We show how weak symmetry protected topological (SPT) phases on systems with a boundary are not in 1-to-1 correspondence with weak SPT phases on fully periodic systems, breaking the standard anomaly inflow interpretation of SPT phases. We further discuss the implications for the crystalline equivalence principle (CEP).
Symmetry protected topological (SPT) phases of bosons in d spatial dimensions have been characterized by the action of the protecting global symmetry G on their boundary. The symmetry acts on the boundary in a way that would be impossible to realize in a purely d−1 dimensional system i.e., without the bulk. This is often formalized by saying the G symmetry is anomalous when the boundary theory is gauged. Simultaneously gauging the symmetry on the boundary and in the bulk yields a gauge-invariant composite system. One says there is an anomaly in-flow from the boundary to the bulk. Recently it has been appreciated that some anomalies are too severe to be regulated by an SPT bulk. These do not satisfy anomaly in-flow in the traditional sense. However, we show that these anomalous systems can be regulated as the symmetric boundaries of the newly discovered higher SPT phases. These higher SPT's are protected by a symmetry d-group, a higher categorical version of a group which can charge not just particles but also strings, volumes, etc. This structure emerges naturally from computation of the anomaly. One can interpret these severe anomalies as producing an emergent higher-form gauge field when G is gauged, and this gauge field participates in the bulk topological action.
One problem of paramount importance in physics over various fields such as elementary particle physics, condensed matter physics, and statistical mechanics has been to make classification of phases of matter, including nontrivial structures of the vacuum. The triumphant history of theory on the phase classification and the phase transition can be traced back to Landau, which is based on the spontaneous breaking of symmetry. It is known, however, that other kinds of phases exist that cannot be characterized by conventional arguments of symmetry breaking, namely, topological phases. Topological phases are gapped phases at zero temperature without symmetry breaking. Examples of the topological phases include a quantum phase in a fractional quantum Hall system, where the ground state exhibits degeneracy, and an anyon, a quasi-particle with nontrivial statistical nature, neither boson nor fermion, emerges as a low-energy excitation. In contemporary physics of the 21st century, it has been revealed that, among various topological states, there exists a nontrivial ground state that does not have ground state degeneracy and yet can be distinguished from a trivial state. This nontrivial ground state, i.e., a topological insulator, has been recognized first in free electron systems [1–3] and later extended to more general quantum many-body systems with interactions including bosonic (spin) systems. Now, such a generalized situation is called a symmetry protected topological (SPT) phase [4–7]. From the point of a modern view of the SPT phase, nontrivial states, such as the Haldane state proposed in antiferromagnetic quantum spin systems in the 1980’s [8] and the ground state in the Affleck-Kennedy-Lieb-Tasaki model [9], belong to the SPT phase. A remarkable feature of the SPT phase is that, if the system has a surface, gapless surface states appear and they are stable against disturbances which do not break the symmetry. One way to understand these surface states is the quantum anomaly on the surface. That is, as long as the surface is concerned, the quantum anomaly arises, but the whole system has no quantum anomaly, and the symmetry is preserved due to cancellation from the bulk contribution. This canceling mechanism of the quantum anomaly has been long known as the anomaly inflow in elementary particle physics [10]. In fact, the classification of the SPT phases can be identified as the classification of the quantum anomaly through the bulk-boundary correspondence. This type of the quantum anomaly closely related to the SPT phase can provide us with a useful theoretical device to constrain phases that can or cannot be realized under the ’t Hooft anomaly matching condition [11–13]. It is quite difficult to scrutinize nonperturbatively interacting systems, but the ’t Hooft anomaly matching condition can be applied to those systems, and possible phases can be constrained. Nowadays, our understanding of the SPT phases has been so developed that applications of the anomaly matching condition can cover systems with finite groups and/or extending objects [14–16]. In this way, the concept of the topological phases has been essential by now in a wide range of physics, particularly in elementary particle physics, condensed matter physics, and statistical mechanics, as mentioned in the beginning. This special section is a collection of papers related to the topological aspects of physics including the topological phases. We would like to express our sincere gratitude to all the authors who made excellent contributions.
Symmetry-protected topological (SPT) phases are gapped phases of matter that cannot be deformed to a trivial phase without breaking the symmetry or closing the bulk gap.Here we introduce a notion of a topological obstruction that is not captured by bulk energy gap closings in periodic boundary conditions.More specifically, given a symmetric boundary termination we say two bulk Hamiltonians belong to distinct boundary obstructed topological phases (BOTPs) if they can be deformed to each other on a system with periodic boundaries, but cannot be deformed to each other in the open system without closing the gap at at least one high-symmetry surface.BOTPs are not topological phases of matter in the standard sense since they are adiabatically deformable to each other on a torus, but, similar to SPTs, they are associated with boundary signatures in open systems such as surface states or fractional corner charges.In contrast to SPTs, these boundary signatures are not anomalous and can be removed by symmetrically adding lower-dimensional SPTs on the boundary, but they are stable as long as the spectral gap at high-symmetry edges/surfaces remains open.We show that the double-mirror quadrupole model of [W. A. Benalcazar, B. A. Bernevig, and T. L. Hughes, Science 357, 61 (2017)] is a prototypical example of such phases, and present a detailed analysis of several aspects of boundary obstructions in this model.In addition, we introduce several three-dimensional models having boundary obstructions, which are characterized either by surface states or fractional corner charges.Furthermore, we provide a complete characterization of boundary obstructed phases in terms of symmetry representations.Namely, two distinct BOTP phases correspond to equivalent band representations in the periodic system which become inequivalent upon restricting the symmetry group to that of the open system.This is used to shown that for a given open boundary, there is only one class of BOTPs which corresponds to a local representation of the symmetry of the open system and thus can be designated as the trivial phase.All other BOTP classes do not correspond to local representation of the open system and as a result necessarily exhibit a filling anomaly or gapless surface states.
The boundary of topological phases of matter can manifest its topology nature, which leads to the so-called boundary-bulk correspondence (BBC) of topological phases. In this Letter, we construct a one-to-one correspondence between the boundary theories of fermionic SPT (fSPT) phases protected by crystalline symmetry and on-site symmetry in 2D fermionic systems, which follow the so-called crystalline equivalence principle. We dub such correspondence crystalline equivalent BBC. We illustrate this correspondence by two simple examples and as an application, we discover the topological boundary theory of 2D fSPT phase with spin-1/2 fermions, protected by a non-Abelian group Z4⋊Z2T with A4=T2=Pf where A is the generator of Z4, from its crystalline equivalent partner -- 2D higher-order fSPT phase with spinless fermions, protected by D4 symmetry.
Symmetry protected topological phases protected by crystalline symmetries and internal symmetries are shown to enjoy fascinating one-to-one correspondence in classification. Here we investigate the physics content behind the abstract correspondence in three or higher-dimensional systems. We show correspondence between anomalous boundary states, which provides a new way to explore the quantum anomaly of symmetry from its crystalline equivalent counterpart. We show such a correspondence directly in two scenarios, including the anomalous symmetry-enriched topological orders (SET) and critical boundary states. (1) First of all, for the surface SET correspondence, we demonstrate it by considering examples involving time-reversal symmetry and mirror symmetry. We show that one 2D topological order can carry the time reversal anomaly as long as it can carry the mirror anomaly and vice versa, by directly establishing the mapping of the time reversal anomaly indicators and mirror anomaly indicators. Besides, we also consider other cases involving continuous symmetry, which leads us to introduce some new anomaly indicators for symmetry from its counterpart. (2) Furthermore, we also build up direct correspondence for (near) critical boundaries. In this perspective, we first consider the edge-corner correspondence between edge theory as 1+1D conformal field theory of internal fermionic SPT and the 0+1D corner modes of (higher-order) crystalline fermionic SPT. By viewing the corner modes on 1D boundary as perturbed CFT is crucial insight for the correspondence, but also help to discover the boundary theory of some intrinsically interacting fermionic SPT, whcih are challenging. Next, we discuss this correspondence bosonic systems, again taking topological phases protected by time reversal and mirror symmetry as examples, the direct correspondence of their (near) critical boundaries can be built up by coupled chain construction that was first proposed by Senthil and Fisher. The examples of critical boundary correspondence we consider in this paper can be understood in a unified framework that is related to hierarchy structure of topological O(n) O ( n ) nonlinear sigma model (NL \sigma σ M), that generalizes the Haldane’s derivation of O(3) O ( 3 ) sigma model from spin one-half system. To our best of knowledge, this hierarchy structure of the O(n) O ( n ) NL \sigma σ M is first exposed, which inspires us to explore more interesting connection between different theories in the light of the boundary correspondence.