We investigate the relationship between two distinct classical approaches to quantum systems: direct simulation from a classical description and sample-based learning from measurement data. While both tasks ultimately aim to reproduce Born-rule statistics, complexity-theoretic results suggest that simulability and learnability need not coincide in general. Here we study this relationship empirically using a fixed deep energy-based generative model trained on measurement samples from controlled families of quantum states. We independently tune two quantum resources associated with classical simulation cost: entanglement, through the bond dimension of random matrix product states, and non-stabilizerness, through the number of T gates in Clifford-dominated circuits. Learning difficulty is characterized using two probes of neural-network complexity: the largest Hessian eigenvalue at convergence and Random Subspace Optimization. For both quantum resources, increasing simulation hardness systematically correlates with sharper loss landscapes and degraded reconstruction performance under constrained capacity. Our results indicate that, within the regimes studied here, classical learnability tracks known simulation complexity measures, suggesting that neural-network training dynamics can provide an empirical probe of quantum computational hardness.
We investigate the relationship between two distinct classical approaches to quantum systems: direct simulation from a classical description and sample-based learning from measurement data. While both tasks ultimately aim to reproduce Born-rule statistics, complexity-theoretic results suggest that simulability and learnability need not coincide in general. Here we study this relationship empirically using a fixed deep energy-based generative model trained on measurement samples from controlled families of quantum states. We independently tune two quantum resources associated with classical simulation cost: entanglement, through the bond dimension of random matrix product states, and non-stabilizerness, through the number of T gates in Clifford-dominated circuits. Learning difficulty is characterized using two probes of neural-network complexity: the largest Hessian eigenvalue at convergence and Random Subspace Optimization. For both quantum resources, increasing simulation hardness systematically correlates with sharper loss landscapes and degraded reconstruction performance under constrained capacity. Our results indicate that, within the regimes studied here, classical learnability tracks known simulation complexity measures, suggesting that neural-network training dynamics can provide an empirical probe of quantum computational hardness.
Quantum resource theory has sharpened our understanding of the intrinsic complexity of quantum systems, particularly their classical simulability. However, it remains unclear which quantum resource governs the classical learnability of quantum circuits, especially beyond the regime of efficient classical simulation. Here we close this knowledge gap by studying the expectation-value functions of families of tunable quantum circuits, with many applications in digital quantum simulation, quantum metrology, and quantum-system characterization. Specifically, we introduce a new resource measure, the dynamical stabilizer entropy (\DSE), which quantifies how broadly an expectation-value function is distributed across its frequency modes. By relating \DSE to operator stabilizer entropy, we establish a computational phase diagram that compares classical simulators with quantum-data-assisted classical surrogates. We first determine the \DSE-dependent learnability boundary of this diagram by deriving bounds on the sample complexity and runtime of classical surrogates, and by developing a \DSE-guided surrogate. We then complete the diagram by proving, under standard complexity-theoretic assumptions, the existence of circuit families that can be efficiently learned by this surrogate but cannot be efficiently emulated from their circuit descriptions alone. Numerical experiments on random and structured circuits with up to 80 qubits support the predicted \DSE-dependent computational landscape. These results establish a quantitative resource-theoretic framework for delineating the boundary between classical simulation and learning, motivate resource measures linking quantum resources to learnability, and guide the design of learning-based algorithms for scalable quantum systems beyond the reach of direct classical simulation.
Abstract Quantum machine-learning models are only useful if a classical computer cannot cheaply imitate them. We test this directly for quantum Kolmogorov–Arnold networks (QKANs)—neural networks whose tunable “activation functions” are small quantum circuits—by asking whether each model can be contracted as an effcient tensor network (TN), the standard tool for classical quantum simulation. We make the test practical with a task-aware yardstick: the bond dimension a classical surrogate needs to copy the model’s output at the accuracy the model itself reaches. We find a clear ladder. The amplitude-encoded Chebyshev QKAN uses only logarithmically many qubits and is exactly classical. The variational QKAN, built from all-to-all controlled rotations, looks hard at random settings but, once trained to genuinely learn a smooth task (R2 = 0.30–0.62), is copied by a constant-bond-dimension surrogate at the sizes (n ≤ 10) we test. Noise pushes it toward classicality near p ≈ 0.03–0.05, echoing noisy random circuits. Every generic attempt to force hardness—a global measurement, a deeper entangler, or an interaction-based (IQP) feature map—instead destroys trainability through exponentially small gradients (a “barren plateau”). The escape is a discrete-logarithm feature map: its kernel variance is flat (0.07±0.01) from 4 to 14 qubits while a generic IQP kernel decays as 2 −n , and a support-vector machine with it learns a classically hard concept to ≥ 99% accuracy while generic and classical kernels stay at chance—hardness placed in number theory stays both classically hard and shot-effciently learnable. The work provides a concrete, measurement-based criterion for when a quantum model is reproducible by a low-bond- dimension surrogate, and a design rule: seek advantage in structured, provably hard encodings rather than in deep entanglement.
Given a quantum circuit, a quantum computer can sample the output distribution exponentially faster in the number of bits than classical computers. A similar exponential separation has yet to be established in generative models through quantum sample learning: given samples from an n-qubit computation, can we learn the underlying quantum distribution using models with training parameters that scale polynomial in n under a fixed training time? We study four kinds of generative models: Deep Boltzmann machine (DBM), Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and Autoregressive GAN, on learning quantum data set generated by deep random circuits. We demonstrate the leading performance of LSTM in learning quantum samples, and thus the autoregressive structure present in the underlying quantum distribution from random quantum circuits. Both numerical experiments and a theoretical proof in the case of the DBM show exponentially growing complexity of learning-agent parameters required for achieving a fixed accuracy as n increases. Finally, we establish a connection between learnability and the complexity of generative models by benchmarking learnability against different sets of samples drawn from probability distributions of variable degrees of complexities in their quantum and classical representations.
We consider the learnability of the quantum neural network (QNN) built on the variational hybrid quantum-classical scheme, which remains largely unknown due to the non-convex optimization landscape, the measurement error, and the unavoidable gate errors introduced by noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) machines. Our contributions in this paper are multi-fold. First, we derive the utility bounds of QNN towards empirical risk minimization, and show that large gate noise, few quantum measurements, and deep circuit depth will lead to the poor utility bounds. This result also applies to the variational quantum circuits with gradient-based classical optimization, and can be of independent interest. We then prove that QNN can be treated as a differentially private (DP) model. Thirdly, we show that if a concept class can be efficiently learned by QNN, then it can also be effectively learned by QNN even with gate noise. This result implies the same learnability of QNN whether it is implemented on noiseless or noisy quantum machines. We last exhibit that the quantum statistical query (QSQ) model can be effectively simulated by noisy QNN. Since the QSQ model can tackle certain tasks with runtime speedup, our result suggests that the modified QNN implemented on NISQ devices will retain the quantum advantage. Numerical simulations support the theoretical results.
Abstract Quantum neural network (QNN), or equivalently, the variational quantum circuits with a gradient-based classical optimizer, has been broadly applied to many experimental proposals for noisy intermediate scale quantum (NISQ) devices. However, the learning capability of QNN remains largely unknown due to the non-convex optimization landscape, the measurement error, and the unavoidable gate noise introduced by NISQ machines. In this study, we theoretically explore the learnability of QNN from the perspective of the trainability and generalization. Particularly, we derive the convergence performance of QNN under the NISQ setting, and identify classes of computationally hard concepts that can be efficiently learned by QNN. Our results demonstrate that large gate noise, few quantum measurements, and deep circuit depth will lead to poor convergence rates of QNN towards the empirical risk minimization. Moreover, we prove that any concept class, which is efficiently learnable by a restricted quantum statistical query (QSQ) learning model, can also be efficiently learned by QNN. Since the restricted QSQ learning model can tackle certain problems such as parity learning with a runtime speedup, our result suggests that QNN established on NISQ devices will retain the quantum advantage. Our work provides the theoretical guidance for developing advanced QNNs and opens up avenues for exploring quantum advantages using NISQ devices.
With increasing maturity of quantum computers, standard methods for characterizing global properties of their output quantum states via direct measurements and classical post-processing are becoming increasingly impractical due to large measurement costs. Although quantum neural networks could directly process quantum states to identify underlying characteristics with reduced measurement efforts, they often require deep quantum circuits that cannot be implemented on existing devices. To overcome these challenges, we introduce a hybrid quantum-classical neural network that consists of a shallow parameterized quantum circuit, measurements, and a classical neural network. The parameterized quantum circuit performs a nonlocal transformation of the measurement basis, which is jointly trained with the classical neural network to maximize the statistical distance between data obtained by measuring different quantum states. Using supervised learning, we demonstrate that the hybrid neural network distinguishes the topological phase of the surface code from a symmetry-enriched topological phase and random product states. Moreover, this hybrid neural network reduces both inference and training sample complexities of recognizing the topological phase by approximately one order of magnitude compared to a classical neural network trained on randomized Pauli measurements. As this hybrid neural network features a shallow quantum circuit that can be readily implemented on existing quantum computers, it enables the efficient characterization of complex quantum states.