We investigate the two-port scattering process in non-Hermitian dimer models via quantum measurements using external leads. We focus on two exemplary dimer models that preserve parity-time symmetry via spatial gain-loss balance and exhibit non-reciprocity due to directional hopping. The scattering matrix is constructed using the biorthogonality of the left and right scattering states of the Hamiltonian, allowing us to calculate the reflection and transmission probabilities. Our analysis compares the reflection and transmission coefficients derived from the left, right, and combined scattering states, revealing that, unlike in Hermitian systems, the non-Hermitian scattering process does not adhere to unitarity when considering only the right scattering states. Furthermore, non-Hermitian scattering can enhance the reflection and transmission probabilities, with distinct physical contributions arising independently from complex eigenvalues and the non-orthogonality of eigenstates. Our results clarify how biorthogonality restores generalized unitarity and identify distinct physical origins of enhanced transport in PT-symmetric and non-reciprocal dimers, providing new insights into quantum transport in non-Hermitian systems.
We investigate the two-port scattering process in non-Hermitian dimer models via quantum measurements using external leads. We focus on two exemplary dimer models that preserve parity-time symmetry via spatial gain-loss balance and exhibit non-reciprocity due to directional hopping. The scattering matrix is constructed using the biorthogonality of the left and right scattering states of the Hamiltonian, allowing us to calculate the reflection and transmission probabilities. Our analysis compares the reflection and transmission coefficients derived from the left, right, and combined scattering states, revealing that, unlike in Hermitian systems, the non-Hermitian scattering process does not adhere to unitarity when considering only the right scattering states. Furthermore, non-Hermitian scattering can enhance the reflection and transmission probabilities, with distinct physical contributions arising independently from complex eigenvalues and the non-orthogonality of eigenstates. Our results clarify how biorthogonality restores generalized unitarity and identify distinct physical origins of enhanced transport in PT-symmetric and non-reciprocal dimers, providing new insights into quantum transport in non-Hermitian systems.
The scattering of quantum particles by non-Hermitian (generally non-local) potentials in one dimension may result in asymmetric transmission and/or reflection from left and right incidence. After extending the concept of symmetry for non-Hermitian potentials, eight generalized symmetries based on the discrete Klein's four-group (formed by parity, time reversal, their product, and unity) are found. Together with generalized unitarity relations they determine selection rules for the possible and/or forbidden scattering asymmetries. Six basic device types are identified when the scattering coefficients (squared moduli of scattering amplitudes) adopt zero/one values, and transmission and/or reflection are asymmetric. They can pictorically be described as a one-way mirror, a one-way barrier (a Maxwell pressure demon), one-way (transmission or reflection) filters, a mirror with unidirectional transmission, and a transparent, one-way reflector. We design potentials for these devices and also demonstrate that the behavior of the scattering coefficients can be extended to a broad range of incident momenta.
We review the methodology to theoretically treat parity-time- (PT-) symmetric, non-Hermitian quantum many-body systems. They are realized as open quantum systems withPTsymmetry and couplings to the environment which are compatible.PT-symmetric non-Hermitian quantum systems show a variety of fascinating properties which single them out among generic open systems. The study of the latter has a long history in quantum theory. These studies are based on the Hermiticity of the combined system-reservoir setup and were developed by the atomic, molecular, and optical physics as well as the condensed matter physics communities. The interest of the mathematical physics community inPT-symmetric, non-Hermitian systems led to a new perspective and the development of the elegant mathematical formalisms ofPT-symmetric and biorthogonal quantum mechanics, which do not make any reference to the environment. In the mathematical physics research, the focus is mainly on the remarkable spectral properties of the Hamiltonians and the characteristics of the corresponding single-particle eigenstates. Despite being non-Hermitian, the Hamiltonians can show parameter regimes, in which all eigenvalues are real. To investigate emergent quantum many-body phenomena in condensed matter physics and to make contact to experiments one, however, needs to study expectation values of observables and correlation functions. One furthermore, has to investigate statistical ensembles and not only eigenstates. The adoption of the concepts ofPT-symmetric and biorthogonal quantum mechanics by parts of the condensed matter community led to a controversial status of the methodology. There is no consensus on fundamental issues, such as, what a proper observable is, how expectation values are supposed to be computed, and what adequate equilibrium statistical ensembles and their corresponding density matrices are. With the technological progress in engineering and controlling open quantum many-body systems it is high time to reconcile the Hermitian with thePT-symmetric and biorthogonal perspectives. We comprehensively review the different approaches, including the overreaching idea of pseudo-Hermiticity. To motivate the Hermitian perspective, which we propagate here, we mainly focus on the ancilla approach. It allows to embed a non-Hermitian system into a larger, Hermitian one. In contrast to other techniques, e.g. master equations, it does not rely on any approximations. We discuss the peculiarities ofPT-symmetric and biorthogonal quantum mechanics. In these, what is considered to be an observable depends on the Hamiltonian or the selected (biorthonormal) basis. Crucially in addition, what is denoted as an 'expectation value' lacks a direct probabilistic interpretation, and what is viewed as the canonical density matrix is non-stationary and non-Hermitian. Furthermore, the non-unitarity of the time evolution is hidden within the formalism. We pick up several model Hamiltonians, which so far were either investigated from the Hermitian perspective or from thePT-symmetric and biorthogonal one, and study them within the respective alternative framework. This includes a simple two-level, single-particle problem but also a many-body lattice model showing quantum critical behavior. Comparing the outcome of the two types of computations shows that the Hermitian approach, which, admittedly, is in parts clumsy, always leads to results which are physically sensible. In the rare cases, in which a comparison to experimental data is possible, they furthermore agree to these. In contrast, the mathematically elegantPT-symmetric and biorthogonal approaches lead to results which, are partly difficult to interpret physically. We thus conclude that the Hermitian methodology should be employed. However, to fully appreciate the physics ofPT-symmetric, non-Hermitian quantum many-body systems, it is also important to be aware of the main concepts ofPT-symmetric and biorthogonal quantum mechanics. Our conclusion has far reaching consequences for the application of Green function methods, functional integrals, and generating functionals, which are at the heart of a large number of many-body methods. They cannot be transferred in their established forms to treatPT-symmetric, non-Hermitian quantum systems. It can be considered as an irony of fate that these methods are available only within the mathematical formalisms ofPT-symmetric and biorthogonal quantum mechanics.
Time-independent scattering methods are widely employed to analyze transport in non-Hermitian systems. Their application, however, rests on a critical yet often overlooked assumption: that an incident wave is a pure superposition of scattering states. In practice, any physically realistic, spatially localized wave packet will generally have a nonzero overlap with the system's bound states, thereby violating this premise. While this violation is inconsequential in Hermitian systems, it can invalidate the conventional scattering picture in their non-Hermitian counterparts. The underlying cause is the emergence of time-growing bound states, which manifest as poles of the scattering matrix (S matrix) in the first quadrant of the complex wave-number plane. Any initial overlap with these states becomes exponentially amplified, eventually dominating the long-time dynamics. Consequently, the actual evolution of a wave packet diverges dramatically from the conventional scattering picture, rendering the transmission and reflection coefficients derived from time-independent scattering methods unphysical. Using tight-binding models with non-Hermiticity introduced via imaginary on-site potentials or asymmetric hopping, we demonstrate that parameter regimes supporting such growing states are common. We therefore conclude that an analysis of S-matrix poles is an indispensable step to confirm the physical relevance of time-independent scattering calculations in non-Hermitian systems.
We study the properties of the entanglement spectrum in gapped non-interacting non-Hermitian systems, and its relation to the topological properties of the system Hamiltonian. Two different families of entanglement Hamiltonians can be defined in non-Hermitian systems, depending on whether we consider only right (or equivalently only left) eigenstates or a combination of both left and right eigenstates. We show that their entanglement spectra can still be computed efficiently, as in the Hermitian limit. We discuss how symmetries of the Hamiltonian map into symmetries of the entanglement spectrum depending on the choice of the many-body state. Through several examples in one and two dimensions, we show that the biorthogonal entanglement Hamiltonian directly inherits the topological properties of the Hamiltonian for line gapped phases, with characteristic singular and energy zero modes. The right (left) density matrix carries distinct information on the topological properties of the many-body right (left) eigenstates themselves. In purely point gapped phases, when the energy bands are not separable, the relation between the entanglement Hamiltonian and the system Hamiltonian breaks down.
We investigate the scattering properties of a parity-time-antisymmetric non-Hermitian system. The parity-time-antisymmetric scattering center possesses imaginary nearest-neighbor hoppings and real on-site potentials; it has been experimentally realized through dissipative coupling and frequency detuning between atomic spin waves. We find that such parity-time-antisymmetric system displays three salient features: First, the reflection and transmission are both reciprocal. Second, the reflection and transmission probabilities satisfy $R\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}T=1$, which depends on the parity of the scattering center size. Third, the scattering matrix satisfies $\left(S{\ensuremath{\sigma}}_{\mathrm{z}}\right){\left(S{\ensuremath{\sigma}}_{\mathrm{z}}\right)}^{*}=I$ for a scattering center with an even site; for a scattering center with an odd site, the dynamics exhibits Hermitian scattering behavior, possessing unitary scattering matrix $S{S}^{\ifmmode\dagger\else\textdagger\fi{}}=I$.
Non-Hermitian, one-dimensional potentials which are also nonlocal, allow for scattering asymmetries, namely, asymmetric transmission or reflection responses to the incidence of a particle from left or right. The symmetries of the potential imply selection rules for transmission and reflection. In particular, parity-time (PT) symmetry or the symmetry of any local potential do not allow for asymmetric transmission. We put forward a feasible quantum-optical implementation of non-Hermitian, nonlocal, non-PT potentials to implement different scattering asymmetries, including transmission asymmetries.