Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2606.05767

Tight relation between the physical effects of a quantum measurement and the information gained about an observable

Natsuki Ogo, Holger F. Hofmann

quant-phSubmitted Jun 4, 2026• Announced Jun 5, 2026• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The dynamics of quantum measurements defines a precise relation between the information gained about one physical property of a system and the observable changes in another physical property of the same system. Here, we express this relation in terms of the Hilbert space superpositions of the corresponding eigenstates and show how the probability of an observable physical change can be obtained from the Bayesian update of the probabilities associated with the information obtained in the measurement. Our analysis demonstrates that the superposition principle provides the tightest possible expression of the trade-off between information and back action in a quantum measurement.

Comments
8 pages

Related papers

Dependence of measurement outcomes on the dynamics of quantum coherent interactions between the system and the meter

Tomonori Matsushita, Holger Friedrich Hofmann

Information about the internal properties of a system can only be obtained through interactions of the system with an external meter. However, such interactions generally result in entanglement between the system and the meter, making it difficult to trace the measurement result back to a specific value of the physical property in the system. It is therefore possible that the outcomes of quantum measurements depend in a nontrivial manner on the dynamics of the measurement interaction, possibly providing a physical explanation for the role of measurement contexts in quantum mechanics. Here we show that the effects of the measurement interaction on the meter can be described entirely in terms of the quantum coherent system dynamics associated with the back-action on the system. For sufficiently small back-action uncertainties, the physical property of the system is described by a weak value obtained from the Hamilton-Jacobi equation of the back-action dynamics. At higher measurement resolutions, the observed values are determined by quantum interferences between different amounts of back-action. Eigenvalues emerge when the quantum interferences between different back-actions correspond to a Fourier transform in the back-action parameter. We conclude that the values of physical properties obtained in quantum measurements originate from the quantum coherent properties of the back-action dynamics generated by that physical property during an interaction. Measurement outcomes represent elements of the dynamics and cannot be explained by measurement independent elements of reality.

arXiv:2209.00751•Physical Review Research•Jul 31, 2023•8 citations

Bayesian updating and information gain in quantum measurements

Leah Henderson

Introduction In many situations, learning from the results of measurements can be regarded as updating one's probability distributions over certain variables. According to Bayesians, this updating should be carried out according to the rule of conditionalization. In the theory of quantum mechanics, there is a rule that tells us how to update the state of a system, given observation of a measurement result. The state of a quantum system is closely related to probability distributions over potential measurements. Therefore we might expect there to be some relation between Bayesian conditionalization and the quantum state-update rule. There have been several suggestions that the state change just is Bayesian conditionalization, appropriately understood, or that it is closely analogous. Bub was the first to make the connection between quantum measurement and Bayesian conditionalization in a 1977 paper, using an approach based on quantum logic. The connection is renewed in discussions by Fuchs and also Jacobs in 2002, where again the analogy between the quantum state update and Bayesian conditionalization is pointed out. At the same time, Fuchs draws attention to a disanalogy – namely that there is an “extra unitary” transformation as part of the measurement in the quantum case. In this chapter, I will first review the proposals of Bub, Jacobs, and Fuchs. I will then show that the presence of the extra unitaries in quantum measurement leads to a difference between classical and quantum measurement in terms of information gain, drawing on results by Nielsen and Fuchs and Jacobs.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Jun 10, 2010•19 citations

Quantum states as complex probabilities: The physics behind direct observations of photon wavefunctions in weak measurements

Holger Friedrich Hofmann

Weak measurements of photon position can be used to obtain direct experimental evidence of the wavefunction of a photon between generation and ultimate detection. Significantly, these measurement results can also be understood as complex valued conditional probabilities of intermediate photon positions. It is therefore possible to interpret the quantum state as a complex valued probability distribution from which measurement probabilities can be derived according to Bayesian rules. The conventional measurement probabilities derived from squares of the wavefunction then describes the effects of measurement back-action, which originate from a non-classical relation between dynamics and statistics that is characteristic of quantum mechanics. It is pointed out that this relation can be used to derive the complete Hilbert space formalism directly from complex probabilities, without the axiomatic introduction of quantum states or operators.

arXiv:1311.0093•Nov 1, 2013•0 citations

Derivation of quantum mechanics from a single fundamental modification of the relations between physical properties

Holger Friedrich Hofmann

Recent results obtained in quantum measurements indicate that the fundamental relations between three physical properties of a system can be represented by complex conditional probabilities. Here, it is shown that these relations provide a fully deterministic and universally valid framework on which all of quantum mechanics can be based. Specifically, quantum mechanics can be derived by combining the rules of Bayesian probability theory with only a single additional law that explains the phases of complex probabilities. This law, which I introduce here as the law of quantum ergodicity, is based on the observation that the reality of physical properties cannot be separated from the dynamics by which they emerge in measurement interactions. The complex phases are an expression of this inseparability and represent the dynamical structure of transformations between the different properties. In its quantitative form, the law of quantum ergodicity describes a fundamental relation between the ergodic probabilities obtained by dynamical averaging and the deterministic relations between three properties expressed by the complex conditional probabilities. The complete formalism of quantum mechanics can be derived from this one relation, without any axiomatic mathematical assumptions about state vectors or superpositions. It is therefore possible to explain all quantum phenomena as the consequence of a single fundamental law of physics.

arXiv:1306.2993•Physical Review A•Apr 24, 2014•29 citations

An operator-based bound on information and disturbance in quantum measurements

Williams, Hollis, Holger Friedrich Hofmann

Quantum measurements can be described by operators that assign conditional probabilities to different outcomes while also describing unavoidable physical changes to the system. Here, we point out that operators describing information gain at minimal disturbance can be expanded into a set of unitary operators representing experimentally distinguishable patterns of disturbance. The observable statistics of disturbance defines a tight upper bound on the information gain of the measurement.

arXiv:2510.00064•Sep 29, 2025•0 citations

The role of system–meter entanglement in controlling the resolution and decoherence of quantum measurements

Kartik Patekar, Holger F Hofmann

Abstract Measurement processes can be separated into an entangling interaction between the system and a meter and a subsequent readout of the meter state that does not involve any further interactions with the system. In the interval between these two stages, the system and the meter are in an entangled state that encodes all possible effects of the readout in the form of non-local quantum correlations between the system and the meter. Here, we show that the entanglement generated in the system–meter interaction expresses a fundamental relation between the amount of decoherence and the conditional probabilities that describe the resolution of the measurement. Specifically, the entanglement generated by the measurement interaction correlates both the target observable and the back-action effects on the system with sets of non-commuting physical properties in the meter. The choice of readout in the meter determines the trade-off between irreversible decoherence and measurement information by steering the system into a corresponding set of conditional output states. The Hilbert space algebra of entanglement ensures that the irreversible part of the decoherence is exactly equal to the Hellinger distance describing the resolution achieved in the measurement. We can thus demonstrate that the trade-off between measurement resolution and back-action is a fundamental property of the entanglement generated in measurement interactions.

arXiv:1905.09978•New Journal of Physics•Sep 13, 2019•14 citations
The dynamics of quantum measurements defines a precise relation between the information gained about one physical property of a system and the observable changes in another physical property of the same system. Here, we express this relation in terms of the Hilbert space superpositions of the corresponding eigenstates and show how the probability of an observable physical change can be obtained from the Bayesian update of the probabilities associated with the information obtained in the measurement. Our analysis demonstrates that the superposition principle provides the tightest possible expression of the trade-off between information and back action in a quantum measurement.
Information about the internal properties of a system can only be obtained through interactions of the system with an external meter. However, such interactions generally result in entanglement between the system and the meter, making it difficult to trace the measurement result back to a specific value of the physical property in the system. It is therefore possible that the outcomes of quantum measurements depend in a nontrivial manner on the dynamics of the measurement interaction, possibly providing a physical explanation for the role of measurement contexts in quantum mechanics. Here we show that the effects of the measurement interaction on the meter can be described entirely in terms of the quantum coherent system dynamics associated with the back-action on the system. For sufficiently small back-action uncertainties, the physical property of the system is described by a weak value obtained from the Hamilton-Jacobi equation of the back-action dynamics. At higher measurement resolutions, the observed values are determined by quantum interferences between different amounts of back-action. Eigenvalues emerge when the quantum interferences between different back-actions correspond to a Fourier transform in the back-action parameter. We conclude that the values of physical properties obtained in quantum measurements originate from the quantum coherent properties of the back-action dynamics generated by that physical property during an interaction. Measurement outcomes represent elements of the dynamics and cannot be explained by measurement independent elements of reality.
Introduction In many situations, learning from the results of measurements can be regarded as updating one's probability distributions over certain variables. According to Bayesians, this updating should be carried out according to the rule of conditionalization. In the theory of quantum mechanics, there is a rule that tells us how to update the state of a system, given observation of a measurement result. The state of a quantum system is closely related to probability distributions over potential measurements. Therefore we might expect there to be some relation between Bayesian conditionalization and the quantum state-update rule. There have been several suggestions that the state change just is Bayesian conditionalization, appropriately understood, or that it is closely analogous. Bub was the first to make the connection between quantum measurement and Bayesian conditionalization in a 1977 paper, using an approach based on quantum logic. The connection is renewed in discussions by Fuchs and also Jacobs in 2002, where again the analogy between the quantum state update and Bayesian conditionalization is pointed out. At the same time, Fuchs draws attention to a disanalogy – namely that there is an “extra unitary” transformation as part of the measurement in the quantum case. In this chapter, I will first review the proposals of Bub, Jacobs, and Fuchs. I will then show that the presence of the extra unitaries in quantum measurement leads to a difference between classical and quantum measurement in terms of information gain, drawing on results by Nielsen and Fuchs and Jacobs.
Weak measurements of photon position can be used to obtain direct experimental evidence of the wavefunction of a photon between generation and ultimate detection. Significantly, these measurement results can also be understood as complex valued conditional probabilities of intermediate photon positions. It is therefore possible to interpret the quantum state as a complex valued probability distribution from which measurement probabilities can be derived according to Bayesian rules. The conventional measurement probabilities derived from squares of the wavefunction then describes the effects of measurement back-action, which originate from a non-classical relation between dynamics and statistics that is characteristic of quantum mechanics. It is pointed out that this relation can be used to derive the complete Hilbert space formalism directly from complex probabilities, without the axiomatic introduction of quantum states or operators.
Recent results obtained in quantum measurements indicate that the fundamental relations between three physical properties of a system can be represented by complex conditional probabilities. Here, it is shown that these relations provide a fully deterministic and universally valid framework on which all of quantum mechanics can be based. Specifically, quantum mechanics can be derived by combining the rules of Bayesian probability theory with only a single additional law that explains the phases of complex probabilities. This law, which I introduce here as the law of quantum ergodicity, is based on the observation that the reality of physical properties cannot be separated from the dynamics by which they emerge in measurement interactions. The complex phases are an expression of this inseparability and represent the dynamical structure of transformations between the different properties. In its quantitative form, the law of quantum ergodicity describes a fundamental relation between the ergodic probabilities obtained by dynamical averaging and the deterministic relations between three properties expressed by the complex conditional probabilities. The complete formalism of quantum mechanics can be derived from this one relation, without any axiomatic mathematical assumptions about state vectors or superpositions. It is therefore possible to explain all quantum phenomena as the consequence of a single fundamental law of physics.
Abstract Measurement processes can be separated into an entangling interaction between the system and a meter and a subsequent readout of the meter state that does not involve any further interactions with the system. In the interval between these two stages, the system and the meter are in an entangled state that encodes all possible effects of the readout in the form of non-local quantum correlations between the system and the meter. Here, we show that the entanglement generated in the system–meter interaction expresses a fundamental relation between the amount of decoherence and the conditional probabilities that describe the resolution of the measurement. Specifically, the entanglement generated by the measurement interaction correlates both the target observable and the back-action effects on the system with sets of non-commuting physical properties in the meter. The choice of readout in the meter determines the trade-off between irreversible decoherence and measurement information by steering the system into a corresponding set of conditional output states. The Hilbert space algebra of entanglement ensures that the irreversible part of the decoherence is exactly equal to the Hellinger distance describing the resolution achieved in the measurement. We can thus demonstrate that the trade-off between measurement resolution and back-action is a fundamental property of the entanglement generated in measurement interactions.