Ideal quantum measurement requires divergent thermodynamic resources. This is a consequence of the third law of thermodynamics, which prohibits the preparation of the measurement pointer in a fully erased, pure state required for the acquisition of perfect, noiseless measurement information. In this work, we investigate the consequences of finite resources in the emergence of intersubjectivity as a model for measurement processes with multiple observers. Here, intersubjectivity refers to a condition in which observers agree on the observed outcome (agreement), and their local random variables exactly reproduce the original random variable for the system observable (probability reproducibility). While agreement and reproducibility are mutually implied in the case of ideal measurement, finite thermodynamic resources constrain each of them. Starting from the third law of thermodynamics, we derive how the achievability of ideal intersubjectivity is affected by restricted thermodynamic resources. Specifically, we establish a no-go theorem concerning perfect intersubjectivity and present a deviation metric to account for the influence of limited resources. We further present attainable bounds for the agreement and bias that are exclusively dependent on the initial state of the environment. In addition, we show that either by cooling or coarse graining, we can approximate ideal intersubjectivity even with finite resources. This work bridges quantum thermodynamics and the emergence of classicality in the form of intersubjectivity.
Ideal quantum measurement requires divergent thermodynamic resources. This is a consequence of the third law of thermodynamics, which prohibits the preparation of the measurement pointer in a fully erased, pure state required for the acquisition of perfect, noiseless measurement information. In this work, we investigate the consequences of finite resources in the emergence of intersubjectivity as a model for measurement processes with multiple observers. Here, intersubjectivity refers to a condition in which observers agree on the observed outcome (agreement), and their local random variables exactly reproduce the original random variable for the system observable (probability reproducibility). While agreement and reproducibility are mutually implied in the case of ideal measurement, finite thermodynamic resources constrain each of them. Starting from the third law of thermodynamics, we derive how the achievability of ideal intersubjectivity is affected by restricted thermodynamic resources. Specifically, we establish a no-go theorem concerning perfect intersubjectivity and present a deviation metric to account for the influence of limited resources. We further present attainable bounds for the agreement and bias that are exclusively dependent on the initial state of the environment. In addition, we show that either by cooling or coarse graining, we can approximate ideal intersubjectivity even with finite resources. This work bridges quantum thermodynamics and the emergence of classicality in the form of intersubjectivity.
Measurements can be viewed as interactions between a measured system and a pointer system that imprint information about the system on the pointer. For so-called unbiased interactions, the measurement statistics--the information corresponding to the diagonal of the system's initial density operator--with respect to a chosen measurement basis are transferred accurately, even if the pointer is initially in a mixed state. However, establishing measurement outcomes as objective facts also requires redundancy. We therefore consider the problem of unitarily distributing the outcome statistics to several pointers or quantum memories. We show that the accuracy of this process is limited by thermodynamic restrictions on preparing the memories in pure states: exact duplication of unknown outcome statistics is impossible using finite resources. For finite-temperature memories, we put forward a lower bound on the entropy production of the duplication process. This \emph{Holevo-Landauer} bound demonstrates that the mixedness of the initial memory limits the ability to accurately transfer the same information to more than one memory component, thus fundamentally restricting the creation of redundancies while maintaining the integrity of the original information. Finally, we show how the outcome statistics can be recovered exactly in the classical limit--via coarse-graining or asymptotically as the number of subsystems of each memory component increases--thus elucidating how objective properties can emerge despite inherent imperfections.
Quantum measurement is a physical process. What physical resources and constraints does quantum mechanics require for measurement to produce the classical world we observe? Treating measurement as a fully unitary quantum process, our goal is to show that objective, redundant, and correctly aligned outcomes are possible iff the environment begins in a specially structured, correlated subspace. We start with a minimal set of assumptions: unitarity, orthogonality of conditional environment branches, and finite-dimensional Hilbert spaces. Using these, we demonstrate that generic environmental states cannot support redundant and mutually consistent records of the signal, the measured quantum system. The admissible initial states form a subspace on which the measurement maps obey the Knill-Laflamme error-correction conditions, revealing that the emergence of classical objectivity relies on the environment behaving like a quantum error-correcting code. The post-measurement subspace naturally factorizes into a ``pointer'' to hold measurement outcomes and ``memory'' to retain pre-measurement quantum information about the environment's state, thereby respecting the no-deletion theorem. This further allows the identification of correlation as a finite resource consumed during measurement. Through an explicit qudit model with local interactions, we demonstrate how correlated environments yield redundant observer networks. Simulations show that record fidelity and redundancy depend on the initial correlations in the environment. This perspective links quantum Darwinism to error correction and raises the possibility that natural processes may prepare and evolutionarily favour environments capable of supporting reliable measurement.
We build a framework for the thermodynamics of macroscopic quantum systems. In contrast with approaches requiring access to the full density matrix, our framework relies on a coarse-grained description, based on measurement statistics of a few observables. When these observables commute, the outcomes define classical macrostates whose entropy is quantified by observational entropy, accounting for uncertainty about both the macrostate and the microstate within it. We extend this notion to non-commuting observables forming a subalgebra of the operator space, and use Jaynes' principle to define an algebra-dependent entropy interpolating between von Neumann and observational entropies. Given initial and final measurement sets, connected by internal and/or environment-induced dynamics, we derive a second law for the coarse-grained dynamics. Unlike formulations based on von Neumann entropy, our inequality captures irreversibility from both non-unitary environment-induced dynamics and internal equilibration. It takes the usual form of a positive entropy production when the system is initially at internal equilibrium, while correction terms capture nonequilibrium resources ignored by the coarse-graining. We also derive fluctuation theorems for coarse-grained thermodynamic quantities. Along a quasi-static path of measurement schemes, we identify quantum macroscopic notions of work and heat fulfilling the first and second laws, including an additional work contribution from manipulating the algebra to which the system is confined, through external constraints or quantum measurement backaction. Finally, we apply our framework to examples illustrating the impact of varying the coarse-graining scheme. Our approach unifies macroscopic and stochastic thermodynamics in a genuinely quantum framework, laying the basis for a versatile, experimentally friendly toolbox to analyze complex quantum dynamics.
In the quantum regime, the third law of thermodynamics implies the unattainability of pure states. As shown recently, such unattainability implies that a unitary interaction between the measured system and a measuring apparatus can never implement an ideal projective measurement. In this paper, we introduce an operational formulation of the third law for the most general class of physical transformations, the violation of which is both necessary and sufficient for the preparation of pure states. Subsequently, we investigate how such a law constrains measurements of general observables, or positive operator-valued measures. We identify several desirable properties of measurements which are simultaneously enjoyed by ideal projective measurements---and are hence all ruled out by the third law in such a case---and determine if the third law allows for these properties to obtain for general measurements of general observables and, if so, under what conditions. It is shown that while the third law rules out some of these properties for all observables, others may be enjoyed by observables that are sufficiently ``unsharp.''
We identify an operational principle that singles out Projection-Valued Measures (PVMs) among general Positive Operator-Valued Measures (POVMs), bridging the modern quantum measurement theory and the traditional formulation based on projective measurements of physical observables. We reformulate Ozawa's intersubjectivity condition, which requires inter-observer agreement of the measurement outcomes, in a quantitative manner within the framework of generalized probabilistic theories. We prove that (i) a POVM is a PVM if and only if its every coarse-graining is intersubjective, and (ii) a system is classical if and only if intersubjectivity is preserved under any coarse-graining, establishing a complete characterization of the physical observables and the classical theory. Furthermore, measurements with intersubjectivity are sufficiently rich for the informational tasks of state tomography and state discrimination, testifying to its operational significance in quantum and beyond information processing.
The challenge of understanding quantum measurement persists as a fundamental issue in modern physics. Particularly, the abrupt and energy-nonconserving collapse of the wave function appears to contradict classical thermodynamic laws. The contradiction can be resolved by considering measurement itself to be an entropy-increasing process, driven by the second law of thermodynamics. One such resolution explains the apparently irreversible emergence of objective outcomes in an isolated, unitarily evolving quantum system via the theory of closed-system equilibration. Working within this framework, we construct the set of “” that best encode the measurement statistics of a system in an objective manner and establish a measurement error bound to quantify the probability an observer will obtain an incorrect measurement outcome. Using this error bound, we show that the objectifying observables readily equilibrate on average under the set of Hamiltonians which preserve the outcome statistics on the measured system. Using a random matrix model for this set, we numerically determine the measurement error bound, finding that the error only approaches zero with increasing environment size when the environment is coarse grained into so-called observer systems. This indicates the necessity of coarse graining an environment for the emergence of objective, classical measurement outcomes.