Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2603.06419

New results for Heisenberg dynamics for non self-adjoint Hamiltonians

Fabio Bagarello

math-phquant-phSubmitted Mar 6, 2026• Announced Mar 9, 2026• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

In a previous paper we began our analysis on the role of non self-adjoint Hamiltonians in connection with the Heisenberg dynamics for quantum systems. Here, motivated by the growing interest on this topic and on some recent results on dynamical systems, we continue this analysis focusing on what we believe is an unexplored (or, at least, not so explored! aspect of Heisenberg dynamics, related to the need for using vectors which are {\em brute-force normalized}. Our main interest is on conserved quantities, and on conditions which guarantee that some observables of the system, or their mean values, do not evolve in time.

Comments
The final version of this paper has been accepted for publication in ZAMP

Related papers

The dynamical problem for a non self-adjoint Hamiltonian

Fabio Bagarello, Miloslav Znojil

We review some recent results of the so-called quasi-hermitian quantum mechanics, with particular focus on the quantum dynamics both in the Schrödinger and in the Heisenberg representations. The role of Krein spaces is also discussed.

arXiv:1105.4716•May 24, 2011•0 citations

New Results for Heisenberg Dynamics for Non-Self-Adjoint Hamiltonians

Ijaz Durrani

•Jan 1, 2026•0 citations

Heisenberg Dynamics for Non Self-Adjoint Hamiltonians: Symmetries and Derivations

Fabio Bagarello

arXiv:2212.01671•Mathematical Physics Analysis and Geometry•Dec 19, 2022•3 citations

Damping and pseudo-fermions

Fabio Bagarello

After a short abstract introduction on the time evolution driven by non-self-adjoint Hamiltonians, we show how the recently introduced concept of pseudo-fermion can be used in the description of damping in finite dimensional quantum systems, and we compare the results deduced adopting the Schrödinger and the Heisenberg representations.

arXiv:1212.3663•Journal of Mathematical Physics•Feb 1, 2013•9 citations

Dynamical Evolution

Enrico G. Beltrametti, Gianni Cassinelli, Peter Carruthers

The Unitary Dynamical Group in Schrödinger's Picture Up to now we have been concerned with the description of a physical system at a fixed instant of time. The time evolution of quantum systems constitutes a many-faced, wide issue which, however, is somewhat tangential to the main aim of this volume. We shall touch upon it only briefly, restricting ourselves to the more familiar aspects of the problem. We assume, to begin with, that the physical system has no superselection rules, so that states and physical quantities correspond one-to-one to density operators and self-adjoint operators, respectively, on the Hilbert space. To describe the dynamical evolution of the system one has to specify the way the representatives of states and physical quantities evolve in, which is fixed in time, since the physical system is supposed to preserve its identity. There is an old tenet according to which there are two kinds of time evolution: the discontinuous, nondeterministic evolution undergone by the quantum system when a measurement is made on it, and the continuous, deterministic evolution caused by the interaction with external forces or with other quantum systems. The first kind of evolution will be dealt with in Chapter 8, where we shall find it less alarming than is often claimed.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Dec 28, 1984•0 citations

A quantum-like model of political consensus via non self-adjoint Hamiltonians

Fabio Bagarello, Gloria Liarda

We discuss here how non self-adjoint Hamiltonians, and their related Heisenberg-like dynamics, can be used to model a political system consisting in a coalition $\C$ of different parties (forming a government) and by their (original) supporters $\Sc$. Our aim is to model how the opinion of these supporters changes depending on the efficiency, competence and coherence of the coalition $\C$, as these are perceived by $\Sc$ during their action while governing. After a rather general introduction we propose three specific models, and we describe and comment the dynamical behaviour of the { full} system, $\Sc\cup\C$. The role of the so-called {\em balanced Hamiltonians}, recently introduced by the authors in connection with integrals of motion, is discussed in details.

math-phCross-listedarXiv:2606.19014•Jun 18, 2026•0 citations
In a previous paper we began our analysis on the role of non self-adjoint Hamiltonians in connection with the Heisenberg dynamics for quantum systems. Here, motivated by the growing interest on this topic and on some recent results on dynamical systems, we continue this analysis focusing on what we believe is an unexplored (or, at least, not so explored! aspect of Heisenberg dynamics, related to the need for using vectors which are {\em brute-force normalized}. Our main interest is on conserved quantities, and on conditions which guarantee that some observables of the system, or their mean values, do not evolve in time.
The Unitary Dynamical Group in Schrödinger's Picture Up to now we have been concerned with the description of a physical system at a fixed instant of time. The time evolution of quantum systems constitutes a many-faced, wide issue which, however, is somewhat tangential to the main aim of this volume. We shall touch upon it only briefly, restricting ourselves to the more familiar aspects of the problem. We assume, to begin with, that the physical system has no superselection rules, so that states and physical quantities correspond one-to-one to density operators and self-adjoint operators, respectively, on the Hilbert space. To describe the dynamical evolution of the system one has to specify the way the representatives of states and physical quantities evolve in, which is fixed in time, since the physical system is supposed to preserve its identity. There is an old tenet according to which there are two kinds of time evolution: the discontinuous, nondeterministic evolution undergone by the quantum system when a measurement is made on it, and the continuous, deterministic evolution caused by the interaction with external forces or with other quantum systems. The first kind of evolution will be dealt with in Chapter 8, where we shall find it less alarming than is often claimed.
We discuss here how non self-adjoint Hamiltonians, and their related Heisenberg-like dynamics, can be used to model a political system consisting in a coalition $\C$ of different parties (forming a government) and by their (original) supporters $\Sc$. Our aim is to model how the opinion of these supporters changes depending on the efficiency, competence and coherence of the coalition $\C$, as these are perceived by $\Sc$ during their action while governing. After a rather general introduction we propose three specific models, and we describe and comment the dynamical behaviour of the { full} system, $\Sc\cup\C$. The role of the so-called {\em balanced Hamiltonians}, recently introduced by the authors in connection with integrals of motion, is discussed in details.