Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2602.20106

The quantum superluminality in the tunnel-ionization process of H-like atoms

Ossama Kullie, Igor A. Ivanov

quant-phSubmitted Feb 23, 2026• Announced Feb 24, 2026• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The quantum tunneling time remains the subject of heated debate, and one of its most curious features is faster-than-light or superluminal tunneling. Our tunnel-ionization model of the time-delay, presented in previous work, shows good agreement with the attoclock measurement in the adiabatic and nonadiabatic field calibrations, which also enables the determination of the barrier time-delay. In the present work, we show that the tunnel-ionization for H-like atoms with large nuclear charge can be superluminal (quantum superluminality), which in principle can be investigated experimentally using the attoclock scheme. We discuss the quantum superluminality in detail for the different regimes of the tunnel-ionization. Our result shows that quantum tunneling faster-than-light is indeed possible, albeit only under somewhat extreme conditions.

Related papers

Tunneling time in attosecond experiment for hydrogen atom

Ossama Kullie

Tunneling and tunneling time are hot debated and very interesting issues because of their fundamental role in the quantum mechanics. The measurement of the tunneling time in today's attosecond and strong field (low-frequency) experiments, despite its controversial discussion offers a fruitful opportunity to understand the time measurement and the role of time in quantum mechanics. In previous work Kullie (2015 Phys. Rev. A 92 , 052118), we suggested a model and derived a simple relation to calculate the tunneling time, which showed a good agreement with the experimental result for He-atom. In the present work we analyze and discuss our model considering the experimental result for H-atom, which is obtained recently by Satya Sainadh et al (2017 arXiv: 1707.05445 ). In the tunneling region, we find that our model shows a good agreement with their experimental result (similar to the He-atom in our previous work), and with the accompanied time-dependent Schrödiger equation simulations. However, Sainadh et al use a different picture of the tunneling, in which tunneling time becomes an imaginary quantity. Whereas our model represents a real tunneling time picture, precisely a delay time with respect to the ionization time at the atomic field strength. Moreover, even though the above-threshold-ionization is beyond the tunneling regime, we still see that the actual ionization time is related to our model. However, crucial points arise and keep some questions open especially on the experimental side.

Journal of Physics Communications•May 24, 2018•7 citations

The Superluminal Tunneling Story

Horst Aichmann, Günter Nimtz

Since 1992 experimental evidence of superluminal (faster than light, FTL) signals are causing much excitement in the physical community and in the media. Superluminal signal velocity and zero time tunneling was first observed in an analog tunneling experiment with microwaves. Recently, the conjectured zero time of electron was claimed to be observed in ionizing helium. The FTL signal velocity was reproduced with infrared light and with various tunneling barriers in several laboratories worldwide. Remarkable, it was shown that the tunneling time is a universal quantity for elastic and for electromagnetic fields. Many theoretical physicists predicted this FTL nature of the tunneling process. However, even with this background many members of the physics community did not accept the superluminal signal velocity interpretation of the experimental results and they also ignored the universal tunneling time. The predicted and measured zero tunneling time was taken as a fantastic nonsense. A brief explanation of the misleading theoretical approaches against FTL signals due to the tunneling process is presented eventually.

arXiv:1304.3155•Apr 10, 2013•3 citations

Delay time and Non-Adiabatic Calibration of the Attoclock. Multiphoton process versus tunneling in strong field interaction

Ossama Kullie, Ivanov, Igor

The measurement of the tunneling time in attosecond experiments, termed attoclock, triggered a hot debate about the tunneling time, the role of time in quantum mechanics, where the interaction with the laser pulse involves two regimes of a different character, the multiphoton and the tunneling (field-) ionization. In the adiabatic field calibration, one of us (O. K.) developed in earlier works a real tunneling time model and showed that the model fits well to the experimental data of Landsmann et al. (Optica {\bf 1}, 343 2014). In the present work, it is shown that the model explains the experimental result in the nonadiabatic field calibration, where one reaches a good agreement with the experimental data of Hofmann et al. (J. of Mod. Opt. {\bf 66}, 1052, 2019). Furthermore, we confirm the result with the numerical integration of the time-dependent Schrödinger equation. The model is appealing because it offers a clear picture of the multiphoton and tunneling field-ionization regimes. In the nonadiabatic case (the nonadiabatic field calibration), the ionization is mainly driven by multiphoton absorption. Surprisingly, at a field strength $F \le F_a$ ($F_a$ is the atomic field strength) the model always predicts a time delay with respect to the quantum limit $τ_a$ at $F=F_a$. For an adiabatic tunneling the saturation at the limit ($F=F_a$) explains the well-known Hartman effect or Hartman paradox.

arXiv:2005.09938•May 20, 2020•0 citations

Tunneling Times and Superluminality: a Tutorial

R. Y. Chiao

Experiments have shown that individual photons penetrate an optical tunnel barrier with an effective group velocity considerably greater than the vacuum speed of light. The experiments were conducted with a two-photon parametric down-conversion light source, which produced correlated, but random, emissions of photon pairs. The two photons of a given pair were emitted in slightly different directions so that one photon passed through the tunnel barrier, while the other photon passed through the vacuum. The time delay for the tunneling photon relative to its twin was measured by adjusting the path length difference between the two photons in a Hong-Ou-Mandel interferometer, in order to achieve coincidence detection. We found that the photon transit time through the barrier was smaller than the twin photon’s transit time through an equal distance in vacuum, indicating that the process of tunneling in quantum mechanics is superluminal. Various conflicting theories of tunneling times are compared with experiment. An introduction to an introduction Tunneling, the quantum mechanical process by which a particle can penetrate a classically forbidden region of space, is one of the most mysterious phenomena of quantum mechanics. Yet it is one of the most basic and important processes in Nature, without which we could not even exist, for tunneling is involved in the very first step of the nuclear reaction, p + p → d + e + νe, which powers the Sun, the source of energy for life on the Earth. ∗ On appointment as a Miller Research Professor in the Miller Institute for Basic Research

•Jan 1, 1999•15 citations

Quantum tunnelling time at long wavelengths

Zheng Shu, Da-Wei Tian, Jing-Yu Zhang +3 more

Abstract Quantum tunnelling is a fundamental phenomenon in quantum physics, yet the question of how long it takes for a particle to tunnel through a barrier remains a topic of ongoing debate. Recent advances in attoclock experimental techniques in strong-field physics have renewed interest in this topic. While various definitions of tunneling time have been proposed, a consensus has yet to be reached. In this study, we adopt a definition of tunnelling time based on the ratio of the barrier width to the expected value of the velocity operator within the barrier. This approach reduces to the Büttiker-Landauer time ($\tau_{BL}$) in the case of an opaque barrier and offers a clear physical interpretation for very thin barriers, where $\tau_{BL}$ may not be well-defined. Additionally, by utilizing a virtual detector at the tunnel exit, we calculate the time delay between the peak of the electric field and the moment of ionization for long wavelengths ($\geq$6 $\mu$m). Our findings indicate that the time delay stabilizes around 190 as, remaining independent of the laser wavelength. Furthermore, through our quantum tunnelling time definition, this time delay can be interpreted as the time required for the electron to tunnel from a point within the barrier to the exit.

Chinese Physics B•Mar 12, 2026•0 citations

Tunneling times and superluminality: a tutorial

R. Y. Chiao

Experiments have shown that individual photons penetrate an optical tunnel barrier with an effective group velocity considerably greater than the vacuum speed of light. The experiments were conducted with a two-photon parametric down-conversion light source, which produced correlated, but random, emissions of photon pairs. The two photons of a given pair were emitted in slightly different directions so that one photon passed through the tunnel barrier, while the other photon passed through the vacuum. The time delay for the tunneling photon relative to its twin was measured by adjusting the path length difference between the two photons in a Hong-Ou-Mandel interferometer, in order to achieve coincidence detection. We found that the photon transit time through the barrier was smaller than the twin photon’s transit time through an equal distance in vacuum, indicating that the process of tunneling in quantum mechanics is superluminal. Various conflicting theories of tunneling times are compared with experiment.

arXiv:quant-ph/9811019•Mysteries, Puzzles, and Paradoxes in Quantum Mechanics•Jan 1, 1999•3 citations
The quantum tunneling time remains the subject of heated debate,
and one of its most curious features is faster-than-light or
superluminal tunneling.
Our tunnel-ionization model of the time-delay, presented in previous work, shows good agreement with the attoclock measurement in the adiabatic and nonadiabatic field calibrations, which also enables the determination of the barrier time-delay.
In the present work, we show that the tunnel-ionization for H-like atoms with large nuclear charge can be superluminal (quantum superluminality), which in principle can be investigated experimentally using the attoclock scheme.
We discuss the quantum superluminality in detail for the different regimes of the tunnel-ionization. Our result shows that quantum tunneling faster-than-light is indeed possible, albeit only under somewhat extreme conditions.
Tunneling and tunneling time are hot debated and very interesting issues because of their fundamental role in the quantum mechanics. The measurement of the tunneling time in today's attosecond and strong field (low-frequency) experiments, despite its controversial discussion offers a fruitful opportunity to understand the time measurement and the role of time in quantum mechanics. In previous work Kullie (2015 Phys. Rev. A 92 , 052118), we suggested a model and derived a simple relation to calculate the tunneling time, which showed a good agreement with the experimental result for He-atom. In the present work we analyze and discuss our model considering the experimental result for H-atom, which is obtained recently by Satya Sainadh et al (2017 arXiv: 1707.05445 ). In the tunneling region, we find that our model shows a good agreement with their experimental result (similar to the He-atom in our previous work), and with the accompanied time-dependent Schrödiger equation simulations. However, Sainadh et al use a different picture of the tunneling, in which tunneling time becomes an imaginary quantity. Whereas our model represents a real tunneling time picture, precisely a delay time with respect to the ionization time at the atomic field strength. Moreover, even though the above-threshold-ionization is beyond the tunneling regime, we still see that the actual ionization time is related to our model. However, crucial points arise and keep some questions open especially on the experimental side.
Since 1992 experimental evidence of superluminal (faster than light, FTL) signals are causing much excitement in the physical community and in the media. Superluminal signal velocity and zero time tunneling was first observed in an analog tunneling experiment with microwaves. Recently, the conjectured zero time of electron was claimed to be observed in ionizing helium. The FTL signal velocity was reproduced with infrared light and with various tunneling barriers in several laboratories worldwide. Remarkable, it was shown that the tunneling time is a universal quantity for elastic and for electromagnetic fields. Many theoretical physicists predicted this FTL nature of the tunneling process. However, even with this background many members of the physics community did not accept the superluminal signal velocity interpretation of the experimental results and they also ignored the universal tunneling time. The predicted and measured zero tunneling time was taken as a fantastic nonsense. A brief explanation of the misleading theoretical approaches against FTL signals due to the tunneling process is presented eventually.
The measurement of the tunneling time in attosecond experiments, termed attoclock, triggered a hot debate about the tunneling time, the role of time in quantum mechanics, where the interaction with the laser pulse involves two regimes of a different character, the multiphoton and the tunneling (field-) ionization. In the adiabatic field calibration, one of us (O. K.) developed in earlier works a real tunneling time model and showed that the model fits well to the experimental data of Landsmann et al. (Optica {\bf 1}, 343 2014). In the present work, it is shown that the model explains the experimental result in the nonadiabatic field calibration, where one reaches a good agreement with the experimental data of Hofmann et al. (J. of Mod. Opt. {\bf 66}, 1052, 2019). Furthermore, we confirm the result with the numerical integration of the time-dependent Schrödinger equation. The model is appealing because it offers a clear picture of the multiphoton and tunneling field-ionization regimes. In the nonadiabatic case (the nonadiabatic field calibration), the ionization is mainly driven by multiphoton absorption. Surprisingly, at a field strength F≤FaF \le F_aF≤Fa​ (FaF_aFa​ is the atomic field strength) the model always predicts a time delay with respect to the quantum limit τaτ_aτa​ at F=FaF=F_aF=Fa​. For an adiabatic tunneling the saturation at the limit (F=FaF=F_aF=Fa​) explains the well-known Hartman effect or Hartman paradox.
Experiments have shown that individual photons penetrate an optical tunnel barrier with an effective group velocity considerably greater than the vacuum speed of light. The experiments were conducted with a two-photon parametric down-conversion light source, which produced correlated, but random, emissions of photon pairs. The two photons of a given pair were emitted in slightly different directions so that one photon passed through the tunnel barrier, while the other photon passed through the vacuum. The time delay for the tunneling photon relative to its twin was measured by adjusting the path length difference between the two photons in a Hong-Ou-Mandel interferometer, in order to achieve coincidence detection. We found that the photon transit time through the barrier was smaller than the twin photon’s transit time through an equal distance in vacuum, indicating that the process of tunneling in quantum mechanics is superluminal. Various conflicting theories of tunneling times are compared with experiment. An introduction to an introduction Tunneling, the quantum mechanical process by which a particle can penetrate a classically forbidden region of space, is one of the most mysterious phenomena of quantum mechanics. Yet it is one of the most basic and important processes in Nature, without which we could not even exist, for tunneling is involved in the very first step of the nuclear reaction, p + p → d + e + νe, which powers the Sun, the source of energy for life on the Earth. ∗ On appointment as a Miller Research Professor in the Miller Institute for Basic Research
Abstract Quantum tunnelling is a fundamental phenomenon in quantum physics, yet the question of how long it takes for a particle to tunnel through a barrier remains a topic of ongoing debate. Recent advances in attoclock experimental techniques in strong-field physics have renewed interest in this topic. While various definitions of tunneling time have been proposed, a consensus has yet to be reached. In this study, we adopt a definition of tunnelling time based on the ratio of the barrier width to the expected value of the velocity operator within the barrier. This approach reduces to the Büttiker-Landauer time (τBL\tau_{BL}τBL​) in the case of an opaque barrier and offers a clear physical interpretation for very thin barriers, where τBL\tau_{BL}τBL​ may not be well-defined. Additionally, by utilizing a virtual detector at the tunnel exit, we calculate the time delay between the peak of the electric field and the moment of ionization for long wavelengths ($\geq$6 μ\muμm). Our findings indicate that the time delay stabilizes around 190 as, remaining independent of the laser wavelength. Furthermore, through our quantum tunnelling time definition, this time delay can be interpreted as the time required for the electron to tunnel from a point within the barrier to the exit.
Experiments have shown that individual photons penetrate an optical tunnel barrier with an effective group velocity considerably greater than the vacuum speed of light. The experiments were conducted with a two-photon parametric down-conversion light source, which produced correlated, but random, emissions of photon pairs. The two photons of a given pair were emitted in slightly different directions so that one photon passed through the tunnel barrier, while the other photon passed through the vacuum. The time delay for the tunneling photon relative to its twin was measured by adjusting the path length difference between the two photons in a Hong-Ou-Mandel interferometer, in order to achieve coincidence detection. We found that the photon transit time through the barrier was smaller than the twin photon’s transit time through an equal distance in vacuum, indicating that the process of tunneling in quantum mechanics is superluminal. Various conflicting theories of tunneling times are compared with experiment.