Increasingly deeper integration of HPC resources and QPUs unveils new challenges in computer architecture and engineering. As a consequence, dependability arises again as a concern encompassing resilience, reproducibility and security. The properties of quantum computing systems involve a reinterpretation of these factors in retrodictive, predictive, and prescriptive ways. We state here that resilience must become an \emph{a priori} design constraint rather than an afterthought of HPC-QPU integration. This article describes the need for conceptual and quantitative models to estimate and assess the resilience hybrid classical-quantum computing infrastructure. We suggest how resilience methods in civil engineering can apply at various levels of the classical-quantum computing stack. We also discuss implications of a model of end-user value for the estimation of consequences resulting from the propagation of vulnerabilities from a given level of the stack upwards. Finally, we argue in favor of new resilience models can help the impact of improving specific components in quantum technology stacks to provide a clearer picture about the value of separation of concerns across different layers. Ultimately, HPC-QPU integration will increasingly demand more precise statements about the cost-benefit ratio of specific system improvements and their cascading consequences against estimates of delivered value to users.
Increasingly deeper integration of HPC resources and QPUs unveils new challenges in computer architecture and engineering. As a consequence, dependability arises again as a concern encompassing resilience, reproducibility and security. The properties of quantum computing systems involve a reinterpretation of these factors in retrodictive, predictive, and prescriptive ways. We state here that resilience must become an \emph{a priori} design constraint rather than an afterthought of HPC-QPU integration. This article describes the need for conceptual and quantitative models to estimate and assess the resilience hybrid classical-quantum computing infrastructure. We suggest how resilience methods in civil engineering can apply at various levels of the classical-quantum computing stack. We also discuss implications of a model of end-user value for the estimation of consequences resulting from the propagation of vulnerabilities from a given level of the stack upwards. Finally, we argue in favor of new resilience models can help the impact of improving specific components in quantum technology stacks to provide a clearer picture about the value of separation of concerns across different layers. Ultimately, HPC-QPU integration will increasingly demand more precise statements about the cost-benefit ratio of specific system improvements and their cascading consequences against estimates of delivered value to users.
Increasing evidence suggests quantum computing (QC) complements traditional High-Performance Computing (HPC) by leveraging its unique capabilities, leading to the emergence of a new, hybrid paradigm, QHPC. However, this integration introduces new challenges, with dependability–defined by reproducibility, resiliency, and security and privacy–emerging as a central concern for building trustworthy systems that provide an advantage to the users. This paper proposes a framework for dependable QHPC system design, organized around these three pillars. We identify integration challenges, anticipate roadblocks, and highlight productive synergies across QC, HPC, cloud platforms, and network security. Drawing from both classical computing principles and quantum-specific insights, we present a roadmap for co-design that supports robust hybrid architectures. Our approach offers concrete metrics for assessing dependability, provides design guidance for engineers working at the QC-HPC interface, and surfaces new engineering questions around complexity, scale, and fault tolerance. Ultimately, designing for dependability is key to realizing practical, scalable QHPC systems and accelerating the broader quantum ecosystem capable of translating quantum promises into actual application delivery.
Quantum Computing (QC) offers the potential to enhance traditional High-Performance Computing (HPC) workloads by leveraging the unique properties of quantum computers, leading to the emergence of a new paradigm: HPC-QC. While this integration presents new opportunities, it also brings novel challenges, particularly in ensuring the dependability of such hybrid systems. This paper aims to identify integration challenges, anticipate failures, and foster a diverse co-design for HPC-QC systems by bringing together QC, cloud computing, HPC, and network security. The focus of this emerging inter-disciplinary effort is to develop engineering principles that ensure the dependability of hybrid systems, aiming for a more prescriptive co-design cycle. Our framework will help to prevent design pitfalls and accelerate the maturation of the QC technology ecosystem. Key aspects include building resilient HPC-QC systems, analyzing the applicability of conventional techniques to the quantum domain, and exploring the complexity of scaling in such hybrid systems. This underscores the need for performance-reliability metrics specific to this new computational paradigm.
High-performance computing (HPC) has evolved over decades through multiple architectural transitions, from vector supercomputers to massively parallel CPU clusters and GPU-accelerated systems, continuously expanding the frontier of scientific discovery. With the emergence of quantum processing units (QPUs) as practical computational accelerators, a new opportunity arises to further extend this trajectory by integrating quantum and classical computing paradigms. Building on the emerging vision of Quantum Integrated High-Performance Computing (QHPC), this paper contributes a full-stack layered architecture that integrates QPUs as first-class accelerators within, not merely alongside, the classical HPC software and hardware stack, with tight, on-premise quantum-classical coupling as its defining characteristic. The architecture comprises of unified resource management, quantum-aware scheduling, hybrid workflow orchestration, middleware and programming abstraction, interconnect technologies, and a tiered execution model enabling seamless workload partitioning across classical and quantum backends. A central aspect of this architecture is a strong user requests abstraction layer that exposes heterogeneous resources through a unified job submission interface, similar in spirit to existing schedulers such as Slurm, allowing users to describe workloads in a consistent template independent of underlying compute type or location. Drawing insights from prior accelerator integration eras, we outline how QHPC can support emerging workloads in quantum chemistry, materials discovery, combinatorial optimization, and climate modeling. We conclude by highlighting open challenges in building scalable, reliable, and programmable quantum-classical infrastructures that seamlessly connect global users to heterogeneous compute resources for future quantum-classical HPC ecosystems.
High-performance computing (HPC) has evolved over decades through multiple architectural transitions, from vector supercomputers to massively parallel CPU clusters and GPU-accelerated systems, continuously expanding the frontier of scientific discovery. With the emergence of quantum processing units (QPUs) as practical computational accelerators, a new opportunity arises to further extend this trajectory by integrating quantum and classical computing paradigms. Building on the emerging vision of Quantum Integrated High-Performance Computing (QHPC), this paper contributes a full-stack layered architecture that integrates QPUs as first-class accelerators within, not merely alongside, the classical HPC software and hardware stack, with tight, on-premise quantum–classical coupling as its defining characteristic. The architecture comprises of unified resource management, quantum-aware scheduling, hybrid workflow orchestration, middleware and programming abstraction, interconnect technologies, and a tiered execution model enabling seamless workload partitioning across classical and quantum backends. A central aspect of this architecture is a strong user requests abstraction layer that exposes heterogeneous resources through a unified job submission interface, similar in spirit to existing schedulers such as Slurm, allowing users to describe workloads in a consistent template independent of underlying compute type or location. Drawing insights from prior accelerator integration eras, we outline how QHPC can support emerging workloads in quantum chemistry, materials discovery, combinatorial optimization, and climate modeling. We conclude by highlighting open challenges in building scalable, reliable, and programmable quantum–classical infrastructures that seamlessly connect global users to heterogeneous compute resources for future quantum–classical HPC ecosystems.
Quantum computing is entering an era where quantum processing units (QPUs) with tens to hundreds of qubits are increasingly integrated with high-performance computing (HPC) systems to support hybrid quantum-classical workloads. This paradigm, often referred to as Quantum-Centric SuperComputing (QCSC), introduces new operational, software, and infrastructure challenges. In this paper, we identify and characterize six distinct personas involved in QCSC environments. Particular attention is given to emerging roles that arise at the interface between quantum and HPC systems. We analyze the responsibilities and tools associated with each persona and examine their differing requirements for operational data. Consistent data representations and analytics frameworks will be required to support diverse users across the quantum-HPC ecosystem. By defining personas and their data needs, we provide a foundation for future discussions in this critical area.
The technology of Quantum Computing (QC) is continuously evolving, as researchers explore new technologies and the public gains access to quantum computers with an increasing number of qubits. In addition, the research community and industry are increasingly interested in the potential use, application, and contribution of QCs to large-scale problems in the real world as a result of this technological enhancement. QCs operations are based on quantum mechanics, and their special properties are mainly exploited to solve computationally intensive problems in polynomial time, problems that are commonly unsolvable, even by High-Performance Computing systems (HPCs) in a feasible time. However, since QCs cannot perform as general-purpose computing machines, alternative computational approaches aiming to boost further their enormous computing abilities are requested, and their combination as an additional computing resource to HPC systems is considered as one of the most promising ones. In the proposed hybrid HPCs, the Quantum Processing Units (QPUs), similar to GPUs and CPUs, target specific problems that, through Quantum Algorithms, can exploit quantum properties like quantum entanglement and superposition to achieve substantial performance gains from the HPC point of view. This interconnection between classical HPC systems and QCs towards the creation of Hybrid Quantum-Classical computing systems is neither straightforward nor standardized while crucial for unlocking the real potential of QCs and achieving real performance improvements. The interconnection between the classical and quantum systems can be performed in the hardware, software (system), or application layer. In this study, a concise overview of the existing architectures for the interconnection interface between HPCs and QCs is provided, focusing mainly on hardware approaches that enable effective hybrid quantum-classical operation.