Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2512.03758 · PRX Quantum

An end-to-end quantum algorithm for nonlinear fluid dynamics with bounded quantum advantage

David Jennings, Kamil Korzekwa, Matteo Lostaglio, Richard Ashworth, Emanuele Marsili, Stephen Rolston

quant-phphysics.flu-dynSubmitted Dec 3, 2025• Announced Dec 4, 2025• 1 citation• Revised Sep 25, 2026 (v2)
v1 · Dec 3, 2025v2 · Sep 25, 2026
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is a cornerstone of classical scientific computing, and there is growing interest in whether quantum computers can accelerate such simulations. The existing proposals for fault-tolerant quantum algorithms for CFD have almost exclusively been based on the Carleman embedding method, used to encode nonlinearities on a quantum computer. Here, we first identify several key challenges that must be addressed in order to establish quantum advantage using this method, including Carleman convergence, time-stepping requirements, condition-number scaling, and data extraction. Building on this analysis, we develop a novel algorithm for the incompressible lattice Boltzmann equation that addresses them, and provide its detailed analysis, including all potential sources of algorithmic complexity, as well as gate count estimates. We find that for an end-to-end problem, a modest quantum advantage may be preserved for selected observables in the high-error-tolerance regime. We establish a lower bound for the Reynolds number scaling of our quantum algorithm in dimension $D$ at Kolmogorov microscale resolution with $O(\mathrm{Re}^{\frac{3}{4}(1+\frac{D}{2})} \times q_M)$, where $q_M$ is a multiplicative overhead for data extraction with $q_M = O(\mathrm{Re}^{\frac{3}{8}})$ for the drag force. This upper bounds the scaling improvement over classical algorithms by $O(\mathrm{Re}^{\frac{3D}{8}})$. However, our numerical investigations suggest a lower speedup, with a scaling estimate of $O(\mathrm{Re}^{1.936} \times q_M)$ for $D=2$. Our results give robust evidence that small, but nontrivial, quantum advantages can be achieved in the context of CFD, and motivate the need for additional rigorous end-to-end quantum algorithm development.

Journal reference
PRX Quantum 7, 033060 (2026)
DOI
10.1103/xysy-q3fp
Comments
57 pages, 9 figures. Published version

Related papers

Detailed assessment of calculating drag force with quantum computers: Explicit time-evolution precludes exponential advantage for nonlinear differential equations

John Penuel, Amara Katabarwa, Johnson, Peter D. +5 more

This study examines the potential for fault-tolerant quantum computers to provide utility in fluid dynamics simulations, with a focus on drag force calculations for ship hull design. We assess whether quantum algorithms can surpass classical computational limits by generating detailed quantum resource estimates (QREs) in terms of logical qubits and $T$-gate counts. Our analysis is based on a quantum algorithm leveraging Carleman linearization of the lattice Boltzmann method (LBM), which has been suggested to offer exponential speedup. We develop efficient block encodings for LBM matrices and a method for amplitude-encoding drag force. We apply the method to the simple case of fluid flow past a sphere across a range of Reynolds numbers ($\mathrm{Re}$). We estimate the required (logical qubits)$\times$($T$-gates), finding them to be prohibitively large, ranging from $10^{21}$ to $10^{39}$. While classical simulations scale as $O(\mathrm{Re}^3)$, our QREs exhibit a modest polynomial scaling of $O(\mathrm{Re}^{2.68})$, indicating no exponential quantum advantage. We attribute this limitation to an intrinsic power-law relationship between spatial grid resolution and time-stepping requirements that is a fundamental characteristic of explicit methods for evolving nonlinear differential equations. Thus, quantum computers are unlikely to provide utility in applications that require time-evolving fluids and other systems of nonlinear differential equations.

arXiv:2406.06323•Jun 10, 2024•4 citations

Potential quantum advantage for simulation of fluid dynamics

Xiangyu Li, Xiaolong Yin, Nathan Wiebe +4 more

Numerical simulation of turbulent fluid dynamics needs to either parametrize turbulence—which introduces large uncertainties—or explicitly resolve the smallest scales—which is prohibitively expensive. Here, we provide evidence through analytic bounds and numerical studies that a potential quantum speedup can be achieved to simulate fluid dynamics using quantum computing. Specifically, we provide a lattice Boltzmann formulation of fluid dynamics for which we give evidence that low-order Carleman linearization is much more accurate than previously believed for these systems. This is achieved via a combination of reformulating the Navier-Stokes nonlinearity ( u · ∇ u ) to lattice-Boltzmann nonlinearity ( u 2 ) and accurately linearizing the dynamical equations, which effectively trades nonlinearity for additional degrees of freedom that add negligible expense in the quantum solver. Based on this, we apply a quantum algorithm for simulating the Carleman-linearized lattice Boltzmann equation and provide evidence that its cost scales logarithmically with system size compared with polynomial scaling in the best known classical algorithms. In this paper, we suggest that a quantum advantage may exist for simulating fluid dynamics, paving the way for simulating nonlinear multiscale transport phenomena in a wide range of disciplines using quantum computing.

arXiv:2303.16550•Physical Review Research•Jan 10, 2025•42 citations

Lattice Boltzmann–Carleman quantum algorithm and circuit for fluid flows at moderate Reynolds number

Claudio Sanavio, Sauro Succi A

We present a quantum computing algorithm for fluid flows based on the Carleman-linearization of the Lattice Boltzmann (LB) method. First, we demonstrate the convergence of the classical Carleman procedure at moderate Reynolds numbers, namely, for Kolmogorov-like flows. Then we proceed to formulate the corresponding quantum algorithm, including the quantum circuit layout, and analyze its computational viability. We show that, at least for moderate Reynolds numbers between 10 and 100, the Carleman–LB procedure can be successfully truncated at second order, which is a very encouraging result. We also show that the quantum circuit implementing the single time-step collision operator has a fixed depth, regardless of the number of lattice sites. However, such depth is of the order of ten thousands quantum gates, meaning that quantum advantage over classical computing is not attainable today, but could be achieved in the near or mid-term future. The same goal for the multi-step version remains, however, an open topic for future research.

arXiv:2310.17973•AVS Quantum Science•Apr 22, 2024•40 citations

A Demonstration of Quantum Circuit Implementation for Obstacle Flow Using Carleman-Linearized Lattice Boltzmann Method

Kazumasa Ueno, Keita Kanno, Yasunori Lee

Fluid simulations, especially at high Reynolds numbers, are computationally expensive on classical computers, making them promising application targets for quantum computing. Recent studies have combined the lattice Boltzmann method (LBM) with Carleman linearization to design quantum algorithms for computational fluid dynamics (CFD). However, practical quantum-circuit implementations of these algorithms that incorporate non-periodic boundary conditions have not been fully explored. In this work, we implement a quantum algorithm for two-dimensional linearized fluid flow around an obstacle, using block-encoding of the linear-system matrix and quantum singular value transformation (QSVT) to solve it. Inflow, outflow, and no-slip boundary conditions are formulated as sparse matrix operations and efficiently embedded into quantum circuits using index-value encoding. We demonstrate logarithmic scaling of the required numbers of qubits and gates with respect to the number of lattice points, suggesting the potential feasibility of quantum-computational fluid dynamics simulations.

quant-pharXiv:2605.28135•May 28, 2026•0 citations

Quantum Algorithms for Computational Fluid Dynamics

Mario Guillaume Cecile, Nis-Luca van Hülst, Tomohiro Hashizume +19 more

We present a comprehensive review of quantum approaches for solving partial differential equations (PDEs) arising in computational fluid dynamics (CFD). We examine fully quantum approaches, including quantum linear system algorithms (QLSAs), ranging from the Harrow--Hassidim--Lloyd (HHL) algorithm to quantum singular value transformation (QSVT), Hamiltonian simulation, and quantum lattice Boltzmann methods (QLBMs), while emphasizing hybrid quantum--classical approaches, including quantum physics-informed neural networks (QPINNs) and amplitude-encoded variational PDE solvers. We focus on hardware-agnostic algorithms compatible with present noisy processors and emerging fault-tolerant architectures. For each framework, we analyze the mathematical formulation, algorithmic structure, and principal limitations. We also examine tensor-network (TN) representations, since CFD fields, differential operators, and geometrical information can often be encoded efficiently in low-rank form. The TN formalism bridges CFD discretizations and quantum states, operators, and circuits, enabling compact representations to be translated into tensor-programmable variational quantum algorithms (TP-VQAs). We further review benchmark problems, including Poisson, reaction, diffusion, and nonlinear model equations, and assess how well quantum algorithms capture key features of fluid dynamics. Our analysis highlights that potential quantum advantage is highly problem dependent and governed by condition number, representational complexity, state preparation, and measurement constraints. We outline capabilities, limitations, and challenges toward scalable quantum algorithms for CFD.

quant-pharXiv:2609.39962•Oct 1, 2026•0 citations

Quantum Carleman linearization efficiency in nonlinear fluid dynamics

Javier Gonzalez-Conde, Dylan Lewis, Sachin S. Bharadwaj +1 more

Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is a specialized branch of fluid mechanics that utilizes numerical methods and algorithms to solve and analyze fluid-flow problems. One promising avenue to enhance CFD is the use of quantum computing, which has the potential to resolve nonlinear differential equations more efficiently than classical computers. Here, we try to answer the question of which regimes of nonlinear partial differential equations for fluid dynamics can have an efficient quantum algorithm. We propose a connection between the numerical parameter R , which guarantees efficiency in the truncation of the Carleman linearization, and the physical parameters that describe the fluid flow. This link can be made thanks to the Kolmogorov scale, which determines the minimum size of the grid needed to properly resolve the energy cascade induced by the nonlinear term. Additionally, we introduce the formalism for vector field simulation in different spatial dimensions, providing the discretization of the operators and the boundary conditions.

arXiv:2410.23057•Physical Review Research•Jun 12, 2025•14 citations
Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is a cornerstone of classical scientific computing, and there is growing interest in whether quantum computers can accelerate such simulations. The existing proposals for fault-tolerant quantum algorithms for CFD have almost exclusively been based on the Carleman embedding method, used to encode nonlinearities on a quantum computer. Here, we first identify several key challenges that must be addressed in order to establish quantum advantage using this method, including Carleman convergence, time-stepping requirements, condition-number scaling, and data extraction. Building on this analysis, we develop a novel algorithm for the incompressible lattice Boltzmann equation that addresses them, and provide its detailed analysis, including all potential sources of algorithmic complexity, as well as gate count estimates. We find that for an end-to-end problem, a modest quantum advantage may be preserved for selected observables in the high-error-tolerance regime. We establish a lower bound for the Reynolds number scaling of our quantum algorithm in dimension DDD at Kolmogorov microscale resolution with O(Re34(1+D2)×qM)O(\mathrm{Re}^{\frac{3}{4}(1+\frac{D}{2})} \times q_M)O(Re43​(1+2D​)×qM​), where qMq_MqM​ is a multiplicative overhead for data extraction with qM=O(Re38)q_M = O(\mathrm{Re}^{\frac{3}{8}})qM​=O(Re83​) for the drag force. This upper bounds the scaling improvement over classical algorithms by O(Re3D8)O(\mathrm{Re}^{\frac{3D}{8}})O(Re83D​). However, our numerical investigations suggest a lower speedup, with a scaling estimate of O(Re1.936×qM)O(\mathrm{Re}^{1.936} \times q_M)O(Re1.936×qM​) for D=2D=2D=2. Our results give robust evidence that small, but nontrivial, quantum advantages can be achieved in the context of CFD, and motivate the need for additional rigorous end-to-end quantum algorithm development.
This study examines the potential for fault-tolerant quantum computers to provide utility in fluid dynamics simulations, with a focus on drag force calculations for ship hull design. We assess whether quantum algorithms can surpass classical computational limits by generating detailed quantum resource estimates (QREs) in terms of logical qubits and TTT-gate counts. Our analysis is based on a quantum algorithm leveraging Carleman linearization of the lattice Boltzmann method (LBM), which has been suggested to offer exponential speedup. We develop efficient block encodings for LBM matrices and a method for amplitude-encoding drag force. We apply the method to the simple case of fluid flow past a sphere across a range of Reynolds numbers (Re\mathrm{Re}Re). We estimate the required (logical qubits)×\times×(TTT-gates), finding them to be prohibitively large, ranging from 102110^{21}1021 to 103910^{39}1039. While classical simulations scale as O(Re3)O(\mathrm{Re}^3)O(Re3), our QREs exhibit a modest polynomial scaling of O(Re2.68)O(\mathrm{Re}^{2.68})O(Re2.68), indicating no exponential quantum advantage. We attribute this limitation to an intrinsic power-law relationship between spatial grid resolution and time-stepping requirements that is a fundamental characteristic of explicit methods for evolving nonlinear differential equations. Thus, quantum computers are unlikely to provide utility in applications that require time-evolving fluids and other systems of nonlinear differential equations.
Numerical simulation of turbulent fluid dynamics needs to either parametrize turbulence—which introduces large uncertainties—or explicitly resolve the smallest scales—which is prohibitively expensive. Here, we provide evidence through analytic bounds and numerical studies that a potential quantum speedup can be achieved to simulate fluid dynamics using quantum computing. Specifically, we provide a lattice Boltzmann formulation of fluid dynamics for which we give evidence that low-order Carleman linearization is much more accurate than previously believed for these systems. This is achieved via a combination of reformulating the Navier-Stokes nonlinearity ( u · ∇ u ) to lattice-Boltzmann nonlinearity ( u 2 ) and accurately linearizing the dynamical equations, which effectively trades nonlinearity for additional degrees of freedom that add negligible expense in the quantum solver. Based on this, we apply a quantum algorithm for simulating the Carleman-linearized lattice Boltzmann equation and provide evidence that its cost scales logarithmically with system size compared with polynomial scaling in the best known classical algorithms. In this paper, we suggest that a quantum advantage may exist for simulating fluid dynamics, paving the way for simulating nonlinear multiscale transport phenomena in a wide range of disciplines using quantum computing.
We present a quantum computing algorithm for fluid flows based on the Carleman-linearization of the Lattice Boltzmann (LB) method. First, we demonstrate the convergence of the classical Carleman procedure at moderate Reynolds numbers, namely, for Kolmogorov-like flows. Then we proceed to formulate the corresponding quantum algorithm, including the quantum circuit layout, and analyze its computational viability. We show that, at least for moderate Reynolds numbers between 10 and 100, the Carleman–LB procedure can be successfully truncated at second order, which is a very encouraging result. We also show that the quantum circuit implementing the single time-step collision operator has a fixed depth, regardless of the number of lattice sites. However, such depth is of the order of ten thousands quantum gates, meaning that quantum advantage over classical computing is not attainable today, but could be achieved in the near or mid-term future. The same goal for the multi-step version remains, however, an open topic for future research.
Fluid simulations, especially at high Reynolds numbers, are computationally expensive on classical computers, making them promising application targets for quantum computing. Recent studies have combined the lattice Boltzmann method (LBM) with Carleman linearization to design quantum algorithms for computational fluid dynamics (CFD). However, practical quantum-circuit implementations of these algorithms that incorporate non-periodic boundary conditions have not been fully explored. In this work, we implement a quantum algorithm for two-dimensional linearized fluid flow around an obstacle, using block-encoding of the linear-system matrix and quantum singular value transformation (QSVT) to solve it. Inflow, outflow, and no-slip boundary conditions are formulated as sparse matrix operations and efficiently embedded into quantum circuits using index-value encoding. We demonstrate logarithmic scaling of the required numbers of qubits and gates with respect to the number of lattice points, suggesting the potential feasibility of quantum-computational fluid dynamics simulations.
We present a comprehensive review of quantum approaches for solving partial differential equations (PDEs) arising in computational fluid dynamics (CFD). We examine fully quantum approaches, including quantum linear system algorithms (QLSAs), ranging from the Harrow--Hassidim--Lloyd (HHL) algorithm to quantum singular value transformation (QSVT), Hamiltonian simulation, and quantum lattice Boltzmann methods (QLBMs), while emphasizing hybrid quantum--classical approaches, including quantum physics-informed neural networks (QPINNs) and amplitude-encoded variational PDE solvers. We focus on hardware-agnostic algorithms compatible with present noisy processors and emerging fault-tolerant architectures. For each framework, we analyze the mathematical formulation, algorithmic structure, and principal limitations. We also examine tensor-network (TN) representations, since CFD fields, differential operators, and geometrical information can often be encoded efficiently in low-rank form. The TN formalism bridges CFD discretizations and quantum states, operators, and circuits, enabling compact representations to be translated into tensor-programmable variational quantum algorithms (TP-VQAs). We further review benchmark problems, including Poisson, reaction, diffusion, and nonlinear model equations, and assess how well quantum algorithms capture key features of fluid dynamics. Our analysis highlights that potential quantum advantage is highly problem dependent and governed by condition number, representational complexity, state preparation, and measurement constraints. We outline capabilities, limitations, and challenges toward scalable quantum algorithms for CFD.
Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is a specialized branch of fluid mechanics that utilizes numerical methods and algorithms to solve and analyze fluid-flow problems. One promising avenue to enhance CFD is the use of quantum computing, which has the potential to resolve nonlinear differential equations more efficiently than classical computers. Here, we try to answer the question of which regimes of nonlinear partial differential equations for fluid dynamics can have an efficient quantum algorithm. We propose a connection between the numerical parameter R , which guarantees efficiency in the truncation of the Carleman linearization, and the physical parameters that describe the fluid flow. This link can be made thanks to the Kolmogorov scale, which determines the minimum size of the grid needed to properly resolve the energy cascade induced by the nonlinear term. Additionally, we introduce the formalism for vector field simulation in different spatial dimensions, providing the discretization of the operators and the boundary conditions.