Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2506.10319

Lieb's Theorem for Bose Hubbard Models

Zhongchao Wei, Chong Ke Zhao

Published Jun 12, 2025• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Using a cone-theoretical method, we prove the uniqueness of the ground state for two Bose Hubbard models. The first model is the usual Bose Hubbard model with real hopping coefficients and attractive interactions. The second model is a two-component Bose Hubbard model. Under certain conditions, we show that the ground state in the subspace with particle number $N=2n$($n$ is a positive integer) is unique for both models. For the second model, we show that the ground state has spin along the z-axis $S^{z}=0$. When the hopping coefficients are real, it has zero spin quantum number, i.e., it is a singlet. Our proofs work equally well for any arbitrary finite-size lattice.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2506.10319

Related papers

Spin and pseudospin towers of the Hubbard model on a bipartite lattice

J. Z. Boretsky, Jeffrey Cohn, James K. Freericks

In 1989, Lieb proved two theorems about the Hubbard model. One showed that the ground state of the attractive model was a spin singlet state (S = 0) was unique and was positive definite. The other showed that the ground state of the repulsive model on a bipartite lattice at half-filling has a total spin given by [Formula: see text](N[Formula: see text]NB)/2[Formula: see text], corresponding to the difference of the number of lattice sites on the two sublattices divided by two. In the mid to late 1990s, Shen extended these proofs to show that the pseudospin of the attractive model was minimal until the electron number equaled 2NA where it became fixed at J = [Formula: see text](N[Formula: see text]NB)/2[Formula: see text] until the filling became 2NB, where it became minimal again. In addition, Shen showed that a spin tower exists for the spin eigenstates for the half-filled case on a bipartite lattice. The spin tower says the minimal energy state with spin S is higher in energy than the minimal energy state with spin S − 1 until we reach the ground-state spin given above. One long-standing conjecture about this model remains, namely, does the attractive model have such a spin tower for all fillings, which would then imply that the repulsive model has minimal pseudopsin in its ground state. While we do not prove this last conjecture, we provide a quick review of this previous work, provide a constructive proof of the pseudospin of the attractive model ground state, and describe the challenges by proving the remaining open conjecture.

arXiv:1712.02694•International Journal of Modern Physics B•Mar 19, 2018•2 citations

Rigorous Results for the Ground States of the Spin-2 Bose-Hubbard Model

Hong Wei Yang, Hosho Katsura

We present rigorous and universal results for the ground states of the f=2 spinor Bose-Hubbard model. The model includes three two-body on-site interaction terms, two of which are spin dependent while the other one is spin independent. We prove that, depending only on the coefficients of the two spin-dependent terms, the ground state exhibits maximum or minimum total spin or SU(5) ferromagnetism. Exact ground-state degeneracies and the forms of ground-state wave function are also determined in each case. All these results are valid regardless of dimension, lattice structure, or particle number. Our approach takes advantage of the symmetry of the Hamiltonian and employs mathematical tools including the Perron-Frobenius theorem and the Lie algebra so(5).

arXiv:1803.09441•Physical Review Letters•Feb 7, 2019•4 citations

Ground-state properties of the attractive one-dimensional Bose-Hubbard model

N. Oelkers, Jon Links

We study the ground state of the attractive one-dimensional Bose-Hubbard model, and in particular the nature of the crossover between the weak interaction and strong interaction regimes for finite system sizes. Indicator properties such as the gap between the ground and first excited energy levels, and the incremental ground-state wave function overlaps are used to locate different regimes. Using mean-field theory we predict that there are two distinct crossovers connected to spontaneous symmetry breaking of the ground state. The first crossover arises in an analysis valid for large $L$ with finite $N$, where $L$ is the number of lattice sites and $N$ is the total particle number. An alternative approach valid for large $N$ with finite $L$ yields a second crossover. For small system sizes we numerically investigate the model and observe that there are signatures of both crossovers. We compare with exact results from Bethe ansatz methods in several limiting cases to explore the validity for these numerical and mean-field schemes. The results indicate that for finite attractive systems there are generically three ground-state phases of the model.

arXiv:cond-mat/0611510•Physical Review B•Mar 19, 2007•77 citations

Ground States of the Spin-1 Bose-Hubbard Model

Hosho Katsura, Hal Tasaki

We prove basic theorems about the ground states of the S=1 Bose-Hubbard model. The results are quite universal and depend only on the coefficient U2 of the spin-dependent interaction. We show that the ground state exhibits saturated ferromagnetism if U2<0, is spin-singlet if U2>0, and exhibits "SU(3)-ferromagnetism" if U2=0, and completely determine the degeneracy in each region.

arXiv:1212.6035•Physical Review Letters•Mar 26, 2013•29 citations

Two theorems on the Hubbard model

Élliott H. Lieb

In the attractive Hubbard Model (and some extended versions of it), the ground state is proved to have spin angular momentum S=0 for every (even) electron filling. In the repulsive case, and with a bipartite lattice and a half-filled band, the ground state has S=(1/2\ensuremath{\parallel}B\ensuremath{\Vert}-\ensuremath{\Vert}A\ensuremath{\Vert}\ensuremath{\Vert}, where \ensuremath{\Vert}B\ensuremath{\Vert} (\ensuremath{\Vert}A\ensuremath{\Vert}) is the number of sites in the B (A) sublattice. In both cases the ground state is unique. The second theorem confirms an old, unproved conjecture in the \ensuremath{\Vert}B\ensuremath{\Vert}=\ensuremath{\Vert}A\ensuremath{\Vert} case and yields, with \ensuremath{\Vert}B\ensuremath{\Vert}\ensuremath{\ne}\ensuremath{\Vert}A\ensuremath{\Vert}, the first provable example of itinerant-electron ferromagnetism. The theorems hold in all dimensions without even the necessity of a periodic lattice structure.

Physical Review Letters•Mar 6, 1989•2,222 citations

Quantum number towers for the Hubbard and Holstein models

James K. Freericks

In 1989, Elliott Lieb published a Physical Review Letter proving two theorems about the Hubbard model. This paper used the concept of spin-reflection positivity to prove that the ground state of the attractive Hubbard model was always a nondegenerate spin singlet and to also prove that the ground state for the repulsive model on a bipartite lattice had spin $\big{|}|\Lambda\_{A}|-|\Lambda\_{B}|\big{|}/2$, corresponding to the difference in number of lattice sites for the two sublattices. In addition, this work relates to quantum number towers—where the minimal energy state with a given quantum number, such as spin, or pseudospin, is ordered, according to the spin or pseudospin values. It was followed up in 1995 by a second paper that extended some of these results to the Holstein model (and more general electron-phonon models). These works prove results about the quantum numbers of these many-body models in condensed matter physics and have been very influential. In this chapter, I will discuss the context for these proofs, what they mean, and the remaining open questions related to the original work. In addition, I will briefly discuss some of the additional work that this methodology inspired.

arXiv:2202.02271•EMS Press eBooks•Jun 29, 2022•1 citation
Using a cone-theoretical method, we prove the uniqueness of the ground state for two Bose Hubbard models. The first model is the usual Bose Hubbard model with real hopping coefficients and attractive interactions. The second model is a two-component Bose Hubbard model. Under certain conditions, we show that the ground state in the subspace with particle number N=2nN=2nN=2n(nnn is a positive integer) is unique for both models. For the second model, we show that the ground state has spin along the z-axis Sz=0S^{z}=0Sz=0. When the hopping coefficients are real, it has zero spin quantum number, i.e., it is a singlet. Our proofs work equally well for any arbitrary finite-size lattice.
In 1989, Lieb proved two theorems about the Hubbard model. One showed that the ground state of the attractive model was a spin singlet state (S = 0) was unique and was positive definite. The other showed that the ground state of the repulsive model on a bipartite lattice at half-filling has a total spin given by [Formula: see text](N[Formula: see text]NB)/2[Formula: see text], corresponding to the difference of the number of lattice sites on the two sublattices divided by two. In the mid to late 1990s, Shen extended these proofs to show that the pseudospin of the attractive model was minimal until the electron number equaled 2NA where it became fixed at J = [Formula: see text](N[Formula: see text]NB)/2[Formula: see text] until the filling became 2NB, where it became minimal again. In addition, Shen showed that a spin tower exists for the spin eigenstates for the half-filled case on a bipartite lattice. The spin tower says the minimal energy state with spin S is higher in energy than the minimal energy state with spin S − 1 until we reach the ground-state spin given above. One long-standing conjecture about this model remains, namely, does the attractive model have such a spin tower for all fillings, which would then imply that the repulsive model has minimal pseudopsin in its ground state. While we do not prove this last conjecture, we provide a quick review of this previous work, provide a constructive proof of the pseudospin of the attractive model ground state, and describe the challenges by proving the remaining open conjecture.
We present rigorous and universal results for the ground states of the f=2 spinor Bose-Hubbard model. The model includes three two-body on-site interaction terms, two of which are spin dependent while the other one is spin independent. We prove that, depending only on the coefficients of the two spin-dependent terms, the ground state exhibits maximum or minimum total spin or SU(5) ferromagnetism. Exact ground-state degeneracies and the forms of ground-state wave function are also determined in each case. All these results are valid regardless of dimension, lattice structure, or particle number. Our approach takes advantage of the symmetry of the Hamiltonian and employs mathematical tools including the Perron-Frobenius theorem and the Lie algebra so(5).
We study the ground state of the attractive one-dimensional Bose-Hubbard model, and in particular the nature of the crossover between the weak interaction and strong interaction regimes for finite system sizes. Indicator properties such as the gap between the ground and first excited energy levels, and the incremental ground-state wave function overlaps are used to locate different regimes. Using mean-field theory we predict that there are two distinct crossovers connected to spontaneous symmetry breaking of the ground state. The first crossover arises in an analysis valid for large LLL with finite NNN, where LLL is the number of lattice sites and NNN is the total particle number. An alternative approach valid for large NNN with finite LLL yields a second crossover. For small system sizes we numerically investigate the model and observe that there are signatures of both crossovers. We compare with exact results from Bethe ansatz methods in several limiting cases to explore the validity for these numerical and mean-field schemes. The results indicate that for finite attractive systems there are generically three ground-state phases of the model.
In the attractive Hubbard Model (and some extended versions of it), the ground state is proved to have spin angular momentum S=0 for every (even) electron filling. In the repulsive case, and with a bipartite lattice and a half-filled band, the ground state has S=(1/2\ensuremath{\parallel}B\ensuremath{\Vert}-\ensuremath{\Vert}A\ensuremath{\Vert}\ensuremath{\Vert}, where \ensuremath{\Vert}B\ensuremath{\Vert} (\ensuremath{\Vert}A\ensuremath{\Vert}) is the number of sites in the B (A) sublattice. In both cases the ground state is unique. The second theorem confirms an old, unproved conjecture in the \ensuremath{\Vert}B\ensuremath{\Vert}=\ensuremath{\Vert}A\ensuremath{\Vert} case and yields, with \ensuremath{\Vert}B\ensuremath{\Vert}\ensuremath{\ne}\ensuremath{\Vert}A\ensuremath{\Vert}, the first provable example of itinerant-electron ferromagnetism. The theorems hold in all dimensions without even the necessity of a periodic lattice structure.
In 1989, Elliott Lieb published a Physical Review Letter proving two theorems about the Hubbard model. This paper used the concept of spin-reflection positivity to prove that the ground state of the attractive Hubbard model was always a nondegenerate spin singlet and to also prove that the ground state for the repulsive model on a bipartite lattice had spin ∣∣Λ_A∣−∣Λ_B∣∣/2\big{|}|\Lambda\_{A}|-|\Lambda\_{B}|\big{|}/2​∣Λ_A∣−∣Λ_B∣​/2, corresponding to the difference in number of lattice sites for the two sublattices. In addition, this work relates to quantum number towers—where the minimal energy state with a given quantum number, such as spin, or pseudospin, is ordered, according to the spin or pseudospin values. It was followed up in 1995 by a second paper that extended some of these results to the Holstein model (and more general electron-phonon models). These works prove results about the quantum numbers of these many-body models in condensed matter physics and have been very influential. In this chapter, I will discuss the context for these proofs, what they mean, and the remaining open questions related to the original work. In addition, I will briefly discuss some of the additional work that this methodology inspired.