Quantum computing remains in the Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) era, with performance constrained by noise. Addressing this limitation requires hardware-facing capabilities beyond gate sequences: mid-circuit measurement and classical feedback for quantum error correction (QEC), precise timing for dynamical decoupling (DD), and pulse-level waveform access for calibration. OpenQASM 3 exposes these capabilities through a hardware-level programming interface. Despite rapid progress in large language models (LLMs) for code generation, datasets targeting these advanced features remain lacking. We introduce QASM-Eval, the first comprehensive dataset to train and evaluate LLMs on OpenQASM 3, targeting completion of hardware-facing constructs within a supplied program context. QASM-Eval comprises an expert-curated test set of 1,200 tasks and a training set of over 4,000 tasks, covering classical logic, timing scheduling, pulse control, and complex tasks inspired by quantum-control workflows. An extended verifier automatically checks syntax, quantum measurement distributions, and program timelines. Our evaluation identifies substantial headroom for OpenQASM 3 code generation and significant gains from targeted fine-tuning. Fine-tuned Llama-3-8B outperforms zero-shot GPT-5.6-Terra, while fine-tuned Llama-3-70B achieves 61.17% overall pass@1 and approaches few-shot-augmented GPT-5.6-Terra. QASM-Eval provides a benchmark and training resource for specification-guided code generation over the hardware-facing constructs of OpenQASM 3, supporting the development of LLM assistants for quantum programming. Data and code: https://github.com/fuzhenxiao/QASM-Eval
Quantum computing remains in the Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) era, with performance constrained by noise. Addressing this limitation requires hardware-facing capabilities beyond gate sequences: mid-circuit measurement and classical feedback for quantum error correction (QEC), precise timing for dynamical decoupling (DD), and pulse-level waveform access for calibration. OpenQASM 3 exposes these capabilities through a hardware-level programming interface. Despite rapid progress in large language models (LLMs) for code generation, datasets targeting these advanced features remain lacking. We introduce QASM-Eval, the first comprehensive dataset to train and evaluate LLMs on OpenQASM 3, targeting completion of hardware-facing constructs within a supplied program context. QASM-Eval comprises an expert-curated test set of 1,200 tasks and a training set of over 4,000 tasks, covering classical logic, timing scheduling, pulse control, and complex tasks inspired by quantum-control workflows. An extended verifier automatically checks syntax, quantum measurement distributions, and program timelines. Our evaluation identifies substantial headroom for OpenQASM 3 code generation and significant gains from targeted fine-tuning. Fine-tuned Llama-3-8B outperforms zero-shot GPT-5.6-Terra, while fine-tuned Llama-3-70B achieves 61.17% overall pass@1 and approaches few-shot-augmented GPT-5.6-Terra. QASM-Eval provides a benchmark and training resource for specification-guided code generation over the hardware-facing constructs of OpenQASM 3, supporting the development of LLM assistants for quantum programming. Data and code: https://github.com/fuzhenxiao/QASM-Eval
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as quantum coding copilots, assisting researchers by generating complex programs for frameworks such as Qiskit, PennyLane, and OpenQASM. However, accurately evaluating the practical utility of these models remains a significant challenge. Existing benchmarks are highly fragmented, ranging from syntax-centric unit tests to simulator- and hardware-aware metrics, making results difficult to compare across different languages and hardware targets. To address this fragmentation, this paper systematically reviews recent evaluation suites and post-training methodologies for quantum code generation. We distill current evaluation criteria into four practical dimensions: syntax and API validity, semantic and physical correctness, resource and hardware feasibility, and execution-based feedback. Building upon these dimensions, we present a unified taxonomy that maps current benchmarks to emerging model adaptation techniques, specifically retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), fine-tuning, multi-agent workflows, and reinforcement learning (RL). Our analysis highlights a clear shift: moving away from prompt-only baselines and toward agentic workflows driven by quantum-verifiable rewards. This shift directly targets the semantic gap between superficially compilable code and physically executable quantum programs. In addition, we identify key research opportunities-such as standardized semantic metrics and integration with quantum error correction-aimed at fostering a more reproducible, verifiable, and hardware-grounded ecosystem for automated quantum software development.
We review thirteen generative systems and five supporting datasets for quantum circuit and quantum code generation, identified through a structured scoping review of Hugging Face, arXiv, and provenance tracing (January-February 2026). We organize the field along two axes: artifact type (Qiskit code, OpenQASM programs, circuit graphs); crossed with training regime (supervised fine-tuning, verifier-in-the-loop RL, diffusion/graph generation, agentic optimization); and systematically apply a three-layer evaluation framework covering syntactic validity, semantic correctness, and hardware executability. The central finding is that while all reviewed systems address syntax and most address semantics to some degree, none reports end-to-end evaluation on quantum hardware (Layer 3b), leaving a significant gap between generated circuits and practical deployment. Scope note: quantum code refers throughout to quantum program artifacts (QASM, Qiskit); we do not cover generation of quantum error-correcting codes (QEC).
Large language models (LLMs) have increasingly been applied to automatic programming code generation. This task can be viewed as a language generation task that bridges natural language, human knowledge, and programming logic. However, it remains underexplored in domains that require interaction with hardware devices, such as quantum programming, where human coders write Python code that is executed on a quantum computer. To address this gap, we introduce QCoder Benchmark, an evaluation framework that assesses LLMs on quantum programming with feedback from simulated hardware devices. Our benchmark offers two key features. First, it supports evaluation using a quantum simulator environment beyond conventional Python execution, allowing feedback of domain-specific metrics such as circuit depth, execution time, and error classification, which can be used to guide better generation. Second, it incorporates human-written code submissions collected from real programming contests, enabling both quantitative comparisons and qualitative analyses of LLM outputs against human-written codes. Our experiments reveal that even advanced models like GPT-4o achieve only around 18.97% accuracy, highlighting the difficulty of the benchmark. In contrast, reasoning-based models such as o3 reach up to 78% accuracy, outperforming averaged success rates of human-written codes (39.98%). We release the QCoder Benchmark dataset and public evaluation API to support further research. (Codes and datasets are available at https://qcoder-bench.github.io/ )
Large language models (LLMs) can generate quantum programs, but reliable evaluation remains difficult because benchmarks differ in task composition, scoring, and failure handling. We evaluate 15 hosted frontier, open-weight, quantum-specialized, and retrieval-augmented models on five quantum code-generation suites (530 tasks), plus 10 models on our new QuantumBenchEval (QBE) benchmark (96 tasks across six topics). We report bootstrap confidence intervals, multiplicity-adjusted paired comparisons, and audits of output validity and evaluator behavior. QiskitHumanEval-Standard approaches saturation (98.7% pass@1), while its Hard variant retains headroom (63.8%). None of the five top-two comparisons across primary suites remains significant after multiple-comparison correction. Evaluator design substantially changes scores: removing checks for unspecified quantities raises GPT-6 Astra's QBE pass@1 from 0% to 94.1% (T1) and from 1.2% to 92.9% (T6), without changing model outputs. We identify 17 QuanBench-117 tasks with shared failures linked to benchmark-owned imports. Controlled probes also reveal unexecuted unit tests, leakage of canonical functions into candidate execution, and reference imports that block otherwise valid candidates. These defects can produce both false failures and false passes, so historical QuanBench results require revalidation under an isolated evaluator. Overall, leaderboard scores alone do not adequately characterize progress in quantum code generation. We release our harness, per-sample results, and audit artifacts and recommend validating evaluators, isolating candidate code, and reporting uncertainty and output validity.
Programming quantum circuits at the OpenQASM level is essential for achieving hardware-aware optimization and reliable execution on noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices, yet it remains challenging due to the need for domain-specific planning, iterative code synthesis, and low-level calibration. In this paper, we present QAgent, the first autonomous multi-agent framework for end-to-end OpenQASM code generation. QAgent integrates schema-aware task planning, example- and tool-driven code synthesis, and hardware-aware calibration within a unified planning-synthesis-calibration workflow. The system leverages retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) to access structured kernel knowledge, examples, and backend constraints, and employs coordinated multi-agent reasoning with iterative execution feedback to ensure correctness. We evaluate QAgent on 12 representative quantum kernels and their compositions across five large language models (LLMs). Results show that QAgent improves Pass@1 accuracy by 47-70% on single-kernel tasks and achieves over 88% accuracy on multi-kernel workflows for large models, substantially outperforming existing baselines. Furthermore, under realistic hardware frequency drift, QAgent maintains near-unit execution fidelity through automated calibration, whereas SDK-based LLM methods suffer significant degradation. These results demonstrate that integrating planning, synthesis, and calibration is critical for reliable quantum program generation. The implementation of QAgent is open-sourced at https://github.com/fuzhenxiao/QAgent
The rapid development of quantum computing (QC) in the NISQ era urgently demands a low-level benchmark suite and insightful evaluation metrics for characterizing the properties of prototype NISQ devices, the efficiency of QC programming compilers, schedulers and assemblers, and the capability of quantum system simulators in a classical computer. In this work, we fill this gap by proposing a low-level, easy-to-use benchmark suite called QASMBench based on the OpenQASM assembly representation. It consolidates commonly used quantum routines and kernels from a variety of domains including chemistry, simulation, linear algebra, searching, optimization, arithmetic, machine learning, fault tolerance, cryptography, etc., trading-off between generality and usability. To analyze these kernels in terms of NISQ device execution, in addition to circuit width and depth, we propose four circuit metrics including gate density, retention lifespan, measurement density, and entanglement variance, to extract more insights about the execution efficiency, the susceptibility to NISQ error, and the potential gain from machine-specific optimizations. Applications in QASMBench can be launched and verified on several NISQ platforms, including IBM-Q, Rigetti, IonQ and Quantinuum. For evaluation, we measure the execution fidelity of a subset of QASMBench applications on 12 IBM-Q machines through density matrix state tomography, which comprises 25K circuit evaluations. We also compare the fidelity of executions among the IBM-Q machines, the IonQ QPU and the Rigetti Aspen M-1 system. QASMBench is released at: http://github.com/pnnl/QASMBench.