Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2605.15969

Quantum mechanics for classical transport equations

Christof Wetterich

quant-phcond-mat.stat-mechnlin.CGSubmitted May 15, 2026• Announced May 18, 2026• 0 citations
v1 · May 15, 2026v2 · Sep 9, 2026
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Classical transport equations with probabilistic initial conditions can be viewed as quantum systems. In a discrete version they are probabilistic automata. The time-local probabilistic information is encoded in a classical wave function. Its unitary evolution obeys a Schrödinger equation. Statistical observables are represented by operators which do not commute with the ones associated to classical observables. Examples are functions of the quantum energy or the quantum angular momentum. They are important conserved quantities. We construct a complex functional integral for the quantum system which describes the probabilistic classical transport equation. The characteristic features of quantum mechanics, as the superposition of wave functions, interference, the importance of phases, non-commuting operators or a unitary time evolution, are realized by probabilistic classical transport equations.

Comments
9 pages

Related papers

Quantum observables for probabilistic classical particles

Christof Wetterich

The classical observables of position and momentum are not well adapted to particles in a microphysical situation where typical probability distributions are characterized by a substantial dispersion. We propose the use of more robust quantum observables for probabilistic classical particles. The quantum observables are statistical observables which do not take fixed values for a given classical position and momentum. Solutions of the Liouville equation are discussed in the quantum formalism for classical statistics. Statistical observables are represented by non-commuting operators. No classical correlation function is defined for these observables and Bell's inequalities do not apply. We demonstrate for a general potential how a quantum system emerges from classical statistics. For the particular cases of a harmonic potential and a Coulomb potential we investigate subsystems which describe all features of a quantum particle. This covers the discrete energy spectrum of the hydrogen atom and quantum harmonic oscillator. We discuss the interference for the double-slit experiment. Conserved statistical observables may also be relevant for the probabilistic dynamics of dust or planets.

quant-pharXiv:2607.13937•Jul 16, 2026•0 citations

The probabilistic world II : Quantum mechanics from classical statistics

CHRISTOF WETTERICH

This work discusses simple examples how quantum systems are obtained as subsystems of classical statistical systems. For a single qubit with arbitrary Hamiltonian and for the quantum particle in a harmonic potential we provide explicitly all steps how these quantum systems follow from an overall ''classical" probability distribution for events at all times. This overall probability distribution is the analogue of Feynman's functional integral for quantum mechanics or for the functional integral defining a quantum field theory. In our case the action and associated weight factor are real, however, defining a classical probabilistic system. Nevertheless, a unitary time-evolution of wave functions can be realized for suitable systems, in particular probabilistic automata. Based on these insights we discuss novel aspects for correlated computing not requiring the extreme isolation of quantum computers. A simple neuromorphic computer based on neurons in an active or quiet state within a probabilistic environment can learn the unitary transformations of an entangled two-qubit system. Our explicit constructions constitute a proof that no-go theorems for the embedding of quantum mechanics in classical statistics are circumvented. We show in detail how subsystems of classical statistical systems can explain various ``quantum mysteries". Conceptually our approach is a straightforward derivation starting from an overall probability distribution without invoking non-locality, acausality, contextuality, many worlds or other additional concepts. All quantum laws follow directly from the standard properties of classical probabilities.

arXiv:2408.06379•Aug 9, 2024•0 citations

The Nature of Schrodinger Equation -- On Quantum Physics Part I

Xue-Shu Zhao, Yu-Ru Ge, Zhao, Xin +1 more

We propose that the Schrodinger equation results from applying the classical wave equation to describe the physical system in which subatomic particles play random motion, thereby leading to quantum mechanics. The physical reality described by the wave function is subatomic particle moving randomly. Therefore, the characteristics of quantum mechanics have a dual nature, one of them is the deterministic nature carried on from classical physics, and the other is the probabilistic nature coined by particle's random motion. Based on this model, almost all of open questions in quantum mechanics can be explained consistently, which include the particle-wave duality, the principle of quantum superposition, the interference pattern of double-slit experiments, and the boundary between the classical world and the quantum world. The current quantum mechanics is a mixture of matrix mechanics and wave mechanics, which are sharply conflicting in principle. Matrix mechanics treats quantum particles as classical particles with fixed relation between the particle's position and its momentum. The matrix mechanics, in fact, belongs to the old quantum theory. Both Born's non-commutative relation and Heisenberg uncertainty relation originate from matrix mechanics. However, in wave mechanics, there is no any fixed relation between the particle's position and its momentum, and the particle's position and its momentum belong to immeasurable physical quantities. Therefore, there is no need for non-commutative relation and uncertainty relation in wave mechanics.

arXiv:2108.06198•Jul 2, 2021•1 citation

Quantum mechanical density matrix

J. W. Halleý

For systems which obey quantum mechanics, the formulation of the problem of treating large numbers of particles is, of course, somewhat different than it is for classical systems. The microscopic description of the system is provided by a wave function which (in the absence of spin) is a function of the classical coordinates { q i }. The mathematical model is provided by a Hamiltonian operator H which is often obtained from the corresponding classical Hamiltonian by the replacement p i → ( ħ /i)(∂/∂ q i ). In other cases the form of the Hamiltonian operator is simply postulated. The microscopic dynamics are provided by the Schrödinger equation i ħ (∂Ψ/∂ t ) = H Ψ which requires as initial condition the knowledge of the wave function Ψ({ q i }, t ) at some initial time t 0 . (Boundary conditions on Ψ({ q i }, t ) must be specified as part of the description of the model as well.) The results of experiments in quantum mechanics are characterized by operators, usually obtained, like the Hamiltonian, from their classical forms and termed observables. Operators associated with observables must be Hermitian. In general, the various operators corresponding to observables do not commute with one another. It is possible to find sets of commuting operators whose mutual eigenstates span the Hilbert space in which the wave function is confined by the Schrödinger equation and the boundary conditions. A set of such (time independent) eigenstates, termed ψ ν ( q ), is a basis for the Hilbert space.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Nov 16, 2006•0 citations

Emergence of quantum mechanics from classical statistics

CHRISTOF WETTERICH

The conceptual setting of quantum mechanics is subject to an ongoing debate from its beginnings until now. The consequences of the apparent differences between quantum statistics and classical statistics range from the philosophical interpretations to practical issues as quantum computing. In this note we demonstrate how quantum mechanics can emerge from classical statistical systems. We discuss conditions and circumstances for this to happen. Quantum systems describe isolated subsystems of classical statistical systems with infinitely many states. While infinitely many classical observables "measure" properties of the subsystem and its environment, the state of the subsystem can be characterized by the expectation values of only a few probabilistic observables. They define a density matrix, and all the usual laws of quantum mechanics follow. No concepts beyond classical statistics are needed for quantum physics – the differences are only apparent and result from the particularities of those classical statistical systems which admit a quantum mechanical description. In particular, we show how the non-commuting properties of quantum operators are associated to the use of conditiona probabilities within the classical system, and how a unitary time evolution reflects the isolation of the subsystem.

arXiv:0811.0927•Journal of Physics Conference Series•Jun 1, 2009•37 citations

Framework for generalized Hamiltonian systems through reasonable postulates

Libo Jiang, Daniel R. Terno, Oscar Dahlsten

Hamiltonian mechanics describes the evolution of a system through its Hamiltonian. The Hamiltonian typically also represents the energy observable, a Noether-conserved quantity associated with the time invariance of the law of evolution. In both quantum and classical mechanics, Hamiltonian mechanics demands a precise relationship between time evolution and observable energy, albeit using slightly different terminology. We distill basic conditions satisfied in both quantum and classical mechanics, including canonical coordinate symmetries and inner product invariance. We express these conditions in the framework of generalized probabilistic theories, which includes generalizing the definition of energy eigenstates in terms of time-invariant properties of the Hamiltonian system. By postulating these conditions to hold, we derive a unified Hamiltonian system model. This unified framework describes quantum and classical mechanics in a consistent language, facilitating their comparison. We moreover discuss alternative theories: an equation of motion given by a mixture of commutation relations, an information-restricted version of quantum theory, and Spekken's toy theory. The findings give a deeper understanding of the Hamiltonian in quantum and classical theories and point to several potential research topics.

arXiv:2403.00038•Physical Review A•Mar 21, 2024•6 citations
Classical transport equations with probabilistic initial conditions can be viewed as quantum systems.
In a discrete version they are probabilistic automata. The time-local probabilistic information is encoded in a classical wave function.
Its unitary evolution obeys a Schrödinger equation.
Statistical observables are represented by operators which do not commute with the ones associated to classical observables.
Examples are functions of the quantum energy or the quantum angular momentum. They are important conserved quantities.
We construct a complex functional integral for the quantum system which describes the probabilistic classical transport equation.
The characteristic features of quantum mechanics, as the superposition of wave functions, interference, the importance of phases,
non-commuting operators or a unitary time evolution, are realized by probabilistic classical transport equations.
The classical observables of position and momentum are not well adapted to particles in a microphysical situation where typical probability distributions are characterized by a substantial dispersion. We propose the use of more robust quantum observables for probabilistic classical particles. The quantum observables are statistical observables which do not take fixed values for a given classical position and momentum. Solutions of the Liouville equation are discussed in the quantum formalism for classical statistics. Statistical observables are represented by non-commuting operators. No classical correlation function is defined for these observables and Bell's inequalities do not apply. We demonstrate for a general potential how a quantum system emerges from classical statistics. For the particular cases of a harmonic potential and a Coulomb potential we investigate subsystems which describe all features of a quantum particle. This covers the discrete energy spectrum of the hydrogen atom and quantum harmonic oscillator. We discuss the interference for the double-slit experiment. Conserved statistical observables may also be relevant for the probabilistic dynamics of dust or planets.
This work discusses simple examples how quantum systems are obtained as subsystems of classical statistical systems. For a single qubit with arbitrary Hamiltonian and for the quantum particle in a harmonic potential we provide explicitly all steps how these quantum systems follow from an overall ''classical" probability distribution for events at all times. This overall probability distribution is the analogue of Feynman's functional integral for quantum mechanics or for the functional integral defining a quantum field theory. In our case the action and associated weight factor are real, however, defining a classical probabilistic system. Nevertheless, a unitary time-evolution of wave functions can be realized for suitable systems, in particular probabilistic automata. Based on these insights we discuss novel aspects for correlated computing not requiring the extreme isolation of quantum computers. A simple neuromorphic computer based on neurons in an active or quiet state within a probabilistic environment can learn the unitary transformations of an entangled two-qubit system. Our explicit constructions constitute a proof that no-go theorems for the embedding of quantum mechanics in classical statistics are circumvented. We show in detail how subsystems of classical statistical systems can explain various ``quantum mysteries". Conceptually our approach is a straightforward derivation starting from an overall probability distribution without invoking non-locality, acausality, contextuality, many worlds or other additional concepts. All quantum laws follow directly from the standard properties of classical probabilities.
We propose that the Schrodinger equation results from applying the classical wave equation to describe the physical system in which subatomic particles play random motion, thereby leading to quantum mechanics. The physical reality described by the wave function is subatomic particle moving randomly. Therefore, the characteristics of quantum mechanics have a dual nature, one of them is the deterministic nature carried on from classical physics, and the other is the probabilistic nature coined by particle's random motion. Based on this model, almost all of open questions in quantum mechanics can be explained consistently, which include the particle-wave duality, the principle of quantum superposition, the interference pattern of double-slit experiments, and the boundary between the classical world and the quantum world. The current quantum mechanics is a mixture of matrix mechanics and wave mechanics, which are sharply conflicting in principle. Matrix mechanics treats quantum particles as classical particles with fixed relation between the particle's position and its momentum. The matrix mechanics, in fact, belongs to the old quantum theory. Both Born's non-commutative relation and Heisenberg uncertainty relation originate from matrix mechanics. However, in wave mechanics, there is no any fixed relation between the particle's position and its momentum, and the particle's position and its momentum belong to immeasurable physical quantities. Therefore, there is no need for non-commutative relation and uncertainty relation in wave mechanics.
For systems which obey quantum mechanics, the formulation of the problem of treating large numbers of particles is, of course, somewhat different than it is for classical systems. The microscopic description of the system is provided by a wave function which (in the absence of spin) is a function of the classical coordinates { q i }. The mathematical model is provided by a Hamiltonian operator H which is often obtained from the corresponding classical Hamiltonian by the replacement p i → ( ħ /i)(∂/∂ q i ). In other cases the form of the Hamiltonian operator is simply postulated. The microscopic dynamics are provided by the Schrödinger equation i ħ (∂Ψ/∂ t ) = H Ψ which requires as initial condition the knowledge of the wave function Ψ({ q i }, t ) at some initial time t 0 . (Boundary conditions on Ψ({ q i }, t ) must be specified as part of the description of the model as well.) The results of experiments in quantum mechanics are characterized by operators, usually obtained, like the Hamiltonian, from their classical forms and termed observables. Operators associated with observables must be Hermitian. In general, the various operators corresponding to observables do not commute with one another. It is possible to find sets of commuting operators whose mutual eigenstates span the Hilbert space in which the wave function is confined by the Schrödinger equation and the boundary conditions. A set of such (time independent) eigenstates, termed ψ ν ( q ), is a basis for the Hilbert space.
The conceptual setting of quantum mechanics is subject to an ongoing debate from its beginnings until now. The consequences of the apparent differences between quantum statistics and classical statistics range from the philosophical interpretations to practical issues as quantum computing. In this note we demonstrate how quantum mechanics can emerge from classical statistical systems. We discuss conditions and circumstances for this to happen. Quantum systems describe isolated subsystems of classical statistical systems with infinitely many states. While infinitely many classical observables "measure" properties of the subsystem and its environment, the state of the subsystem can be characterized by the expectation values of only a few probabilistic observables. They define a density matrix, and all the usual laws of quantum mechanics follow. No concepts beyond classical statistics are needed for quantum physics – the differences are only apparent and result from the particularities of those classical statistical systems which admit a quantum mechanical description. In particular, we show how the non-commuting properties of quantum operators are associated to the use of conditiona probabilities within the classical system, and how a unitary time evolution reflects the isolation of the subsystem.
Hamiltonian mechanics describes the evolution of a system through its Hamiltonian. The Hamiltonian typically also represents the energy observable, a Noether-conserved quantity associated with the time invariance of the law of evolution. In both quantum and classical mechanics, Hamiltonian mechanics demands a precise relationship between time evolution and observable energy, albeit using slightly different terminology. We distill basic conditions satisfied in both quantum and classical mechanics, including canonical coordinate symmetries and inner product invariance. We express these conditions in the framework of generalized probabilistic theories, which includes generalizing the definition of energy eigenstates in terms of time-invariant properties of the Hamiltonian system. By postulating these conditions to hold, we derive a unified Hamiltonian system model. This unified framework describes quantum and classical mechanics in a consistent language, facilitating their comparison. We moreover discuss alternative theories: an equation of motion given by a mixture of commutation relations, an information-restricted version of quantum theory, and Spekken's toy theory. The findings give a deeper understanding of the Hamiltonian in quantum and classical theories and point to several potential research topics.