Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2604.19871

Co-Designing Error Mitigation and Error Detection for Logical Qubits

Rohan S. Kumar, Takahiro Tsunoda, Sophia H. Xue, Dantong Li, Robert J. Schoelkopf, Yongshan Ding

quant-phcs.ARSubmitted Apr 21, 2026• Announced Apr 23, 2026• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Near-term quantum workloads demand error management, yet the two lightest-weight techniques, Quantum Error Detection (QED) and Probabilistic Error Cancellation (PEC), have complementary cost profiles whose joint architectural design space remains unexplored. QED encodes logical qubits and discards error-flagged runs, filtering noise with low qubit overhead but leaving residual errors; PEC can correct these in software, but at exponential cost in noise strength. If QED efficiently reduces per-gate noise, PEC's cost savings can outweigh QED's discard overhead; realizing this, however, requires solving two system-level design challenges. First, the \textit{QED interval} -- how often detection cycles are inserted -- is a tunable architectural parameter governing the cost-accuracy tradeoff. We derive an efficiency condition and show that the canonical one-cycle-per-gate frequency does not achieve break-even in any code we evaluate, while optimized intervals on high-rate Iceberg codes do. Second, we discover that naive PEC+QED integration \textit{degrades} accuracy below the QED-only baseline. The root cause is a transient error profile in the first detection cycle that corrupts PEC's noise model. We develop \textit{steady-state extraction}, a co-designed characterization protocol that isolates steady-state error behavior, reducing estimation bias by up to $10.2\times$. On a $[[6,4,2]]$ Iceberg code running QAOA ($p{=}4$--$8$) with a fixed shot budget, PEC+QED achieves $2$--$11\times$ lower absolute error and up to $31\times$ lower MSE versus PEC on physical qubits, with per-interval savings compounding over interval depth.

Comments
15 pages, 9 figures, 2 tables

Related papers

Zeno-Enhanced Probabilistic Error Cancellation with Quantum Error Detection Codes

Yi Yuan, Yuanchen Zhao, Dong E. Liu

Probabilistic error cancellation (PEC) is unbiased but suffers exponential sampling overhead set by noise-weighted circuit volume, whereas quantum error-detecting codes (QEDCs) remove many physical faults by stabilizer post-selection but leave an undetectable logical residue. We exploit this complementarity by using post-selection to map physical noise to a weaker accepted logical channel, and then applying PEC only to the residual channel. The resulting feedback-free QED+PEC scheme interleaves Clifford logical blocks, stabilizer measurements, post-selection, and probabilistic cancellation on accepted trajectories, without real-time decoding or active recovery. A key complication is that post-selection correlates accepted fault branches through stabilizer-commutation constraints, so the sparse Pauli-Lindblad factorization underlying bare PEC no longer applies directly. We therefore construct the inverse channel perturbatively: for fixed order $K$, only accepted fault branches up to order $K$ are retained, reducing preprocessing from $2^m$ branches to $O(m^K)$ per block. The order-$K$ protocol cancels the normalized post-selected channel through degree $K$, leaving a per-block error $O(W^{K+1})$ that accumulates at most linearly. For logical GHZ-state preparation with the $[[n,n-2,2]]$ Iceberg code under circuit-level depolarizing noise and ideal stabilizer measurements, first-order QED+PEC reaches $n=200$ physical qubits and lowers sampling overhead by three to four orders of magnitude relative to standard PEC while maintaining $F\simeq0.956$. Syndrome-noise tests show that readout-only flips mainly increase post-selection cost, whereas noisy GHZ-assisted global stabilizer extraction can remove the advantage. This identifies a discrete-Zeno trade-off: cheap detection reshapes the effective channel PEC must invert, rather than simply adding overhead.

quant-pharXiv:2605.12149•Quantum Science and Technology•May 13, 2026•0 citations

Optimizing Symmetry Informed Probabilistic Error Cancellation

Tom O'Leary, Daniel J. Egger, Dieter Jaksch

We show that combining quantum error detection (QED) with probabilistic error cancellation (PEC) gives more accurate and lower-variance estimates than PEC alone, provided that the symmetry measurements required for QED are carefully chosen. Because noisy symmetry measurements can negate the benefits of the PEC+QED approach, we cast the selection of measurement configurations as a classical optimization problem that systematically suppresses the impact of noise. Applying optimized PEC+QED to GHZ-state output distributions and to simulating the time-dynamics of a generalized superfast encoded Fermi-Hubbard model, we find consistent improvements over PEC. For GHZ states, the optimization over symmetry measurement configurations is essential for achieving an advantage. For the Fermi-Hubbard model, PEC+QED improves observable estimation on a $2 \times 2$ lattice and for larger systems the mitigation overheads can be reduced by measuring only subsets of stabilizers. Our results demonstrate the importance of circuit-specific tailoring of QEM techniques and that fault-tolerant design principles may already provide value for near-term devices.

quant-pharXiv:2607.01072•Jul 2, 2026•0 citations

Quantum Error Correction on Error-mitigated Physical Qubits

Minjun Jeon, Zhenyu Cai

We present a general framework for applying linear quantum error mitigation (QEM) techniques directly to physical qubits within a logical qubit to suppress logical errors. By exploiting the linearity of quantum error correction (QEC), we demonstrate that any linear QEM method$\unicode{x2014}$including probabilistic error cancellation (PEC), zero-noise extrapolation (ZNE), and symmetry verification$\unicode{x2014}$can be integrated into the physical layer without requiring modifications to the subsequent QEC decoder. Applying this framework to memory experiments using PEC, we analytically prove and numerically verify that the leading-order contribution to the logical error can be removed, increasing the effective code distance by 2. Our simulations on repetition and rotated surface codes show that a distance-3 code with physical-level PEC achieves logical error rates lower than or similar to a distance-5 unmitigated code while using 40% and 64% fewer qubits, respectively. These results establish physical-level QEM as a widely compatible and resource-efficient strategy for enhancing logical performance in early fault-tolerant architectures.

quant-pharXiv:2601.18384•Jan 27, 2026•0 citations

Spacetime mitigation of logical errors

Laurin E. Fischer, Ali Javadi-Abhari, Simon Martiel +1 more

Error detection can suppress noise at a lower sampling cost than probabilistic error cancellation (PEC), but leaves residual logical errors. We combine the two approaches to mitigate these errors while lowering the cost of PEC. We introduce a spacetime Pauli-Lindblad representation and use it to construct the post-selected logical noise perturbatively from physical noise and syndrome information. Individually undetected faults contribute at first order, while detected faults with canceling syndromes generate higher-order terms coupling distinct spacetime locations. To reconcile the nonlinearity of post-selection with the linearity of PEC, we formulate the combined protocol in terms of unnormalized post-selected maps, with normalization performed only after averaging. On the ibm_aachen superconducting quantum processor, Clifford experiments validate the post-selected noise model and its perturbative scaling. We then demonstrate error detection with first-order PEC for transverse-field Ising dynamics using 22 data and 27 check qubits. The combined protocol recovers the mean magnetization within statistical uncertainty through six Trotter steps and reduces the inferred sampling overhead by up to a factor of 63 relative to PEC without post-selection.

quant-pharXiv:2609.13108•Sep 14, 2026•0 citations

Error Mitigation of Fault-Tolerant Quantum Circuits with Soft Information

Zeyuan Zhou, Shaun Pexton, Aleksander Kubica +1 more

Quantum error mitigation (QEM) is typically viewed as a suite of practical techniques for today's noisy intermediate-scale quantum devices, with limited relevance once fault-tolerant quantum computers become available. In this work, we challenge this conventional wisdom by showing that QEM can continue to provide substantial benefits in the era of quantum error correction (QEC), and in an even more efficient manner than it does on current devices. We introduce a framework for logical-level QEM that leverages soft information naturally produced by QEC decoders, requiring no additional data, hardware modifications, or runtime overhead beyond what QEC protocols already provide. Within this framework, we develop and analyze three logical-level QEM techniques: post-selection and runtime abort policies, probabilistic error cancellation, and zero-noise extrapolation. Our techniques reduce logical error rates by more than 100x while discarding fewer than 0.1% of shots; they also provide in situ characterization of logical channels for QEM protocols. As a proof of principle, we benchmark our approach using a surface-code architecture and two state-of-the-art decoders based on tensor-network contraction and minimum-weight perfect matching. We evaluate logical-level QEM on random Clifford circuits and molecular simulation algorithms and find that, compared to previous approaches relying on QEC only or QEC combined with QEM, we can achieve up to 87.4% spacetime overhead savings. Our results demonstrate that logical-level QEM with QEC decoder soft information can reliably improve logical performance, underscoring the efficiency and usefulness of QEM techniques for fault-tolerant quantum computers.

quant-pharXiv:2512.09863•Dec 11, 2025•0 citations

Quantum Error Mitigation Techniques for Reliable Computation

Anna Ivanov, Noah Popescu

Quantum error mitigation (QEM) bridges the gap between today's noisy NISQ hardware and fault-tolerant quantum computing by reducing the effect of hardware errors on expectation value estimates without the qubit overhead of full quantum error correction. This paper proposes the Quantum Error Mitigation Design (QEMD) framework, a systematic evaluation of six QEM techniques across four circuit families on IBM Quantum Eagle and IonQ Forte: Zero-Noise Extrapolation (ZNE), Probabilistic Error Cancellation (PEC), Clifford Data Regression (CDR), Symmetry Verification (SV), Dynamical Decoupling (DD), and a novel Adaptive Ensemble Mitigation (AEM) combining ZNE and CDR with context-aware technique selection. QEMD finds: ZNE 3-point Richardson provides the best cost-performance trade-off for QAOA and VQE circuits (4.8x overhead, 28.4pp error reduction); PEC provides the highest accuracy but at 48x shot overhead -- practical only for n <= 12; DD reduces coherence-limited errors by 18.4% on IonQ Forte at zero shot overhead; AEM outperforms all individual techniques by 6.4pp at 8.4x overhead. QEMD provides a decision guide mapping circuit type, qubit count, and shot budget to optimal QEM technique selection.

Quantum Frontiers Journal•Jun 28, 2025•0 citations
Near-term quantum workloads demand error management, yet the two lightest-weight techniques, Quantum Error Detection (QED) and Probabilistic Error Cancellation (PEC), have complementary cost profiles whose joint architectural design space remains unexplored. QED encodes logical qubits and discards error-flagged runs, filtering noise with low qubit overhead but leaving residual errors; PEC can correct these in software, but at exponential cost in noise strength. If QED efficiently reduces per-gate noise, PEC's cost savings can outweigh QED's discard overhead; realizing this, however, requires solving two system-level design challenges.
First, the \textit{QED interval} -- how often detection cycles are inserted -- is a tunable architectural parameter governing the cost-accuracy tradeoff. We derive an efficiency condition and show that the canonical one-cycle-per-gate frequency does not achieve break-even in any code we evaluate, while optimized intervals on high-rate Iceberg codes do. Second, we discover that naive PEC+QED integration \textit{degrades} accuracy below the QED-only baseline. The root cause is a transient error profile in the first detection cycle that corrupts PEC's noise model. We develop \textit{steady-state extraction}, a co-designed characterization protocol that isolates steady-state error behavior, reducing estimation bias by up to 10.2×10.2\times10.2×. On a [[6,4,2]][[6,4,2]][[6,4,2]] Iceberg code running QAOA (p=4p{=}4p=4--888) with a fixed shot budget, PEC+QED achieves 222--11×11\times11× lower absolute error and up to 31×31\times31× lower MSE versus PEC on physical qubits, with per-interval savings compounding over interval depth.
Probabilistic error cancellation (PEC) is unbiased but suffers exponential sampling overhead set by noise-weighted circuit volume, whereas quantum error-detecting codes (QEDCs) remove many physical faults by stabilizer post-selection but leave an undetectable logical residue. We exploit this complementarity by using post-selection to map physical noise to a weaker accepted logical channel, and then applying PEC only to the residual channel. The resulting feedback-free QED+PEC scheme interleaves Clifford logical blocks, stabilizer measurements, post-selection, and probabilistic cancellation on accepted trajectories, without real-time decoding or active recovery. A key complication is that post-selection correlates accepted fault branches through stabilizer-commutation constraints, so the sparse Pauli-Lindblad factorization underlying bare PEC no longer applies directly. We therefore construct the inverse channel perturbatively: for fixed order KKK, only accepted fault branches up to order KKK are retained, reducing preprocessing from 2m2^m2m branches to O(mK)O(m^K)O(mK) per block. The order-KKK protocol cancels the normalized post-selected channel through degree KKK, leaving a per-block error O(WK+1)O(W^{K+1})O(WK+1) that accumulates at most linearly. For logical GHZ-state preparation with the [[n,n−2,2]][[n,n-2,2]][[n,n−2,2]] Iceberg code under circuit-level depolarizing noise and ideal stabilizer measurements, first-order QED+PEC reaches n=200n=200n=200 physical qubits and lowers sampling overhead by three to four orders of magnitude relative to standard PEC while maintaining F≃0.956F\simeq0.956F≃0.956. Syndrome-noise tests show that readout-only flips mainly increase post-selection cost, whereas noisy GHZ-assisted global stabilizer extraction can remove the advantage. This identifies a discrete-Zeno trade-off: cheap detection reshapes the effective channel PEC must invert, rather than simply adding overhead.
We show that combining quantum error detection (QED) with probabilistic error cancellation (PEC) gives more accurate and lower-variance estimates than PEC alone, provided that the symmetry measurements required for QED are carefully chosen. Because noisy symmetry measurements can negate the benefits of the PEC+QED approach, we cast the selection of measurement configurations as a classical optimization problem that systematically suppresses the impact of noise. Applying optimized PEC+QED to GHZ-state output distributions and to simulating the time-dynamics of a generalized superfast encoded Fermi-Hubbard model, we find consistent improvements over PEC. For GHZ states, the optimization over symmetry measurement configurations is essential for achieving an advantage. For the Fermi-Hubbard model, PEC+QED improves observable estimation on a 2×22 \times 22×2 lattice and for larger systems the mitigation overheads can be reduced by measuring only subsets of stabilizers. Our results demonstrate the importance of circuit-specific tailoring of QEM techniques and that fault-tolerant design principles may already provide value for near-term devices.
We present a general framework for applying linear quantum error mitigation (QEM) techniques directly to physical qubits within a logical qubit to suppress logical errors. By exploiting the linearity of quantum error correction (QEC), we demonstrate that any linear QEM method$\unicode{x2014}$including probabilistic error cancellation (PEC), zero-noise extrapolation (ZNE), and symmetry verification$\unicode{x2014}$can be integrated into the physical layer without requiring modifications to the subsequent QEC decoder. Applying this framework to memory experiments using PEC, we analytically prove and numerically verify that the leading-order contribution to the logical error can be removed, increasing the effective code distance by 2. Our simulations on repetition and rotated surface codes show that a distance-3 code with physical-level PEC achieves logical error rates lower than or similar to a distance-5 unmitigated code while using 40% and 64% fewer qubits, respectively. These results establish physical-level QEM as a widely compatible and resource-efficient strategy for enhancing logical performance in early fault-tolerant architectures.
Error detection can suppress noise at a lower sampling cost than probabilistic error cancellation (PEC), but leaves residual logical errors. We combine the two approaches to mitigate these errors while lowering the cost of PEC. We introduce a spacetime Pauli-Lindblad representation and use it to construct the post-selected logical noise perturbatively from physical noise and syndrome information. Individually undetected faults contribute at first order, while detected faults with canceling syndromes generate higher-order terms coupling distinct spacetime locations. To reconcile the nonlinearity of post-selection with the linearity of PEC, we formulate the combined protocol in terms of unnormalized post-selected maps, with normalization performed only after averaging. On the ibm_aachen superconducting quantum processor, Clifford experiments validate the post-selected noise model and its perturbative scaling. We then demonstrate error detection with first-order PEC for transverse-field Ising dynamics using 22 data and 27 check qubits. The combined protocol recovers the mean magnetization within statistical uncertainty through six Trotter steps and reduces the inferred sampling overhead by up to a factor of 63 relative to PEC without post-selection.
Quantum error mitigation (QEM) is typically viewed as a suite of practical techniques for today's noisy intermediate-scale quantum devices, with limited relevance once fault-tolerant quantum computers become available. In this work, we challenge this conventional wisdom by showing that QEM can continue to provide substantial benefits in the era of quantum error correction (QEC), and in an even more efficient manner than it does on current devices. We introduce a framework for logical-level QEM that leverages soft information naturally produced by QEC decoders, requiring no additional data, hardware modifications, or runtime overhead beyond what QEC protocols already provide. Within this framework, we develop and analyze three logical-level QEM techniques: post-selection and runtime abort policies, probabilistic error cancellation, and zero-noise extrapolation. Our techniques reduce logical error rates by more than 100x while discarding fewer than 0.1% of shots; they also provide in situ characterization of logical channels for QEM protocols. As a proof of principle, we benchmark our approach using a surface-code architecture and two state-of-the-art decoders based on tensor-network contraction and minimum-weight perfect matching. We evaluate logical-level QEM on random Clifford circuits and molecular simulation algorithms and find that, compared to previous approaches relying on QEC only or QEC combined with QEM, we can achieve up to 87.4% spacetime overhead savings. Our results demonstrate that logical-level QEM with QEC decoder soft information can reliably improve logical performance, underscoring the efficiency and usefulness of QEM techniques for fault-tolerant quantum computers.
Quantum error mitigation (QEM) bridges the gap between today's noisy NISQ hardware and fault-tolerant quantum computing by reducing the effect of hardware errors on expectation value estimates without the qubit overhead of full quantum error correction. This paper proposes the Quantum Error Mitigation Design (QEMD) framework, a systematic evaluation of six QEM techniques across four circuit families on IBM Quantum Eagle and IonQ Forte: Zero-Noise Extrapolation (ZNE), Probabilistic Error Cancellation (PEC), Clifford Data Regression (CDR), Symmetry Verification (SV), Dynamical Decoupling (DD), and a novel Adaptive Ensemble Mitigation (AEM) combining ZNE and CDR with context-aware technique selection. QEMD finds: ZNE 3-point Richardson provides the best cost-performance trade-off for QAOA and VQE circuits (4.8x overhead, 28.4pp error reduction); PEC provides the highest accuracy but at 48x shot overhead -- practical only for n <= 12; DD reduces coherence-limited errors by 18.4% on IonQ Forte at zero shot overhead; AEM outperforms all individual techniques by 6.4pp at 8.4x overhead. QEMD provides a decision guide mapping circuit type, qubit count, and shot budget to optimal QEM technique selection.