Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2601.00010

On the measurement problem in quantum mechanics: a simple proposal

Luigi E. Picasso

quant-phSubmitted Dec 20, 2025• Announced Dec 23, 2025• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Some of the problems connected with the interpretation of quantum mechanics are enumerated, in particular those related to some well known paradoxes and, above all, to the measurement process. We then show how the so called "Physics Laboratory Assumption" introduced in [1], which considers as "observables'' only the self-adjoint operators corresponding to existing measuring instruments, can propose a new perspective on the aforementioned problems and can replace the wavefunction collapse postulate. [1] Luigi E. Picasso, "On the Concept of State in Quantum Mechanics: Another Way to Decoherence?'' Int. J. Theor. Phys. 62 (2), (2023)

Comments
8 pages, 0 figures

Related papers

The quantum measurement problem

Henk Fidder, O. Tapia

Abstract The measurement problem in quantum mechanics still appears to be an unresolved issue. Here we present a new quantum theory of measurement that overcomes many of the difficulties previously found. It is based on a consistent use of the linear superposition principle and distinguishes two aspects: recording and observation. A recording elicits the full interaction of the object quantum system with the quantum measuring apparatus. No wavefunction collapse is introduced. Statistics may appear at the observation of the recording only and depends on filtering processes. The theory presented here uses the existing mathematical structure of quantum mechanics but requires no ad hoc measurement postulates. Well‐known paradoxical aspects in standard quantum mechanics, for instance, wave–particle duality, Schrödinger's cat, and Zeno effects do not appear in the current formulation. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Quantum Chem, 2004

International Journal of Quantum Chemistry•Sep 8, 2003•11 citations

The Quantum Measurement Problem

E. Karlsson

Measurements play a specific role in quantum mechanics; only measurements allow us to catch a glimpse of the eluding physical reality. However, there is something deeply unsatisfactory with this specificity—a measurement is itself a physical process! Several varying modes of coping with this dilemma have been proposed and this article tries to describe how a now-century-long discussion has led to new insights about the transition from the quantum to the classical world. Starting from the pioneer’s view of the quantum measurement problem, it follows the development of formalisms, the interest from philosophers for its new aspects on reality and how different interpretations of quantum mechanics have tried to support our classically working brains in understanding quantum phenomena. Decoherence is a main topic and its role in measurement processes exemplified. The question of whether the quantum measurement problem is now solved is left open for the readers’ own judgment.

Quantum Reports•Jun 13, 2025•1 citation

The Measurement Problem Is the "Measurement" Problem

Arne Hansen, Stefan Wolf

The term "measurement" in quantum theory (as well as in other physical theories) is ambiguous: It is used to describe both an experience - e.g., an observation in an experiment - and an interaction with the system under scrutiny. If doing physics is regarded as a creative activity to develop a meaningful description of the world, then one has to carefully discriminate between the two notions: An observer's account of experience - consitutive to meaning - is hardly expressed exhaustively by the formal framework of an interaction within one particular theory. We develop a corresponding perspective onto central terms in quantum mechanics in general, and onto the measurement problem in particular.

arXiv:1810.04573•Oct 10, 2018•2 citations

Concept of consciousness in the context of quantum mechanics

Михаил Борисович Менский

Conceptual problems of the quantum theory of measurement are considered, which are embodied in well-known paradoxes and in Bell's inequalities. Arguments are advanced in favor of the viewpoint that these problems may hardly be solved without direct inclusion of the observer's consciousness in the theoretical description of a quantum measurement. Discussed in this connection is the so-called many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics proposed by Everett, as is the extension of Everett's concept, which consists in the assumption that separating the quantum state components corresponding to alternative measurements is not only associated with the observer's consciousness but is completely identified with it. This approach is shown to open up qualitatively new avenues for the unification of physics and psychology and, more broadly, of the sciences and the humanities. This may lead to an extension of the theory of consciousness and shed light on significant and previously misunderstood phenomena in the sphere of consciousness.

Physics-Uspekhi•Apr 30, 2005•54 citations

What does it take to solve the measurement problem?

Jonte R. Hance, S Hossenfelder

We summarise different aspects of the measurement problem in quantum mechanics. We argue that it is a real problem which requires a solution, and identify the properties a theory needs to solve the problem. We show that no current interpretation of quantum mechanics solves the problem, and that, being interpretations rather than extensions of quantum mechanics, they cannot solve it. Finally, we speculate what a solution of the measurement problem might be good for.

•Oct 11, 2022•0 citations

On quantum systems with a self-adjoint time operator without violating Pauli's theorem

Tomer Shushi

Abstract Pauli's theorem asserts that no self-adjoint time operator can exist that is canonically conjugate to a Hamiltonian with a spectrum bounded from below, preventing time and energy from both being operators in standard quantum mechanics. In this paper, we propose a new reformulation that circumvents this constraint by inverting the roles of time and energy: time becomes a self-adjoint operator, while energy is treated as an external parameter. This dual perspective yields a mathematically equivalent yet physically distinct formulation, where quantum systems evolve according to internal clocks. The model accounts for the measurement problem without invoking collapse, offering an observer-relative interpretation tied to temporal misalignment. The proposed model also suggests a fresh perspective on the relationship between quantum systems and spacetime geometry.

Europhysics Letters (EPL)•Jul 24, 2025•1 citation
Some of the problems connected with the interpretation of quantum mechanics are enumerated, in particular those related to some well known paradoxes and, above all, to the measurement process. We then show how the so called "Physics Laboratory Assumption" introduced in [1], which considers as "observables'' only the self-adjoint operators corresponding to existing measuring instruments, can propose a new perspective on the aforementioned problems and can replace the wavefunction collapse postulate.
[1] Luigi E. Picasso, "On the Concept of State in Quantum Mechanics: Another Way to Decoherence?'' Int. J. Theor. Phys. 62 (2), (2023)
Abstract The measurement problem in quantum mechanics still appears to be an unresolved issue. Here we present a new quantum theory of measurement that overcomes many of the difficulties previously found. It is based on a consistent use of the linear superposition principle and distinguishes two aspects: recording and observation. A recording elicits the full interaction of the object quantum system with the quantum measuring apparatus. No wavefunction collapse is introduced. Statistics may appear at the observation of the recording only and depends on filtering processes. The theory presented here uses the existing mathematical structure of quantum mechanics but requires no ad hoc measurement postulates. Well‐known paradoxical aspects in standard quantum mechanics, for instance, wave–particle duality, Schrödinger's cat, and Zeno effects do not appear in the current formulation. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Quantum Chem, 2004
Measurements play a specific role in quantum mechanics; only measurements allow us to catch a glimpse of the eluding physical reality. However, there is something deeply unsatisfactory with this specificity—a measurement is itself a physical process! Several varying modes of coping with this dilemma have been proposed and this article tries to describe how a now-century-long discussion has led to new insights about the transition from the quantum to the classical world. Starting from the pioneer’s view of the quantum measurement problem, it follows the development of formalisms, the interest from philosophers for its new aspects on reality and how different interpretations of quantum mechanics have tried to support our classically working brains in understanding quantum phenomena. Decoherence is a main topic and its role in measurement processes exemplified. The question of whether the quantum measurement problem is now solved is left open for the readers’ own judgment.
The term "measurement" in quantum theory (as well as in other physical theories) is ambiguous: It is used to describe both an experience - e.g., an observation in an experiment - and an interaction with the system under scrutiny. If doing physics is regarded as a creative activity to develop a meaningful description of the world, then one has to carefully discriminate between the two notions: An observer's account of experience - consitutive to meaning - is hardly expressed exhaustively by the formal framework of an interaction within one particular theory. We develop a corresponding perspective onto central terms in quantum mechanics in general, and onto the measurement problem in particular.
Conceptual problems of the quantum theory of measurement are considered, which are embodied in well-known paradoxes and in Bell's inequalities. Arguments are advanced in favor of the viewpoint that these problems may hardly be solved without direct inclusion of the observer's consciousness in the theoretical description of a quantum measurement. Discussed in this connection is the so-called many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics proposed by Everett, as is the extension of Everett's concept, which consists in the assumption that separating the quantum state components corresponding to alternative measurements is not only associated with the observer's consciousness but is completely identified with it. This approach is shown to open up qualitatively new avenues for the unification of physics and psychology and, more broadly, of the sciences and the humanities. This may lead to an extension of the theory of consciousness and shed light on significant and previously misunderstood phenomena in the sphere of consciousness.
Abstract Pauli's theorem asserts that no self-adjoint time operator can exist that is canonically conjugate to a Hamiltonian with a spectrum bounded from below, preventing time and energy from both being operators in standard quantum mechanics. In this paper, we propose a new reformulation that circumvents this constraint by inverting the roles of time and energy: time becomes a self-adjoint operator, while energy is treated as an external parameter. This dual perspective yields a mathematically equivalent yet physically distinct formulation, where quantum systems evolve according to internal clocks. The model accounts for the measurement problem without invoking collapse, offering an observer-relative interpretation tied to temporal misalignment. The proposed model also suggests a fresh perspective on the relationship between quantum systems and spacetime geometry.