We present a layered and modular network architecture that combines Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) and Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC) to provide scalable end-to-end security across long distance multi-hop, trusted-node quantum networks. To ensure interoperability and efficient practical deployment, hop-wise tunnels between physically secured nodes are protected by WireGuard with periodically rotated pre-shared keys sourced via the ETSI GS QKD 014 interface. On top, Rosenpass performs a PQC key exchange to establish an end-to-end data channel without modifying deployed QKD devices or network protocols. This dual-layer composition yields post-quantum forward secrecy and authenticity under practical assumptions. We implement the design using open-source components and validate and evaluate it in simulated and lab test-beds. Experiments show uninterrupted operation over multi-hop paths, low resource footprint and fail-safe mechanisms. We further discuss the design's compositional security, wherein the security of each individual component is preserved under their combination and outline migration paths for operators integrating QKD-aware overlays in existing infrastructures.
We present a layered and modular network architecture that combines Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) and Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC) to provide scalable end-to-end security across long distance multi-hop, trusted-node quantum networks. To ensure interoperability and efficient practical deployment, hop-wise tunnels between physically secured nodes are protected by WireGuard with periodically rotated pre-shared keys sourced via the ETSI GS QKD 014 interface. On top, Rosenpass performs a PQC key exchange to establish an end-to-end data channel without modifying deployed QKD devices or network protocols. This dual-layer composition yields post-quantum forward secrecy and authenticity under practical assumptions. We implement the design using open-source components and validate and evaluate it in simulated and lab test-beds. Experiments show uninterrupted operation over multi-hop paths, low resource footprint and fail-safe mechanisms. We further discuss the design's compositional security, wherein the security of each individual component is preserved under their combination and outline migration paths for operators integrating QKD-aware overlays in existing infrastructures.
Abstract: This study advances a unifying systems perspective on quantum-safe network security by synthesizing recent progress in quantum cryptography with practical integration patterns across carrier-grade infrastructures. Concept analysis distinguishes the roles of quantum key distribution (QKD), device-independent variants, quantum authentication, and post-quantum cryptography (PQC) within zero-trust architectures. Building on this, a layered framework—spanning physical/entanglement resources, key management, crypto-agility, control plane orchestration, and policy/compliance—is articulated to support end-to-end, composable guarantees. The problem addressed is the realization of verifiable, quantum-resilient security under operational constraints involving latency, key-rate variability, and heterogeneous trust assumptions. Methodology combines a structured literature synthesis with formal composability mapping to universal composability principles, adversarial threat modeling for quantum-enabled attackers, and testbed/simulation evaluation of hybrid QKD–PQC pipelines across L2–L3 segments and 5G/6G backhaul scenarios. Key results indicate that (i) selective QKD deployment on high-value links coupled with PQC at endpoints enhances resilience while preserving crypto-agility; (ii) automated key-lifecycle orchestration reduces exposure windows; and (iii) device-independent assurances strengthen guarantees where trust relaxation is necessary. The impact is a deployment-ready reference architecture, measurable integration metrics, and guidance aligned with emerging standards for critical infrastructure and national networks. The implications extend to procurement, compliance, and roadmap planning for quantum-era network security. Keywords: quantum-safe cryptography, quantum key distribution (QKD), post-quantum cryptography (PQC), hybrid QKD–PQC, composable security, device-independent QKD, zero-trust networks, key management and orchestration, 5G/6G backhaul, network security architecture, standards and interoperability
Quantum-Safe Networks (QSNs) use quantum key distribution (QKD) to deliver keys generated using a Quantum Random Number Generator (QRNG) to consumers at scale. In practice, prevailing Quantum-Key-as-a-Service (QKaaS) offerings still assume that each consumer site deploys on-premise QKD hardware, creating cost and feasibility barriers that limit adoption. Although ETSI GS QKD 014 standardizes APIs for key retrieval between Secure Application Entities (SAEs) and Key Management Entities (KMEs), it does not address key delivery across untrusted classical networks to consumers without local QKD devices. We close this gap with a gateway architecture that transparently secures ETSI-compliant QKD APIs using Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC)—applying PQC signatures and key-encapsulation mechanisms end-to-end—without requiring changes to existing devices or software. The design supports cryptographic agility, enabling runtime selection and rotation among standardized PQC schemes. Evaluations on both simulated QKD environments and production-grade hardware show minimal overhead (≈1.3×–1.5× versus baseline) and robust scaling across concurrent connections and multiple consumer sites, extending the reach of QSNs beyond premises equipped with QKD while preserving end-to-end quantum-safe guarantees. Overall, this paper equips practitioners with a systematized view of PQC–QKD integration in QSNs, with an actionable gateway blueprint for extending QSNs without the need for on-premise QKD deployments.
Post-quantum cryptography (PQC) and quantum key distribution (QKD) address the quantum threat from opposite directions: PQC replaces vulnerable public-key algorithms with schemes believed to resist quantum cryptanalysis, while QKD derives keys whose secrecy rests on physical assumptions rather than computational ones. Because each approach has a distinct failure mode, a growing body of work combines them so that a session key remains secure if either component holds. We first establish the deployed baseline, hybrid classical-plus-PQC key exchange, against which QKD-augmented designs must be judged. We then propose a taxonomy of hybrid PQC-QKD designs along eight dimensions (integration layer, combiner construction, authentication scope and source, QKD topology, trusted entities, key-delivery interface, classical component, and evidence type), and use it to compare published protocols, including Muckle and its successors, MACsec and TLS integrations, and IKEv2 mechanisms standardised in RFCs 8784, 9370, and 9867. We examine key-combiner constructions in light of the KEM-combiner literature and of NIST, ETSI, and ITU-T guidance, and map the security arguments for hybrid PQC-QKD protocols onto a common grid of security model, assumptions, permitted compromise, established guarantee, and limitations. We synthesise deployment evidence from metropolitan and national QKD networks, distinguishing the few testbeds that have run PQC in the key path from pure-QKD deployments, and summarise the standards and policy landscape, including the positions of national security agencies that recommend against relying on QKD alone. We close with open problems: authentication of the QKD classical channel, shared-infrastructure threat models, device certification versus formal proofs, formal verification of hybrid handshakes, and the lack of peer-reviewed deployment economics.
This paper presents a vendor-agnostic architecture for secure pre-shared key (PSK) exchange between Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) nodes, leveraging post-quantum cryptography (PQC) tools. The proposed system combines PQC-OpenVPN and OQS-OpenSSH with USB mass storage emulation and single-board computers (SBCs) to automate the transfer of initial authentication secrets. This design significantly reduces manual intervention and mitigates risks associated with physical key handling. The solution was experimentally validated on IDQ Clavis3 and Cerberis3 devices and is broadly applicable to other QKD platforms that support only USB-based key input. Integration of lattice-based algorithms such as Kyber, Dilithium, and ML-DSA enables encapsulation and authentication of quantum-safe keys. Furthermore, a layered design using VPN and SSH channels provides robust cryptographic isolation for authentication material in transit. The work contributes a reproducible and cost-effective testbed for post-quantum hardened QKD deployments and demonstrates the practical feasibility of combining PQC mechanisms with QKD systems to enhance trust in future quantum-safe infrastructures.
The European Quantum Communication Infrastructure (EuroQCI) initiative is fostering the deployment of national quantum key distribution (QKD) testbeds across the European Union. In this context, we report on the design, implementation, and evaluation of the Austrian testbed, with a particular focus on advances in key management and applicationlevel integration of QKD. First, we introduce a hybrid key management system (KMS) that combines QKD-derived keys in a decentralized architecture with post-quantum authenticated key exchange, enabling end-to-end hybrid keys while reducing trust assumptions in intermediate nodes. Second, we present three QKD-enabled applications: (i) a secure secret-sharing-based storage system leveraging QKD-protected share distribution, (ii) a QKD-integrated extension of Jitsi employing ETSI GS QKD 014 group keys to reduce overhead in multi-party communication, and (iii) a hybrid QKD/PQC WireGuard-based VPN enabling QKD-secured HSM backup operations without requiring modifications to proprietary HSM protocols. Finally, we describe the deployment of these solutions in a national network comprising a four-node metropolitan testbed and a 200 km long-distance link with trusted nodes, and provide performance measurements for both the network and the hybrid KMS. Together, these results demonstrate the feasibility of integrating QKD into heterogeneous applications and hybrid cryptographic infrastructures.
The exponential development of quantum computing represents a serious threat to the existence of the modern cybersecurity infrastructure. Fault-tolerant large-scale quantum computing will be realized roughly five to ten years hence, and will make most of the current standards for asymmetric cryptography-such as RSA and ECC-deviant. While mitigations, such as Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC) and Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) offer possible countermeasures, both are hampered by vulnerabilities of their own. Respectively, PQC relies on unproven mathematical hardness assumptions that are always subject to future algorithmic innovations, while QKD is limited by the physical requirements of a dedicated quantum channel.This paper presents a new hybrid protocol which aims to solve these limitations by combining PQC and QKD into a unified design. The proposed scheme will hybridize the secure key resulting from the BB84-based QKD protocol with a second secret derived by using a lattice-based PQC key exchange, using a strong hybrid key derivation function. It deals with a point-to-point transport-layer model, which is in line with the technological limitations of QKD models at present. The implementation would need trusted nodes or quantum repeaters, which are beyond the reach of this implementation. The system is implemented on a dual-channel platform: the quantum channel is used for key distribution and the classical channel is used for PQC negotiation and secure data transmission, all classical communication is authenticated by HMAC. The resulting architecture is a future-proof quantum-safe communication system that will protect government sensitive data, as well as financial and e-commerce enterprises, thus ensuring the transition to a quantum resistant digital society in the face of a catastrophic event that would have a massive financial and societal impact.