arXiv:2603.24557
Geometric Curvature Governs Work in Open Quantum Steady States
Eric R. Bittner
Abstract
Classical thermodynamics admits a geometric formulation in which work is associated with areas enclosed by cycles in state space. Whether an analogous structure persists in driven, dissipative quantum systems remains an open question. Here we show that quasistatic work in open quantum steady states is governed by an emergent geometric curvature in control-parameter space arising from steady-state coherence. For a driven dissipative two-level system, we construct a work one-form whose curvature determines the work produced in cyclic processes. The work vanishes under strong dephasing, identifying coherence as a necessary condition for nontrivial geometry. However, its magnitude is set not by the coherence itself but by the spatial structure of the curvature: cycles enclosing comparable areas produce different work depending on their location in parameter space. Reversing the cycle orientation reverses the sign of the work, confirming its geometric origin. These results establish a geometric framework for open quantum thermodynamics and identify curvature as the organizing principle of thermodynamic response, with direct implications for driven light--matter systems in cavity quantum electrodynamics.
AI Summary
The paper asks whether quasistatic work in driven, dissipative quantum steady states can be described geometrically in control-parameter space. It defines the work one-form $\mathcal A=\sum_i\mathrm{Tr}(\rho_{\rm ss}\partial_iH)\,d\lambda_i$ and its curvature $\mathcal F=d\mathcal A$. Stokes’ theorem then expresses cyclic work as the curvature flux, $W_{\rm cyc}=\oint\mathcal A=\int_\Sigma\mathcal F$. The explicit example is a driven two-level system with $H=(\Delta/2)\sigma_z+\Omega\sigma_x$, Lindblad relaxation at rate $\gamma$, and pure dephasing at rate $\gamma_\phi$. Analytical steady-state Bloch components yield a closed expression for $\mathcal F_{\Delta\Omega}$. The reported curvature is nonuniform and concentrated near resonance. Representative cycle calculations illustrate that loops enclosing comparable areas can produce different work because they sample different curvature distributions; opposite-sign contributions can cancel, and reversing a loop reverses the work’s sign. In the strong-dephasing limit, both the dissipative-basis coherence and cyclic work vanish. This is interpreted as evidence that coherence enables the response, while curvature determines its magnitude. The treatment assumes smooth instantaneous steady states and quasistatic control, and its explicit results concern this Markovian two-level model. No experimental demonstration or finite-speed analysis is presented. Many-body systems, correlated environments, and symmetry- or topology-related Liouvillian structures are proposed as extensions. The discussion also identifies effectively one-dimensional Hamiltonian dependence as a possible mechanism for vanishing curvature, illustrated by the SSH Bloch Hamiltonian at $k=\pi$.
Central claim may not hold: The claimed general necessity of steady-state coherence is false: a diagonal steady state with parameter-dependent populations can produce nonzero work curvature without any coherence. The paper’s explicit formulas give large-dephasing scalings x_ss∝Γ₂⁻², y_ss∝Γ₂⁻¹ and F_ΔΩ∝Γ₂⁻¹ for generic fixed nonzero controls, contradicting its stated curvature scaling Γ₂⁻². The strong-dephasing limit removes dissipative-basis coherence but generally leaves instantaneous-energy-basis coherence, undermining the paper’s interchangeable use of these notions. Antisymmetry of cyclic work under orientation reversal does not establish thermodynamic reversibility or absence of entropy production in a driven nonequilibrium steady state. Cancellation of curvature flux for loop C does not imply that the work one-form is exact or that only an exact component was sampled.
Written by gpt-6.1-sol from the paper's full text. Automated: it can be wrong.