Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

International Journal of Academic and Industrial Research Innovations(IJAIRI)

Quantum-Safe Network Security: Advances in Quantum Cryptography and Systems Integration

Murali Krishna Pasupuleti

Published Jan 30, 2021• 2 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Abstract: This study advances a unifying systems perspective on quantum-safe network security by synthesizing recent progress in quantum cryptography with practical integration patterns across carrier-grade infrastructures. Concept analysis distinguishes the roles of quantum key distribution (QKD), device-independent variants, quantum authentication, and post-quantum cryptography (PQC) within zero-trust architectures. Building on this, a layered framework—spanning physical/entanglement resources, key management, crypto-agility, control plane orchestration, and policy/compliance—is articulated to support end-to-end, composable guarantees. The problem addressed is the realization of verifiable, quantum-resilient security under operational constraints involving latency, key-rate variability, and heterogeneous trust assumptions. Methodology combines a structured literature synthesis with formal composability mapping to universal composability principles, adversarial threat modeling for quantum-enabled attackers, and testbed/simulation evaluation of hybrid QKD–PQC pipelines across L2–L3 segments and 5G/6G backhaul scenarios. Key results indicate that (i) selective QKD deployment on high-value links coupled with PQC at endpoints enhances resilience while preserving crypto-agility; (ii) automated key-lifecycle orchestration reduces exposure windows; and (iii) device-independent assurances strengthen guarantees where trust relaxation is necessary. The impact is a deployment-ready reference architecture, measurable integration metrics, and guidance aligned with emerging standards for critical infrastructure and national networks. The implications extend to procurement, compliance, and roadmap planning for quantum-era network security. Keywords: quantum-safe cryptography, quantum key distribution (QKD), post-quantum cryptography (PQC), hybrid QKD–PQC, composable security, device-independent QKD, zero-trust networks, key management and orchestration, 5G/6G backhaul, network security architecture, standards and interoperability

DOI
10.62311/nesx/rp-1-01-2021

Related papers

Beyond encryption: post-quantum cryptography and the future of quantum-safe networks

Radhakrishnan Delhibabu

Introduction The rapid advancement of quantum computing presents an existential threat to the mathematical foundations of modern internet security. Fault-tolerant quantum computers are projected to reach the logical qubit scale necessary to execute Shor's algorithm by 2030–2035, threatening currently deployed public-key cryptography infrastructures. Methods We evaluate the performance metrics of integrating post-quantum cryptography (PQC), specifically the newly finalized NIST standards (FIPS 203, 204, and 205), with quantum key distribution (QKD) across communication networks. Results Our analysis demonstrates that while hybrid PQC-QKD models reduce long-term key compromise probabilities to near 0%, they introduce a 15% to 40% increase in bandwidth overhead during initial cryptographic handshakes. Discussion Given that enterprise-wide cryptographic migrations historically require 7–10 years, organizations face an immediate vulnerability window against “harvest now, decrypt later” adversaries. Ultimately, we propose a phased, cryptographically agile framework to achieve a Zero-Trust, Quantum-Safe network architecture within a 5-year implementation timeline.

Frontiers in Computer Science•Aug 27, 2026•0 citations

Quantum Safe Networks: A Case Study on Securing QKD Interfaces Using PQC

Sayan Das, Aarav Varshney, Prasanna Ravi +1 more

Quantum-Safe Networks (QSNs) use quantum key distribution (QKD) to deliver keys generated using a Quantum Random Number Generator (QRNG) to consumers at scale. In practice, prevailing Quantum-Key-as-a-Service (QKaaS) offerings still assume that each consumer site deploys on-premise QKD hardware, creating cost and feasibility barriers that limit adoption. Although ETSI GS QKD 014 standardizes APIs for key retrieval between Secure Application Entities (SAEs) and Key Management Entities (KMEs), it does not address key delivery across untrusted classical networks to consumers without local QKD devices. We close this gap with a gateway architecture that transparently secures ETSI-compliant QKD APIs using Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC)—applying PQC signatures and key-encapsulation mechanisms end-to-end—without requiring changes to existing devices or software. The design supports cryptographic agility, enabling runtime selection and rotation among standardized PQC schemes. Evaluations on both simulated QKD environments and production-grade hardware show minimal overhead ($\approx 1.3\times$–1.5× versus baseline) and robust scaling across concurrent connections and multiple consumer sites, extending the reach of QSNs beyond premises equipped with QKD while preserving end-to-end quantum-safe guarantees. Overall, this paper equips practitioners with a systematized view of PQC–QKD integration in QSNs, with an actionable gateway blueprint for extending QSNs without the need for on-premise QKD deployments.

IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering•Jan 1, 2026•0 citations

Benchmarking hybrid quantum-safe cryptography over real-world infrastructures

Jaime S. Buruaga, Juan P. Brito, Vicente Martín

Abstract Advances in quantum computing pose a significant threat to the widely used Public Key Infrastructure (PKI). The two leading technologies to address this challenge are Post-Quantum Cryptography and Quantum Key Distribution. A promising approach is the hybridization of these technologies - combining their respective strengths while mitigating their limitations - and integrating them with the cryptographic mechanisms used today to enhance crypto-agility and facilitate transitioning to a quantum-safe infrastructure. However, changing current network protocols to quantum-safe alternatives is not just a matter of security: their efficiency and scalability must also be demonstrated within real-world telecommunications infrastructures to ensure their practical adoption. In this work, we present the first long-running test with detailed measurements of a suite of hybrid quantum-safe protocols that integrate classical cryptography, PQC, and QKD within a production environment (MadQCI). Using standardized protocols and interfaces and employing Transport Layer Security (TLS) as the base protocol for real-world comparison, this study demonstrates the efficiency and scalability of the proposed solution in deployed heterogeneous networks. These results mark a significant step towards the widespread adoption of quantum-safe hybrid protocols and contribute to clarifying the path toward their future standardization in next-generation telecommunications networks.

EPJ Quantum Technology•May 15, 2026•0 citations

Benchmarking hybrid quantum-safe cryptography over real-world infrastructures

Jaime S. Buruaga, Juan Pedro Brito Méndez, Vicente Martín Ayuso

Advances in quantum computing pose a significant threat to the widely used Public Key Infrastructure (PKI). The two leading technologies to address this challenge are Post-Quantum Cryptography and Quantum Key Distribution. A promising approach is the hybridization of these technologies - combining their respective strengths while mitigating their limitations - and integrating them with the cryptographic mechanisms used today to enhance crypto-agility and facilitate transitioning to a quantum-safe infrastructure. However, changing current network protocols to quantum-safe alternatives is not just a matter of security: their efficiency and scalability must also be demonstrated within real-world telecommunications infrastructures to ensure their practical adoption. In this work, we present the first long-running test with detailed measurements of a suite of hybrid quantum-safe protocols that integrate classical cryptography, PQC, and QKD within a production environment (MadQCI). Using standardized protocols and interfaces and employing Transport Layer Security (TLS) as the base protocol for real-world comparison, this study demonstrates the efficiency and scalability of the proposed solution in deployed heterogeneous networks. These results mark a significant step towards the widespread adoption of quantum-safe hybrid protocols and contribute to clarifying the path toward their future standardization in next-generation telecommunications networks.

•May 15, 2026•0 citations

Quantum Cryptography, Quantum Communications and Nano-Enabled Cybersecurity: Global Frameworks for DefenceTech, FinTech and SpaceTech

Murali Krishna Pasupuleti

Abstract: This study develops a scope of analytical framework for integrating quantum cryptography, quantum communications, post-quantum cryptography and nano-enabled hardware security into global cybersecurity architectures for DefenceTech, FinTech and SpaceTech. The research problem is framed by the convergence of three pressures: the long-lived confidentiality exposure created by harvest-now-decrypt-later attacks, the rapid standardization of post-quantum algorithms, and the need for hardware-rooted trust in physically exposed devices, satellites, edge nodes and payment infrastructures. The paper synthesizes quantum key distribution, quantum-network standardization, crypto-agile migration, physical unclonable functions and sectoral governance into a single evaluation model. It uses a public-source calibrated realistic dataset of 18 high-value scenarios across defence, finance and space systems. The dataset is not represented as confidential operational telemetry; rather, it is explicitly constructed from publicly available threat, standards and engineering indicators to support transparent modelling. The methodology combines literature review, structured scenario analysis, weighted risk scoring, residual-risk modelling, expected annual loss estimation and feasibility-sensitive control selection. Mathematical equations are used to express QKD channel attenuation, secret-key-rate intuition, cryptographic migration risk, expected loss and multi-criteria optimization. Results indicate that hybrid PQC adoption produces the broadest near-term risk reduction, QKD offers the strongest value where long-lived secrets and controlled optical paths exist, and nano-enabled roots of trust are especially relevant to contested devices and supply chains. The study proposes a staged global framework in which crypto-agility, hybrid PQC, QKD network governance and nano-PUF attestation are treated as complementary layers rather than competing security paradigms. The conclusion identifies future work in real operational benchmarking, satellite-QKD testbeds, standards-aligned implementation assurance and machine-verifiable security reasoning. Keywords: Quantum cryptography; quantum key distribution; post-quantum cryptography; quantum communications; nano-enabled cybersecurity; physical unclonable functions; DefenceTech; FinTech; SpaceTech; crypto-agility; QKD networks; ML-KEM; ML-DSA; hardware root of trust; cyber resilience

International Journal of Academic and Industrial Research Innovations(IJAIRI)•Jun 29, 2026•0 citations

Quantum-Resistant Networks: A Review of Primitives, Protocols and Best Practices

Elisa Bertino, Ramana Kompella, Ashish Kundu +3 more

Large-scale quantum computers threaten the public-key cryptographic foundations underpinning today's network security infrastructures. While significant progress has been made in standardizing post-quantum cryptographic (PQC) primitives and adapting individual protocols such as TLS and SSH, far less attention has been paid to the broader architectural consequences of the post-quantum transition for networked systems. In particular, many real-world deployments such as mobile networks, industrial control systems, IoT environments, and regulated infrastructures cannot assume the universal availability, deployability, or desirability of PQ public-key infrastructures. This paper presents the first comprehensive systematization of PQ-resistant network architectures, focusing on key distribution and management as a system-level design problem rather than a protocol-local substitution. We introduce a unified taxonomy spanning cryptographic foundations (symmetric-only, PQ-PKI, hybrid, and information-theoretic multi-path), key-distribution architectures (centralized, hierarchical, replicated, threshold, MPC-backed, and serverless), trust and threat models, key-management lifecycle, and deployment environments. Using this framework, we analyze the security, scalability, and operational trade-offs of a wide range of architectures under realistic PQ adversary assumptions, including harvest-now, decrypt-later attacks and partial infrastructure compromise. Our study highlights fundamental gaps in existing approaches, clarifies when PQ-PKI is necessary or avoidable, and identifies promising research directions for building cryptographically agile, quantum-resilient network infrastructures.

arXiv:2605.04129•May 5, 2026•0 citations
Abstract: This study advances a unifying systems perspective on quantum-safe network security by synthesizing recent progress in quantum cryptography with practical integration patterns across carrier-grade infrastructures. Concept analysis distinguishes the roles of quantum key distribution (QKD), device-independent variants, quantum authentication, and post-quantum cryptography (PQC) within zero-trust architectures. Building on this, a layered framework—spanning physical/entanglement resources, key management, crypto-agility, control plane orchestration, and policy/compliance—is articulated to support end-to-end, composable guarantees. The problem addressed is the realization of verifiable, quantum-resilient security under operational constraints involving latency, key-rate variability, and heterogeneous trust assumptions. Methodology combines a structured literature synthesis with formal composability mapping to universal composability principles, adversarial threat modeling for quantum-enabled attackers, and testbed/simulation evaluation of hybrid QKD–PQC pipelines across L2–L3 segments and 5G/6G backhaul scenarios. Key results indicate that (i) selective QKD deployment on high-value links coupled with PQC at endpoints enhances resilience while preserving crypto-agility; (ii) automated key-lifecycle orchestration reduces exposure windows; and (iii) device-independent assurances strengthen guarantees where trust relaxation is necessary. The impact is a deployment-ready reference architecture, measurable integration metrics, and guidance aligned with emerging standards for critical infrastructure and national networks. The implications extend to procurement, compliance, and roadmap planning for quantum-era network security. Keywords: quantum-safe cryptography, quantum key distribution (QKD), post-quantum cryptography (PQC), hybrid QKD–PQC, composable security, device-independent QKD, zero-trust networks, key management and orchestration, 5G/6G backhaul, network security architecture, standards and interoperability
Introduction The rapid advancement of quantum computing presents an existential threat to the mathematical foundations of modern internet security. Fault-tolerant quantum computers are projected to reach the logical qubit scale necessary to execute Shor's algorithm by 2030–2035, threatening currently deployed public-key cryptography infrastructures. Methods We evaluate the performance metrics of integrating post-quantum cryptography (PQC), specifically the newly finalized NIST standards (FIPS 203, 204, and 205), with quantum key distribution (QKD) across communication networks. Results Our analysis demonstrates that while hybrid PQC-QKD models reduce long-term key compromise probabilities to near 0%, they introduce a 15% to 40% increase in bandwidth overhead during initial cryptographic handshakes. Discussion Given that enterprise-wide cryptographic migrations historically require 7–10 years, organizations face an immediate vulnerability window against “harvest now, decrypt later” adversaries. Ultimately, we propose a phased, cryptographically agile framework to achieve a Zero-Trust, Quantum-Safe network architecture within a 5-year implementation timeline.
Quantum-Safe Networks (QSNs) use quantum key distribution (QKD) to deliver keys generated using a Quantum Random Number Generator (QRNG) to consumers at scale. In practice, prevailing Quantum-Key-as-a-Service (QKaaS) offerings still assume that each consumer site deploys on-premise QKD hardware, creating cost and feasibility barriers that limit adoption. Although ETSI GS QKD 014 standardizes APIs for key retrieval between Secure Application Entities (SAEs) and Key Management Entities (KMEs), it does not address key delivery across untrusted classical networks to consumers without local QKD devices. We close this gap with a gateway architecture that transparently secures ETSI-compliant QKD APIs using Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC)—applying PQC signatures and key-encapsulation mechanisms end-to-end—without requiring changes to existing devices or software. The design supports cryptographic agility, enabling runtime selection and rotation among standardized PQC schemes. Evaluations on both simulated QKD environments and production-grade hardware show minimal overhead (≈1.3×\approx 1.3\times≈1.3×–1.5× versus baseline) and robust scaling across concurrent connections and multiple consumer sites, extending the reach of QSNs beyond premises equipped with QKD while preserving end-to-end quantum-safe guarantees. Overall, this paper equips practitioners with a systematized view of PQC–QKD integration in QSNs, with an actionable gateway blueprint for extending QSNs without the need for on-premise QKD deployments.
Abstract Advances in quantum computing pose a significant threat to the widely used Public Key Infrastructure (PKI). The two leading technologies to address this challenge are Post-Quantum Cryptography and Quantum Key Distribution. A promising approach is the hybridization of these technologies - combining their respective strengths while mitigating their limitations - and integrating them with the cryptographic mechanisms used today to enhance crypto-agility and facilitate transitioning to a quantum-safe infrastructure. However, changing current network protocols to quantum-safe alternatives is not just a matter of security: their efficiency and scalability must also be demonstrated within real-world telecommunications infrastructures to ensure their practical adoption. In this work, we present the first long-running test with detailed measurements of a suite of hybrid quantum-safe protocols that integrate classical cryptography, PQC, and QKD within a production environment (MadQCI). Using standardized protocols and interfaces and employing Transport Layer Security (TLS) as the base protocol for real-world comparison, this study demonstrates the efficiency and scalability of the proposed solution in deployed heterogeneous networks. These results mark a significant step towards the widespread adoption of quantum-safe hybrid protocols and contribute to clarifying the path toward their future standardization in next-generation telecommunications networks.
Advances in quantum computing pose a significant threat to the widely used Public Key Infrastructure (PKI). The two leading technologies to address this challenge are Post-Quantum Cryptography and Quantum Key Distribution. A promising approach is the hybridization of these technologies - combining their respective strengths while mitigating their limitations - and integrating them with the cryptographic mechanisms used today to enhance crypto-agility and facilitate transitioning to a quantum-safe infrastructure. However, changing current network protocols to quantum-safe alternatives is not just a matter of security: their efficiency and scalability must also be demonstrated within real-world telecommunications infrastructures to ensure their practical adoption. In this work, we present the first long-running test with detailed measurements of a suite of hybrid quantum-safe protocols that integrate classical cryptography, PQC, and QKD within a production environment (MadQCI). Using standardized protocols and interfaces and employing Transport Layer Security (TLS) as the base protocol for real-world comparison, this study demonstrates the efficiency and scalability of the proposed solution in deployed heterogeneous networks. These results mark a significant step towards the widespread adoption of quantum-safe hybrid protocols and contribute to clarifying the path toward their future standardization in next-generation telecommunications networks.
Abstract: This study develops a scope of analytical framework for integrating quantum cryptography, quantum communications, post-quantum cryptography and nano-enabled hardware security into global cybersecurity architectures for DefenceTech, FinTech and SpaceTech. The research problem is framed by the convergence of three pressures: the long-lived confidentiality exposure created by harvest-now-decrypt-later attacks, the rapid standardization of post-quantum algorithms, and the need for hardware-rooted trust in physically exposed devices, satellites, edge nodes and payment infrastructures. The paper synthesizes quantum key distribution, quantum-network standardization, crypto-agile migration, physical unclonable functions and sectoral governance into a single evaluation model. It uses a public-source calibrated realistic dataset of 18 high-value scenarios across defence, finance and space systems. The dataset is not represented as confidential operational telemetry; rather, it is explicitly constructed from publicly available threat, standards and engineering indicators to support transparent modelling. The methodology combines literature review, structured scenario analysis, weighted risk scoring, residual-risk modelling, expected annual loss estimation and feasibility-sensitive control selection. Mathematical equations are used to express QKD channel attenuation, secret-key-rate intuition, cryptographic migration risk, expected loss and multi-criteria optimization. Results indicate that hybrid PQC adoption produces the broadest near-term risk reduction, QKD offers the strongest value where long-lived secrets and controlled optical paths exist, and nano-enabled roots of trust are especially relevant to contested devices and supply chains. The study proposes a staged global framework in which crypto-agility, hybrid PQC, QKD network governance and nano-PUF attestation are treated as complementary layers rather than competing security paradigms. The conclusion identifies future work in real operational benchmarking, satellite-QKD testbeds, standards-aligned implementation assurance and machine-verifiable security reasoning. Keywords: Quantum cryptography; quantum key distribution; post-quantum cryptography; quantum communications; nano-enabled cybersecurity; physical unclonable functions; DefenceTech; FinTech; SpaceTech; crypto-agility; QKD networks; ML-KEM; ML-DSA; hardware root of trust; cyber resilience
Large-scale quantum computers threaten the public-key cryptographic foundations underpinning today's network security infrastructures. While significant progress has been made in standardizing post-quantum cryptographic (PQC) primitives and adapting individual protocols such as TLS and SSH, far less attention has been paid to the broader architectural consequences of the post-quantum transition for networked systems. In particular, many real-world deployments such as mobile networks, industrial control systems, IoT environments, and regulated infrastructures cannot assume the universal availability, deployability, or desirability of PQ public-key infrastructures. This paper presents the first comprehensive systematization of PQ-resistant network architectures, focusing on key distribution and management as a system-level design problem rather than a protocol-local substitution. We introduce a unified taxonomy spanning cryptographic foundations (symmetric-only, PQ-PKI, hybrid, and information-theoretic multi-path), key-distribution architectures (centralized, hierarchical, replicated, threshold, MPC-backed, and serverless), trust and threat models, key-management lifecycle, and deployment environments. Using this framework, we analyze the security, scalability, and operational trade-offs of a wide range of architectures under realistic PQ adversary assumptions, including harvest-now, decrypt-later attacks and partial infrastructure compromise. Our study highlights fundamental gaps in existing approaches, clarifies when PQ-PKI is necessary or avoidable, and identifies promising research directions for building cryptographically agile, quantum-resilient network infrastructures.