Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2511.23392 · Physical Review X

Bounded-Error Quantum Simulation via Hamiltonian and Lindbladian Learning

Tristan Kraft, Manoj K. Joshi, William Lam, Tobias Olsacher, Florian Kranzl, Johannes Franke, Lata Kh Joshi, Rainer Blatt, Augusto Smerzi, Daniel Stilck França, Benoît Vermersch, Barbara Kraus, Christian F. Roos, Peter Zoller

quant-phSubmitted Nov 28, 2025• Announced Dec 1, 2025• 0 citations
v1 · Nov 28, 2025v2 · Aug 17, 2026
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Analog Quantum Simulators offer a route to exploring strongly correlated many-body dynamics beyond classical computation, but their predictive power remains limited by the absence of quantitative error estimation. Establishing rigorous uncertainty bounds is essential for elevating such devices from qualitative demonstrations to quantitative scientific tools. Here we introduce a general framework for bounded-error quantum simulation, which provides predictions for many-body observables with experimentally quantifiable uncertainties. The approach combines Hamiltonian and Lindbladian Learning--a statistically rigorous inference of the coherent and dissipative generators governing the dynamics--with the propagation of their uncertainties into the simulated observables, yielding confidence bounds directly derived from experimental data. We demonstrate this framework on trapped-ion quantum simulators implementing long-range Ising interactions with up to 51 ions, and validate it where classical comparison is possible. We analyze error bounds on two levels. First, we learn an open-system model from experimental data collected in an initial time window of quench dynamics, simulate the corresponding master equation, and quantitatively verify consistency between theoretical predictions and measured dynamics at long times. Second, we establish error bounds directly from experimental measurements alone, without relying on classical simulation--crucial for entering regimes of quantum advantage. The learned models reproduce the experimental evolution within the predicted bounds, demonstrating quantitative reliability and internal consistency. Bounded-error quantum simulation provides a scalable foundation for trusted analog quantum computation, bridging the gap between experimental platforms and predictive many-body physics. The techniques presented here directly extend to digital quantum simulation.

Journal reference
Phys. Rev. X 16, 031037 (2026)
DOI
10.1103/s96t-n8tx
Comments
22 pages, 10 figures

Related papers

Propagation of errors and quantitative quantum simulation with quantum advantage

S. Flannigan, Natalie Pearson, Guang Hao Low +5 more

The rapid development in hardware for quantum computing and simulation has led to much interest in problems where these devices can exceed the capabilities of existing classical computers and known methods. Approaching this for problems that go beyond testing the performance of a quantum device is an important step, and quantum simulation of many-body quench dynamics is one of the most promising candidates for early practical quantum advantage. We analyse the requirements for quantitatively reliable quantum simulation beyond the capabilities of existing classical methods for analogue quantum simulators with neutral atoms in optical lattices and trapped ions. Considering the primary sources of error in analogue devices and how they propagate after a quench in studies of the Hubbard or long-range transverse field Ising model, we identify the level of error expected in quantities we extract from experiments. We conclude for models that are directly implementable that regimes of practical quantum advantage are attained in current experiments with analogue simulators. We also identify the hardware requirements to reach the same level of accuracy with future fault-tolerant digital quantum simulation. Verification techniques are already available to test the assumptions we make here, and demonstrating these in experiments will be an important next step.

arXiv:2204.13644•Apr 28, 2022•0 citations

Observable Estimation in the Absence of Classical Verification

Samantha V. Barron, Bradley Mitchell, Vinay Tripathi +45 more

The predictive success of quantum mechanics underpins many areas of modern science, even as the exact simulation of large, interacting quantum systems remains beyond the reach of classical computation. This success has been enabled by the remarkable advancement of scalable numerical approximation methods, which often demonstrate practical accuracy despite the absence of formal guarantees. As quantum simulation pushes into regimes where these approximations struggle, a fundamental challenge arises: How can quantum outcomes be trusted when reliable classical benchmarks are unavailable? Here, we establish a framework for the independent validation of quantum estimates in this setting and present evidence that they provide the most credible result among several considered methods, in the absence of an immediately accessible ground-truth solution. We apply our framework to the semi-scrambling dynamics of a physical model that strains several leading classical simulation methods yet remains experimentally accessible, in part through our introduction of the \textit{operator Loschmidt echo}. We systematically design a series of experiments using quantum heuristics that, taken together, test the underlying assumptions and provide strong confidence in the observable estimates obtained from the quantum computer. We then show how this framework can be extended to place accuracy bounds on quantum estimates via careful characterization and manipulation of the device noise, transforming the problem of validating the observable estimation to validating the noise model. These results establish a route towards trusted quantum computation for scientific discovery, independent of classical verification.

quant-pharXiv:2607.25998•Jul 29, 2026•0 citations

Propagation of errors and quantitative quantum simulation with quantum advantage

Stuart Flannigan, Natalie Pearson, Guang Hao Low +5 more

Abstract The rapid development in hardware for quantum computing and simulation has led to much interest in problems where these devices can exceed the capabilities of existing classical computers and known methods. Approaching this for problems that go beyond testing the performance of a quantum device is an important step, and quantum simulation of many-body quench dynamics is one of the most promising candidates for early practical quantum advantage. We analyse the requirements for quantitatively reliable quantum simulation beyond the capabilities of existing classical methods for analogue quantum simulators with neutral atoms in optical lattices and trapped ions. Considering the primary sources of error in analogue devices and how they propagate after a quench in studies of the Hubbard or long-range transverse field Ising model, we identify the level of error expected in quantities we extract from experiments. We conclude for models that are directly implementable that regimes of practical quantum advantage are attained in current experiments with analogue simulators. We also identify the hardware requirements to reach the same level of accuracy with future fault-tolerant digital quantum simulation. Verification techniques are already available to test the assumptions we make here, and demonstrating these in experiments will be an important next step.

Quantum Science and Technology•Aug 11, 2022•29 citations

Error mitigation of shot-to-shot fluctuations in analog quantum simulators

Thomas Steckmann, Luo, De, Wang, Yu-Xin +7 more

Analog quantum simulators have provided key insights into quantum many-body dynamics. However, in such systems, both coherent and incoherent errors limit their scalability, hindering simulations in regimes that challenge classical simulations. In this work, we introduce an error mitigation technique that addresses and effectively suppresses a key source of error in leading simulator platforms: shot-to-shot fluctuations in the parameters for the Hamiltonian governing the system dynamics. We rigorously prove that amplifying this shot-to-shot noise and extrapolating to the zero-noise limit recovers noiseless results for realistic noise distributions. Experimentally, we demonstrate this technique on a 27-ion trapped-ion quantum simulator, extending the two-qubit exchange oscillation lifetime threefold. Numerically, we predict a significant enhancement in the effective many-body coherence time for Rydberg atom arrays under realistic conditions. Our scheme provides a possible route towards extending the effective coherence time in analog quantum experiments, enabling deeper explorations of quantum many-body dynamics.

arXiv:2506.16509•Jun 19, 2025•0 citations

Optimization of algorithmic errors in analog quantum simulations

Nikita A. Zemlevskiy, Henry Froland, Stephan Caspar

Analog quantum simulation is emerging as a powerful tool for uncovering classically unreachable physics such as many-body real-time dynamics. A complete quantification of uncertainties is necessary in order to make precise predictions using simulations on modern-day devices. Therefore, the inherent physical limitations of the device on the parameters of the simulation must be understood. This analysis examines the interplay of errors arising from simulation of approximate time evolution with those due to practical, real-world device constraints. These errors are studied in Heisenberg-type systems on analog quantum devices described by the Ising Hamiltonian. A general framework for quantifying these errors is introduced and applied to several proposed time evolution methods, including Trotter-like methods and Floquet-engineered constant-field approaches. The limitations placed on the accuracy of time evolution methods by current devices are discussed. Characterization of the scaling of coherent effects of different error sources provides a way to extend the presented Hamiltonian engineering methods to take advantage of forthcoming device capabilities.

arXiv:2308.02642•Physical Review A•May 15, 2024•8 citations

A Validation Framework for Quantum Simulation of Spin Dynamics against Inelastic Neutron Scattering and Classical Simulation

Gilles Buchs, Elaine Wong, Anshumitra Baul +16 more

Establishing quantum simulations as reliable tools for materials research requires quantitative validation against experiments and, where available, classical many-body calculations. For dynamical spin response, such validation remains challenging because experiment, classical simulation, and quantum simulation do not produce the same native observables. This challenge is increasingly relevant as quantum simulation protocols for dynamical response progress from theory to hardware-level benchmarking against neutron scattering data. The longer-term goal is to extend validation to classically intractable regimes accessible through future fault-tolerant implementations. Here, we develop a cross-pipeline validation framework for quantum simulation of dynamical spin response, using inelastic neutron scattering and classical many-body simulation as complementary experimental and computational anchors. The framework brings these pipelines to common momentum- and energy-resolved comparison levels through explicit forward and inverse observable maps, propagates uncertainty via covariance matrices or resampling, tests robustness to structured distortion, and evaluates agreement using a hierarchy of complementary metric families. It distinguishes stochastic uncertainty from robustness-induced distortion, carries both through the comparison chain, and uses the resulting metric-level uncertainty and distortion information to support layered validation at the pipeline, solver, and model levels. We also introduce actuator-aware feedback logic to improve agreement without obscuring the physical origin of any remaining mismatch. We close by outlining future extensions of this methodology, including upstream uncertainty and distortion modeling, adaptive feedback, asymmetric validation beyond full classical benchmarking, fault-tolerant workflows, and community infrastructure for reproducible validation.

quant-pharXiv:2607.01568•Jul 3, 2026•0 citations
Analog Quantum Simulators offer a route to exploring strongly correlated many-body dynamics beyond classical computation, but their predictive power remains limited by the absence of quantitative error estimation. Establishing rigorous uncertainty bounds is essential for elevating such devices from qualitative demonstrations to quantitative scientific tools. Here we introduce a general framework for bounded-error quantum simulation, which provides predictions for many-body observables with experimentally quantifiable uncertainties. The approach combines Hamiltonian and Lindbladian Learning--a statistically rigorous inference of the coherent and dissipative generators governing the dynamics--with the propagation of their uncertainties into the simulated observables, yielding confidence bounds directly derived from experimental data. We demonstrate this framework on trapped-ion quantum simulators implementing long-range Ising interactions with up to 51 ions, and validate it where classical comparison is possible. We analyze error bounds on two levels. First, we learn an open-system model from experimental data collected in an initial time window of quench dynamics, simulate the corresponding master equation, and quantitatively verify consistency between theoretical predictions and measured dynamics at long times. Second, we establish error bounds directly from experimental measurements alone, without relying on classical simulation--crucial for entering regimes of quantum advantage. The learned models reproduce the experimental evolution within the predicted bounds, demonstrating quantitative reliability and internal consistency. Bounded-error quantum simulation provides a scalable foundation for trusted analog quantum computation, bridging the gap between experimental platforms and predictive many-body physics. The techniques presented here directly extend to digital quantum simulation.
The rapid development in hardware for quantum computing and simulation has led to much interest in problems where these devices can exceed the capabilities of existing classical computers and known methods. Approaching this for problems that go beyond testing the performance of a quantum device is an important step, and quantum simulation of many-body quench dynamics is one of the most promising candidates for early practical quantum advantage. We analyse the requirements for quantitatively reliable quantum simulation beyond the capabilities of existing classical methods for analogue quantum simulators with neutral atoms in optical lattices and trapped ions. Considering the primary sources of error in analogue devices and how they propagate after a quench in studies of the Hubbard or long-range transverse field Ising model, we identify the level of error expected in quantities we extract from experiments. We conclude for models that are directly implementable that regimes of practical quantum advantage are attained in current experiments with analogue simulators. We also identify the hardware requirements to reach the same level of accuracy with future fault-tolerant digital quantum simulation. Verification techniques are already available to test the assumptions we make here, and demonstrating these in experiments will be an important next step.
The predictive success of quantum mechanics underpins many areas of modern science, even as the exact simulation of large, interacting quantum systems remains beyond the reach of classical computation. This success has been enabled by the remarkable advancement of scalable numerical approximation methods, which often demonstrate practical accuracy despite the absence of formal guarantees. As quantum simulation pushes into regimes where these approximations struggle, a fundamental challenge arises: How can quantum outcomes be trusted when reliable classical benchmarks are unavailable? Here, we establish a framework for the independent validation of quantum estimates in this setting and present evidence that they provide the most credible result among several considered methods, in the absence of an immediately accessible ground-truth solution. We apply our framework to the semi-scrambling dynamics of a physical model that strains several leading classical simulation methods yet remains experimentally accessible, in part through our introduction of the \textit{operator Loschmidt echo}. We systematically design a series of experiments using quantum heuristics that, taken together, test the underlying assumptions and provide strong confidence in the observable estimates obtained from the quantum computer. We then show how this framework can be extended to place accuracy bounds on quantum estimates via careful characterization and manipulation of the device noise, transforming the problem of validating the observable estimation to validating the noise model. These results establish a route towards trusted quantum computation for scientific discovery, independent of classical verification.
Abstract The rapid development in hardware for quantum computing and simulation has led to much interest in problems where these devices can exceed the capabilities of existing classical computers and known methods. Approaching this for problems that go beyond testing the performance of a quantum device is an important step, and quantum simulation of many-body quench dynamics is one of the most promising candidates for early practical quantum advantage. We analyse the requirements for quantitatively reliable quantum simulation beyond the capabilities of existing classical methods for analogue quantum simulators with neutral atoms in optical lattices and trapped ions. Considering the primary sources of error in analogue devices and how they propagate after a quench in studies of the Hubbard or long-range transverse field Ising model, we identify the level of error expected in quantities we extract from experiments. We conclude for models that are directly implementable that regimes of practical quantum advantage are attained in current experiments with analogue simulators. We also identify the hardware requirements to reach the same level of accuracy with future fault-tolerant digital quantum simulation. Verification techniques are already available to test the assumptions we make here, and demonstrating these in experiments will be an important next step.
Analog quantum simulators have provided key insights into quantum many-body dynamics. However, in such systems, both coherent and incoherent errors limit their scalability, hindering simulations in regimes that challenge classical simulations. In this work, we introduce an error mitigation technique that addresses and effectively suppresses a key source of error in leading simulator platforms: shot-to-shot fluctuations in the parameters for the Hamiltonian governing the system dynamics. We rigorously prove that amplifying this shot-to-shot noise and extrapolating to the zero-noise limit recovers noiseless results for realistic noise distributions. Experimentally, we demonstrate this technique on a 27-ion trapped-ion quantum simulator, extending the two-qubit exchange oscillation lifetime threefold. Numerically, we predict a significant enhancement in the effective many-body coherence time for Rydberg atom arrays under realistic conditions. Our scheme provides a possible route towards extending the effective coherence time in analog quantum experiments, enabling deeper explorations of quantum many-body dynamics.
Analog quantum simulation is emerging as a powerful tool for uncovering classically unreachable physics such as many-body real-time dynamics. A complete quantification of uncertainties is necessary in order to make precise predictions using simulations on modern-day devices. Therefore, the inherent physical limitations of the device on the parameters of the simulation must be understood. This analysis examines the interplay of errors arising from simulation of approximate time evolution with those due to practical, real-world device constraints. These errors are studied in Heisenberg-type systems on analog quantum devices described by the Ising Hamiltonian. A general framework for quantifying these errors is introduced and applied to several proposed time evolution methods, including Trotter-like methods and Floquet-engineered constant-field approaches. The limitations placed on the accuracy of time evolution methods by current devices are discussed. Characterization of the scaling of coherent effects of different error sources provides a way to extend the presented Hamiltonian engineering methods to take advantage of forthcoming device capabilities.
Establishing quantum simulations as reliable tools for materials research requires quantitative validation against experiments and, where available, classical many-body calculations. For dynamical spin response, such validation remains challenging because experiment, classical simulation, and quantum simulation do not produce the same native observables. This challenge is increasingly relevant as quantum simulation protocols for dynamical response progress from theory to hardware-level benchmarking against neutron scattering data. The longer-term goal is to extend validation to classically intractable regimes accessible through future fault-tolerant implementations. Here, we develop a cross-pipeline validation framework for quantum simulation of dynamical spin response, using inelastic neutron scattering and classical many-body simulation as complementary experimental and computational anchors. The framework brings these pipelines to common momentum- and energy-resolved comparison levels through explicit forward and inverse observable maps, propagates uncertainty via covariance matrices or resampling, tests robustness to structured distortion, and evaluates agreement using a hierarchy of complementary metric families. It distinguishes stochastic uncertainty from robustness-induced distortion, carries both through the comparison chain, and uses the resulting metric-level uncertainty and distortion information to support layered validation at the pipeline, solver, and model levels. We also introduce actuator-aware feedback logic to improve agreement without obscuring the physical origin of any remaining mismatch. We close by outlining future extensions of this methodology, including upstream uncertainty and distortion modeling, adaptive feedback, asymmetric validation beyond full classical benchmarking, fault-tolerant workflows, and community infrastructure for reproducible validation.