arXiv:2603.24665 · Quantum Science and Technology
A versatile neural-network toolbox for testing Bell locality in networks
Antoine Girardin, Mohammad Massi Rashidi, Géraldine Haack, Nicolas Brunner, Alejandro Pozas-Kerstjens
Abstract
Determining whether an observed distribution of events generated in a quantum network is Bell local, i.e., if it admits an alternative realization in terms of independent local variables, is extremely challenging. Building upon arXiv:1907.10552, we develop a software solution that parameterizes local models in networks via neural networks. This allows one to leverage optimization tools available from the machine learning community in the search of network Bell nonlocality. Our solution applies to arbitrary networks, is easy to use, and includes technical improvements that significantly increase performance compared to previous implementations. We apply it to investigate nonlocality in several networks hitherto unexplored, providing insights on the corresponding quantum nonlocal sets and suggesting concrete, promising realizations of quantum nonlocal correlations.
AI Summary
The paper addresses whether correlations generated by independent quantum sources admit network-local hidden-variable models. It extends an existing neural-network approach from the triangle to arbitrary network topologies, providing a PyTorch toolbox with utilities for computing quantum distributions and inspecting learned response functions. Each party’s response function is represented by a feed-forward network receiving only its connected sources’ independent random variables. Monte Carlo estimates of the resulting distribution are fitted to a target using KL divergence and Euclidean distance. An adaptive sampling rule increases sample counts as the loss decreases, aiming to keep sampling error below the optimization loss. Benchmarking on the triangle-network RGB4 distribution at measurement parameter $u^2=0.85$ revises an earlier numerical estimate of the critical Werner-state visibility from approximately $0.89$ to $0.99$, indicating substantially weaker noise robustness. This remains a numerical estimate; the cited rigorous bound is $V^*<0.9945$. Parameter scans then identify candidate nonlocal correlations in triangle, square and pentagon networks, including coarse-grained three-output pentagon distributions, and in a square with an additional diagonal source and tripartite measurements. Noise scans suggest candidate robustness to roughly $10\%$ source white noise in the triangle and $20\%$ in the four-output square and pentagon. These conclusions rely on optimization residuals and comparisons with known-local baselines. Small residuals establish approximate fits, not exact locality; large residuals can reflect nonlocality, insufficient expressivity or optimization failure. Hyperparameter tuning is incomplete, and attempted inflation tests did not certify the new candidates.
Error found: The claimed runtime improvement is not supported by reported timing measurements or a controlled speed comparison. The RGB4 benchmark demonstrates improved fitting but does not isolate adaptive sampling as its cause. Appendix A prints N_s = L^2 where its stated Euclidean-error scaling requires N_s proportional to L^(-2), although the main text uses the correct dependence. The sampling-error derivation omits an expectation and presents an RMS bound as though it bounded every empirical realization. The binomial-variance equality does not generally describe the conditional-probability estimator in Eq. (5), although the same RMS upper bound remains valid.
Written by gpt-6.1-sol from the paper's full text. Automated: it can be wrong.
- Journal reference
- Quantum Sci. Technol. 11 035056 (2026)
- DOI
- 10.1088/2058-9565/ae8df7
- Comments
- 11+4 pages, 4+3 figures, 1 table, RevTeX 4.2. The computational appendix is available at https://www.github.com/Antoine0Girardin/local_model_in_networks V2: Added section V.B with new results, close to published version