This work investigates the performance of hybrid quantum-classical variational classifiers applied to a supervised learning task involving the titanic3 dataset. Quantum models were constructed using Pauli entangling and non-entangling expansion-based feature maps and the RealAmplitudes ansatz with up to 50 variational parameters. Model training employed the COBYLA gradient-free optimizer to minimize the cross-entropy loss, within an ideal statevector simulation framework. Comparative performance analysis reveals that the models based on the non-entangling feature map consistently outperformed the models based on the entangling features maps, achieving saturation of classification metrics (accuracy, balanced accuracy, and Youden's index) beyond 15 to 20 parameters. Further, two quantum models were benchmarked against a classical Support Vector Classifier (SVC). While both approaches yielded similar predictive performance across multiple training sizes, the classical model exhibited a performance collapse when trained with 90% of the dataset, a failure mode absent in the quantum classifiers. These results underscore the robustness and viability of variational quantum classifiers for binary classification tasks on classical datasets in the NISQ era.
This work investigates the performance of hybrid quantum-classical variational classifiers applied to a supervised learning task involving the titanic3 dataset. Quantum models were constructed using Pauli entangling and non-entangling expansion-based feature maps and the RealAmplitudes ansatz with up to 50 variational parameters. Model training employed the COBYLA gradient-free optimizer to minimize the cross-entropy loss, within an ideal statevector simulation framework. Comparative performance analysis reveals that the models based on the non-entangling feature map consistently outperformed the models based on the entangling features maps, achieving saturation of classification metrics (accuracy, balanced accuracy, and Youden's index) beyond 15 to 20 parameters. Further, two quantum models were benchmarked against a classical Support Vector Classifier (SVC). While both approaches yielded similar predictive performance across multiple training sizes, the classical model exhibited a performance collapse when trained with 90% of the dataset, a failure mode absent in the quantum classifiers. These results underscore the robustness and viability of variational quantum classifiers for binary classification tasks on classical datasets in the NISQ era.
With the advancement of quantum computing in the Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) era, hybrid quantum-classical algorithms have emerged as promising approaches for addressing certain machine learning tasks. This study investigates the Variational Quantum Classifier (VQC), a hybrid model that integrates parameterized quantum circuits with classical optimization routines, implemented via IBM’s Qiskit framework. We provide a detailed account of the VQC architecture, including feature encoding, ansatz construction, and optimization methodology. To assess its performance, we conduct a comparative analysis between VQC and classical Support Vector Classifiers (SVC) across synthetic and real-world datasets, including Iris and a binary-filtered version of MNIST. Experimental results reveal that classical models consistently achieve higher accuracy and faster training times. However, the VQC demonstrates functional viability, particularly under noise-free conditions and reduced-dimensionality settings. These findings underscore the current limitations of quantum models while highlighting the potential of VQC as a proof-of-concept for quantum-enhanced learning as quantum hardware matures.
Quantum Machine Learning (QML) has emerged as a compelling research domain that unites quantum computing principles with classical learning theory to address computationally demanding classification problems.This paper investigates two principal QML architectures-Variational Quantum Classifiers (VQC) and Quantum Neural Networks (QNN)-within the context of binary classification.We present an end-to-end hybrid quantum-classical pipeline applied to the UCI Mushroom dataset, comprising 22 categorical attributes, and demonstrate that quantumenhanced models can achieve competitive classification performance under present-day hardware constraints.The pipeline integrates Quantum Random Access Code (QRAC) encoding for dimensionality reduction, ZZFeatureMapbased quantum feature mapping, RealAmplitudes parameterized ansatz, and classical optimizer-driven parameter updates using the COBYLA algorithm.The complete system is deployed through a Flask web interface and containerized with Docker for reproducibility.Experimental results on a quantum simulator indicate a classification accuracy of 87.4%, precision of 0.891, and recall of 0.863, establishing the practical viability of NISQ-era quantum classifiers for structured categorical data.The paper further analyzes convergence behavior, circuit depth effects, and comparative performance against classical baselines, providing insights into the strengths and limitations of current QML architectures for real-world classification deployment.
This thesis presents a systematic empirical evaluation of quantum machine learning performance under noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) era constraints. Through 670 controlled experiments, it evaluated quantum kernel support vector machines and variational quantum classifiers against classical baselines on MNIST binary and multiclass classification tasks with systematic variation of problem difficulty, feature dimensionality (4, 8 qubits), and training set size (n ∈{100, 250, 400, 500, 2000, 4000}). Statistical rigor was ensured through five random seeds per condition and comprehensive significance testing. During the testing with binary datasets, classical methods (SVM, logistic regression, k-NN, neural networks) achieved 85.9% to 99.6% accuracy with training times under one second across all sample sizes. Quantum kernel methods utilizing ZZ feature maps yielded 70.5% to 96.0% accuracy, requiring 129 to 2,140 seconds training with quadratic sample size scaling. Larger scale quantum experiments (n = 4000 for both architectures, 8-qubit encoding with n = 2000 for quantum kernels) proved computationally impossible on available hardware leading to out of memory errors, highlighting practical NISQ-era scalability constraints. Variational quantum classifiers exhibited persistent performance stagnation, failing to exceed 66.5% accuracy despite increases in training data and feature dimensionality. Performance gaps ranged from 3.3 to 35.2 percentage points. All quantum classical differences achieved statistical significance (p< 0.05, with 13 of 14 comparisons meeting p< 0.01) and exhibited large to very large efect sizes (d> 1.0, with 13 of 14 comparisons exceeding d> 2.0). To further evaluate performance and scalability, a 4 class classification experiment was conducted following an identical experimental protocol, with training set sizes of n ∈{100, 250, 400}. Across 180 runs, classical baselines achieved mean accuracies between 87.2% and 95% across both 4 and 8 dimensional data. Quantum Kernel SVM struggled during runs with 4 dimensions, accuracy varying between 64.6% and 74%. Quantum Kernel SVM accuracy declined 16%-25% when the dimension and qubit count were increased to 8, showing findings of exponential kernel concentration. The Variational Quantum Classifier also performed poorly, with accuracy ranging from 43.4% to 44.6% across all runs, providing further evidence that it failed to leverage additional features or training data. Experiments employed noiseless statevector simulation, establishing that quantum underperformance stems from fundamental algorithmic limitations independent of hardware noise. A further extension to 8 class classification (digits 0–7) confirmed and amplified these findings: classical methods maintained 65–83% accuracy while Quantum Kernel SVM degraded to 34–47% and VQC collapsed to 21–23%, approaching the 12.5% random baseline. Supplementary appendix experiments further examined amplitude encoding on raw 784 dimensional pixel features and an alternative angle encoding scheme on the 8-class task; the latter demonstrated that replacing the ZZ Feature Map with simple per qubit rotations substantially recovered quantum kernel performance, suggesting feature map design as a more consequential variable than circuit depth or qubit count in near-term quantum classification.
Quantum Machine Learning (QML) is a newly emerging research area at the intersection of classical machine learning (CML) and quantum computing (QC). Data is becoming voluminous rapidly, so it is challenging for classical computers to train Machine Learning (ML) models over massive datasets. The hope is that quantum physics' intrinsic features, such as entanglement, superposition, and interference, could be exploited as resources for training ML models on big datasets that would otherwise be relatively impossible for classical computers. It is theoretically proven that quantum computers have an exponential-time advantage over their classical counterparts in solving several problems, e.g., complex large dimensional matrix multiplication, factorization problem, unstructured database search, etc. QML models attempt to find a quantum advantage over their classical counterparts. Variational Quantum Classifiers (VQC) are hybrid quantum neural networks to perform the task of classification using QML models. VQC models in the present NISQ (Noisy Intermediate Scale Quantum — 50 to 100 qubits) era can produce comparable and even better results than Classical models. In this article, we examined the performance of a VQC while performing a simple binary classification task. In this article, we use a VQC to evaluate this method's performance empirically. We constructed a VQC to predict the label of fresh input for the typical Iris dataset comprising pairings of target outputs and training inputs. Our quantum classifier can reasonably predict species labels using only four qubits. These levels are fairly good compared to the accuracy levels attained by classical classifiers.
Quantum Machine Learning (QML) has emerged as an interdisciplinary field that harnesses the potential of quantum computing to revolutionize classical machine learning paradigms. This paper presents a benchmarking study focused on four quantum classifier algorithms: Quantum Support Vector Classifier (QSVC), Variational Quantum Circuit (VQC), Quantum Neural Network Classifier (QNNC) and Pegasos Quantum Support Vector Classifier (PegasosQSVC). These quantum classifiers hold promise for unlocking quantum advantages in classification tasks. However, a systematic assessment of their performance across diverse datasets is yet to be fully explored. In this research study, we evaluate and compare the classification performance of quantum machine learning classifiers on various datasets (Breast Cancer, Diabetes, and Titanic) and compare them to a classical model. Our findings revealed that PegasosQSVC consistently maintained high performance across all datasets with the highest average accuracy, recall, and F1-score values of 0.81, 0.72, and 0.71, respectively, followed by VQC, followed by VQC, while QSVC and QNNC perform variably. Nevertheless, QSVC was found to balance performance and training time, achieving an average accuracy of 0.81 and a training time of 177 seconds. Overall, the classical model surpassed QML models as it was up to 10% higher in average accuracy.
Near-term quantum machine learning (QML) models operate in environments wherein noise is unavoidable, arising from both imperfect classical data acquisition and the limitations of noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) hardware. Although most existing studies have focused primarily on quantum circuit noise in isolation, the combined influence of corrupted classical inputs and quantum hardware noise has received comparatively little attention.
In this work, we present a systematic experimental study of the robustness of a variational quantum classifier under realistic multi-level noise conditions. Using the Titanic dataset as a benchmark, a range of dataset-level noise models-including speckle noise, impulse noise, quantization noise, and feature dropout are applied to classical features prior to quantum encoding using a ZZ feature map. In parallel, hardware-inspired quantum noise channels such as depolarizing noise, amplitude damping, phase damping, Pauli errors, and readout errors are incorporated at the circuit level using the Qiskit Aer simulator.
The experimental results indicate that noise in classical input data can significantly intensify the effects of quantum decoherence, resulting in less stable training and noticeably lower classification accuracy. Together, these observations emphasize the importance of designing and evaluating quantum machine learning pipelines with noise in mind, and highlight the need to consider classical and quantum noise simultaneously when assessing QML performance in the NISQ era