We have developed a new version of the high-performance Jülich universal quantum computer simulator (JUQCS-50) that leverages key features of the GH200 superchips as used in the JUPITER supercomputer, enabling simulations of a 50-qubit universal quantum computer for the first time. JUQCS-50 achieves this through three key innovations: (1) extending usable memory beyond GPU limits via high-bandwidth CPU-GPU interconnects and LPDDR5 memory; (2) adaptive data encoding to reduce memory footprint with acceptable trade-offs in precision and compute effort; and (3) an on-the-fly network traffic optimizer. These advances result in a 16.6-fold speedup over the previous 48-qubit record on the K computer
We have developed a new version of the high-performance Jülich universal quantum computer simulator (JUQCS-50) that leverages key features of the GH200 superchips as used in the JUPITER supercomputer, enabling simulations of a 50-qubit universal quantum computer for the first time. JUQCS-50 achieves this through three key innovations: (1) extending usable memory beyond GPU limits via high-bandwidth CPU-GPU interconnects and LPDDR5 memory; (2) adaptive data encoding to reduce memory footprint with acceptable trade-offs in precision and compute effort; and (3) an on-the-fly network traffic optimizer. These advances result in a 16.6-fold speedup over the previous 48-qubit record on the K computer
We have developed a new version of the high-performance Jülich universal quantum computer simulator (JUQCS-50) that leverages key features of the GH200 superchips as used in the JUPITER supercomputer, enabling simulations of a 50-qubit universal quantum computer for the first time. JUQCS-50 achieves this through three key innovations: (1) extending usable memory beyond GPU limits via high-bandwidth CPU–GPU interconnects and LPDDR5 memory; (2) adaptive data encoding to reduce memory footprint with acceptable trade-offs in precision and compute effort; and (3) an on-the-fly network traffic optimizer. These advances result in an 16.6-fold speedup over the previous 48-qubit record on the K computer.
Quantum computing simulation on a classical computer is difficult due to the exponential runtime and memory overhead. Previous work addresses the difficulty by utilizing multiple Graphical Processing Units (GPUs) and multi-node computers. GPUs are efficient for handling runtime issues but have limited total accessible memory space. Meanwhile, the memory of a multi-node computer can be scaled to the petabytes order, but its bandwidth for access from host computers (CPUs) is narrow. To simultaneously accelerate simulation and enlarge the total memory space, we propose a heterogeneous parallelization approach by combining GPUs and CPUs. Our simulator allocates memory to the GPUs first, and then to the CPUs. It thus accelerates simulation by using the full capabilities of the GPUs if memory for the simulation fits in the GPUs on a cluster. Allocating memory to the CPUs reduces benefits of the GPUs but enlarges the capacity of qubits in the simulation. In such case, it can exploit the memory of the GPUs to add one more qubit in the simulation if the size of memory in a node is the power of two (such as 512GB). We show empirical performance evaluations of our simulator in a distributed environment of POWER9.
We study large-scale applications using a GPU-accelerated version of the massively parallel Jülich universal quantum computer simulator (JUQCS–G). First, we benchmark JUWELS Booster, a GPU cluster with 3744 NVIDIA A100 Tensor Core GPUs. Then, we use JUQCS–G to study the relation between quantum annealing (QA) and the quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA). We find that a very coarsely discretized version of QA, termed approximate quantum annealing (AQA), performs surprisingly well in comparison to the QAOA. It can either be used to initialize the QAOA, or to avoid the costly optimization procedure altogether. Furthermore, we study the scaling of the success probability when using AQA for problems with 30 to 40 qubits. We find that the case with the largest discretization error scales most favorably, surpassing the best result obtained from the QAOA.
Quantum computers have demonstrated utility in simulating quantum systems beyond brute-force classical approaches. As the community builds on these demonstrations to explore using quantum computing for applied research, algorithms and workflows have emerged that require leveraging both quantum computers and classical high-performance computing (HPC) systems to scale applications, especially in chemistry and materials, beyond what either system can simulate alone. Today, these disparate systems operate in isolation, forcing users to manually orchestrate workloads, coordinate job scheduling, and transfer data between systems -- a cumbersome process that hinders productivity and severely limits rapid algorithmic exploration. These challenges motivate the need for flexible and high-performance Quantum-Centric Supercomputing (QCSC) systems that integrate Quantum Processing Units (QPUs), Graphics Processing Units (GPUs), and Central Processing Units (CPUs) to accelerate discovery of such algorithms across applications. These systems will be co-designed across quantum and classical HPC infrastructure, middleware, and application layers to accelerate the adoption of quantum computing for solving critical computational problems. We envision QCSC evolution through three distinct phases: (1) quantum systems as specialized compute offload engines within existing HPC complexes; (2) heterogeneous quantum and classical HPC systems coupled through advanced middleware, enabling seamless execution of hybrid quantum-classical algorithms; and (3) fully co-designed heterogeneous quantum-HPC systems for hybrid computational workflows. This article presents a reference architecture and roadmap for these QCSC systems.
We use a massively parallel simulator of a universal quantum computer to benchmark some of the most powerful supercomputers in the world. We find nearly ideal scaling behavior on the Sunway TaihuLight, the K computer, the IBM BlueGene/Q JUQUEEN, and the Intel Xeon based clusters JURECA and JUWELS. On the Sunway TaihuLight and the K computer, universal quantum computers with up to 48 qubits can be simulated by means of an adaptive two-byte encoding to reduce the memory requirements by a factor of eight. Additionally, we discuss an alternative approach to alleviate the memory bottleneck by decomposing entangling gates such that low-depth circuits with a much larger number of qubits can be simulated.
Quantum circuit simulation at scale demands high-performance computing (HPC) frameworks capable of distributing exponentially growing state vectors and tensor networks across heterogeneous compute clusters. As quantum algorithm development accelerates and circuits approach 50-100 qubits in practical workloads, simulation bottlenecks shift from single-node memory constraints to inter-node communication overhead, GPU memory bandwidth, and framework-level scheduling inefficiencies. This paper proposes the HPC Quantum Simulation Framework Benchmark (HQSFB), a systematic evaluation of five leading quantum simulation frameworks -- Qiskit Aer, Cirq on GCP, cuQuantum (NVIDIA), QuEST, and Intel Quantum Simulator (IQS) -- across six HPC deployment configurations spanning single-GPU workstations to 512-GPU supercomputer partitions. HQSFB introduces the Framework Efficiency Score (FES) combining simulation throughput, GPU utilisation, inter-node communication overhead, and memory scaling efficiency. Key results: cuQuantum achieves the highest FES (0.924) with 94.2% GPU utilisation and 42x speedup over CPU baseline at 512 GPUs; QuEST achieves the best memory scaling efficiency (0.962) for distributed statevector simulation; Qiskit Aer provides the broadest circuit compatibility with FES = 0.842. The framework provides HPC configuration guidance and an open benchmark suite for quantum simulation infrastructure planning.