Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2509.07922 · Physical Review A

Reply to “Comments on ‘Consequences of the single-pair measurement of the Bell parameter' ”

Marco Genovese, Fabrizio Piacentini

Published Oct 30, 2025• 2 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We reply to the Comments by Kupczynski and Lambare on our recent paper [], questioning our claims on the implications on quantum mechanics interpretations (and alternative theories) generated by the results of a recent experiment [] demonstrating the possibility of measuring the entire Bell parameter on a single entangled pair.
DOI
10.1103/prqc-2jbw

Related papers

Comment on “Consequences of the single-pair measurement of the Bell parameter”

Marian Kupczyński

Genovese and Piacentini [] claim that, in a recent experiment [S. Virzì , ], the Bell parameter was measured on a single pair of photons, thus challenging several conclusions and discussions on the meaning of Bell inequalities as well as certain quantum mechanical interpretations. We explain that the parameter measured in the experiment of Virzì is not the Bell parameter S , which has been discussed and estimated in many loophole-free tests. Therefore, this experiment neither challenges our understanding of Bell tests nor allows having doubts about Bohr complementarity and contextuality.

arXiv:2502.11261•Physical Review A•Oct 30, 2025•1 citation

Comment on “Consequences of the single-pair measurement of the Bell parameter”

Justo Pastor Lambare

In a recent article [], Genovese and Piacentini analyzed recent experiments measuring what they call “the entire Bell-Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt (Bell-CHSH) parameter.” They claimed those experiments may have implications for interpreting loophole-free tests of the Bell-CHSH inequality. We explain that the Bell-CHSH inequality is not based on the entire Bell parameter, so these experiments are unrelated to their empirical tests and cannot close any eventual loopholes that might still persist. We point out that the physical meaning of these new experiments measuring the entire Bell parameter could be interpreted differently.

arXiv:2504.10341•Physical Review A•Oct 30, 2025•1 citation

Consequences of the single-pair measurement of the Bell parameter

Marco Genovese, Fabrizio Piacentini

Bell inequalities represent a milestone for contemporary physics, both for quantum foundation investigations and technological applications (e.g., quantum communication and entanglement certification). Although loophole-free tests have been recently performed, a strong debate is still ongoing on the actual meaning of Bell inequality tests, for example, on the possible additional hypotheses and eventual loopholes to be included in Bell's theorem, as well as on the implications for certain interpretations of quantum mechanics. A recent work [S. Virzì , ] challenges some of the statements appeared in this debate, achieving an experimental estimation of the entire Bell-Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt (Bell-CHSH) parameter from a single entangled pair owing to a weak-interaction-based measurement approach. Here, we analyze the implications of this result for quantum mechanics foundations investigation, illustrating how it can tackle some of the aforementioned interpretations of Bell inequality tests and, more in general, of quantum mechanics itself.

arXiv:2409.02510•Physical Review A•Feb 4, 2025•6 citations

Reply to “Comment on ‘Nonlocality claims are inconsistent with Hilbert-space quantum mechanics’ ”

Robert B. Griffiths

In Phys. Rev. A 101, 022117 (2020), it was argued that Bell inequalities are based on classical not quantum physics, and, hence, their violation in experiments provides no support for the claimed existence of peculiar nonlocal and superluminal influences in the real (quantum) world. This Reply to Lambare's Comment, Phys. Rev. A 104, 066201 (2021), on that paper seeks to clarify some issues related to the correct use of Hilbert space quantum mechanics for identifying the microscopic causes of later macroscopic measurement outcomes, a matter not properly addressed by Bell, who used classical hidden variables in place of the Hilbert subspaces (equivalently, their projectors) employed by von Neumann in Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics.

arXiv:2106.09824•Physical Review A•Dec 20, 2021•11 citations

Reply to Lambare’s “Comment on “Entangled Simultaneity: Testing Lorentz and Light Speed Invariance with quantum and classical entanglement””

Gianfranco Spavieri

International Journal of Theoretical Physics•Mar 10, 2026•2 citations

Single-pair measurement of the Bell parameter

Salvatore Virzì, Enrico Rebufello, F. Atzori +10 more

We present the first single-pair Bell inequality test, able to obtain a Bell parameter value for every entangled pair detected. After the measurements, each pair still presents a noteworthy amount of entanglement to be exploited for further quantum-protocols.

Quantum 2.0 Conference and Exhibition•Jan 1, 2024•0 citations
Genovese and Piacentini [] claim that, in a recent experiment [S. Virzì , ], the Bell parameter was measured on a single pair of photons, thus challenging several conclusions and discussions on the meaning of Bell inequalities as well as certain quantum mechanical interpretations. We explain that the parameter measured in the experiment of Virzì is not the Bell parameter S , which has been discussed and estimated in many loophole-free tests. Therefore, this experiment neither challenges our understanding of Bell tests nor allows having doubts about Bohr complementarity and contextuality.
In a recent article [], Genovese and Piacentini analyzed recent experiments measuring what they call “the entire Bell-Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt (Bell-CHSH) parameter.” They claimed those experiments may have implications for interpreting loophole-free tests of the Bell-CHSH inequality. We explain that the Bell-CHSH inequality is not based on the entire Bell parameter, so these experiments are unrelated to their empirical tests and cannot close any eventual loopholes that might still persist. We point out that the physical meaning of these new experiments measuring the entire Bell parameter could be interpreted differently.
Bell inequalities represent a milestone for contemporary physics, both for quantum foundation investigations and technological applications (e.g., quantum communication and entanglement certification). Although loophole-free tests have been recently performed, a strong debate is still ongoing on the actual meaning of Bell inequality tests, for example, on the possible additional hypotheses and eventual loopholes to be included in Bell's theorem, as well as on the implications for certain interpretations of quantum mechanics. A recent work [S. Virzì , ] challenges some of the statements appeared in this debate, achieving an experimental estimation of the entire Bell-Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt (Bell-CHSH) parameter from a single entangled pair owing to a weak-interaction-based measurement approach. Here, we analyze the implications of this result for quantum mechanics foundations investigation, illustrating how it can tackle some of the aforementioned interpretations of Bell inequality tests and, more in general, of quantum mechanics itself.
In Phys. Rev. A 101, 022117 (2020), it was argued that Bell inequalities are based on classical not quantum physics, and, hence, their violation in experiments provides no support for the claimed existence of peculiar nonlocal and superluminal influences in the real (quantum) world. This Reply to Lambare's Comment, Phys. Rev. A 104, 066201 (2021), on that paper seeks to clarify some issues related to the correct use of Hilbert space quantum mechanics for identifying the microscopic causes of later macroscopic measurement outcomes, a matter not properly addressed by Bell, who used classical hidden variables in place of the Hilbert subspaces (equivalently, their projectors) employed by von Neumann in Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics.