We study how to implement and transform frame perspectives for quantum processes in the process-matrix formalism. We argue that, for pure processes, the causal reference frames (CRF)and time-delocalized subsystems (TDS) formalisms should be understood as coordinate parametrizations of a single perspective-neutral higher-order object. A genuine perspective arises when one endows the process with additional frame data by choosing an operational foliation into circuit fragments (events). With this distinction, existing no-go results acquire a clear scope: they rule out unitary transformations that preserve time foliation, attempting to switch perspectives while keeping the fragment boundaries -- hence the global past/future partition -- fixed. Focusing on the quantum switch, we construct explicit maps that transform perspectives unitarily at the price of reshuffling the notions of past and future. We then show that unitary transformations between perspectives can also be achieved in a different way, namely by extending the process with subsystems that define quantum reference frames and provide a shared spatiotemporal scaffold. In this extended setting, complementary CRF/TDS perspectives become unitarily related while preserving global past and future. We discuss how this frame-perspectival approach informs the broader question of empirical realizability of abstract process matrices.
We study how to implement and transform frame perspectives for quantum processes in the process-matrix formalism. We argue that, for pure processes, the causal reference frames (CRF)and time-delocalized subsystems (TDS) formalisms should be understood as coordinate parametrizations of a single perspective-neutral higher-order object. A genuine perspective arises when one endows the process with additional frame data by choosing an operational foliation into circuit fragments (events). With this distinction, existing no-go results acquire a clear scope: they rule out unitary transformations that preserve time foliation, attempting to switch perspectives while keeping the fragment boundaries -- hence the global past/future partition -- fixed. Focusing on the quantum switch, we construct explicit maps that transform perspectives unitarily at the price of reshuffling the notions of past and future. We then show that unitary transformations between perspectives can also be achieved in a different way, namely by extending the process with subsystems that define quantum reference frames and provide a shared spatiotemporal scaffold. In this extended setting, complementary CRF/TDS perspectives become unitarily related while preserving global past and future. We discuss how this frame-perspectival approach informs the broader question of empirical realizability of abstract process matrices.
One can theoretically conceive of processes in which quantum operations are composed cyclically in a way that is incompatible with a well-defined causal order. Some of these processes can be realized within standard quantum temporal evolutions on systems that are delocalized in time. In this Letter, we introduce the "circuit (super)operator," a tool that allows one to express how a (possibly cyclic) quantum circuit transforms under arbitrary changes of subsystem decompositions. This framework concisely captures the link between causally indefinite processes and their temporal realizations. We apply it to the quantum switch, a paradigmatic example of a causally indefinite process, and consider two distinct temporal realizations. These correspond to the "causal perspectives" or "causal reference frames" of the two parties involved, describing the process from their respective viewpoints. Surprisingly, we show that these causal perspectives cannot be related by a change of subsystem decomposition, i.e., they cannot be seen as two equivalent descriptions of the same process.
A fundamental question in the field of quantum reference frames concerns what global properties of a system can be determined by observers operating entirely from within that system. We investigate this question by extending both the perspectival and perspective-neutral approaches beyond the commonly studied zero total momentum case to arbitrary fixed charge sectors. When the entire system, including the reference frames, moves at a fixed total momentum P relative to an external frame, this global charge becomes encoded in the quantum states and transformations between reference frames. Our extension leads to modified relative states and observables with QRF transformations that induce an additional P-dependent phase, treating all charge sectors as equally fundamental. By granting the internal observers successively more access and resources, we identify under which conditions they can infer the total momentum. These results clarify the relationship between major QRF approaches -- perspectival, perspective-neutral, operational, and extra-particle -- showing how their differing conclusions stem from different assumptions about which observables are deemed accessible from within. Our findings cast light on the relation between local and global perspectives and raise fundamental questions about scenarios where no global perspective exists, contributing to a deeper understanding of relationality and the role of perspectives in quantum theory.
In general relativity, the causal structure between events is dynamical, but it is definite and observer-independent; events are point-like and the membership of an event A in the future or past light-cone of an event B is an observer-independent statement. When events are defined with respect to quantum systems however, nothing guarantees that the causal relationship between A and B is definite. We propose to associate a causal reference frame corresponding to each event, which can be interpreted as an observer-dependent time according to which an observer describes the evolution of quantum systems. In the causal reference frame of one event, this particular event is always localised, but other events can be ‘smeared out’ in the future and in the past. We do not impose a predefined causal order between the events, but only require that descriptions from different reference frames obey a global consistency condition. We show that our new formalism is equivalent to the pure process matrix formalism (Araújo et al 2017 Quantum 1 10). The latter is known to predict certain multipartite correlations, which are incompatible with the assumption of a causal ordering of the events—these correlations violate causal inequalities. We show how the causal reference frame description can be used to gain insight into the question of realisability of such strongly non-causal processes in laboratory experiments. As another application, we use causal reference frames to revisit a thought experiment Zych et al (arXiv: 1708.00248 ) where the gravitational time dilation due to a massive object in a quantum superposition of positions leads to a superposition of the causal ordering of two events.
Treating reference frames fundamentally as quantum systems is inevitable in quantum gravity and also in quantum foundations once considering laboratories as physical systems. Both fields thereby face the question of how to describe physics relative to quantum reference systems and how the descriptions relative to different such choices are related. Here, we exploit a fruitful interplay of ideas from both fields to begin developing a unifying approach to transformations among quantum reference systems that ultimately aims at encompassing both quantum and gravitational physics. In particular, using a gravity inspired symmetry principle, which enforces physical observables to be relational and leads to an inherent redundancy in the description, we develop a perspective-neutral structure, which contains all frame perspectives at once and via which they are changed. We show that taking the perspective of a specific frame amounts to a fixing of the symmetry related redundancies in both the classical and quantum theory and that changing perspective corresponds to a symmetry transformation. We implement this using the language of constrained systems, which naturally encodes symmetries. Within a simple one-dimensional model, we recover some of the quantum frame transformations of \cite{Giacomini:2017zju}, embedding them in a perspective-neutral framework. Using them, we illustrate how entanglement and classicality of an observed system depend on the quantum frame perspective. Our operational language also inspires a new interpretation of Dirac and reduced quantized theories within our model as perspective-neutral and perspectival quantum theories, respectively, and reveals the explicit link between them. In this light, we suggest a new take on the relation between a `quantum general covariance' and the diffeomorphism symmetry in quantum gravity.
We generalize the notion of quantum reference frames (QRFs) to cases where the frame does not necessarily correspond to a tensor factor subsystem, but to a covariant quantum instrument. This unlocks a variety of physical applications: "frames of labeling" for indistinguishable particles, suggesting explanations for the symmetrization postulate and the absence of parastatistics, and yielding a transparent description of the entanglement of bosons and fermions; and relational clocks reproducing the Schrödinger equation exactly even when all subsystems are interacting or when there are frequency superselection sectors. Our work generalizes the perspective-neutral approach to QRFs pioneered by Höhn and co-authors, which we reconstruct from a simple operational scenario. We give a resource-theoretic grounding of this framework, and show how the notion of completely covariant operations explains the relevance of the charge-zero sector and the pure-state transformation behavior across perspectives. This also suggests operational clarifications of some aspects of constraint quantization, e.g. of the meaning of constraint equations such as C∣ψ⟩=0. Some of our results, such as our generalization of relationalization maps to instruments, apply more broadly to other QRF frameworks too, and they contribute to bridging the gap between operational quantum information theory and the internal QRF research program.
In standard quantum mechanics, reference frames are treated as abstract entities. We can think of them as idealized, infinite-mass subsystems which decouple from the rest of the system. In nature, however, all reference frames are realized through finite-mass systems that are subject to the laws of quantum mechanics and must be included in the dynamical evolution. A fundamental physical theory should take this fact seriously. In this paper, we further develop a symmetry-inspired approach to describe physics from the perspective of quantum reference frames. We find a unifying framework allowing us to systematically derive a broad class of perspective dependent descriptions and the transformations between them. Working with a translational-invariant toy model of three free particles, we discover that the introduction of relative coordinates leads to a Hamiltonian structure with two non-commuting constraints. This structure can be said to contain all observer-perspectives at once, while the redundancies prevent an immediate operational interpretation. We show that the operationally meaningful perspective dependent descriptions are given by Darboux coordinates on the constraint surface and that reference frame transformations correspond to reparametrizations of the constraint surface. We conclude by constructing a quantum perspective neutral structure, via which we can derive and change perspective dependent descriptions without referring to the classical theory. In addition to the physical findings, this work illuminates the interrelation of first and second class constrained systems and their respective quantization procedures.