Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/0412178 · Physical Review Letters

Pre- and Post-Selection Paradoxes and Contextuality in Quantum Mechanics

Matthew Leifer, Robert W. Spekkens

Published Nov 11, 2005• 52 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Many seemingly paradoxical effects are known in the predictions for outcomes of intermediate measurements made on pre- and post-selected quantum systems. Despite appearances, these effects do not demonstrate the impossibility of a noncontextual hidden variable theory, since an explanation in terms of measurement disturbance is possible. Nonetheless, we show that for every paradoxical effect wherein all the pre- and post-selected probabilities are 0 or 1 and the pre- and post-selected states are nonorthogonal, there is an associated proof of the impossibility of a noncontextual hidden variable theory. This proof is obtained by considering all the measurements involved in the paradoxical effect--the preselection, the post-selection, and the alternative possible intermediate measurements--as alternative possible measurements at a single time.

DOI
10.1103/physrevlett.95.200405

Related papers

Logical pre- and post-selection paradoxes are proofs of contextuality

Matthew F. Pusey, Matthew Leifer

If a quantum system is prepared and later post-selected in certain states, "paradoxical" predictions for intermediate measurements can be obtained. This is the case both when the intermediate measurement is strong, i.e. a projective measurement with Luders-von Neumann update rule, or with weak measurements where they show up in anomalous weak values. Leifer and Spekkens [quant-ph/0412178] identified a striking class of such paradoxes, known as logical pre- and post-selection paradoxes, and showed that they are indirectly connected with contextuality. By analysing the measurement-disturbance required in models of these phenomena, we find that the strong measurement version of logical pre- and post-selection paradoxes actually constitute a direct manifestation of quantum contextuality. The proof hinges on under-appreciated features of the paradoxes. In particular, we show by example that it is not possible to prove contextuality without Luders-von Neumann updates for the intermediate measurements, nonorthogonal pre- and post-selection, and 0/1 probabilities for the intermediate measurements. Since one of us has recently shown that anomalous weak values are also a direct manifestation of contextuality [arXiv:1409.1535], we now know that this is true for both realizations of logical pre- and post-selection paradoxes.

arXiv:1506.07850•Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science•Nov 4, 2015•25 citations

Probing Contextuality with Pre- and Post-selection

Jeff Tollaksen

By analyzing the concept of contextuality (Bell-Kochen-Specker) in terms of pre-and-post-selection (PPS), it is possible to assign definite values to observables in a new way. Physical reasons are presented for restrictions on these assignments. When measurements are performed which do not disturb the pre- and post-selection (i.e. weak measurements), then novel experimental aspects of contextuality can be demonstrated including a proof that every PPS-paradox with definite predictions implies contextuality. Certain results of these measurements (eccentric weak values with e.g. negative values outside the spectrum), however, cannot be explained by a classical-like hidden variable theory. Surprising theoretical implications are discussed.

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 5, 2007•0 citations

Coherence as a resource for $N$-box and quantum pigeonhole paradoxes

Som Kanjilal, Rafael Wagner, Ernesto F. Galvão

Pre- and post-selection (PPS) paradoxes are striking demonstrations of quantum nonclassicality. Logical PPS paradoxes, where inferences made with the Aharonov-Bergmann-Lebowitz (ABL) rule are exactly 0 or 1, are linked to contextuality. Non-logical paradoxes lack this strong signature. In this work, we analyse more general, non-logical PPS scenarios involving mixed pre- and post-selected states. We show that two such scenarios, the $N$-box and quantum pigeonhole paradoxes, require coherence of both pre- and post-selected states in the basis of the intermediate measurement. This is done by showing each paradox holds if and only if there is weak-value anomaly for a single, paradox-specific operator, together with the fact that weak-value anomaly requires coherence. This clarifies the role of different notions of nonclassicality in these scenarios, highlighting the required quantitative departures from (strictly) classical explanations provided by incoherent sub-theories of quantum theory.

quant-pharXiv:2607.24282•Jul 28, 2026•0 citations

Pre- and post-selection, weak values and contextuality

Jeff Tollaksen

By analysing the concept of contextuality (Bell–Kochen–Specker) in terms of pre- and post-selection, it is possible to assign definite values to observables in a new and surprising way. Physical reasons are presented for restrictions on these assignments. When measurements are performed which do not disturb the pre- and post-selection (i.e. weak measurements), then novel experimental aspects of contextuality can be demonstrated. We also prove that every PPS-paradox with definite predictions directly implies 'quantum contextuality' which is introduced as the analogue of contextuality at the level of quantum mechanics rather than at the level of hidden variable theories. Finally, we argue that certain results of these measurements (e.g. eccentric weak values outside the eigenvalue spectrum) cannot be explained by a 'classical-like' hidden variable theory.

arXiv:quant-ph/0602226•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical•Jul 12, 2007•63 citations

Probing contextuality with pre- and post-selection

Jeff Tollaksen

By analyzing the concept of contextuality (Bell-Kochen-Specker) in terms of pre-and-post-selection (PPS), it is possible to assign definite values to observables in a new way. Physical reasons are presented for restrictions on these assignments. When measurements are performed which do not disturb the pre- and post-selection (i.e. weak measurements), then novel experimental aspects of contextuality can be demonstrated including a proof that every PPS-paradox with definite predictions implies contextuality. Certain results of these measurements (eccentric weak values with e.g. negative values outside the spectrum), however, cannot be explained by a "classical-like" hidden variable theory. Surprising theoretical implications are discussed.

Journal of Physics Conference Series•May 1, 2007•11 citations

Characterization of the nonclassical relation between measurement outcomes represented by nonorthogonal quantum states

Ming Ji, Holger Friedrich Hofmann

Quantum mechanics describes seemingly paradoxical relations between the outcomes of measurements that cannot be performed jointly. In Hilbert space, the outcomes of such incompatible measurements are represented by nonorthogonal states. In this paper we investigate how the relation between outcomes represented by nonorthogonal quantum states differs from the relations suggested by a joint assignment of measurement outcomes that do not depend on the actual measurement context. The analysis is based on a well-known scenario where three statements about the impossibilities of certain outcomes would seem to make a specific fourth outcome impossible as well, yet quantum theory allows the observation of that outcome with a nonvanishing probability. We show that the Hilbert space formalism modifies the relation between the four measurement outcomes by defining a lower bound of the fourth probability that increases as the total probability of the first three outcomes drops to zero. Quantum theory thus not only makes the violation of noncontextual consistency between the measurement outcomes possible, but actually requires it as a necessary consequence of the Hilbert space inner products that describe the contextual relation between the outcomes of different measurements.

arXiv:2211.02199•Physical Review A•Feb 9, 2023•9 citations
Many seemingly paradoxical effects are known in the predictions for outcomes of intermediate measurements made on pre- and post-selected quantum systems. Despite appearances, these effects do not demonstrate the impossibility of a noncontextual hidden variable theory, since an explanation in terms of measurement disturbance is possible. Nonetheless, we show that for every paradoxical effect wherein all the pre- and post-selected probabilities are 0 or 1 and the pre- and post-selected states are nonorthogonal, there is an associated proof of the impossibility of a noncontextual hidden variable theory. This proof is obtained by considering all the measurements involved in the paradoxical effect--the preselection, the post-selection, and the alternative possible intermediate measurements--as alternative possible measurements at a single time.
If a quantum system is prepared and later post-selected in certain states, "paradoxical" predictions for intermediate measurements can be obtained. This is the case both when the intermediate measurement is strong, i.e. a projective measurement with Luders-von Neumann update rule, or with weak measurements where they show up in anomalous weak values. Leifer and Spekkens [quant-ph/0412178] identified a striking class of such paradoxes, known as logical pre- and post-selection paradoxes, and showed that they are indirectly connected with contextuality. By analysing the measurement-disturbance required in models of these phenomena, we find that the strong measurement version of logical pre- and post-selection paradoxes actually constitute a direct manifestation of quantum contextuality. The proof hinges on under-appreciated features of the paradoxes. In particular, we show by example that it is not possible to prove contextuality without Luders-von Neumann updates for the intermediate measurements, nonorthogonal pre- and post-selection, and 0/1 probabilities for the intermediate measurements. Since one of us has recently shown that anomalous weak values are also a direct manifestation of contextuality [arXiv:1409.1535], we now know that this is true for both realizations of logical pre- and post-selection paradoxes.
By analyzing the concept of contextuality (Bell-Kochen-Specker) in terms of pre-and-post-selection (PPS), it is possible to assign definite values to observables in a new way. Physical reasons are presented for restrictions on these assignments. When measurements are performed which do not disturb the pre- and post-selection (i.e. weak measurements), then novel experimental aspects of contextuality can be demonstrated including a proof that every PPS-paradox with definite predictions implies contextuality. Certain results of these measurements (eccentric weak values with e.g. negative values outside the spectrum), however, cannot be explained by a classical-like hidden variable theory. Surprising theoretical implications are discussed.
Coherence as a resource for NNN-box and quantum pigeonhole paradoxes
Pre- and post-selection (PPS) paradoxes are striking demonstrations of quantum nonclassicality. Logical PPS paradoxes, where inferences made with the Aharonov-Bergmann-Lebowitz (ABL) rule are exactly 0 or 1, are linked to contextuality. Non-logical paradoxes lack this strong signature. In this work, we analyse more general, non-logical PPS scenarios involving mixed pre- and post-selected states. We show that two such scenarios, the NNN-box and quantum pigeonhole paradoxes, require coherence of both pre- and post-selected states in the basis of the intermediate measurement. This is done by showing each paradox holds if and only if there is weak-value anomaly for a single, paradox-specific operator, together with the fact that weak-value anomaly requires coherence. This clarifies the role of different notions of nonclassicality in these scenarios, highlighting the required quantitative departures from (strictly) classical explanations provided by incoherent sub-theories of quantum theory.
By analysing the concept of contextuality (Bell–Kochen–Specker) in terms of pre- and post-selection, it is possible to assign definite values to observables in a new and surprising way. Physical reasons are presented for restrictions on these assignments. When measurements are performed which do not disturb the pre- and post-selection (i.e. weak measurements), then novel experimental aspects of contextuality can be demonstrated. We also prove that every PPS-paradox with definite predictions directly implies 'quantum contextuality' which is introduced as the analogue of contextuality at the level of quantum mechanics rather than at the level of hidden variable theories. Finally, we argue that certain results of these measurements (e.g. eccentric weak values outside the eigenvalue spectrum) cannot be explained by a 'classical-like' hidden variable theory.
By analyzing the concept of contextuality (Bell-Kochen-Specker) in terms of pre-and-post-selection (PPS), it is possible to assign definite values to observables in a new way. Physical reasons are presented for restrictions on these assignments. When measurements are performed which do not disturb the pre- and post-selection (i.e. weak measurements), then novel experimental aspects of contextuality can be demonstrated including a proof that every PPS-paradox with definite predictions implies contextuality. Certain results of these measurements (eccentric weak values with e.g. negative values outside the spectrum), however, cannot be explained by a "classical-like" hidden variable theory. Surprising theoretical implications are discussed.
Quantum mechanics describes seemingly paradoxical relations between the outcomes of measurements that cannot be performed jointly. In Hilbert space, the outcomes of such incompatible measurements are represented by nonorthogonal states. In this paper we investigate how the relation between outcomes represented by nonorthogonal quantum states differs from the relations suggested by a joint assignment of measurement outcomes that do not depend on the actual measurement context. The analysis is based on a well-known scenario where three statements about the impossibilities of certain outcomes would seem to make a specific fourth outcome impossible as well, yet quantum theory allows the observation of that outcome with a nonvanishing probability. We show that the Hilbert space formalism modifies the relation between the four measurement outcomes by defining a lower bound of the fourth probability that increases as the total probability of the first three outcomes drops to zero. Quantum theory thus not only makes the violation of noncontextual consistency between the measurement outcomes possible, but actually requires it as a necessary consequence of the Hilbert space inner products that describe the contextual relation between the outcomes of different measurements.