© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

Terms Privacy Legal Notice

arXiv:2602.19397 · Physical Review A

Contextuality-enhanced quantum state discrimination under fixed failure probability

Min Namkung, Hyang-Tag Lim

quant-phSubmitted Feb 23, 2026• Announced Feb 24, 2026• 1 citation

Abstract

Quantum state discrimination enables the accurate identification of quantum states, which are generally nonorthogonal. Among various strategies, minimum-error discrimination and unambiguous state discrimination exhibit contextuality-enhanced success probabilities that surpass classical bounds, offering significant advantages for quantum sensing and communication. However, in practice, both error and failure outcomes can occur, suggesting the need for a unified strategy that incorporates both aspects while exploring the potential for contextuality enhancement. In this work, we theoretically demonstrate contextuality enhancement in quantum state discrimination under a fixed failure probability. We show that this enhancement disappears within a certain intermediate range of failure probabilities--a phenomenon absent in conventional strategies, where both minimum-error and unambiguous discrimination consistently outperform the noncontextual bound for equal priors. Moreover, we analyze how the existence of this non-enhancement region depends on the confusability of the quantum states, which corresponds to their fidelity in a quantum model. We further extend the discussion to the noisy state discrimination, which even encompasses the maximal-confidence discrimination. In this extended discussion, we observe that the non-enhancement region tends to disappear with increasing noise strength.

Journal reference: Physical Review A 113, 022216 (2026)
DOI: 10.1103/zx3b-y3fc
Comments: 12 pages, 4 figures

Related papers

Contextual advantages across two-state discrimination strategies

Kieran Flatt, Joonwoo Bae

Quantum state discrimination, alongside its other applications, has recently found use as a tool for witnessing generalised contextuality. In this article, we derive noncontextuality inequalities for both conclusive and inconclusive outcomes across various guessing strategies. For minimum-error discrimination, the advantage is in terms of the confidences of individual outcomes, while for unambiguous state discrimination, it is in terms of the average guessing probability. For maximum-confidence discrimination, we show that contextual advantages occur not only for the confidence but also their average, the guessing probability, as well as the inconclusive outcome rate. Our results show that contextual advantages are observed across all two-state discrimination schemes and figures of merit. We envisage that various quantum information applications based on state discrimination may offer advantages over noncontextual theories.

quant-pharXiv:2511.04100•New Journal of Physics•Nov 7, 2025•2 citations

Contextuality in Sequential State Discrimination

Nyan Raess, Farid Shahandeh

Generalized contextuality is known to be required in optimal strategies for quantum state discrimination protocols. More recently, sequential discrimination tasks have been studied; n players attempt to determine in which state a qubit was prepared, in such a way that they all have a finite probability of success. We consider the extent to which contextuality plays a role in sequential versions of both unambiguous and minimum error discrimination. In the standard nonsequential case where n = 1, we use the COPE formalism to demonstrate that the presence of contextuality is guaranteed not only for the optimal measurement, but for a specific set of nonoptimal measurements as well. In the sequential case n > 1, we show that the presence of contextuality depends on which states are prepared, and on the protocol (unambiguous or minimum error) selected.

quant-pharXiv:2608.04099•Aug 6, 2026•0 citations

Contextuality of quantum non-demolition measurement via state discrimination

Min Namkung, Ilhwan Kim, Hyang-Tag Lim

Quantum non-demolition measurements facilitate various quantum technologies, including quantum communication. Notably, their operational structure can be replicated by a classical model--referred to as a noncontextual model--making it crucial to identify which features prevents such models from reproducing the corresponding quantum measurements. In this work, we theoretically demonstrate contextual features inherent in the structure of quantum non-demolition measurements. These features not only reveal the nonclassicality of unambiguous state discrimination, but also extend to sequential unambiguous discrimination and probabilistic quantum cloning, both of which involve post-measurement states. Moreover, our analysis extends to noisy scenarios, highlighting its potential relevance for practical implementations. We believe that our results broaden the scope of observing nonclassicality in quantum systems and ultimately contribute to the advancement of various quantum technologies.

quant-pharXiv:2603.27917•Mar 31, 2026•0 citations

Discriminating three mirror-symmetric states with a restricted contextual advantage

Sumit Mukherjee, Shivam Naonit, A. K. Pan

The generalized notion of noncontextuality provides an avenue to explore the fundamental departure of quantum theory from a classical explanation. Recently, extracting different forms of quantum advantages in various information processing tasks has received an upsurge of attention. In a recent work [Schmid and Spekkens, Phys. Rev. X 8, 011015 (2018)] it has been demonstrated that minimum error discrimination of two nonorthogonal pure quantum states entails contextual advantage when the states are supplied with equal prior probabilities. We generalize their work for arbitrary prior probabilities and extend the investigation for three arbitrary mirror-symmetric states. We show that the contextual advantage can be obtained for any value of prior probability when only two quantum states are present in the task. But surprisingly, for the case of three mirror-symmetric states, the contextual advantage can be revealed only for a restrictive range of prior probabilities with which the states are supplied. Further, we extend our study to examine the contextual advantage for maximum confidence state discrimination. We demonstrate that the prior probabilities of state preparation play a similar role in exploiting the quantum advantage in maximum confidence discrimination.

arXiv:2112.15452•Physical Review A•Jul 21, 2022•20 citations

Contextual Advantages and Certification for Maximum-Confidence Discrimination

Kieran Flatt, Hanwool Lee, Carles Roch i Carceller +2 more

One of the most fundamental results in quantum information theory is that no measurement can perfectly discriminate between nonorthogonal quantum states.In this work, we investigate quantum advantages for discrimination tasks over noncontextual theories by considering a maximum-confidence measurement that unifies different strategies of quantum state discrimination, including minimum-error and unambiguous discrimination.We first show that maximum-confidence discrimination, as well as unambiguous discrimination, contains contextual advantages.We then consider a semi-device-independent scenario of certifying maximum-confidence measurement.The scenario naturally contains undetected events, making it a natural setting to explore maximum-confidence measurements.We show that the certified maximum confidence in quantum theory also contains contextual advantages.Our results establish how the advantages of quantum theory over a classical model may appear in a realistic scenario of a discrimination task.

arXiv:2112.09626•PRX Quantum•Sep 13, 2022•46 citations

Optimal state discrimination with a fixed rate of inconclusive results: Analytical solutions and relation to state discrimination with a fixed error rate

Ulrike Herzog

We study an optimum measurement for quantum state discrimination, which maximizes the probability of correct results when the probability of inconclusive results is fixed at a given value. The measurement describes minimum-error discrimination if this value is zero, while under certain conditions it corresponds to optimized maximum-confidence discrimination, or to optimum unambiguous discrimination, respectively, when the fixed value reaches a definite minimum. Using operator conditions that determine the optimum measurement, we derive analytical solutions for the discrimination of two mixed qubit states, including the case of two pure states occurring with arbitrary prior probabilities, and for the discrimination of $N$ symmetric states, both pure and mixed. We also consider a case where the given density operators resolve the identity operator, and we specify the optimality conditions for partially symmetric states. Moreover, we show that from the complete solution for arbitrary values of the fixed rate of inconclusive results one can always obtain the optimum measurement in another strategy where the error rate is fixed, and vice versa.

arXiv:1206.4412•Physical Review A•Sep 14, 2012•45 citations

Quantum state discrimination enables the accurate identification of quantum states, which are generally nonorthogonal. Among various strategies, minimum-error discrimination and unambiguous state discrimination exhibit contextuality-enhanced success probabilities that surpass classical bounds, offering significant advantages for quantum sensing and communication. However, in practice, both error and failure outcomes can occur, suggesting the need for a unified strategy that incorporates both aspects while exploring the potential for contextuality enhancement. In this work, we theoretically demonstrate contextuality enhancement in quantum state discrimination under a fixed failure probability. We show that this enhancement disappears within a certain intermediate range of failure probabilities--a phenomenon absent in conventional strategies, where both minimum-error and unambiguous discrimination consistently outperform the noncontextual bound for equal priors. Moreover, we analyze how the existence of this non-enhancement region depends on the confusability of the quantum states, which corresponds to their fidelity in a quantum model. We further extend the discussion to the noisy state discrimination, which even encompasses the maximal-confidence discrimination. In this extended discussion, we observe that the non-enhancement region tends to disappear with increasing noise strength.

Quantum state discrimination, alongside its other applications, has recently found use as a tool for witnessing generalised contextuality. In this article, we derive noncontextuality inequalities for both conclusive and inconclusive outcomes across various guessing strategies. For minimum-error discrimination, the advantage is in terms of the confidences of individual outcomes, while for unambiguous state discrimination, it is in terms of the average guessing probability. For maximum-confidence discrimination, we show that contextual advantages occur not only for the confidence but also their average, the guessing probability, as well as the inconclusive outcome rate. Our results show that contextual advantages are observed across all two-state discrimination schemes and figures of merit. We envisage that various quantum information applications based on state discrimination may offer advantages over noncontextual theories.

Generalized contextuality is known to be required in optimal strategies for quantum state discrimination protocols. More recently, sequential discrimination tasks have been studied; n players attempt to determine in which state a qubit was prepared, in such a way that they all have a finite probability of success. We consider the extent to which contextuality plays a role in sequential versions of both unambiguous and minimum error discrimination. In the standard nonsequential case where n = 1, we use the COPE formalism to demonstrate that the presence of contextuality is guaranteed not only for the optimal measurement, but for a specific set of nonoptimal measurements as well. In the sequential case n > 1, we show that the presence of contextuality depends on which states are prepared, and on the protocol (unambiguous or minimum error) selected.

Quantum non-demolition measurements facilitate various quantum technologies, including quantum communication. Notably, their operational structure can be replicated by a classical model--referred to as a noncontextual model--making it crucial to identify which features prevents such models from reproducing the corresponding quantum measurements. In this work, we theoretically demonstrate contextual features inherent in the structure of quantum non-demolition measurements. These features not only reveal the nonclassicality of unambiguous state discrimination, but also extend to sequential unambiguous discrimination and probabilistic quantum cloning, both of which involve post-measurement states. Moreover, our analysis extends to noisy scenarios, highlighting its potential relevance for practical implementations. We believe that our results broaden the scope of observing nonclassicality in quantum systems and ultimately contribute to the advancement of various quantum technologies.

The generalized notion of noncontextuality provides an avenue to explore the fundamental departure of quantum theory from a classical explanation. Recently, extracting different forms of quantum advantages in various information processing tasks has received an upsurge of attention. In a recent work [Schmid and Spekkens, Phys. Rev. X 8, 011015 (2018)] it has been demonstrated that minimum error discrimination of two nonorthogonal pure quantum states entails contextual advantage when the states are supplied with equal prior probabilities. We generalize their work for arbitrary prior probabilities and extend the investigation for three arbitrary mirror-symmetric states. We show that the contextual advantage can be obtained for any value of prior probability when only two quantum states are present in the task. But surprisingly, for the case of three mirror-symmetric states, the contextual advantage can be revealed only for a restrictive range of prior probabilities with which the states are supplied. Further, we extend our study to examine the contextual advantage for maximum confidence state discrimination. We demonstrate that the prior probabilities of state preparation play a similar role in exploiting the quantum advantage in maximum confidence discrimination.

One of the most fundamental results in quantum information theory is that no measurement can perfectly discriminate between nonorthogonal quantum states.In this work, we investigate quantum advantages for discrimination tasks over noncontextual theories by considering a maximum-confidence measurement that unifies different strategies of quantum state discrimination, including minimum-error and unambiguous discrimination.We first show that maximum-confidence discrimination, as well as unambiguous discrimination, contains contextual advantages.We then consider a semi-device-independent scenario of certifying maximum-confidence measurement.The scenario naturally contains undetected events, making it a natural setting to explore maximum-confidence measurements.We show that the certified maximum confidence in quantum theory also contains contextual advantages.Our results establish how the advantages of quantum theory over a classical model may appear in a realistic scenario of a discrimination task.

We study an optimum measurement for quantum state discrimination, which maximizes the probability of correct results when the probability of inconclusive results is fixed at a given value. The measurement describes minimum-error discrimination if this value is zero, while under certain conditions it corresponds to optimized maximum-confidence discrimination, or to optimum unambiguous discrimination, respectively, when the fixed value reaches a definite minimum. Using operator conditions that determine the optimum measurement, we derive analytical solutions for the discrimination of two mixed qubit states, including the case of two pure states occurring with arbitrary prior probabilities, and for the discrimination of

N

symmetric states, both pure and mixed. We also consider a case where the given density operators resolve the identity operator, and we specify the optimality conditions for partially symmetric states. Moreover, we show that from the complete solution for arbitrary values of the fixed rate of inconclusive results one can always obtain the optimum measurement in another strategy where the error rate is fixed, and vice versa.