A reason is discussed (may be not the only one) for why we do not see any superposition of macroscopic states in the real world. Under the general assumption that quantum macrostates are statistical ensembles of microstates, it is shown that any superposition of macrostates is reduced in a very short time by the unitary dynamics of the ordinary Schrödinger equation, deducing the Born rule without having to postulate it. In more detail, the macroscopic and microscopic degrees of freedom are decoupled in the Schrödinger equation, yielding an effective stochastic equation for the macroscopic variables, with the ensemble average of the microscopic amplitudes that acts as a self-generated internal white noise. The stochastic equation is shown to be a reducing Itô equation if some general causality conditions are met, predicting a very quick collapse of any macroscopic superposition upon formation, with probabilities which satisfy the Born rule. In the context of the von Neumann measurement scheme, the relevance of the result is discussed as a simple dynamical solution of the measurement problem.
The Born rule asserts the probability distribution of eigenstates observed in unbiased quantum measurements, but the reason it holds remains elusive. This manuscript discusses how the Born rule might be explained by Schrodinger equation dynamics, if a measurement comprises a system responding to random fluctuations until it is within an arbitrarily small tolerance of a measurement eigenstate. We describe the random walk dynamics that produce this behavior in terms of a class of time-dependent, stochastic unitary matrices U(t). We also discuss the class of stochastic potential energies in the Schrodinger equation that is equivalent to this class of unitary matrices. This analysis raises some questions worth considering, including how to determine if any measurements actually follow the predicted random walk mechanism and whether a reliable measurement apparatus could be designed that deviates from Born rule probabilities. Interestingly, if any measurements do follow this random walk mechanism, then exposing a quantum system to stochastic 'noise' is an intrinsic part of such a measurement, not merely an unwanted side effect. This characteristic would have implications for reducing noise in quantum sensing and quantum computing. This is a draft of a work in progress. Questions and suggestions are welcome.
Two categories of results regarding quantum measurements are derived in this work and applied to the problem of collapse. The first category is concerned with local and transient features of the entanglement between a macroscopic measuring system and a measured one. These properties result directly from the Schrödinger equation. They cannot be formulated in terms of observables, do not affect the wave functions themselves but express their history in an irreversible way. They carry a specific new kind of local probabilities, which evolve with a finite velocity under nonlinear wave equations. The second category of results extends these local properties to the case of a macroscopic system and its environment. Fluctuations in their interaction are predicted then and generate a specific incoherence in the quantum state of the system. These two kinds of effects act together when a macroscopic measuring system interacts with a measured system and with an environment. Their combination yields then an explicit and effective mechanism of collapse, with a random behavior resulting from random incoherence. Born's basic probability rule for the results of measurements turns out then simply a consequence of quantum dynamics. Some conjectures still enter into the derivation of these effects, which one may recognize to look hardly credible at first sight. They fit however so well together that one proposes a more thorough investigation of their approach as a promising strategy for a self-contained explanation of collapse.
Schrödinger’s cat condenses the quantum measurement problem into an amplification chain: a microscopic alternative becomes correlated with distinguishable records, while linear quantum dynamics retains the records in an entangled state. The problem is not a puzzle about an animal with incompatible predicates. It concerns the relation between unitary dynamics, reduced-state classicality, and observing a outcome. This article develops the cat problem from the density-operator description of measurement, deriving the role of partial tracing and environmental decoherence, and distinguishing a decohered improper mixture from a proper classical ensemble. It examines pointer-state selection, Lindblad dynamics, quantum Darwinism, and responses to the outcome problem: Everettian branching, consistent histories, Bohmian mechanics, and objective-collapse models. Experimental realizations in trapped ions, cavity quantum electrodynamics, and mechanical resonators demonstrate superpositions of distinguishable alternatives. Bosonic cat codes show that macroscopic-superposition structure can be engineered as an information resource. The article identifies four weaknesses: conflating diagonal reduced states with collapse; treating non-equivalent “cat-size” measures as interchangeable; insufficient treatment of environmental noise in collapse tests; and an underdeveloped connection between measurement theory and error-corrected bosonic architectures.
The basic idea of quantum mechanics is that the property of any system can be in a state of superposition of various possibilities (or eigen states).This state of superposition is also known as wave function and it evolves linearly with time in a deterministic way in accordance with the Schrodinger equation.However, when a measurement is carried out on the system to determine the value of that property (say position), the system instantaneously transforms to one of the eigen states and thus we get only a single value as an outcome of the measurement.Quantum measurement problem seeks to find the cause and exact mechanism governing this transformation.In an attempt to solve the above problem, in this paper, we will first define what the wave function represents in real-world and will identify the root cause behind the stochastic nature of events.Then, we will develop a model to explain the mechanism of collapse of the quantum mechanical wave function in response to a measurement.In the process of development of model, we will explain Schrodinger cat paradox and will show how Born's rule for probability becomes a natural consequence of the measurement process.
The motion of a ball through an appropriate lattice of round obstacles models the behavior of a Brownian particle and can be used to describe measurement on a macro system. On another hand, such motion is chaotic and a known conjecture asserts that the Hamiltonian of the corresponding quantum system must follow the random matrix statistics of an appropriate ensemble. We use the Hamiltonian represented by a random matrix in the Gaussian unitary ensemble to study the Schrödinger evolution of non-stationary states. For Gaussian states representing a classical system, the Brownian motion that describes the behavior of the system under measurement is obtained. For general quantum states, the Born rule for the probability of transition between states is derived. It is then shown that the Schrödinger evolution with such a Hamiltonian models measurement on macroscopic and microscopic systems, provides an explanation for the classical behavior of macroscopic bodies and for irreversibility of a measurement, and identifies the boundary between micro and macro worlds.
In this paper, we examine measurement using the Q-based, objective-field model for quantum mechanics. Schrodinger considered a microscopic system prepared in a superposition of states which is then coupled to a macroscopic meter. We analyze the entangled meter and system, and measurements on it, by solving forward-backward stochastic differential equations for real amplitudes
x(t) and
p(t) that correspond to the phase-space variables of the Q function of the system at a time
t. We model the system and meter as single-mode fields, and measurement of
x^ by amplification of the amplitude
x(t). Our conclusion is that the outcome for the measurement is determined at (or by) the time
tm, when the coupling to the meter is complete, the meter states being macroscopically distinguishable. There is consistency with macroscopic realism. By evaluating the distribution of the amplitudes
x and
p postselected on a given outcome of the meter, we show how the
Q-based model represents a more complete description of quantum mechanics: The variances associated with amplitudes
x and
p are too narrow to comply with the uncertainty principle, ruling out that the distribution represents a quantum state. We conclude that the collapse of the wavefunction occurs as a two-stage process: First there is an amplification that creates branches of amplitudes
x(t) of the meter, associated with distinct eigenvalues. The outcome of measurement is determined by
x(t) once amplified, explaining Born's rule. Second, the distribution that determines the final collapse is the state inferred for the system conditioned on the outcome of the meter: information is lost about the meter, in particular, about the complementary variable
p.