The original version of the de Broglie-Bohm pilot-wave theory, also called Bohmian mechanics, attempted to treat the wave function or pilot wave as a part of the physical ontology of nature. More recent versions of the de Broglie-Bohm theory appearing in the last few decades have tried to regard the pilot wave instead as an aspect of the theory's nomology, or dynamical laws. This paper argues that neither of these views is correct, and that the de Broglie-Bohm pilot wave is best understood as a collection of latent variables in the sense of a hidden Markov model, a construct that was not available when de Broglie and Bohm originally formulated what became their pilot-wave theory. This paper also discusses several other challenges for the ontological view of the pilot wave. One such challenge is due to Foldy-Wouthuysen gauge transformations, which connect up with the Deotto-Ghirardi ambiguity in the de Broglie-Bohm theory. Another challenge arises from the freedom to carry out canonical transformations in the wave function's own notion of phase space, as defined by Strocchi and Heslot.
The original version of the de Broglie-Bohm pilot-wave theory, also called Bohmian mechanics, attempted to treat the wave function or pilot wave as a part of the physical ontology of nature. More recent versions of the de Broglie-Bohm theory appearing in the last few decades have tried to regard the pilot wave instead as an aspect of the theory's nomology, or dynamical laws. This paper argues that neither of these views is correct, and that the de Broglie-Bohm pilot wave is best understood as a collection of latent variables in the sense of a hidden Markov model, a construct that was not available when de Broglie and Bohm originally formulated what became their pilot-wave theory. This paper also discusses several other challenges for the ontological view of the pilot wave. One such challenge is due to Foldy-Wouthuysen gauge transformations, which connect up with the Deotto-Ghirardi ambiguity in the de Broglie-Bohm theory. Another challenge arises from the freedom to carry out canonical transformations in the wave function's own notion of phase space, as defined by Strocchi and Heslot.
The de Broglie–Bohm interpretation (Bohmian mechanics, hidden-variables theory, causal interpretation
or pilot-wave theory) is one of the interpretations of quantum mechanics which opposes
to the claim of standard interpretation on the completeness of description of the state of quantummechanical
system, that description in Bohmian mechanics is completed by defining positions of
the particles of the system i.e. hidden variables and their dynamics. These facts are the basis of motivation
for the introduction of a new theory that can describe dubious axiomatic requirements of
standard interpretation. The presented theory is deterministic and explicitly nonlocal. Originators
of Bohmian mechanics were L. de Broglie (1927.) and D. Bohm (1952.) who presented mathematically
more general and conceptual elaborate formulation. Along with the historical overview,
a note is given about the main properties of the theory, such as the issue of nonlocality and hidden
variables. The aim of this paper is to present and explain the main ideas and properties of the
theory as well as to give a systematic overview of present and historical mathematical construction
of the theory and most of all to discuss implications of de Broglie–Bohm theory on the ontology of
quantum-mechanical picture, showcasing examples of the equivalency of the description of a free
particle as a propagation of the plane wave in space or as the ensemble of the trajectories and of
the spreading of the Gaussian wave packet. The main example of the obvious conceptual clashing
of the interpretations is presented: the double-slit experiment, with a detailed examination of the
Bohmian mechanics’ predictions using presented formalism on the two double-slit experiment.
The graphs of trajectories for given examples are obtained.
Pilot wave theory (PWT), also called de Broglie-Bohm theory or Bohmian Mechanics, is a deterministic nonlocal `hidden variables' quantum theory without fundamental uncertainty. It is in agreement with all experimental facts about nonrelativistic quantum mechanics (QM) and furthermore explains its mathematical structure. But in general, PWT describes a nonequilibrium state, admitting new physics beyond standard QM. This essay is concerned with the problem how to generalise the PWT approach to quantum field theories (QFTs). First, we briefy state the formulation of nonrelativistic PWT and review its major results. We work out the parts of its structure that it shares with the QFT case. Next, we come to the main part: We show how PW QFTs can be constructed both for field and particle ontologies. In this context, we discuss some of the existing models as well as general issues: most importantly the status of Lorentz invariance in the context of quantum nonlocality. The essay concludes with a more speculative outlook in which the potential of PWT for open QFT questions as well as quantum nonequilibrium physics are considered.
In this work celebrating the centenary of quantum mechanics, we review the principles of the de Broglie-Bohm theory (dBB), also known as pilot-wave theory. We assess the most common reading of it (the Nomological interpretation based on the notion of primitive ontology in tridimensional space) and defend instead a more causal and pluralistic approach, drawing on classical analogies with optics and hydrodynamics. Within this framework, we review some of the approaches exploiting mechanical analogies to overcome the limitations of the current dBB theory and perhaps quantum mechanics itself.
We reply to claims (by Deutsch, Zeh, Brown and Wallace) that the pilot-wave theory of de Broglie and Bohm is really a many-worlds theory with a superfluous configuration appended to one of the worlds. Assuming that pilot-wave theory does contain an ontological pilot wave (a complex-valued field in configuration space), we show that such claims arise from not interpreting pilot-wave theory on its own terms. Specifically, the theory has its own ('subquantum') theory of measurement, and in general describes a 'nonequilibrium' state that violates the Born rule. Furthermore, in realistic models of the classical limit, one does not obtain localised pieces of an ontological pilot wave following alternative macroscopic trajectories: from a de Broglie-Bohm viewpoint, alternative trajectories are merely mathematical and not ontological. Thus, from the perspective of pilot-wave theory itself, many worlds are an illusion. It is further argued that, even leaving pilot-wave theory aside, the theory of many worlds is rooted in the intrinsically unlikely assumption that quantum measurements should be modelled on classical measurements, and is therefore unlikely to be true.
Abstract This introductory chapter reviews the main steps in the history of the pilot-wave theory from its inception to the present day, as well as the major philosophical discussions revolving around this theoretical framework. The first part of this essay begins with a discussion of de Broglie’ key ideas leading to the first formulation of the pilot-wave theory in 1924, followed by a detailed analysis of David Bohm’s rediscovery of this framework in 1952 along with the generalizations of his causal interpretation to the Pauli and Dirac theories. Moreover, the second renaissance of the pilot-wave theory is considered. Here I focus on the works of Hiley, Dewdney, Philippidis, Holland and other collaborators of Bohm who provided decisive contributions to the causal interpretation between the late 1970s and the 1980s. This part is concluded taking into account recent developments of the pilot-wave perspective, with particular attention to the approaches of Dürr, Goldstein, Zanghì and Valentini. The second part of the essay discusses in detail some of the main metaphysical debates concerning the ontology of this interpretative framework, as for instance the status of the wave function, the various notions of “particle” employed by various authors, as well as the meaning of quantum operators and contextuality in the de Broglie-Bohm theory. In addition, also the notion of primitive ontology is briefly introduced. Finally, the third part of this introduction illustrates the book chapters, guiding the reader into the various contents of the volume.
As we discussed in Section 2.4, in his Solvay lecture of 1927 de Broglie presented the pilot-wave dynamics of a non-relativistic many-body system, and outlined some simple applications of his ‘new dynamics of quanta’ (to interference, diffraction and atomic transitions). Further, as we saw in Section 10.2, contrary to a widespread misunderstanding, in the general discussion de Broglie's reply to Pauli's objection contained the essential points needed to treat inelastic scattering (even if Fermi's misleading optical analogy confused matters): in particular, de Broglie correctly indicated how definite quantum outcomes in scattering processes arise from a separation of wave packets in configuration space. We also saw in Section 10.4 that de Broglie was unable to reply to a query from Kramers concerning the recoil of a single photon on a mirror: to do so, he would have had to introduce a joint wave function for the photon and the mirror. De Broglie's theory was revived by Bohm 25 years later (Bohm 1952a,b) (though with the dynamics written in terms of a law for acceleration instead of a law for velocity). Bohm's truly new and very important contribution was a pilot-wave account of the general quantum theory of measurement, with macroscopic equipment (pointers, etc.) treated as part of the quantum system. In effect, in 1952, Bohm provided a detailed derivation of quantum phenomenology from de Broglie's dynamics of 1927 (albeit with the dynamical equations written differently).