There is growing interest in extensions of the standard model of gate-based quantum computation to include auxiliary degrees of freedom evolving according to a nonlinear Schrödinger equation. By reducing the Boolean satisfiability problem SAT to quantum state discrimination, Abrams and Lloyd argued that the right type of nonlinearity can be used to solve {\sf NP} and #{\sf P} problems in polynomial time, at least in an idealized noise-free limit. For practical implementation, however, we are restricted to simulated and emergent nonlinearities, such as that appearing in mean field models for ultracold atoms and similar ensembles. A prominent example is the torsion model, which arises in two-component Bose-Einstein condensates and spin models with all-to-all Ising interaction. But torsion-based state discrimination appears to fall short of solving SAT. Here we close this gap by constructing the filtered oracle of the Valiant-Vazirani theorem, providing a randomized polynomial-time reduction from SAT to UNIQUE SAT, a promise problem where there is at most 1 satisfying assignment. In the noise free limit, the UNIQUE SAT problem can be olved in polynomial time using torsion nonlinearity. Quantum Valiant-Vazirani reduction is no faster than the efficient classical version, but a fault-tolerant implementation coupled to a nonlinear quantum coprocessor simulating torsion would enable polynomial time solution to {\sf NP} (but not #{\sf P}) problems.
We consider an extended model of quantum computation where a scalable fault-tolerant quantum computer is coupled to one or more ancilla qubits that evolve according to a nonlinear Schrödinger equation. Following the approach of Abrams and Lloyd, an efficient quantum circuit evaluating an
n-bit Boolean function in conjunctive normal form is used to prepare an ancilla encoding its number
s of satisfying assignments (
0≤s≤2n). This is followed by a nonlinear quantum state discrimination gate on the ancilla qubit that is used to learn properties of
s. Here we consider three types of state discriminators generated by different nonlinear Hamiltonians. First, given a restricted Boolean satisfiability problem with the promise of at most one satisfying assignment ($ 0 \le s \le 1$), we show that a qubit with
⟨σz⟩σz nonlinearity can be used to efficiently determine whether
s=0 or
s=1, solving the UNIQUE SAT problem. Here $\langle A \rangle := \langle ψ| A |ψ\rangle $ denotes expectation in the current state. UNIQUE SAT is NP-hard under a randomized polynomial-time reduction (of course any discussion of complexity assumes a scalable, fault-tolerant implementation). Second, for unrestricted satisfiability problems with $ 0 \le s \le 2^n$, a Hamiltonian with $ \langle σ^x \rangle σ^y - \langle σ^y \rangle σ^x$ nonlinearity can be used to efficiently determine whether
s=0 or
s>0, thereby solving 3SAT, which is NP-complete. Finally, we show that $ \langle σ^y \rangle \langle σ^z \rangle σ^x - \langle σ^x \rangle \langle σ^z \rangle σ^y $ nonlinearity can be used to efficiently measure
s and solve #SAT, which is #P-complete. The nonlinear models are of mean field type and might be simulated with ultracold atoms.
What is the power of polynomial-time quantum computation with access to an NP oracle? In this work, we focus on two fundamental tasks from the study of Boolean satisfiability (SAT) problems: search-to-decision reductions, and approximate counting. We first show that, in strong contrast to the classical setting where a poly-time Turing machine requires
Θ(n) queries to an NP oracle to compute a witness to a given SAT formula, quantumly
Θ(logn) queries suffice. We then show this is tight in the black-box model - any quantum algorithm with "NP-like" query access to a formula requires
Ω(logn) queries to extract a solution with constant probability. Moving to approximate counting of SAT solutions, by exploiting a quantum link between search-to-decision reductions and approximate counting, we show that existing classical approximate counting algorithms are likely optimal. First, we give a lower bound in the "NP-like" black-box query setting: Approximate counting requires
Ω(logn) queries, even on a quantum computer. We then give a "white-box" lower bound (i.e. where the input formula is not hidden in the oracle) - if there exists a randomized poly-time classical or quantum algorithm for approximate counting making
o(logn) NP queries, then
BPPNP[o(n)] contains a
PNP-complete problem if the algorithm is classical and
FBQPNP[o(n)] contains an
FPNP-complete problem if the algorithm is quantum.
If quantum states exhibit small nonlinearities during time evolution, then quantum computers can be used to solve
NP-complete and #
P problems in polynomial time. We provide algorithms that solve
NP-complete and #
P oracle problems by exploiting nonlinear quantum logic gates. Using the Weinberg model as a simple example, the explicit construction of these gates is derived from the underlying physics. Nonlinear quantum algorithms are also presented using Polchinski type nonlinearities which do not allow for superluminal communication.
If one modifies the laws of Quantum Mechanics to allow nonlinear evolution of quantum states, this paper shows that NP-complete problems would be efficiently solvable in polynomial time with bounded probability (NP in BQP). With that (admittedly very unlikely) assumption, this is demonstrated by describing a polynomially large network of quantum gates that solves the 3SAT problem with bounded probability in polynomial time. As in a previous paper by Abrams and Lloyd (but by a somewhat simpler argument), allowing nonlinearity in the laws of Quantum Mechanics would prove the "weak Church-Turing thesis" to be false. General Relativity is suggested as a possible mechanism to supply the necessary nonlinearity.
The Boolean constraint satisfaction problem 3-SAT is arguably the canonical NP-complete problem. In contrast, 2-SAT can not only be decided in polynomial time, but in fact in deterministic linear time. In 2006, Bravyi proposed a physically motivated generalization of k-SAT to the quantum setting, defining the problem "quantum k-SAT". He showed that quantum 2-SAT is also solvable in polynomial time on a classical computer, in particular in deterministic time O(n^4), assuming unit-cost arithmetic over a field extension of the rational numbers, where n is number of variables. In this paper, we present an algorithm for quantum 2-SAT which runs in linear time, i.e. deterministic time O(n+m) for n and m the number of variables and clauses, respectively. Our approach exploits the transfer matrix techniques of Laumann et al. [QIC, 2010] used in the study of phase transitions for random quantum 2-SAT, and bears similarities with both the linear time 2-SAT algorithms of Even, Itai, and Shamir (based on backtracking) [SICOMP, 1976] and Aspvall, Plass, and Tarjan (based on strongly connected components) [IPL, 1979].
Abstract Quantum k-SAT (the problem of determining whether a k-local Hamiltonian is frustration-free) is known to be QMA
1 1 -complete for
k≥3 k ≥ 3 , and hence likely hard for quantum computers to solve. Building on a classical result of Alon and Shapira, we show that quantum k-SAT can be solved in randomised polynomial time given the ‘property testing’ promise that the instance is either satisfiable (by any state) or far from satisfiable by a product state; by ‘far from satisfiable by a product state’ we mean that
ϵnk ϵ n k constraints must be removed before a product state solution exists, for some fixed
ϵ>0 ϵ > 0 . The proof has two steps: we first show that for a satisfiable instance of quantum k-SAT, most subproblems on a constant number of qubits are satisfiable by a product state. We then show that for an instance of quantum k-SAT which is far from satisfiable by a product state, most subproblems are unsatisfiable by a product state. Given the promise, quantum k-SAT may therefore be solved by checking satisfiability by a product state on randomly chosen subsystems of constant size.