With the applications of quantum computing becoming more and more widespread, finding ways that allow end users without experience in the field to apply quantum computers to solve their individual problems is becoming a crucial task. However, current optimization algorithms require problem instances to be posed in complex formats that are challenging to formulate, even for experts. In particular, the Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) formalism employed by many quantum optimization algorithms, such as the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA), involves the mathematical rewriting of constraints under strict conditions. To facilitate this process, we propose a framework to automatically generate QUBO formulations for pathfinding problems. This framework allows users to translate their specific problem instances into formulations that can be passed directly to quantum algorithms for optimization without requiring any expertise in the field of quantum computing. It supports three different encoding schemes that can easily be compared without requiring manual reformulation efforts. The resulting QUBO formulations are robust and efficient, reducing the previously tedious and error-prone reformulation process to a task that can be completed in a matter of seconds. In addition to an open-source Python package available on https://github.com/munich-quantum-toolkit/problemsolver, we also provide a graphical user interface accessible through the web (https://munich-quantum-toolkit.github.io/problemsolver/), which can be used to operate the framework without requiring the end user to write any code.
With the applications of quantum computing becoming more and more widespread, finding ways that allow end users without experience in the field to apply quantum computers to solve their individual problems is becoming a crucial task. However, current optimization algorithms require problem instances to be posed in complex formats that are challenging to formulate, even for experts. In particular, the Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) formalism employed by many quantum optimization algorithms, such as the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA), involves the mathematical rewriting of constraints under strict conditions. To facilitate this process, we propose a framework to automatically generate QUBO formulations for pathfinding problems. This framework allows users to translate their specific problem instances into formulations that can be passed directly to quantum algorithms for optimization without requiring any expertise in the field of quantum computing. It supports three different encoding schemes that can easily be compared without requiring manual reformulation efforts. The resulting QUBO formulations are robust and efficient, reducing the previously tedious and error-prone reformulation process to a task that can be completed in a matter of seconds. In addition to an open-source Python package available on https://github.com/munich-quantum-toolkit/problemsolver, we also provide a graphical user interface accessible through the web (https://munich-quantum-toolkit.github.io/problemsolver/), which can be used to operate the framework without requiring the end user to write any code.
Optimizing objective functions stands to benefit significantly from leveraging quantum computers, promising enhanced solution quality across various application domains in the future. However, harnessing the potential of quantum solvers necessitates formulating problems according to the Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) model, demanding significant expertise in quantum computation and QUBO formulations. This expertise barrier limits access to quantum solutions. Fortunately, automating the conversion of conventional optimization problems into QUBO formulations presents a solution for promoting accessibility to quantum solvers. This article addresses the unmet need for a comprehensive automatic framework to assist users in utilizing quantum solvers for optimization tasks while preserving interfaces that closely resemble conventional optimization practices. The framework prompts users to specify variables, optimization criteria, as well as validity constraints and, afterwards, allows them to choose the desired solver. Subsequently, it automatically transforms the problem description into a format compatible with the chosen solver and provides the resulting solution. Additionally, the framework offers instruments for analyzing solution validity and quality. Comparative analysis against existing libraries and tools in the literature highlights the comprehensive nature of the proposed framework. Two use cases (the knapsack problem and linear regression) are considered to show the completeness and efficiency of the framework in real-world applications. Finally, the proposed framework represents a significant advancement towards automating quantum computing solutions and widening access to quantum optimization for a broader range of users. The framework is publicly available on GitHub (https://github.com/cda-tum/mqt-qao) as part of the Munich Quantum Toolkit (MQT).
Leveraging quantum computers for optimization problems holds promise across various application domains. Nevertheless, utilizing respective quantum computing solvers requires describing the optimization problem according to the Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) formalism and selecting a proper solver for the application of interest with a reasonable setting. Both demand significant proficiency in quantum computing, QUBO formulation, and quantum solvers, a background that usually cannot be assumed by end users who are domain experts rather than quantum computing specialists. While tools aid in QUBO formulations, support for selecting the best-solving approach remains absent. This becomes even more challenging because selecting the best solver for a problem heavily depends on the problem itself. In this work, we are accepting this challenge and propose a predictive selection approach, which aids end users in this task. To this end, the solver selection task is first formulated as a classification task that is suitable to be solved by supervised machine learning. Based on that, we then propose strategies for adjusting solver parameters based on problem size and characteristics. Experimental evaluations, considering more than 500 different QUBO problems, confirm the benefits of the proposed solution. In fact, we show that in more than 70% of the cases, the best solver is selected, and in about 90% of the problems, a solver in the top two, i.e., the best or its closest suboptimum, is selected. This exploration proves the potential of machine learning in quantum solver selection and lays the foundations for its automation, broadening access to quantum optimization for a wider range of users. The pre-trained classifier is integrated into the MQT Quantum Auto Optimizer (MQT QAO) framework, publicly available on GitHub (https://github.com/cda-tum/mqt-qao) as part of the Munich Quantum Toolkit (MQT).
The Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) requires considered optimization problems to be translated into a compatible format. A popular transformation step in this pipeline involves the quadratization of higher-order binary optimization problems, translating them into Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) formulations through the introduction of auxiliary variables. Conventional algorithms for the selection of auxiliary variables often aim to minimize the total number of required variables without taking the constraints of the underlying quantum computer-in particular, the connectivity of its qubits-into consideration. This quickly results in interaction graphs that are incompatible with the target device, resulting in a substantial compilation overhead even with highly optimized compilers. To address this issue, this work presents a novel approach for the selection of auxiliary variables tailored for architectures with limited connectivity. By specifically constructing an interaction graph with a regular structure and a limited maximal degree of vertices, we find a way to construct QAOA circuits that can be mapped efficiently to a variety of architectures. We show that, compared to circuits constructed from a QUBO formulation using conventional auxiliary selection methods, the proposed approach reduces the circuit depth by almost 40%. An implementation of all proposed methods is publicly available at https://github.com/munich-quantum-toolkit/problemsolver.
Quantum computing is fast evolving as a technology due to recent advances in hardware, software, as well as the development of promising applications. To use this technology for solving specific problems, a suitable quantum algorithm has to be determined, the problem has to be encoded in a form suitable for the chosen algorithm, it has to be executed, and the result has to be decoded. To date, each of these tedious and error-prone steps is conducted in a mostly manual fashion. This creates a high entry barrier for using quantum computing—especially for users with little to no expertise in that domain. In this work, we envision a framework that aims to lower this entry barrier by allowing users to employ quantum computing solutions in an automatic fashion. To this end, interfaces as similar as possible to classical solvers are provided, while the quantum steps of the workflow are shielded from the user as much as possible by a fully automated backend. To demonstrate the feasibility and usability of such a framework, we provide proof-of-concept implementations for two different classes of problems which are publicly available on GitHub (https://github.com/cda-tum/MQTProblemSolver) as part of the Munich Quantum Toolkit (MQT). By this, this work provides the foundation for a low-threshold approach realizing quantum computing solutions with no or only moderate expertise in this technology.
Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) is a central formulation for combinatorial optimization and has gained increasing attention due to its compatibility with quantum, hybrid quantum-classical, and quantum-inspired solvers. However, translating natural-language problem descriptions into correct QUBO formulations remains difficult, requiring the identification of binary variables, constraints, objective functions, penalty terms, and suitable penalty weights. This process is time-consuming and often demands substantial domain expertise. To address this challenge, we propose an end-to-end multi-agent framework that automatically generates QUBO formulations from natural-language problem descriptions, supported by structured or unstructured test cases. To evaluate its performance, We also introduce QUBOBench, a benchmark containing 100 combinatorial optimization problems across 12 application domains, curated from peer-reviewed literature, competitions, and canonical NP-hard problems. Experimental results show that our framework achieves 68% accuracy on QUBOBench, outperforming a direct single-call baseline by 22%. Further analysis identifies iterative self-repair as the most important component contributing to improved performance. The data and code are open-sourced at https://quitttcat.github.io/QuantumQUBOAgent.
Recent advances in quantum computing and the increasing availability of quantum hardware have substantially enhanced the practical relevance of quantum approaches to discrete optimization. Among these, the Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) formulation provides a unifying modeling framework for a broad class of NP-hard problems and is naturally suited to quantum computing and quantum-inspired algorithms. Location science, network design, and logistics represent core application domains of discrete optimization, combining high practical impact with substantial computational challenges. In this work, we develop QUBO formulations for several fundamental problems in these domains, including a nonlinear integer formulation of the Discrete Ordered Median Problem (DOMP). Beyond their modeling relevance, these QUBO formulations serve as representative benchmark problems for assessing quantum algorithms and quantum hardware. We further derive a tight bound for the penalty parameter ensuring equivalence between the QUBO formulation and its underlying integer program. Finally, we conduct a comprehensive computational study using QAOA, WS-QAOA, and classical heuristics for QUBO instances of the p-Median Problem and the Fixed-Charge Facility Location Problem (FCFLP), and introduce two effective warm-start strategies for WS-QAOA based on its linear programming relaxation.