Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2509.16258

Non-Commutation Chains in Pre- and Post-Selection Paradoxes

Ouissal Moumou

Published Sep 18, 2025• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Peculiar measurements can be obtained on systems that undergo both pre- and post-selection. We prove a conjecture from [1] on logical Pre- and Post-Selection (PPS) paradoxes for a restricted case. We prove that all of these paradoxes admit non-commutation chains. We also relate this to the theory of causal balance, recently introduced in [1], and show how the theory blocks such paradoxes.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2509.16258

Related papers

Probing contextuality with pre- and post-selection

Jeff Tollaksen

By analyzing the concept of contextuality (Bell-Kochen-Specker) in terms of pre-and-post-selection (PPS), it is possible to assign definite values to observables in a new way. Physical reasons are presented for restrictions on these assignments. When measurements are performed which do not disturb the pre- and post-selection (i.e. weak measurements), then novel experimental aspects of contextuality can be demonstrated including a proof that every PPS-paradox with definite predictions implies contextuality. Certain results of these measurements (eccentric weak values with e.g. negative values outside the spectrum), however, cannot be explained by a "classical-like" hidden variable theory. Surprising theoretical implications are discussed.

Journal of Physics Conference Series•May 1, 2007•11 citations

Probing Contextuality with Pre- and Post-selection

Jeff Tollaksen

By analyzing the concept of contextuality (Bell-Kochen-Specker) in terms of pre-and-post-selection (PPS), it is possible to assign definite values to observables in a new way. Physical reasons are presented for restrictions on these assignments. When measurements are performed which do not disturb the pre- and post-selection (i.e. weak measurements), then novel experimental aspects of contextuality can be demonstrated including a proof that every PPS-paradox with definite predictions implies contextuality. Certain results of these measurements (eccentric weak values with e.g. negative values outside the spectrum), however, cannot be explained by a classical-like hidden variable theory. Surprising theoretical implications are discussed.

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 5, 2007•0 citations

Coherence as a resource for $N$-box and quantum pigeonhole paradoxes

Som Kanjilal, Rafael Wagner, Ernesto F. Galvão

Pre- and post-selection (PPS) paradoxes are striking demonstrations of quantum nonclassicality. Logical PPS paradoxes, where inferences made with the Aharonov-Bergmann-Lebowitz (ABL) rule are exactly 0 or 1, are linked to contextuality. Non-logical paradoxes lack this strong signature. In this work, we analyse more general, non-logical PPS scenarios involving mixed pre- and post-selected states. We show that two such scenarios, the $N$-box and quantum pigeonhole paradoxes, require coherence of both pre- and post-selected states in the basis of the intermediate measurement. This is done by showing each paradox holds if and only if there is weak-value anomaly for a single, paradox-specific operator, together with the fact that weak-value anomaly requires coherence. This clarifies the role of different notions of nonclassicality in these scenarios, highlighting the required quantitative departures from (strictly) classical explanations provided by incoherent sub-theories of quantum theory.

quant-pharXiv:2607.24282•Jul 28, 2026•0 citations

Pre- and post-selection paradoxes in quantum walks

T. Kopyciuk, Mikołaj Lewandowski, Paweł Kurzyński

Abstract Many features of single-partite quantum walks can be simulated by classical waves. However, it was recently experimentally shown that some temporal sequences of measurements on a quantum walker do not admit a classical description in terms of macro-realistic theories. Here, we extend this observation and present pre- and post-selection scenarios in quantum walks leading to logical paradoxes. Such paradoxes were recently shown to be equivalent to proofs of contextuality, therefore we provide an additional argument for non-classicality of a quantum walk model. The assumptions behind the claims of non-classicality (including contextuality and violations of macro-realism) are also discussed.

arXiv:1905.13501•New Journal of Physics•Oct 1, 2019•5 citations

Logical pre- and post-selection paradoxes are proofs of contextuality

Matthew F. Pusey, Matthew Leifer

If a quantum system is prepared and later post-selected in certain states, "paradoxical" predictions for intermediate measurements can be obtained. This is the case both when the intermediate measurement is strong, i.e. a projective measurement with Luders-von Neumann update rule, or with weak measurements where they show up in anomalous weak values. Leifer and Spekkens [quant-ph/0412178] identified a striking class of such paradoxes, known as logical pre- and post-selection paradoxes, and showed that they are indirectly connected with contextuality. By analysing the measurement-disturbance required in models of these phenomena, we find that the strong measurement version of logical pre- and post-selection paradoxes actually constitute a direct manifestation of quantum contextuality. The proof hinges on under-appreciated features of the paradoxes. In particular, we show by example that it is not possible to prove contextuality without Luders-von Neumann updates for the intermediate measurements, nonorthogonal pre- and post-selection, and 0/1 probabilities for the intermediate measurements. Since one of us has recently shown that anomalous weak values are also a direct manifestation of contextuality [arXiv:1409.1535], we now know that this is true for both realizations of logical pre- and post-selection paradoxes.

arXiv:1506.07850•Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science•Nov 4, 2015•25 citations

Pre- and Post-Selection Paradoxes and Contextuality in Quantum Mechanics

Matthew Leifer, Robert W. Spekkens

Many seemingly paradoxical effects are known in the predictions for outcomes of intermediate measurements made on pre- and post-selected quantum systems. Despite appearances, these effects do not demonstrate the impossibility of a noncontextual hidden variable theory, since an explanation in terms of measurement disturbance is possible. Nonetheless, we show that for every paradoxical effect wherein all the pre- and post-selected probabilities are 0 or 1 and the pre- and post-selected states are nonorthogonal, there is an associated proof of the impossibility of a noncontextual hidden variable theory. This proof is obtained by considering all the measurements involved in the paradoxical effect--the preselection, the post-selection, and the alternative possible intermediate measurements--as alternative possible measurements at a single time.

arXiv:quant-ph/0412178•Physical Review Letters•Nov 11, 2005•52 citations
Peculiar measurements can be obtained on systems that undergo both pre- and post-selection. We prove a conjecture from [1] on logical Pre- and Post-Selection (PPS) paradoxes for a restricted case. We prove that all of these paradoxes admit non-commutation chains. We also relate this to the theory of causal balance, recently introduced in [1], and show how the theory blocks such paradoxes.
By analyzing the concept of contextuality (Bell-Kochen-Specker) in terms of pre-and-post-selection (PPS), it is possible to assign definite values to observables in a new way. Physical reasons are presented for restrictions on these assignments. When measurements are performed which do not disturb the pre- and post-selection (i.e. weak measurements), then novel experimental aspects of contextuality can be demonstrated including a proof that every PPS-paradox with definite predictions implies contextuality. Certain results of these measurements (eccentric weak values with e.g. negative values outside the spectrum), however, cannot be explained by a "classical-like" hidden variable theory. Surprising theoretical implications are discussed.
By analyzing the concept of contextuality (Bell-Kochen-Specker) in terms of pre-and-post-selection (PPS), it is possible to assign definite values to observables in a new way. Physical reasons are presented for restrictions on these assignments. When measurements are performed which do not disturb the pre- and post-selection (i.e. weak measurements), then novel experimental aspects of contextuality can be demonstrated including a proof that every PPS-paradox with definite predictions implies contextuality. Certain results of these measurements (eccentric weak values with e.g. negative values outside the spectrum), however, cannot be explained by a classical-like hidden variable theory. Surprising theoretical implications are discussed.
Coherence as a resource for NNN-box and quantum pigeonhole paradoxes
Pre- and post-selection (PPS) paradoxes are striking demonstrations of quantum nonclassicality. Logical PPS paradoxes, where inferences made with the Aharonov-Bergmann-Lebowitz (ABL) rule are exactly 0 or 1, are linked to contextuality. Non-logical paradoxes lack this strong signature. In this work, we analyse more general, non-logical PPS scenarios involving mixed pre- and post-selected states. We show that two such scenarios, the NNN-box and quantum pigeonhole paradoxes, require coherence of both pre- and post-selected states in the basis of the intermediate measurement. This is done by showing each paradox holds if and only if there is weak-value anomaly for a single, paradox-specific operator, together with the fact that weak-value anomaly requires coherence. This clarifies the role of different notions of nonclassicality in these scenarios, highlighting the required quantitative departures from (strictly) classical explanations provided by incoherent sub-theories of quantum theory.
Abstract Many features of single-partite quantum walks can be simulated by classical waves. However, it was recently experimentally shown that some temporal sequences of measurements on a quantum walker do not admit a classical description in terms of macro-realistic theories. Here, we extend this observation and present pre- and post-selection scenarios in quantum walks leading to logical paradoxes. Such paradoxes were recently shown to be equivalent to proofs of contextuality, therefore we provide an additional argument for non-classicality of a quantum walk model. The assumptions behind the claims of non-classicality (including contextuality and violations of macro-realism) are also discussed.
If a quantum system is prepared and later post-selected in certain states, "paradoxical" predictions for intermediate measurements can be obtained. This is the case both when the intermediate measurement is strong, i.e. a projective measurement with Luders-von Neumann update rule, or with weak measurements where they show up in anomalous weak values. Leifer and Spekkens [quant-ph/0412178] identified a striking class of such paradoxes, known as logical pre- and post-selection paradoxes, and showed that they are indirectly connected with contextuality. By analysing the measurement-disturbance required in models of these phenomena, we find that the strong measurement version of logical pre- and post-selection paradoxes actually constitute a direct manifestation of quantum contextuality. The proof hinges on under-appreciated features of the paradoxes. In particular, we show by example that it is not possible to prove contextuality without Luders-von Neumann updates for the intermediate measurements, nonorthogonal pre- and post-selection, and 0/1 probabilities for the intermediate measurements. Since one of us has recently shown that anomalous weak values are also a direct manifestation of contextuality [arXiv:1409.1535], we now know that this is true for both realizations of logical pre- and post-selection paradoxes.
Many seemingly paradoxical effects are known in the predictions for outcomes of intermediate measurements made on pre- and post-selected quantum systems. Despite appearances, these effects do not demonstrate the impossibility of a noncontextual hidden variable theory, since an explanation in terms of measurement disturbance is possible. Nonetheless, we show that for every paradoxical effect wherein all the pre- and post-selected probabilities are 0 or 1 and the pre- and post-selected states are nonorthogonal, there is an associated proof of the impossibility of a noncontextual hidden variable theory. This proof is obtained by considering all the measurements involved in the paradoxical effect--the preselection, the post-selection, and the alternative possible intermediate measurements--as alternative possible measurements at a single time.