We introduce crosstalk-robust gate sets, which are obtained using a novel, scalable optimal control problem exploiting locality. Through the suppression of pairwise quantum crosstalk, the gate sets enable robustness that extends to multi-qubit circuits. The IBM Quantum Platform devices provide a testbed for our gate sets, where we study their efficacy via error suppression protocols and randomized parallel single-qubit circuits of up to eight qubits. Furthermore, we provide the first known assessment of the impact of complete optimal control gate sets on quantum algorithms. Using a Hamiltonian simulation of a four-qubit transverse field Ising model, we show that noise-informed gates enhance median algorithmic performance by a factor of four over baseline Gaussian gates using the same calibration procedures. Lastly, we provide numerical evidence that optimized gate sets enable larger qubit-qubit coupling strengths that can cut two-qubit gate times in half. This result confirms that hardware-software co-design using quantum optimal control can create new opportunities for quantum computing architectures.
We introduce crosstalk-robust gate sets, which are obtained using a novel, scalable optimal control problem exploiting locality. Through the suppression of pairwise quantum crosstalk, the gate sets enable robustness that extends to multi-qubit circuits. The IBM Quantum Platform devices provide a testbed for our gate sets, where we study their efficacy via error suppression protocols and randomized parallel single-qubit circuits of up to eight qubits. Furthermore, we provide the first known assessment of the impact of complete optimal control gate sets on quantum algorithms. Using a Hamiltonian simulation of a four-qubit transverse field Ising model, we show that noise-informed gates enhance median algorithmic performance by a factor of four over baseline Gaussian gates using the same calibration procedures. Lastly, we provide numerical evidence that optimized gate sets enable larger qubit-qubit coupling strengths that can cut two-qubit gate times in half. This result confirms that hardware-software co-design using quantum optimal control can create new opportunities for quantum computing architectures.
Accurate and efficient implementation of parallel quantum gates is crucial for scalable quantum information processing. However, the unavoidable crosstalk between qubits in current noisy processors impedes the achievement of high gate fidelities and renders full Hilbert-space control optimization prohibitively difficult. Here, we overcome this challenge by reducing the full-system optimization to crosstalk-robust control over constant-sized subsystems, which dramatically reduces the computational cost. Our method effectively eliminates the leading-order gate operation deviations induced by crosstalk, thereby suppressing error rates. Within this framework, we construct analytical pulse solutions for parallel single-qubit gates and numerical pulses for parallel multi-qubit operations. We validate the proposed approach numerically across multiple platforms, including coupled nitrogen-vacancy centers, a nuclear-spin processor, and superconducting-qubit arrays with up to 200 qubits. As a result, the noise scaling is reduced from exponential to linear for parallel single-qubit gates, and an order-of-magnitude reduction is achieved for parallel multi-qubit gates. Moreover, our method does not require precise knowledge of crosstalk strengths and makes no assumption about the underlying qubit connectivity or lattice geometry, thereby establishing a scalable framework for parallel quantum control in large-scale quantum architectures.
Current advancements in technology have focused the attention of the quantum computing community toward exploring the potential of near-term devices whose computing power surpasses that of classical computers in practical applications. An unresolved central question revolves around whether the inherent noise in these devices can be overcome or whether any potential quantum advantage would be limited. There is no doubt that crosstalk is one of the main sources of noise in noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) systems, and it poses a fundamental challenge to hardware designs. Crosstalk between parallel instructions can corrupt quantum states and cause incorrect program execution. In this study, we present a necessary analysis of the crosstalk error effect on NISQ devices. Our approach is extremely straightforward and practical to estimate the crosstalk error of various multi-qubit devices. In particular, we combine the randomized benchmarking (RB) and simultaneous randomized benchmarking (SRB) protocol to estimate the crosstalk error from the correlation controlled-NOT (CNOT) gate. We demonstrate this protocol experimentally on 5-, 7-, \& 16-qubit devices. Our results demonstrate the crosstalk error model of three different IBM quantum devices over the experimental week and compare the error variation against the machine, number of qubits, quantum volume, processor, and topology. We then confirm the improvement in the circuit fidelity on different benchmarks by up to 3.06x via inserting an instruction barrier, as compared with an IBM quantum noisy device which offers near-optimal crosstalk mitigation in practice. Finally, we discuss the current system limitation, its tradeoff on fidelity and depth, noise beyond the NISQ system, and mitigation opportunities to ensure that the quantum operation can perform its quantum magic undisturbed.
Quantum crosstalk poses a major challenge to scaling up quantum computations as its strength is typically unknown and its effect accumulates exponentially as system size grows. Here, we show that many-body robust control can be utilized to suppress unwanted couplings during multi-qubit gate operations and state preparation. By combining tensor network simulations with the GRAPE algorithm, and leveraging an efficient random sampling over noise ensembles, our method overcomes the exponential scaling of the Hilbert space. We demonstrate its effectiveness for designing control solutions for high-fidelity implementations of parallel X gates and parallel CNOT on a chain of 50 qubits, and for realizing a 30-qubit GHZ state and the ground state of a 20-qubit Heisenberg model. In the presence of many-body quantum crosstalk due to parasitic interaction between neighboring qubits, robust control results in order-of magnitude improvement in fidelity for large system sizes. These findings pave the way for more reliable operations on near-term quantum processors.
Quantum error mitigation (QEM) is vital for noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices. While most conventional QEM schemes assume discrete gate-based circuits with noise appearing either before or after each gate, the assumptions are inappropriate for describing realistic noise that may have strong gate dependence and complicated nonlocal effects, and general computing models such as analog quantum simulators. To address these challenges, we first extend the scenario, where each computation process, being either digital or analog, is described by a continuous time evolution. For noise from imperfections of the engineered Hamiltonian or additional noise operators, we show it can be effectively suppressed by a stochastic QEM method. Since our method assumes only accurate single qubit controls, it is applicable to all digital quantum computers and various analog simulators. Meanwhile, errors in the mitigation procedure can be suppressed by leveraging the Richardson extrapolation method. As we numerically test our method with various Hamiltonians under energy relaxation and dephasing noise and digital quantum circuits with additional two-qubit crosstalk, we show an improvement of simulation accuracy by 2 orders. We assess the resource cost of our scheme and conclude the feasibility of accurate quantum computing with NISQ devices.
We present a (REAS) technique to manage errors in quantum computers. Our method reduces the accumulation of errors in any quantum circuit composed of single- or two-qubit gates expressed as e − i σ θ for Pauli operators σ and θ ∈ [ 0 , π ) , which forms a universal gate set. For coherent errors, which include gate overrotation and crosstalk, we demonstrate a reduction of the error scaling in an L -depth circuit from O ( L ) to O ( L ) . This asymptotic error suppression behavior can be proven in a regime where all gates, including those constituting the error-suppressing protocol itself, are noisy. Going beyond coherent errors, we derive the general form of decoherence noise that can be suppressed by REAS. Lastly, we experimentally demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach regarding realistic errors using 100-qubit circuits with up to 64 two-qubit gate layers on IBM Quantum processors.
We describe an experimental effort designing and deploying error-robust single-qubit operations using a cloud-based quantum computer and analog-layer programming access. We design numerically optimized pulses that implement target operations and exhibit robustness to various error processes including dephasing noise, instabilities in control amplitudes, and crosstalk. Pulse optimization is performed using a flexible optimization package incorporating a device model and physically relevant constraints (e.g., bandwidth limits on the transmission lines of the dilution refrigerator housing IBM Quantum hardware). We present techniques for conversion and calibration of physical Hamiltonian definitions to pulse waveforms programmed via Qiskit Pulse and compare performance against hardware default derivative removal by adiabatic gate (DRAG) pulses on a five-qubit device. Experimental measurements reveal default DRAG pulses exhibit coherent errors an order of magnitude larger than tabulated randomized-benchmarking measurements; solutions designed to be robust against these errors outperform hardware-default pulses for all qubits across multiple metrics. Experimental measurements demonstrate performance enhancements up to: about a 10 times single-qubit gate coherent-error reduction; about a 5 times average coherent-error reduction across a five-qubit system; about a 10 times increase in calibration window to one week of valid pulse calibration; about a 12 times reduction gate-error variability across qubits and over time; and up to about a 9 times reduction in single-qubit gate error (including crosstalk) in the presence of fully parallelized operations. Randomized benchmarking reveals error rates for Clifford gates constructed from optimized pulses consistent with tabulated T1 limits, and demonstrates a narrowing of the distribution of outcomes over randomizations associated with suppression of coherent errors.