequalities between the BMSA and other nonstabilizerness measures such as the robustness of magic, stabilizer extent, stabilizer rank, stabilizer fidelity and stabilizer Rényi entropy. We also prove that the stabilizer fidelity, stabilizer Rényi entropy and BMSA with index α ⩾ 2 have the same asymptotic scaling with qubit number. Finally, we present numerical methods to compute the BMSA, highlighting its advantages and drawbacks compared to other nonstabilizerness measures in the context of pure many-body quantum states. We also discuss the importance of additivity and strong monotonicity for measures of nonstabilizerness in many-body physics, motivating the search for additional computable nonstabilizerness monotones.
We introduce the Clifford entropy, a measure of how close an arbitrary unitary is to a Clifford unitary, which generalizes the stabilizer entropy for states. We show that this quantity vanishes if and only if a unitary is Clifford, is invariant under composition with Clifford unitaries, and is subadditive under tensor products. Rewriting the Clifford entropy in terms of the stabilizer entropy of the corresponding Choi state allows us to derive an upper bound: that this bound is not tight follows from considering the properties of symmetric informationally complete sets. Nevertheless we are able to numerically estimate the maximum in low dimensions, comparing it to the average over all unitaries, which we derive analytically. Finally, harnessing a concentration of measure result, we show that as the dimension grows large, with probability approaching unity, the ratio between the Clifford entropy of a Haar random unitary and that of a fixed magic gate gives a lower bound on the depth of a doped Clifford circuit which realizes the former in terms of the latter. In fact, numerical evidence suggests that this result holds reliably even in low dimensions. We conclude with several directions for future research.