We present a comprehensive quantum algorithm tailored for pricing autocallable options, offering a full implementation and experimental validation. Our experiments include simulations conducted on high performance computing (HPC) hardware, along with an empirical analysis of convergence to the classically estimated value. Our key innovation is an improved integration-based exponential amplitude loading technique that reduces circuit depth compared to state-of-the-art approaches. A detailed complexity analysis in a relevant setting shows a$\sim 50 x$reduction in T-depth for the payoff component relative to previous methods. These contributions represent a step toward more efficient quantum approaches to pricing complex financial derivatives.
We present a comprehensive quantum algorithm tailored for pricing autocallable options, offering a full implementation and experimental validation. Our experiments include simulations conducted on high performance computing (HPC) hardware, along with an empirical analysis of convergence to the classically estimated value. Our key innovation is an improved integration-based exponential amplitude loading technique that reduces circuit depth compared to state-of-the-art approaches. A detailed complexity analysis in a relevant setting shows a∼50xreduction in T-depth for the payoff component relative to previous methods. These contributions represent a step toward more efficient quantum approaches to pricing complex financial derivatives.
This work introduces a novel approach to price rainbow options, a type of path-independent multi-asset derivatives, with quantum computers. Leveraging the Iterative Quantum Amplitude Estimation method, we present an end-to-end quantum circuit implementation, emphasizing efficiency by delaying the transition to price space. Moreover, we analyze two different amplitude loading techniques for handling exponential functions. Experiments on the IBM QASM simulator validate our quantum pricing model, contributing to the evolving field of quantum finance.
Options are financial instruments whose payoffs are determined by the value of an underlying asset. These underlying assets are typically stocks, interest rates, or exchange rates, but can also include commodities such as energy or agricultural products. Options serve diverse purposes, including hedging against price volatility and speculating on market movements. Additionally, they play a critical role in assessing certain positions on the balance sheets of insurance companies, particularly in the context of solvency capital requirement calculations. As an option’s payoff lies in the future and is stochastic in nature, finding a fair price today is a non-trivial task. The focus of this work is finding quantum algorithms for calculating these prices and compare them to algorithms designed for classical computers. This work follows two different directions on how to improve on classical methods for option pricing. The first direction is improving on Monte-Carlo (MC) methods and the second one is adapting Fourier based pricing algorithms. The Amplitude Estimation (AE) algorithm promises a quadratic speedup compared to classical MC. This fact makes this algorithm an interesting candidate for improvements by quantum algorithms. It was shown in the literature, that simple options with very crude discretization of the underlying stochastic models, can be implemented on a quantum device and evaluated with AE. One big challenge is the efficient implementation of the option’s payoff profile. To solve this problem colleagues and I have introduced a multi-objective genetic algorithm to automatically find well performing and efficient circuits to implement the payoff of non-path-dependent European options on one or more underlyings. Another strategy for pricing options is based on the fact, that in many models the characteristic function of the underlying is numerically more tractable than its distribution function. There are methods that make use of this fact and the performance of the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) to efficiently calculate prices for European call options for many strikes in one go. The quantum version of the FFT, the Quantum Fourier Transform (QFT), is in some sense, even faster than its classical counterpart. We have adapted the existing classical method to make use of QFT, to benefit from its performance. Finally, the different strategies are benchmarked and compared regarding their accuracy, their potential for scaling and their adaptability to different styles of derivatives and models. The result of this comparison are requirements on the quantum hardware for the methods to be viable as well as use cases where each method has its benefits over the others.
Abstract The flourishing development of quantum computing has brought breakthroughs to many classical algorithms, particularly in fields like quantum finance, where quantum computers are employed for estimating the pricing of financial options. Compared to traditional Monte Carlo methods, quantum amplitude estimation (AE) algorithms offer exponential acceleration in estimating the pricing of financial options. However, the execution of quantum AE algorithms is limited by the quantum depth available in current Noisy Intermediate Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices. To explore more applications of quantum algorithms with NISQ devices, a power law AE algorithm for option pricing with NISQ devices is proposed and simulated on Qiskit to validate the theoretical performance. Compared with other AE algorithms, the power law AE algorithm achieves an overall accuracy improved by about 13.12%.
We present a methodology to price options and portfolios of options on a gate-based quantum computer using amplitude estimation, an algorithm which provides a quadratic speedup compared to classical Monte Carlo methods. The options that we cover include vanilla options, multi-asset options and path-dependent options such as barrier options. We put an emphasis on the implementation of the quantum circuits required to build the input states and operators needed by amplitude estimation to price the different option types. Additionally, we show simulation results to highlight how the circuits that we implement price the different option contracts. Finally, we examine the performance of option pricing circuits on quantum hardware using the IBM Q Tokyo quantum device. We employ a simple, yet effective, error mitigation scheme that allows us to significantly reduce the errors arising from noisy two-qubit gates.
Option pricing is a fundamental problem in quantitative finance, where the accuracy and efficiency of valuation methods directly affect investment and risk management decisions. While the Black-Scholes model provides a closed-form solution for European options, numerical approaches such as Monte Carlo simulation are widely used when analytical methods are intractable. However, Monte Carlo suffers from slow convergence with complexity O(1/ε2).Quantum Amplitude Estimation (QAE), an algorithm in quantum computing, promises a quadratic speedup with complexity O(1/ε). This paper implements QAE, specifically Iterative Amplitude Estimation (IAE), for European call option pricing and compares its performance against Monte Carlo simulation and the Black-Scholes model. Experiments are conducted on both Qiskit simulators and IBM Quantum hardware (ibm_brisbane).Results show that QAE achieves estimates close to Monte Carlo and analytical benchmarks, with mean payoff deviations of less than 0.01. While QAE produces wider confidence intervals due to noise and discretization, the findings demonstrate its potential scalability advantage for future quantum finance applications.
The article provides a literature review and analysis of quantum computing methods in the context of option pricing, comparing them against a strict classical benchmark and recommending a viable way forward to quantum computing implementation. We assess the capabilities and the weaknesses of Windows-choice models closed-form legacy formulae of vanillas, lattice/PDE true hockeygoal models of early exercise, and Monte Carlo models of flexibleness and point out where classical run attracted and precision restraints are shown to apply in the new generation(s): complexity of variables, in this path dependence, in a portfolio composing. We proceed to describe quantum algorithms that are based on quantum Monte Carlo which is centered on amplitude-estimation-based algorithms to cut down on contact with sampling; avoiding the scale of classical Monte Carlo and are particularly appealing to complex derivatives; we describe circuit components to prepare states, encode payoffs, and approximate expectations. The study establishes research priorities that achieve scale implies: depth frequently used to design loaders in, and variants of payoff circuits, workflow standardizations that exchange the exchange of error-resilient quantum modules and technological risk engines in the NISQ age. In general, the paper offers a single source of information on classical-quantum option pricing, clean insertion architecture to deploy hybrids and a roadmap between demonstrations and reliable production.