The Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) requires considered optimization problems to be translated into a compatible format. A popular transformation step in this pipeline involves the quadratization of higher-order binary optimization problems, translating them into Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) formulations through the introduction of auxiliary variables. Conventional algorithms for the selection of auxiliary variables often aim to minimize the total number of required variables without taking the constraints of the underlying quantum computer-in particular, the connectivity of its qubits-into consideration. This quickly results in interaction graphs that are incompatible with the target device, resulting in a substantial compilation overhead even with highly optimized compilers. To address this issue, this work presents a novel approach for the selection of auxiliary variables tailored for architectures with limited connectivity. By specifically constructing an interaction graph with a regular structure and a limited maximal degree of vertices, we find a way to construct QAOA circuits that can be mapped efficiently to a variety of architectures. We show that, compared to circuits constructed from a QUBO formulation using conventional auxiliary selection methods, the proposed approach reduces the circuit depth by almost 40%. An implementation of all proposed methods is publicly available at https://github.com/munich-quantum-toolkit/problemsolver.
Comments
7 pages, 8 figures, published at Design, Automation and Test in Europe Conference (DATE) 2026
The Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) requires considered optimization problems to be translated into a compatible format. A popular transformation step in this pipeline involves the quadratization of higher-order binary optimization problems, translating them into Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) formulations through the introduction of auxiliary variables. Conventional algorithms for the selection of auxiliary variables often aim to minimize the total number of required variables without taking the constraints of the underlying quantum computer-in particular, the connectivity of its qubits-into consideration. This quickly results in interaction graphs that are incompatible with the target device, resulting in a substantial compilation overhead even with highly optimized compilers. To address this issue, this work presents a novel approach for the selection of auxiliary variables tailored for architectures with limited connectivity. By specifically constructing an interaction graph with a regular structure and a limited maximal degree of vertices, we find a way to construct QAOA circuits that can be mapped efficiently to a variety of architectures. We show that, compared to circuits constructed from a QUBO formulation using conventional auxiliary selection methods, the proposed approach reduces the circuit depth by almost 40%. An implementation of all proposed methods is publicly available at https://github.com/munich-quantum-toolkit/problemsolver.
With the applications of quantum computing becoming more and more widespread, finding ways that allow end users without experience in the field to apply quantum computers to solve their individual problems is becoming a crucial task. However, current optimization algorithms require problem instances to be posed in complex formats that are challenging to formulate, even for experts. In particular, the Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) formalism employed by many quantum optimization algorithms, such as the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA), involves the mathematical rewriting of constraints under strict conditions. To facilitate this process, we propose a framework to automatically generate QUBO formulations for pathfinding problems. This framework allows users to translate their specific problem instances into formulations that can be passed directly to quantum algorithms for optimization without requiring any expertise in the field of quantum computing. It supports three different encoding schemes that can easily be compared without requiring manual reformulation efforts. The resulting QUBO formulations are robust and efficient, reducing the previously tedious and error-prone reformulation process to a task that can be completed in a matter of seconds. In addition to an open-source Python package available on https://github.com/munich-quantum-toolkit/problemsolver, we also provide a graphical user interface accessible through the web (https://munich-quantum-toolkit.github.io/problemsolver/), which can be used to operate the framework without requiring the end user to write any code.
Leveraging quantum computers for optimization problems holds promise across various application domains. Nevertheless, utilizing respective quantum computing solvers requires describing the optimization problem according to the Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) formalism and selecting a proper solver for the application of interest with a reasonable setting. Both demand significant proficiency in quantum computing, QUBO formulation, and quantum solvers, a background that usually cannot be assumed by end users who are domain experts rather than quantum computing specialists. While tools aid in QUBO formulations, support for selecting the best-solving approach remains absent. This becomes even more challenging because selecting the best solver for a problem heavily depends on the problem itself. In this work, we are accepting this challenge and propose a predictive selection approach, which aids end users in this task. To this end, the solver selection task is first formulated as a classification task that is suitable to be solved by supervised machine learning. Based on that, we then propose strategies for adjusting solver parameters based on problem size and characteristics. Experimental evaluations, considering more than 500 different QUBO problems, confirm the benefits of the proposed solution. In fact, we show that in more than 70% of the cases, the best solver is selected, and in about 90% of the problems, a solver in the top two, i.e., the best or its closest suboptimum, is selected. This exploration proves the potential of machine learning in quantum solver selection and lays the foundations for its automation, broadening access to quantum optimization for a wider range of users. The pre-trained classifier is integrated into the MQT Quantum Auto Optimizer (MQT QAO) framework, publicly available on GitHub (https://github.com/cda-tum/mqt-qao) as part of the Munich Quantum Toolkit (MQT).
In order to implement a quantum computing application, problem instances must be encoded into a quantum circuit and then compiled for a specific platform. The lengthy compilation process is a key bottleneck in this workflow, especially for problems that arise repeatedly with a similar yet distinct structure (each of which requires a new compilation run thus far). In this paper, we aim to overcome this bottleneck by proposing a comprehensive pre-compilation technique that tries to minimize the time spent for compiling recurring problems while preserving the solution quality as much as possible. The following concepts underpin the proposed approach: Beginning with a problem class and a corresponding quantum algorithm, a predictive encoding scheme is applied to encode a representative problem instance into a general-purpose quantum circuit for that problem class. Once the real problem instance is known, the previously constructed circuit only needs to be adjusted-with (nearly) no compilation necessary. Experimental evaluations on QAOA for the MaxCut problem as well as a case study involving a satellite mission planning problem show that the proposed approach significantly reduces the compilation time by several orders of magnitude compared to Qiskit's compilation schemes while maintaining comparable compiled circuit quality. All implementations are available on GitHub (https://github.com!cda-tum!mqt-problemsolver) as part of the Munich Quantum Toolkit (MQT).
The Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) has shown promise in solving combinatorial optimization problems by leveraging quantum computational power. We propose a simple approach, the Two-Step QAOA, which aims to improve the effectiveness of QAOA by decomposing problems with k-hot encoding QUBO (Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization) formulations. By identifying and separating the problem into two stages, we transform soft constraints into hard constraints, simplifying the generation of initial conditions and enabling more efficient optimization. The method is particularly beneficial for tackling complex societal problems that often involve intricate constraint structures.
Combinatorial optimization problems are typically formulated using Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO), where constraints are enforced through penalty terms that introduce auxiliary variables and rapidly increase Hamiltonian complexity, limiting scalability on near term quantum devices. In this work, we systematically study Quadratic Unconstrained D-ary Optimization (QUDO) as an alternative formulation in which decision variables are encoded directly in higher dimensional Hilbert spaces. We demonstrate that QUDO naturally captures structural constraints across a range of problem classes, including the Traveling Salesman Problem, two variants of the Vehicle Routing Problem, graph coloring, job scheduling, and Max-K-Cut, without the need for extensive penalty constructions. Using a qudit-level implementation of the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (qudit QAOA), we benchmark these formulations against their binary QUBO counterparts and exact classical solutions. Our study show consistently improved approximation ratios and substantially reduced computational overhead at comparable circuit depths, highlighting QUDO as a scalable and expressive representation for quantum combinatorial optimization.
Abstraction layers are of paramount importance in software architecture, as they shield the higher-level formulation of payload computations from lower-level details. Since quantum computing (QC) introduces many such details that are often unaccustomed to computer scientists, an obvious desideratum is to devise appropriate abstraction layers for QC. For discrete optimisation, one such abstraction is to cast problems in quadratic unconstrained binary optimisation (QUBO) form, which is amenable to a variety of quantum approaches. However, different mathematically equivalent forms can lead to different behaviour on quantum hardware, ranging from ease of mapping onto qubits to performance scalability. In this work, we show how using higher-order problem formulations (that provide better expressivity in modelling optimisation tasks than plain QUBO formulations) and their automatic transformation into QUBO form can be used to leverage such differences to prioritise between different desired non-functional properties for quantum optimisation. Based on a practically relevant use-case and a graph-theoretic analysis, we evaluate how different transformation approaches influence widely used quantum performance metrics (circuit depth, gates count, gate distribution, qubit scaling), and also consider the classical computational efforts required to perform the transformations, as they influence possibilities for achieving future quantum advantage. Furthermore, we establish more general properties and invariants of the transformation methods. Our quantitative study shows that the approach allows us to satisfy different trade-offs, and suggests various possibilities for the future construction of general-purpose abstractions and automatic generation of useful quantum circuits from high-level problem descriptions.