Measurement incompatibility and bipartite quantum steering are known to display a strong connection: a set of measurements is incompatible if and only if it can lead to bipartite steering. Despite such a close link between these concepts in bipartite scenarios, little is known in the multipartite setting, where notions of genuine multipartite correlations play major roles. In this work we prove that, as in the bipartite case, incompatibility is also necessary and sufficient for genuine multipartite steering in any multipartite scenario with a single uncharacterised party. Interestingly, genuine multipartite steering can be extracted from any set of incompatible measurements using states which are not SLOCC equivalent, such as GHZ and W states. In contrast, we prove that this result does not hold in scenarios with more than one uncharacterised party, by presenting a set of incompatible measurements that can never lead to genuine multipartite steering in these cases. In order to obtain our main results, we introduce methods tailored for multipartite correlations, paving the way to understanding the role of measurement incompatibility beyond bipartite scenarios.
Measurement incompatibility and bipartite quantum steering are known to display a strong connection: a set of measurements is incompatible if and only if it can lead to bipartite steering. Despite such a close link between these concepts in bipartite scenarios, little is known in the multipartite setting, where notions of genuine multipartite correlations play major roles. In this work we prove that, as in the bipartite case, incompatibility is also necessary and sufficient for genuine multipartite steering in any multipartite scenario with a single uncharacterised party. Interestingly, genuine multipartite steering can be extracted from any set of incompatible measurements using states which are not SLOCC equivalent, such as GHZ and W states. In contrast, we prove that this result does not hold in scenarios with more than one uncharacterised party, by presenting a set of incompatible measurements that can never lead to genuine multipartite steering in these cases. In order to obtain our main results, we introduce methods tailored for multipartite correlations, paving the way to understanding the role of measurement incompatibility beyond bipartite scenarios.
Two important ingredients necessary for obtaining Bell nonlocal correlations between two spatially separated parties are an entangled state shared between them and an incompatible set of measurements employed by each of them. However, not all entangled states can give rise to Bell nonlocality. Here, we are interested in a complementary question, regarding the role of the sets of incompatible measurements in enabling Bell nonlocality, for arbitrary entangled states. It is known that for some sets of more than two jointly incompatible measurements performed by one of the parties, there does not exist an entangled state and another set of incompatible measurements for the other party, which will result in Bell nonlocality. However, in the two-input and two-output setting per party, measurement incompatibility at a single party will always guarantee Bell nonlocality. Thus, it is interesting to ask whether all sets of incompatible measurements at both parties, in the two-input and two-output setting per party, will result in Bell nonlocality for some shared state. We first observe that Bell nonlocality can always be established when both parties employ any set of incompatible projective measurements. On the other hand, going beyond projective measurements, we present a class of incompatible positive operator-valued measures, employed by both observers, which can never activate Bell nonlocality. Furthermore, we find a sufficient criterion for achieving Bell nonlocal correlations given a fixed amount of pure two-qubit entanglement and a fixed amount of incompatibility of projective measurements applied by either both parties or a single party.
Quantum steering, as a manifestation of nonlocal quantum correlations, plays a crucial role in enabling various quantum information processing tasks. However, practical implementations are often hindered by significant challenges arising from imperfect or untrusted measurement devices. This study investigates the impact of measurement inaccuracies on quantum steering, with a particular focus on errors in the untrusted party's measurement devices. We first analyze how such errors affect the evaluation of steering inequalities, and then derive bipartite steering inequalities based on correlation matrices under imperfect measurements.
Our findings show that even small measurement errors can significantly compromise the certification of quantum steerability, an effect that becomes particularly pronounced as the system dimension increases. Furthermore, by extending the proposed steering inequality to a modified tripartite scenario via correlation matrices, we demonstrate that the influence of measurement imperfections is far more severe in multipartite quantum steering than in the bipartite case. Our results underscore the critical need to account for measurement imperfections in experimental quantum steering and provide a theoretical framework for characterizing and mitigating these effects in high-dimensional quantum systems.
The effect of quantum steering arises from the judicious combination of an entangled state with a set of incompatible measurements. Recently, it was shown that this form of quantum correlations can be quantified in terms of a dimension, leading to the notion of genuine high-dimensional steering. While this naturally connects to the dimensionality of entanglement (Schmidt number), we show that this effect also directly connects to a notion of dimension for measurement incompatibility. More generally, we present a general connection between the concepts of steering and measurement incompatibility, when quantified in terms of dimension. From this connection, we propose an alternative twist on the problem of simulating quantum correlations. Specifically, we show how the correlations of certain high-dimensional entangled states can be exactly recovered using only shared randomness and lower-dimensional entanglement. Finally, we derive criteria for testing the dimension of measurement incompatibility and discuss the extension of these ideas to quantum channels.
We consider a quantum steering scenario where Alice prepares a bipartite state, sends one subsystem to Bob through a quantum channel, and aims to convince him that their shared state is entangled. Bob, however, will never be convinced if the channel is steering-breaking, that is, if the channel destroys steerability for any input state. To verify that a channel renders a state useless for demonstrating steering, one must consider all possible measurements performed by Alice and check if the conditional states Bob receives admit a local-hidden-state (LHS) model. This is generally a hard problem since it requires considering an infinite number of measurement combinations. Here, we show that the method proposed in [Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 190401 (2016); Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 190402 (2016)] can be utilized to tackle this problem. Furthermore, owing to the intimate relation between steering and measurement incompatibility, our approach can faithfully certify whether a channel destroys incompatibility for any set of measurements. Finally, we propose an experimental criterion for certifying steering- and incompatibility-breaking channels, which may be of independent interest.
Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) steering is a form of quantum nonlocality which is intermediate between entanglement and Bell nonlocality. EPR steering is a resource for quantum key distribution that is device independent on only one side in that it certifies bipartite entanglement when one party's device is not characterized while the other party's device is fully characterized. In this work, we introduce two types of genuine tripartite EPR steering, and derive two steering inequalities to detect them. In a semi-device-independent scenario where only the dimensions of two parties are assumed, the correlations which violate one of these inequalities also certify genuine tripartite entanglement. It is known that Alice can demonstrate bipartite EPR steering to Bob if and only if her measurement settings are incompatible. We demonstrate that quantum correlations can also detect tripartite EPR steering from Alice to Bob and Charlie, even if Charlie's measurement settings are compatible.
Steering is one of the most counter intuitive non-classical features of bipartite quantum system, first noticed by Schrödinger at the early days of quantum theory. On the other hand, measurement incompatibility is another non-classical feature of quantum theory, initially pointed out by Bohr. Recently, Quintino et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 160402 (2014)] and Uola et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 160403 (2014)] have investigated the relation between these two distinct non-classical features. They have shown that a set of measurements is not jointly measurable (i.e., incompatible) if and only if they can be used for demonstrating Schrödinger-Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering. The concept of steering has been generalized for more general abstract tensor product theories rather than just Hilbert space quantum mechanics. In this article, we discuss that the notion of measurement incompatibility can be extended for general probability theories. Further, we show that the connection between steering and measurement incompatibility holds in a border class of tensor product theories rather than just quantum theory.