Quantum measurements, alongside quantum states and processes, form a cornerstone of quantum information processing. However, unlike states and processes, their efficient characterisation remains relatively unexplored. We resolve this asymmetry by introducing a comprehensive framework for efficient detector estimation that reveals the fundamental limits to extractable parameter information and errors arising in detector analysis - the detector quantum Fisher information. Our development eliminates the need to optimise for the best probe state, while highlighting aspects of detector analysis that fundamentally differ from quantum state estimation. Through proofs, examples and experimental validation, we demonstrate the relevance and robustness of our proposal for current quantum detector technologies. By formalising a dual perspective to state estimation, our framework completes and connects the triad of efficient state, process, and detector tomography, advancing quantum information theory with broader implications for emerging technologies reliant on precisely calibrated measurements.
Quantum measurements, alongside quantum states and processes, form a cornerstone of quantum information processing. However, unlike states and processes, their efficient characterisation remains relatively unexplored. We resolve this asymmetry by introducing a comprehensive framework for efficient detector estimation that reveals the fundamental limits to extractable parameter information and errors arising in detector analysis - the detector quantum Fisher information. Our development eliminates the need to optimise for the best probe state, while highlighting aspects of detector analysis that fundamentally differ from quantum state estimation. Through proofs, examples and experimental validation, we demonstrate the relevance and robustness of our proposal for current quantum detector technologies. By formalising a dual perspective to state estimation, our framework completes and connects the triad of efficient state, process, and detector tomography, advancing quantum information theory with broader implications for emerging technologies reliant on precisely calibrated measurements.
Quantum states and measurements are two central physical objects in the theory of quantum mechanics. The preparation, control and measurement of quantum states lies at the heart of modern quantum information processing protocols ranging from secure communication to quantum computation and precision sensing. And yet, the reliable operation of these advanced protocols ultimately rests on a far more essential prerequisite - our ability to calibrate, certify and benchmark the quantum states we prepare and the quantum measurements we perform. Quantum information theory provides a natural framework for these tasks, meaningfully connecting the resources we expend for characterisation with the accuracy and precision we can expect in return. While decades of advances in quantum information have refined our understanding of quantum characterisation and sharpened our practical ability to calibrate with enhanced precision, important questions about the fundamental limits of quantum characterisation remain unanswered. Although incorporating entanglement at the measurement stage is known to enhance the estimation of unknown quantum states, the extent of this improvement remains poorly understood. This leaves open a fundamental question on the utility of complex entangling measurement strategies, impeding progress towards bridging the significant gap between practically achievable precision and the ultimate theoretical quantum limit. Complementary to quantum state estimation, which is relatively well-established in theory and practice, the characterisation of quantum measurements lacks a rigorous information-theoretic foundation, leading to a dearth of principled benchmarks and provably optimal strategies despite growing experimental interest. This thesis develops and applies information-theoretic tools to answer questions in quantum characterisation, with an eye to enabling practical improvements beyond current techniques in the field. First, we introduce a computable measure of entanglement enhancement for quantum state estimation and study its variation across general multi-parameter estimation problems for higher-dimensional quantum states. We show that the entanglement enhancement is maximised for full qudit state tomography but grows only linearly with system dimension even when allowing an asymptotically large number of entangling operations. Our proposed tight upper bound to entanglement enhancement therefore constitutes a strong limitation on the utility of such entangling measurements. Next, we formulate the dual problem of quantum detector estimation, developing a comprehensive framework for maximally precise calibration centred around a newly introduced quantity - the detector quantum Fisher information. This information-theoretic measure stipulates the ultimate precision attainable for measurement calibration and identifies the optimal input states that achieve this precision. Further, our framework enables the first provably optimal detector estimation experiment and reveals the scope for entanglement-based enhancements, thereby placing measurement characterisation on equal footing with state characterisation. Considered together, these results suggest two contrasting conclusions about quantum characterisation. On the one hand, they show that for quantum state estimation, increasingly powerful entangling measurements offer only diminishing returns at the ultimate precision limit. On the other hand, they highlight practical quantum advantages available for detector estimation by providing a framework that can improve calibration performance and guide future experimental design. More broadly, these results complete and advance the triad of state, process, and detector characterisation, positioning quantum information measures as not merely abstract bounds, but practical guides for deciding when complex quantum resources are genuinely worth deploying and where near-term quantum advantages are most likely to be realised.
Informationally complete measurements form the foundation of universal quantum state reconstruction, while quantum parameter estimation is based on the local structure of the manifold of quantum states. Here we establish a general link between these two aspects, in the context of a single informationally complete measurement, by employing a suitably adapted operator frame theory. In particular, we bound the ratio between the classical and quantum Fisher information in terms of the spectral decomposition of the associated frame operator, and connect these bounds to the optimal and least optimal directions for parameter encoding. The geometric and operational characterization of information extraction thus obtained reveals the fundamental tradeoff imposed by informational completeness on local quantum parameter estimation.
Quantum state tomography (QST) is a crucial technique for characterizing the state of a quantum system. However, the inherent limitations of measurement processes, including detector efficiency and photon counting statistics, introduce noise that affects the accuracy of the reconstructed quantum state. This work presents a rigorous information-theoretic framework for analyzing and quantifying the accuracy achievable in QST. We leverage concepts from information theory, specifically mutual information and channel capacity, to precisely determine the trade-offs between measurement resolution and the complexity of state reconstruction. The central argument is that the achievable accuracy is fundamentally limited by the information that can be reliably extracted from the measurement data, rather than relying solely on empirical estimates of error. This approach provides a theoretical benchmark for evaluating QST protocols and identifying optimal measurement strategies. The key contributions lie in establishing a quantifiable relationship between measurement parameters, noise levels, and the fidelity of the reconstructed quantum state. This offers a more robust and predictive method for assessing the quality of QST than traditional approaches.
Quantum measurements lie at the core of quantum information processing, enabling tasks ranging from state reconstruction and parameter estimation to sensing and computation. As quantum technologies scale and become increasingly precise, a central question emerges: what does it mean for a quantum measurement to be good? This thesis addresses this question by developing quantitative, operational, and physically grounded frameworks for assessing the quality and informational power of quantum measurements.The first part of the thesis focuses on the intrinsic quality of quantum measurements independent of any particular input state. Adopting the formalism of quantum resource theories, measurements are treated as resources ordered under classical post-processing, which cannot increase informational content. Restricting attention to informationally complete measurements, we employ frame theory to introduce a novel resource monotone termed completeness stability, defined as the minimum eigenvalue of a suitably scaled frame operator. We establish its operational significance by showing that the average error in quantum state tomography and the average variance in shadow tomography are tightly bounded by the inverse of the completeness stability. Maximizing this monotone identifies weighted complex projective 2-designs, including symmetric informationally complete POVMs and mutually unbiased bases, as optimal measurement configurations.The second part of the thesis extends these ideas to quantum parameter estimation, where measurement performance necessarily depends on correlations between the measurement and the encoded quantum state. By introducing a state-dependent inner product on operator space, we develop an operator-theoretic formulation in which both the classical and quantum Fisher information arise naturally from a single frame operator associated with the measurement and the reference state. Within this framework, the spectral properties of the frame operator provide a complete characterization of estimation performance. The maximum and minimum eigenvalues identify the best- and worst-case parameter-encoding directions, respectively, yielding sharp bounds on the achievable ratio of classical and quantum Fisher information. This establishes a direct connection between informational completeness, estimation robustness, and resource-theoretic monotonicity.The final part of the thesis returns to foundational questions concerning quantum measurement and arrival time. Using Bohmian mechanics, we develop a microscopic, first-principles account of the Hong–Ou–Mandel effect, a paradigmatic two-particle interference phenomenon. By analyzing particle trajectories guided by the wave function, we show how bosonic bunching and fermionic anti-bunching emerge dynamically from the guiding equation without invoking wave-function collapse. Beyond reproducing the Hong–Ou–Mandel dip, we demonstrate how experimental parameters such as barrier strength, phase velocity, and path asymmetry influence both coincidence probabilities and temporal correlations.Taken together, this thesis provides a unified treatment of quantum measurement quality across operational, metrological, and dynamical regimes. By bridging resource theory, frame theory, Fisher information, and trajectory-based quantum dynamics, it offers new insights into the structure, limitations, and physical interpretation of quantum measurements in both applied and foundational contexts.
Abstract Precise device characterisation is a fundamental requirement for a large range of applications using photonic hardware, and constitutes a multi-parameter estimation problem. Estimates based on measurements using single photons or classical light have precision which is limited by shot noise, while quantum resources can be used to achieve sub-shot-noise precision. However, there are many open questions with regard to the best quantum protocols for multi-parameter estimation, including the ultimate limits to achievable precision, as well as optimal choices for probe states and measurements. In this paper, we develop a formalism based on Fisher information to tackle these questions for setups based on linear-optical components and photon-counting measurements. A key ingredient of our analysis is a mapping for equivalent protocols defined for photonic and spin systems, which allows us to draw upon results in the literature for general finite-dimensional systems. Motivated by the protocol in Zhou, et al Optica 2, 510 (2015), we present new results for quantum-enhanced tomography of unitary processes, including a comparison of Holland-Burnett and NOON probe states.