arXiv:2507.17614 · IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE)
Comparing Performance of Variational Quantum Algorithm Simulations on HPC Systems
Marco De Pascale, Tobias Valentin Bauer, Yaknan John Gambo, Mario Hernández Vera, Stefan Huber, Burak Mete, Amit Jamadagni, Amine Bentellis, Marita Oliv, Luigi Iapichino, Jeanette Miriam Lorenz
Variational quantum algorithms are of special importance in the research on quantum computing applications because of their applicability to current Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices. The main building blocks of these algorithms define a relatively large parameter space, making the comparison of results and performance between different approaches and software simulators cumbersome and prone to errors. In this paper, we employ a generic description of the problem, in terms of both Hamiltonian and ansatz, to consistently port a problem definition across different simulators. A use case relevant to current quantum hardware has been run on a set of HPC systems and software simulators to study the dependence of performance on the runtime environment, the scalability of the simulation codes, and the agreement between the physical results, respectively. The results show that our toolchain can successfully translate a problem definition between different simulators. On the other hand, variational algorithms are limited in their scaling by the long runtimes with respect to their memory footprint, so they expose limited parallelism to computation. This shortcoming is partially mitigated by using techniques like job arrays. The potential of the parser tool within the toolchain for exploring HPC performance and comparisons of results of variational algorithm simulations is highlighted.
Variational quantum algorithms are of special importance in the research on quantum computing applications because of their applicability to current Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices. The main building blocks of these algorithms define a relatively large parameter space, making the comparison of results and performance between different approaches and software simulators cumbersome and prone to errors. In this paper, we employ a generic description of the problem, in terms of both Hamiltonian and ansatz, to consistently port a problem definition across different simulators. A use case relevant to current quantum hardware has been run on a set of HPC systems and software simulators to study the dependence of performance on the runtime environment, the scalability of the simulation codes, and the agreement between the physical results, respectively. The results show that our toolchain can successfully translate a problem definition between different simulators. On the other hand, variational algorithms are limited in their scaling by the long runtimes with respect to their memory footprint, so they expose limited parallelism to computation. This shortcoming is partially mitigated by using techniques like job arrays. The potential of the parser tool within the toolchain for exploring HPC performance and comparisons of results of variational algorithm simulations is highlighted.
Rapid advances in quantum computing technology lead to an increasing need for software simulators that enable both algorithm design and the validation of results obtained from quantum hardware. This includes calculations that aim at probing regimes of quantum advantage, where a quantum computer outperforms a classical computer in the same task. High performance computing (HPC) platforms play a crucial role as today’s quantum devices already reach beyond the limits of what powerful workstations can model, but a systematic evaluation of the individual performance of the many offered simulation packages is lacking so far. In this Technical Review, we benchmark several software packages capable of simulating quantum dynamics with a special focus on HPC capabilities. We develop a containerized toolchain for benchmarking a large set of simulation packages on a local HPC cluster using different parallelisation capabilities, and compare the performance and system size-scaling for three paradigmatic quantum computing tasks. Our results can help finding the right package for a given simulation task and lay the foundation for a systematic community effort to benchmark and validate upcoming versions of existing and also newly developed simulation packages.
Hybrid quantum-high performance computing (Q-HPC) workflows are emerging as a key strategy for running quantum applications at scale in current noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices. These workflows must operate seamlessly across diverse simulators and hardware backends since no single simulator offers the best performance for every circuit type. Simulation efficiency depends strongly on circuit structure, entanglement, and depth, making a flexible and backend-agnostic execution model essential for fair benchmarking, informed platform selection, and ultimately the identification of quantum advantage opportunities. In this work, we extend the Quantum Framework (QFw), a modular and HPC-aware orchestration layer, to integrate multiple local backends (Qiskit Aer, NWQ-Sim, QTensor, and TN-QVM) and a cloud-based quantum backend (IonQ) under a unified interface. Using this integration, we execute a number of non-variational as well as variational workloads. The results highlight workload-specific backend advantages: while Qiskit Aer’s matrix product state excels for large Ising models, NWQ-Sim not only leads on large-scale entanglement and Hamiltonian but also shows the benefits of concurrent subproblem execution in a distributed manner for optimization problems. These findings demonstrate that simulator-agnostic, HPC-aware orchestration is a practical path toward scalable, reproducible, and portable Q-HPC ecosystems, thereby accelerating progress toward demonstrating quantum advantage.
Scientific simulations demand methods combining scalability with predictive accuracy. Density Functional Theory (DFT) on High-Performance Computing (HPC) enables large-scale electronic-structure simulations but is limited by approximations affecting strongly correlated systems and band-gap predictions. Quantum computing offers a pathway to address this, though current Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) hardware remains constrained by qubit resources, noise, and execution cost.
This work presents a hybrid DFT-Quantum Embedding (QDFT) framework integrating classical HPC-based DFT with a quantum electronic-structure solver. Large systems are partitioned to isolate a chemically relevant active space, treated via the Variational Quantum Eigensolver (VQE), while the remaining degrees of freedom are described by DFT. The framework incorporates active-space selection, embedded Hamiltonian construction, symmetry preservation, operator mapping, self-consistent density updating, and modular classical-quantum coupling.
We focus on noiseless quantum simulation to systematically evaluate accuracy, convergence, active-space dependence, computational cost, and HPC scalability without hardware noise. Detailed profiling identifies computational bottlenecks and highlights limitations of CPU-based quantum simulation. A QPU runtime-estimation methodology is additionally developed to assess execution requirements on actual quantum hardware.
Results demonstrate quantum embedding's potential to improve selected electronic-structure properties while retaining classical HPC's scalability. Noisy quantum simulation and QPU execution remain key future directions, providing a pathway toward practical, scalable HPC-quantum hybrid simulations as hardware matures.
Variational quantum algorithms (VQAs) have established themselves as a central computational paradigm in the Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) era. By coupling parameterized quantum circuits (PQCs) with classical optimization, they operate effectively under strict hardware limitations. However, as quantum architectures transition toward early fault-tolerant (EFT) and ultimate fault-tolerant (FT) regimes, the foundational principles and long-term viability of VQAs require systematic reassessment. This review offers an insightful analysis of VQAs and their progression toward the fault-tolerant regime. We deconstruct the core algorithmic framework by examining ansatz design and classical optimization strategies, including cost function formulation, gradient computation, and optimizer selection. Concurrently, we evaluate critical training bottlenecks, notably barren plateaus (BPs), alongside established mitigation strategies. The discussion then explores the EFT phase, detailing how the integration of quantum error mitigation and partial error correction can sustain algorithmic performance. Addressing the FT phase, we analyze the inherent challenges confronting current hybrid VQA models. Furthermore, we synthesize recent VQA applications across diverse domains, including many-body physics, quantum chemistry, machine learning, and mathematical optimization. Ultimately, this review outlines a theoretical roadmap for adapting quantum algorithms to future hardware generations, elucidating how variational principles can be systematically refined to maintain their relevance and efficiency within an error-corrected computational environment.
Variational Quantum Algorithms are a major method of harnessing Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum devices to solve classically intractable problems in physics, chemistry, optimization, and machine learning. The current review offers a critical overview of VQAs, with special emphasis on their theoretical backgrounds, algorithmic structures, and application performance within realistic models of noise. Several key variants, such as the Variational Quantum Eigensolver, Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm, and Quantum Neural Networks, are compared in terms of noise robustness, ansatz archi- tecture, and hybrid quantum-classical methods of optimization. Benchmarks in fields such as quantum chemistry, finance modeling, and particles and nuclei physics reveal the poten- tial of VQAs in achieving practical quantum advantage. Fundamentally limiting factors 1such as barren plateaus, optimization overhead, and hardware constraints are considered in addition to mitigation strategies, including adaptive construction of ansatz, informed training in the presence of noise, and quantum error correction using QVECTOR. The paper is concluded with an overview of the scalability and future of VQAs in the direction of transitioning toward fault-tolerant quantum computing.
The increasing complexity of quantum algorithms and the limitations of current Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) hardware underscore the importance of efficient classical simulators. To support informed decision-making by users of quantum circuit simulators, we benchmark seven statevector-based quantum circuit simulators (Qiskit, Qulacs, Qibo, Qsimov, Cirq, Pennylane and the Intel Quantum Simulator (IQS)) on a multicore node of the Lusitania high-performance computing (HPC) system. We evaluate their performance in terms of execution time, memory usage and core scalability using Grover’s algorithm, the quantum Fourier transform (QFT), and quantum volume (QV) circuits, across qubit counts ranging from 3 to 30. Our results reveal that Qulacs offers the best performance for circuits below 22 qubits, while Qiskit becomes the fastest for larger and more complex circuits. Qiskit and Qulacs achieve the most efficient parallel performance across multiple cores, while others display limited scaling benefits. IQS shows the lowest memory consumption in QFT and QV benchmarks for systems under 24 qubits; however, it suffers from higher execution times, particularly for Grover’s algorithm. The experimental implementation of Qsimov consistently underperforms in both runtime and scalability; for this reason, it is employed as a baseline in our measurements, serving to highlight the importance of performance optimizations in statevector-based quantum circuit simulators. Previous findings provide a comprehensive performance landscape to guide researchers in selecting appropriate simulators for both standard and large-scale quantum workloads on HPC infrastructures.