In quantum theory, a weak value is a complex number with a somewhat technical definition: it is a ratio whose numerator is the matrix element of a self-adjoint operator and whose denominator is the inner product of a corresponding pair of state vectors. Weak values first appeared in the research literature in a pair of papers in 1987 and 1988, and were originally defined as the results of a special kind of experimental protocol involving non-disturbing measurements combined with an explicit form of post-selection. In the years since, subsequent papers on weak values have produced a number of important practical spin-offs, including new methods for signal amplification and quantum-state tomography. The present work is not concerned with those practical spin-offs, but with historical and ongoing attempts to assign weak values a transparent, single-system interpretation, as well as efforts that invoke weak values to make a number of exotic claims about the properties and behavior of individual quantum systems. This paper challenges these interpretational claims by arguing that they involve several forms of fallacious reasoning.
In quantum theory, a weak value is a complex number with a somewhat technical definition: it is a ratio whose numerator is the matrix element of a self-adjoint operator and whose denominator is the inner product of a corresponding pair of state vectors. Weak values first appeared in the research literature in a pair of papers in 1987 and 1988, and were originally defined as the results of a special kind of experimental protocol involving non-disturbing measurements combined with an explicit form of post-selection. In the years since, subsequent papers on weak values have produced a number of important practical spin-offs, including new methods for signal amplification and quantum-state tomography. The present work is not concerned with those practical spin-offs, but with historical and ongoing attempts to assign weak values a transparent, single-system interpretation, as well as efforts that invoke weak values to make a number of exotic claims about the properties and behavior of individual quantum systems. This paper challenges these interpretational claims by arguing that they involve several forms of fallacious reasoning.
Since its introduction 25 years ago, the quantum weak value has gradually transitioned from a theoretical curiosity to a practical laboratory tool. While its utility is apparent in the recent explosion of weak value experiments, its interpretation has historically been a subject of confusion. Here a pragmatic introduction to the weak value in terms of measurable quantities is presented, along with an explanation for how it can be determined in the laboratory. Further, its application to three distinct experimental techniques is reviewed. First, as a large interaction parameter it can amplify small signals above technical background noise. Second, as a measurable complex value it enables novel techniques for direct quantum state and geometric phase determination. Third, as a conditioned average of generalized observable eigenvalues it provides a measurable window into nonclassical features of quantum mechanics. In this selective review, a single experimental configuration to discuss and clarify each of these applications is used.
Abstract Quantum measurement is one of the most fascinating and discussed phenomena in quantum physics, due to the impact on the system of the measurement action and the resulting interpretation issues. Scholars proposed weak measurements to amplify measured signals by exploiting a quantity called a weak value, but also to overcome philosophical difficulties related to the system perturbation induced by the measurement process. The method finds many applications and raises many philosophical questions as well, especially about the proper interpretation of the observations. In this paper, we show that any weak value can be expressed as the expectation value of a suitable non-normal operator. We propose a preliminary explanation of their anomalous and amplification behavior based on the theory of non-normal matrices and their link with non-normality: the weak value is different from an eigenvalue when the operator involved in the expectation value is non-normal. Our study paves the way for a deeper understanding of the measurement phenomenon, helps the design of experiments, and it is a call for collaboration to researchers in both fields to unravel new quantum phenomena induced by non-normality.
A so called “weak value” of an observable in quantum mechanics (QM) may be obtained in a weak measurement + post-selection procedure on the QM system under study. Applied to number operators, it has been invoked in revisiting some QM paradoxes ( e.g. , the so called Three-Box Paradox and Hardy’s Paradox). This requires the weak value to be interpreted as a bona fide property of the system considered, a par with entities like operator mean values and eigenvalues. I question such an interpretation; it has no support in the basic axioms of quantum mechanics and it leads to unreasonable results in concrete situations.
Weak measurement of a quantum system followed by postselection based on a subsequent strong measurement gives rise to a quantity called the weak value : a complex number for which the interpretation has long been debated. We analyse the procedure of weak measurement and postselection, and the interpretation of the associated weak value, using a theory of classical mechanics supplemented by an epistemic restriction that is known to be operationally equivalent to a subtheory of quantum mechanics. Both the real and imaginary components of the weak value appear as phase space displacements in the postselected expectation values of the measurement device's position and momentum distributions, and we recover the same displacements as in the quantum case by studying the corresponding evolution in our theory of classical mechanics with an epistemic restriction. By using this epistemically restricted theory, we gain insight into the appearance of the weak value as a result of the statistical effects of post selection, and this provides us with an operational interpretation of the weak value, both its real and imaginary parts. We find that the imaginary part of the weak value is a measure of how much postselection biases the mean phase space distribution for a given amount of measurement disturbance. All such biases proportional to the imaginary part of the weak value vanish in the limit where disturbance due to measurement goes to zero. Our analysis also offers intuitive insight into how measurement disturbance can be minimized and the limits of weak measurement.
The novel physical quantity known as the weak value has attracted much attention for two reasons.First, from the perspective of applications, since the weak value can take arbitrarily large values, it is expected to be useful for detecting very small physical signals.Indeed, following an initial successful demonstration, numerous reports have supported the utility of this method, in which small signals are amplified through large weak values.Second, from the perspective of the foundations of quantum mechanics, the weak value is expected to shed light on certain quantum paradoxes.Its proponents argue that the weak value reveals the behavior of a quantum system prior to measurement.In this dissertation, we analyze the Two-State Vector Formalism (TSVF), which is the theoretical origin of the discovery of the weak value.The TSVF describes a quantum system that is conditioned by both pre-and post-selection.Therefore, the term "weak" does not necessarily imply that the formalism itself requires weak interactions.Rather, it refers to the fact that the measurement performed to detect the weak value is weak, typically characterized by a small coupling constant.While the weak value has attracted much attention, most studies have focused on the weak coupling regime, and the strong or intermediate coupling regions remain relatively unexplored.In this work, we numerically analyze systems described by the TSVF beyond the weak limit.Our findings suggest that the amount of information obtainable from the post-selected system has an upper bound.This observation motivates an information-theoretic analysis, through which we identify peculiar behavior in the information content associated with the quantum state in weak regime.
Interest in weak values has grown steadily since their introduction in 1988, driven by developments in quantum measurement theory and increasing attention to the foundational issues at the heart of quantum mechanics. This thesis undertakes a philosophical investigation into the nature and implications of weak values, with a particular focus on their interpretation and role in creating and resolving quantum paradoxes. Overall, we argue that sequential weak values offer novel conceptual tools for assessing logical consistency in an atemporal fashion, ultimately motivating a shift toward a fundamentally relation-based ontology. Chapter 1 begins by establishing the conceptual and philosophical foundations of the thesis. We argue that performing this conceptual analysis of weak values requires a philosophical methodology informed by the structure of quantum theory and the foundational questions it poses. In Chapter 2, we provide a critical exploration of weak measurement theory and weak values, outlining their historical foundations and development, the experimental context, and interpretative challenges. Through a detailed analysis of paradoxes related to weak values such as the nested interferometer and the quantum Cheshire cat, the chapter argues that weak values reveal spatiotemporally discontinuous trajectories which conflict with classical intuition about particles and their trajectories. We contend that weak values are inherently contextual, as their significance arises in the context of the pre- and post- selections of the system. Chapter 3 develops an original account of ‘particle presence' across time, building on metaphysical notions of persistence. This chapter proposes a way of recovering continuity in paradoxes such as the three-box gendankenexperiment. Our framework offers a means of assessing the persistence of particles through spacetime via sequential weak values which we argue test the logical consistency of propositions across time. We then explore the implications for temporality, developing the key argument of this chapter: presence is defined across durations of time, rather than in discrete spacetime. This raises the possibility of presence without a well-defined causal order. In Chapter 4, the insights developed in the previous chapters are extended to a consideration of Relational Quantum Mechanics (RQM), addressing the longstanding issue of a lack of intersubjective agreement in relational interpretations. Given RQM's rejection of absolutism, this chapter critiques existing attempts at bridging perspectives and proposes a new route to empirical confirmation grounded in the persistence and reliability of observer's memory records. Our two- step model, consisting of internal confirmation via sequential weak values and then a consistency check from a second observer, offers a new approach to confirmation in RQM without rejecting the non-absolutist core of the interpretation. Sequential weak values are re-interpreted as atemporal probes available to the informational observer, distinct from its physical counterpart. This atemporal nature allows them to establish logical consistency across the observer's records and assign credence to them without presupposing a classical temporal order. These results suggest an ontology grounded in primitive relations, rather than one built on temporally ordered events. Chapter 4 thus builds on the contextuality arguments of earlier chapters: just as weak values reveal measurement outcomes to be context-dependent, their sequential and time-symmetric structure exposes temporal contextuality, challenging classical assumptions about fixed causal order and reinforcing the case for a non-classical, relation-based ontology. Finally, in Chapter 5, we conclude by summarising our key results and giving a list of open questions.