Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2606.23647

Genuine certification of incompatible quantum instruments through sequential communication tasks

Arindam Mitra, Satyaki Manna, Debashis Saha

quant-phmath-phSubmitted Jun 22, 2026• Announced Jun 23, 2026• 0 citations• Revised Sep 1, 2026 (v2)
v1 · Jun 22, 2026v2 · Sep 1, 2026
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Quantum instruments constitute the general description of quantum dynamics, encompassing both quantum measurements and quantum channels as special cases. Consequently, the incompatibility of quantum instruments represents a fundamental manifestation of nonclassicality in quantum theory. Here, we establish the operational significance of this notion by demonstrating communication tasks with classical inputs and outputs that enable the semi-device-independent certification of incompatible quantum instruments. We introduce a class of three-party communication tasks involving a sender, a relayer, and a receiver, and derive the tight upper bounds of the figure of merits of these tasks achievable by all compatible instruments implemented by the relayer. Furthermore, we show that these bounds coincide with the optimal performance attainable in a classical communication subject to the same dimensional constraints. Violation of this bound certifies the incompatibility of the pair of quantum instruments implemented by the relayer. This identifies certification of incompatible instruments as a manifestation of quantum advantage in communication. This certification protocol is genuine as it is able to certify the incompatibility of a pair of instruments where the set of induced measurements and the set of induced channels are compatible and, therefore it does not depend on the incompability of measurements and channels induced by the instruments. Finally, we identify the simplest instance of our communication scenario that enable the certification of incompatible quantum instruments.

Comments
15 pages, 2 figures, typos fixed

Related papers

Robust certification of quantum instruments through a sequential communication game

Pritam Roy, Subhankar Bera, A. S. Majumdar +1 more

We propose a communication game in the sequential measurement scenario, involving a sender and two receivers with restricted communication among the latter parties. In the framework of the prepare-transform-measure scenario, we find a prominent quantum advantage in the receiver's decoding of the message originally encoded by the sender. We show that an optimal trade-off between the success probabilities of the two receivers enables self-testing of the sender's state preparation, the first receiver's instruments, and the measurement device of the second receiver in a semi-device-independent way. Our protocol enables a more robust certification of the unsharp measurement parameter of the first receiver compared to an earlier protocol. We further generalize our game to higher-dimensional systems, revealing greater quantum advantage with an increase in dimensions.

arXiv:2506.12946•Physical Review A•Jan 20, 2026•2 citations

Characterizing and quantifying the incompatibility of quantum instruments

Arindam Mitra, Máté Farkas

Incompatibility of quantum devices is one of the cornerstones of quantum theory, and the incompatibility of quantum measurements and channels has been linked to quantum advantage in certain information-theoretic tasks. In this work, we focus on the less well explored question of the incompatibility of quantum instruments, that is, devices that describe the measurement process in its entirety, accounting for both the classical measurement outcome and the quantum postmeasurement state. In particular, we focus on the recently introduced notion of parallel compatibility of instruments, which has been argued to be a natural notion of instrument compatibility. We introduce, in a manner similar to the case of measurements and channels, the incompatibility robustness of quantum instruments and derive universal bounds on it. We then prove that postprocessing of quantum instruments is a free operation for parallel compatibility. Last, we provide families of instruments for which our bounds are tight and families of compatible indecomposable instruments.

arXiv:2209.02621•Physical Review A•Mar 24, 2023•14 citations

Topology-independent quantum advantage in communication networks

Ankush Pandit, V. N. S. Meghanath Ashtakala, Leon George Padayatty +1 more

Quantum communication can outperform classical communication in a variety of information-processing tasks, but such advantages are typically established for a fixed communication network. Here we introduce topology-independent quantum advantage, in which a quantum protocol outperforms every classical protocol subject to the same communication constraint, irrespective of how the classical communication resource is distributed among the parties or which communication topology is employed, even when the parties may share unlimited classical randomness. We first demonstrate this phenomenon through a simple three-party equality task: two senders receive ternary classical inputs, while an input-free receiver determines whether the inputs are equal. We then formulate a general framework for topology-independent communication and completely characterize the corresponding classical correlation polytope in the minimal three-party scenario. Its facet inequalities reveal several instances of topology-independent quantum advantage. Remarkably, one of these inequalities enables the semi-device-independent certification of a nonunitary quantum channel, while another certifies a sequential quantum network topology without any prior assumption about the network configuration. Finally, we extend the framework to four-party networks, characterize the relevant classical communication structures, and identify a communication task exhibiting quantum advantages against all admissible classical topologies. Our results establish topology independence as a genuine and robust form of quantum advantage in communication networks.

quant-pharXiv:2610.04734•Oct 6, 2026•0 citations

Measurement incompatibility and quantum advantage in communication

Debashis Saha, Debarshi Das, Arun Kumar Das +2 more

Measurement incompatibility stipulates the existence of quantum measurements that cannot be carried out simultaneously on single systems. We show that the set of input-output probabilities obtained from $d$-dimensional classical systems assisted with shared randomness is the same as the set obtained from $d$-dimensional quantum strategies restricted to compatible measurements with shared randomness in any communication scenario. Thus, measurement incompatibility is necessary for quantum advantage in communication, and any quantum advantage (with or without shared randomness) in communication acts as a witness to the incompatibility of the measurements at the receiver's end in a semi-device-independent way. We introduce a class of communication tasks---a general version of random access codes---to witness incompatibility of an arbitrary number of quantum measurements with arbitrary outcomes acting on $d$-dimensional systems and provide generic upper bounds on the success metric of these tasks for compatible measurements. We identify all sets of three incompatible rank-one projective qubit measurements that random access codes can witness. Finally, we present the generic relationship between different sets of probability distributions---classical, quantum with or without shared randomness, and quantum restricted to compatible measurements with or without shared randomness---produced in communication scenarios.

arXiv:2209.14582•Physical Review A•Jun 12, 2023•21 citations

Certifying Measurement Incompatibility under Bounded Classical Communication

Oxana Shaya

Measurement incompatibility enables quantum advantages in communication and state discrimination. It is also necessary for Bell nonlocality, which is used in device-independent protocols for quantum key distribution and private randomness generation. Classical communication can influence the receiver's outcome and must therefore be accounted for when certifying measurement incompatibility. We introduce union maximal leakage, which quantifies the information needed for a common classical explanation of all observed probabilities and is computed from them by a linear program. If a message of at most $k$ bits precedes the receiver's independent measurement choice, compatible measurements for each message give union maximal leakage at most $k$. This bound holds with any input-independent nonsignalling shared resource. In quantum theory, a violation also implies that the initially shared state is entangled. Conversely, union maximal leakage determines the minimum classical communication needed to reproduce the observations with compatible measurements and arbitrary nonsignalling assistance. For a fixed shared quantum state and receiver measurements, a violation is possible exactly when, for some message value, the receiver's measurements are Bell-nonlocal against two-outcome sender measurements on that state. For binary receiver outcomes, we show that a violation also certifies randomness private from the sender, even when the receiver's measurement depends on the sender's message and the sender retains quantum side information. We quantify this privacy through an explicit conditional entropy bound and establish composably secure randomness extraction in sequential protocols with device memory.

quant-pharXiv:2610.06722•Oct 6, 2026•0 citations

Robust certification of unsharp instruments through sequential quantum advantages in a prepare-measure communication game

S. S. Abhyoudai., Sumit Mukherjee, A. K. Pan

Communication games are one of the widely used tools that are designed to demonstrate quantum supremacy over classical resources. In that, two or more parties collaborate to perform an information processing task to achieve the highest success probability of winning the game. We propose a specific two-party communication game in the prepare-measure scenario that relies on an encoding-decoding task of specific information. We first demonstrate that quantum theory outperforms the classical preparation non-contextual theory, and the optimal quantum success probability of such a communication game enables the semi-device-independent certification of qubit states and measurements. Further, we consider the sequential sharing of quantum preparation contextuality and show that, at most, two sequential observers can share the quantum advantage. The sub-optimal quantum advantages for two sequential observers form an optimal pair that certifies a unique value of the unsharpness parameter of the first observer. Since the practical implementation inevitably introduces noise, we devised a scheme to demonstrate the robust certification of the states and unsharp measurement instruments of both the sequential observers.

arXiv:2212.14207•Dec 29, 2022•0 citations
Quantum instruments constitute the general description of quantum dynamics, encompassing both quantum measurements and quantum channels as special cases. Consequently, the incompatibility of quantum instruments represents a fundamental manifestation of nonclassicality in quantum theory. Here, we establish the operational significance of this notion by demonstrating communication tasks with classical inputs and outputs that enable the semi-device-independent certification of incompatible quantum instruments. We introduce a class of three-party communication tasks involving a sender, a relayer, and a receiver, and derive the tight upper bounds of the figure of merits of these tasks achievable by all compatible instruments implemented by the relayer. Furthermore, we show that these bounds coincide with the optimal performance attainable in a classical communication subject to the same dimensional constraints. Violation of this bound certifies the incompatibility of the pair of quantum instruments implemented by the relayer. This identifies certification of incompatible instruments as a manifestation of quantum advantage in communication. This certification protocol is genuine as it is able to certify the incompatibility of a pair of instruments where the set of induced measurements and the set of induced channels are compatible and, therefore it does not depend on the incompability of measurements and channels induced by the instruments. Finally, we identify the simplest instance of our communication scenario that enable the certification of incompatible quantum instruments.
We propose a communication game in the sequential measurement scenario, involving a sender and two receivers with restricted communication among the latter parties. In the framework of the prepare-transform-measure scenario, we find a prominent quantum advantage in the receiver's decoding of the message originally encoded by the sender. We show that an optimal trade-off between the success probabilities of the two receivers enables self-testing of the sender's state preparation, the first receiver's instruments, and the measurement device of the second receiver in a semi-device-independent way. Our protocol enables a more robust certification of the unsharp measurement parameter of the first receiver compared to an earlier protocol. We further generalize our game to higher-dimensional systems, revealing greater quantum advantage with an increase in dimensions.
Incompatibility of quantum devices is one of the cornerstones of quantum theory, and the incompatibility of quantum measurements and channels has been linked to quantum advantage in certain information-theoretic tasks. In this work, we focus on the less well explored question of the incompatibility of quantum instruments, that is, devices that describe the measurement process in its entirety, accounting for both the classical measurement outcome and the quantum postmeasurement state. In particular, we focus on the recently introduced notion of parallel compatibility of instruments, which has been argued to be a natural notion of instrument compatibility. We introduce, in a manner similar to the case of measurements and channels, the incompatibility robustness of quantum instruments and derive universal bounds on it. We then prove that postprocessing of quantum instruments is a free operation for parallel compatibility. Last, we provide families of instruments for which our bounds are tight and families of compatible indecomposable instruments.
Quantum communication can outperform classical communication in a variety of information-processing tasks, but such advantages are typically established for a fixed communication network. Here we introduce topology-independent quantum advantage, in which a quantum protocol outperforms every classical protocol subject to the same communication constraint, irrespective of how the classical communication resource is distributed among the parties or which communication topology is employed, even when the parties may share unlimited classical randomness. We first demonstrate this phenomenon through a simple three-party equality task: two senders receive ternary classical inputs, while an input-free receiver determines whether the inputs are equal. We then formulate a general framework for topology-independent communication and completely characterize the corresponding classical correlation polytope in the minimal three-party scenario. Its facet inequalities reveal several instances of topology-independent quantum advantage. Remarkably, one of these inequalities enables the semi-device-independent certification of a nonunitary quantum channel, while another certifies a sequential quantum network topology without any prior assumption about the network configuration. Finally, we extend the framework to four-party networks, characterize the relevant classical communication structures, and identify a communication task exhibiting quantum advantages against all admissible classical topologies. Our results establish topology independence as a genuine and robust form of quantum advantage in communication networks.
Measurement incompatibility stipulates the existence of quantum measurements that cannot be carried out simultaneously on single systems. We show that the set of input-output probabilities obtained from ddd-dimensional classical systems assisted with shared randomness is the same as the set obtained from ddd-dimensional quantum strategies restricted to compatible measurements with shared randomness in any communication scenario. Thus, measurement incompatibility is necessary for quantum advantage in communication, and any quantum advantage (with or without shared randomness) in communication acts as a witness to the incompatibility of the measurements at the receiver's end in a semi-device-independent way. We introduce a class of communication tasks---a general version of random access codes---to witness incompatibility of an arbitrary number of quantum measurements with arbitrary outcomes acting on ddd-dimensional systems and provide generic upper bounds on the success metric of these tasks for compatible measurements. We identify all sets of three incompatible rank-one projective qubit measurements that random access codes can witness. Finally, we present the generic relationship between different sets of probability distributions---classical, quantum with or without shared randomness, and quantum restricted to compatible measurements with or without shared randomness---produced in communication scenarios.
Measurement incompatibility enables quantum advantages in communication and state discrimination. It is also necessary for Bell nonlocality, which is used in device-independent protocols for quantum key distribution and private randomness generation. Classical communication can influence the receiver's outcome and must therefore be accounted for when certifying measurement incompatibility. We introduce union maximal leakage, which quantifies the information needed for a common classical explanation of all observed probabilities and is computed from them by a linear program. If a message of at most kkk bits precedes the receiver's independent measurement choice, compatible measurements for each message give union maximal leakage at most kkk. This bound holds with any input-independent nonsignalling shared resource. In quantum theory, a violation also implies that the initially shared state is entangled. Conversely, union maximal leakage determines the minimum classical communication needed to reproduce the observations with compatible measurements and arbitrary nonsignalling assistance. For a fixed shared quantum state and receiver measurements, a violation is possible exactly when, for some message value, the receiver's measurements are Bell-nonlocal against two-outcome sender measurements on that state. For binary receiver outcomes, we show that a violation also certifies randomness private from the sender, even when the receiver's measurement depends on the sender's message and the sender retains quantum side information. We quantify this privacy through an explicit conditional entropy bound and establish composably secure randomness extraction in sequential protocols with device memory.
Communication games are one of the widely used tools that are designed to demonstrate quantum supremacy over classical resources. In that, two or more parties collaborate to perform an information processing task to achieve the highest success probability of winning the game. We propose a specific two-party communication game in the prepare-measure scenario that relies on an encoding-decoding task of specific information. We first demonstrate that quantum theory outperforms the classical preparation non-contextual theory, and the optimal quantum success probability of such a communication game enables the semi-device-independent certification of qubit states and measurements. Further, we consider the sequential sharing of quantum preparation contextuality and show that, at most, two sequential observers can share the quantum advantage. The sub-optimal quantum advantages for two sequential observers form an optimal pair that certifies a unique value of the unsharpness parameter of the first observer. Since the practical implementation inevitably introduces noise, we devised a scheme to demonstrate the robust certification of the states and unsharp measurement instruments of both the sequential observers.