We review the methodology to theoretically treat parity-time- (PT-) symmetric, non-Hermitian quantum many-body systems. They are realized as open quantum systems withPTsymmetry and couplings to the environment which are compatible.PT-symmetric non-Hermitian quantum systems show a variety of fascinating properties which single them out among generic open systems. The study of the latter has a long history in quantum theory. These studies are based on the Hermiticity of the combined system-reservoir setup and were developed by the atomic, molecular, and optical physics as well as the condensed matter physics communities. The interest of the mathematical physics community inPT-symmetric, non-Hermitian systems led to a new perspective and the development of the elegant mathematical formalisms ofPT-symmetric and biorthogonal quantum mechanics, which do not make any reference to the environment. In the mathematical physics research, the focus is mainly on the remarkable spectral properties of the Hamiltonians and the characteristics of the corresponding single-particle eigenstates. Despite being non-Hermitian, the Hamiltonians can show parameter regimes, in which all eigenvalues are real. To investigate emergent quantum many-body phenomena in condensed matter physics and to make contact to experiments one, however, needs to study expectation values of observables and correlation functions. One furthermore, has to investigate statistical ensembles and not only eigenstates. The adoption of the concepts ofPT-symmetric and biorthogonal quantum mechanics by parts of the condensed matter community led to a controversial status of the methodology. There is no consensus on fundamental issues, such as, what a proper observable is, how expectation values are supposed to be computed, and what adequate equilibrium statistical ensembles and their corresponding density matrices are. With the technological progress in engineering and controlling open quantum many-body systems it is high time to reconcile the Hermitian with thePT-symmetric and biorthogonal perspectives. We comprehensively review the different approaches, including the overreaching idea of pseudo-Hermiticity. To motivate the Hermitian perspective, which we propagate here, we mainly focus on the ancilla approach. It allows to embed a non-Hermitian system into a larger, Hermitian one. In contrast to other techniques, e.g. master equations, it does not rely on any approximations. We discuss the peculiarities ofPT-symmetric and biorthogonal quantum mechanics. In these, what is considered to be an observable depends on the Hamiltonian or the selected (biorthonormal) basis. Crucially in addition, what is denoted as an 'expectation value' lacks a direct probabilistic interpretation, and what is viewed as the canonical density matrix is non-stationary and non-Hermitian. Furthermore, the non-unitarity of the time evolution is hidden within the formalism. We pick up several model Hamiltonians, which so far were either investigated from the Hermitian perspective or from thePT-symmetric and biorthogonal one, and study them within the respective alternative framework. This includes a simple two-level, single-particle problem but also a many-body lattice model showing quantum critical behavior. Comparing the outcome of the two types of computations shows that the Hermitian approach, which, admittedly, is in parts clumsy, always leads to results which are physically sensible. In the rare cases, in which a comparison to experimental data is possible, they furthermore agree to these. In contrast, the mathematically elegantPT-symmetric and biorthogonal approaches lead to results which, are partly difficult to interpret physically. We thus conclude that the Hermitian methodology should be employed. However, to fully appreciate the physics ofPT-symmetric, non-Hermitian quantum many-body systems, it is also important to be aware of the main concepts ofPT-symmetric and biorthogonal quantum mechanics. Our conclusion has far reaching consequences for the application of Green function methods, functional integrals, and generating functionals, which are at the heart of a large number of many-body methods. They cannot be transferred in their established forms to treatPT-symmetric, non-Hermitian quantum systems. It can be considered as an irony of fate that these methods are available only within the mathematical formalisms ofPT-symmetric and biorthogonal quantum mechanics.
We review the methodology to theoretically treat parity-time- (PT-) symmetric, non-Hermitian quantum many-body systems. They are realized as open quantum systems withPTsymmetry and couplings to the environment which are compatible.PT-symmetric non-Hermitian quantum systems show a variety of fascinating properties which single them out among generic open systems. The study of the latter has a long history in quantum theory. These studies are based on the Hermiticity of the combined system-reservoir setup and were developed by the atomic, molecular, and optical physics as well as the condensed matter physics communities. The interest of the mathematical physics community inPT-symmetric, non-Hermitian systems led to a new perspective and the development of the elegant mathematical formalisms ofPT-symmetric and biorthogonal quantum mechanics, which do not make any reference to the environment. In the mathematical physics research, the focus is mainly on the remarkable spectral properties of the Hamiltonians and the characteristics of the corresponding single-particle eigenstates. Despite being non-Hermitian, the Hamiltonians can show parameter regimes, in which all eigenvalues are real. To investigate emergent quantum many-body phenomena in condensed matter physics and to make contact to experiments one, however, needs to study expectation values of observables and correlation functions. One furthermore, has to investigate statistical ensembles and not only eigenstates. The adoption of the concepts ofPT-symmetric and biorthogonal quantum mechanics by parts of the condensed matter community led to a controversial status of the methodology. There is no consensus on fundamental issues, such as, what a proper observable is, how expectation values are supposed to be computed, and what adequate equilibrium statistical ensembles and their corresponding density matrices are. With the technological progress in engineering and controlling open quantum many-body systems it is high time to reconcile the Hermitian with thePT-symmetric and biorthogonal perspectives. We comprehensively review the different approaches, including the overreaching idea of pseudo-Hermiticity. To motivate the Hermitian perspective, which we propagate here, we mainly focus on the ancilla approach. It allows to embed a non-Hermitian system into a larger, Hermitian one. In contrast to other techniques, e.g. master equations, it does not rely on any approximations. We discuss the peculiarities ofPT-symmetric and biorthogonal quantum mechanics. In these, what is considered to be an observable depends on the Hamiltonian or the selected (biorthonormal) basis. Crucially in addition, what is denoted as an 'expectation value' lacks a direct probabilistic interpretation, and what is viewed as the canonical density matrix is non-stationary and non-Hermitian. Furthermore, the non-unitarity of the time evolution is hidden within the formalism. We pick up several model Hamiltonians, which so far were either investigated from the Hermitian perspective or from thePT-symmetric and biorthogonal one, and study them within the respective alternative framework. This includes a simple two-level, single-particle problem but also a many-body lattice model showing quantum critical behavior. Comparing the outcome of the two types of computations shows that the Hermitian approach, which, admittedly, is in parts clumsy, always leads to results which are physically sensible. In the rare cases, in which a comparison to experimental data is possible, they furthermore agree to these. In contrast, the mathematically elegantPT-symmetric and biorthogonal approaches lead to results which, are partly difficult to interpret physically. We thus conclude that the Hermitian methodology should be employed. However, to fully appreciate the physics ofPT-symmetric, non-Hermitian quantum many-body systems, it is also important to be aware of the main concepts ofPT-symmetric and biorthogonal quantum mechanics. Our conclusion has far reaching consequences for the application of Green function methods, functional integrals, and generating functionals, which are at the heart of a large number of many-body methods. They cannot be transferred in their established forms to treatPT-symmetric, non-Hermitian quantum systems. It can be considered as an irony of fate that these methods are available only within the mathematical formalisms ofPT-symmetric and biorthogonal quantum mechanics.
Despite acute interest in the dynamics of non-Hermitian systems, there is a lack of consensus in the mathematical formulation of non-Hermitian quantum mechanics in the community. Different methodologies are used in the literature to study non-Hermitian dynamics. This ranges from consistent frameworks like biorthogonal quantum mechanics and metric approach characterized by modified inner products, to normalization by time-dependent norms inspired by open quantum systems. In this work, we systematically explore the similarities and differences among these various methods. Utilizing illustrative models with exact solutions, we demonstrate that these methods produce not only quantitatively different results but also distinct physical interpretations. For dissipative systems where non-Hermiticity arises as an approximation, we find that simply dividing by the norm in the PT -broken regime closely aligns with the full master equation solutions. In contrast, for quantum systems where non-Hermiticity can be engineered exactly, incorporating metric dynamics is crucial for the probabilistic interpretation of quantum mechanics, necessitating the generalizations of similarity transformations and unitarity to non-Hermitian systems. This study lays the groundwork for further exploration of non-Hermitian Hamiltonians, potentially leveraging generalized transformations for novel physical phenomena.
The main motivation behind the call for this special issue was to gather recent results, developments and open problems in quantum physics with non-Hermitian operators. There have been previous special issues in this journal [1, 2] and elsewhere on this subject. The intention of this issue is to reflect the current state of this rapidly-developing field. It has therefore been open to all contributions containing new results on non-Hermitian theories that are explicitly -symmetric and/or pseudo-Hermitian or quasi-Hermitian. In the last decade these types of systems have proved to be viable self-consistent physical theories with well defined unitary time-evolution and real spectra. As the large number of responses demonstrates, this is a rapidly evolving field of research. A consensus has been reached regarding most of the fundamental problems, and the general ideas and techniques are now readily being employed in many areas of physics. Nonetheless, this issue still contains some treatments of a more general nature regarding the spectral analysis of these models, in particular, the physics of the exceptional points, the breaking of the -symmetry, an interpretation of negative energies and the consistent implementation of the WKB analysis. This issue also contains a treatment of a scattering theory associated with these types of systems, weak measurements, coherent states, decoherence, unbounded metric operators and the inclusion of domain issues to obtain well defined self-adjoint theories. Contributions in the form of applications of the general ideas include: studies of classical shock-waves and tunnelling, supersymmetric models, spin chain models, models with ring structure, random matrix models, the Pauli equation, the nonlinear Schrödinger equation, quasi-exactly solvable models, integrable models such as the Calogero model, Bose–Einstein condensates, thermodynamics, nonlinear oligomers, quantum catastrophes, the Landau–Zener problem and pseudo-Fermions. Applications close to experimental realization are proposed in optics, including short light pulse models, waveguides and laser systems, and also in electronics. We hope that this issue will become a valuable reference and inspiration for the broader scientific community working in mathematical and theoretical physics. References [1] Fring A, Jones H F and Znojil M (ed) 2008 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 41 240301 [2] Geyer H, Heiss D and Znojil M (ed) 2006 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 39 9963
In a way inspired by the brief 2002 note "The challenge of nonhermitian structures in physics" by Ramirez and Mielnik (with the text most easily available via arXiv: quant- ph/0211048 ) the situation in the theory is briefly summarized here as it looks twelve years later. Our text has three parts. In the first one we briefly mention the pre-history (dating back to the Freeman Dyson's proposal of the non-Hermitian-Hamiltonian method in 1956 and to its subsequent successful "interacting boson model" applications in nuclear physics) and, first of all, the amazing recent progress reached, in the stationary case, using, in essence, an inversion of the Dyson's approach. The impact on the latter idea upon abstract quantum physics is sampled, first of all, by the reference to papers by Bender et al. (who made the non-Hermitian model-building popular under the nickname of parity-times-time-reflection- symmetric alias PT-symmetric quantum mechanics) and by Mostafazadeh (who reinterpreted PT-symmetry as P-pseudo-Hermiticity). In the second part of our review the emphasis is shifted to the newest, non-stationary upgrade of the formalism which we proposed in the year 2009 and which is characterized by the simultaneous participation of a triplet of Hilbert spaces H in the representation of a single quantum system. In the third part of the review we finally emphasize that the majority of applications of our three-Hilbert-space (THS) recipe is still ahead of us because the enhancement of the flexibility is necessarily accompanied by an enhancement of the technical difficulties. An escape out of the technical trap is proposed to be sought in a restriction of attention to quantum models living in finite-dimensional Hilbert spaces H . As long as the use of such spaces is so typical for the quantum-control considerations, we conclude with conjecture that the THS formalism should start searching for implementations in the field of quantum control.
The traditional framework of quantum mechanics and many classical wave phenomena is underpinned by Hermitian operators, which guarantee real eigenvalues corresponding to observable quantities and orthogonal eigenvectors. However, a growing number of physical systems exhibit non-reciprocal interactions, leading to Hamiltonians or system matrices that are inherently non-Hermitian. This paper delves into the spectral theory of such non-reciprocal systems, exploring the unique mathematical and physical characteristics that emerge when the constraint of Hermiticity is relaxed. We discuss phenomena like complex energy eigenvalues, exceptional points where both eigenvalues and eigenvectors coalesce, and the breakdown of standard perturbation theory. The implications of non-Hermitian spectral properties extend to diverse fields, including parity-time (PT) symmetric photonics, active matter, open quantum systems, and even classical wave propagation in active or lossy media. By extending spectral analysis beyond the Hermitian paradigm, we aim to provide a comprehensive overview of the current understanding, challenges, and future directions in characterizing the dynamics and phases of non-reciprocal systems. This exploration is crucial for advancing both fundamental theoretical understanding and practical applications in emerging technologies that leverage tailored non-reciprocity.
A review is given on the foundations and applications of non-Hermitian classical and quantum physics. First, key theorems and central concepts in non-Hermitian linear algebra, including Jordan normal form, biorthogonality, exceptional points, pseudo-Hermiticity, and parity-time symmetry, are delineated in a pedagogical and mathematically coherent manner. Building on these, we provide an overview of how diverse classical systems, ranging from photonics, mechanics, electrical circuits, and acoustics to active matter, can be used to simulate non-Hermitian wave physics. In particular, we discuss rich and unique phenomena found therein, such as unidirectional invisibility, enhanced sensitivity, topological energy transfer, coherent perfect absorption, single-mode lasing, and robust biological transport. We then explain in detail how non-Hermitian operators emerge as an effective description of open quantum systems on the basis of the Feshbach projection approach and the quantum trajectory approach. We discuss their applications to physical systems relevant to a variety of fields, including atomic, molecular and optical physics, mesoscopic physics, and nuclear physics with emphasis on prominent phenomena and subjects in quantum regimes, such as quantum resonances, superradiance, the continuous quantum Zeno effect, quantum critical phenomena, Dirac spectra in quantum chromodynamics, and nonunitary conformal field theories. Finally, we introduce the notion of band topology in complex spectra of non-Hermitian systems and present their classifications by providing the proof, first given by this review in a complete manner, as well as a number of instructive examples. Other topics related to non-Hermitian physics, including nonreciprocal transport, speed limits, nonunitary quantum walk, are also reviewed.
Since the role that 𝓟𝓣-symmetric Hamiltonians could play in quantum mechanics theory was suggested in1998, much work has been conducted on the mathematical analysis of 𝓟𝓣-symmetry. Carl Benderchallenged the perceived wisdom of Quantum Mechanics that the Hamiltonian operator describing anyquantum mechanical system has to be Hermitian. He showed that Hamiltonians that are invariant undercombined parity-time 𝓟𝓣-symmetry transformations likewise can exhibit real eigenvalue spectra.However, 𝓟𝓣-symmetric systems began as an analytic extension of classical and quantum mechanical tothe complex domain. These findings had a particularly profound impact in the field of photonics, where PTsymmetricpotential landscapes can be implemented by introducing dissipative terms appropriatelydistributing gain and loss in open or coupled systems. The refractive index profile plays the role of thecomplex potential. Similar research activity was transferred to other physical settings such as electronicscircuits, microwaves and cavities resonators, acoustic, superconducting wires, and atomic systems.Unconventional characteristics compared with Hermitian ones were found and allow to engineer newdevices.Likewise, topological phases of matter are another new field of physics which have had a rapid growth inthe last years, based on the concept of Geometric or Berry phase. Topological Insulators andSuperconductors, Topological photonics and nanophotonics, Topological Computers are some of theapplications widely described in scientific journals.In Nature all the processes have to be described by a property in a discrete or iterative way instead of acontinuous way which usually is time. Continuous processes, being a mathematical idealization, has beenthe best tool to model observable properties in physics and is the conventional tool used in Classical andQuantum Mechanics. The formal way to model discrete systems is through difference equations which aresimilar to differential equations but not equal.Identification of dynamical discrete system with recurrence equations, give us the possibility to consider ananalytical continuation of its evolution variable, from discrete values to fractional one´s, in the solution ofthe system. Parametric solutions obtained by this procedure takes automatically complex values, avoidingto make any supposition about the possibility of their analytical extension to complex domain. Thisprocedure leads, in a very simple natural way, a rich variety of dynamical behaviors in the complex domainunknown in the real domain. This new mathematical tool is developed to enhance and provide a moresubtle description of the behavior of dynamical systems and provides a more general class of Non-Hermitian Hamiltonians than 𝓟𝓣-symmetric systems with real spectra, keeping also topological propertiesdue to a kind of geometric phase.