Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2506.02277 · Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science

Parallel Repetition for Post-Quantum Arguments

Andrew Huang, Yael Tauman Kalai

Published Dec 14, 2025• 1 citation
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

In this work, we show that parallel repetition of public-coin interactive arguments reduces the soundness error at an exponential rate even in the post-quantum setting. Moreover, we generalize this result to hold for threshold verifiers, where the parallel repeated verifier accepts if and only if at least t of the executions are accepted (for some threshold t). Prior to this work, these results were known only when the cheating prover was assumed to be classical.We also prove a similar result for three-message private-coin arguments. Previously, Bostanci, Qian, Spooner, and Yuen (STOC 2024) proved such a parallel repetition result in the more general setting of quantum protocols, where the verifier and communication may be quantum. We consider only protocols where the verifier is classical, but obtain a simplified analysis, and for the more general setting of threshold verifiers.

DOI
10.1109/focs63196.2025.00100

Related papers

Tight Post-Quantum Parallel Repetition for Private-Coin Arguments

Zvika Brakerski, Andrew Huang, Yael Tauman Kalai +1 more

We show that assuming the existence of homomorphic encryption, parallel repetition of all interactive arguments (after being run under homomorphic encryption) reduces the soundness error at a tight exponential rate even in the post-quantum setting. Moreover, we generalize this result to hold for threshold verifiers, where the parallel repeated verifier accepts if and only if at least $t$ of the executions are accepted (for some threshold $t$). Prior to this work, these results were known only when the cheating prover was assumed to be classical, and it was not known how to achieve tight bounds. As a corollary, we construct the first constant-round succinct argument for $\mathsf{QMA}$ with negligible completeness and soundness errors assuming only the existence of quantum homomorphic encryption.

quant-pharXiv:2609.38941•Oct 1, 2026•0 citations

Parallel Repetition of Prover-Verifier Quantum Interactions

Abel Molina

In this thesis, we answer several questions about the behaviour of prover-verifier interactions under parallel repetition when quantum information is allowed, and the verifier acts independently in them. We first consider the case in which a value is associated with each of the possible outcomes of an interaction. We prove that it is not possible for the prover to improve on the optimum average value per repetition by repeating the protocol multiple times in parallel. We look then at games in which the outcomes are classified into two types, winning outcomes and losing outcomes. We ask what is the optimal probability for the prover of winning at least k times out of n parallel repetitions, given that the optimal probability of winning when only one repetition is considered is $p$. A reasonable conjecture for the answer would be \sum_{m \geq k} {n \choose m} p^m (1-p)^{n-m}, as that is the answer when it is optimal for the prover to act independently. This is known to be the correct answer when k=n, and also in the classical case. It is also correct in some generalizations of the classical case that we will discuss later. We will show how this cannot be extended to all cases, presenting an example of an interaction with k=1,n=2 in which p\approx 0.85, but it is possible to always win at least once. We will then give some upper bounds on the optimal probability for the prover of winning k times out of n parallel repetitions. These bounds are expressed as a function of p. Finally, we will connect our results to the study of error reduction for quantum interactive proofs using parallel repetition.

arXiv:1203.4885•Mar 22, 2012•0 citations

Quantum interaction can superactivate cheating under parallel repetition

Archishna Bhattacharyya, Laura Mančinska, Yuming Zhao

We study interactive multiprover games and many-round protocols in which the communication between the verifier and the provers is quantum. Parallel repetition is known to suppress soundness error of classical two-prover games arbitrarily close to zero, as shown by Raz (STOC '95), even with quantum strategies as shown by Yuen (ICALP '16), and Bavarian, Vidick and Yuen (STOC '17). Yet, we show that quantum communication can have the opposite, unexpected effect. Specifically, we exhibit a one-round quantum game and two-round $\mathsf{QMIP}$ protocols whose local (unentangled) value is strictly less than one for a single instance, yet equals one under $n$-fold parallel repetition for every $n \geq 2$. The key is that parallel repetition not only imposes additional winning conditions but also supplies additional quantum resources as entanglement in the exchanged states can be exploited jointly across copies. Our multiround examples build on superactivation of zero-error capacities of quantum channels. To establish this connection, we introduce quantum games and interactive protocols which capture the one-shot zero-error classical and quantum capacities, both with and without entanglement assistance. Our constructions use quantum-state verification and a teleportation-based reduction from two rounds to one. In contrast, when shared entanglement is allowed, we show that parallel repetition cannot increase the entangled value when at most $3$ messages are exchanged, consistent with classical results of Bellare, Impagliazzo and Naor (FOCS '97), and that of single-prover systems by Kitaev and Watrous (STOC '00). Combining this monotonicity with our quantum game-channel correspondence, we show that entanglement-assisted zero-error classical and quantum capacities cannot be superactivated.

quant-pharXiv:2609.31223•Sep 28, 2026•0 citations

Parallel Repetition of Prover-Verifier Quantum Interactions

Abel Molina

In this thesis, we answer several questions about the behaviour of prover-verifier interactions under parallel repetition when quantum information is allowed, and the verifier acts independently in them. \n \nWe first consider the case in which a value is associated with each of the possible outcomes of an interaction. We prove that it is not possible for the prover to improve on the optimum average value per repetition by repeating the protocol multiple times in parallel. \n \nWe look then at games in which the outcomes are classified into two types, winning outcomes and losing outcomes. We ask what is the optimal probability for the prover of winning at least k times out of n parallel repetitions, given that the optimal probability of winning when only one repetition is considered is p. A reasonable conjecture for the answer would be the answer when it is optimal for the prover to act independently. This is known to be the correct answer when k=n. We will show how this cannot be extended to the general case, presenting an example of an interaction with k=1,n=2 in which p is approximately 0.85, but it is possible to always win at least once. We will then give some upper bounds on the optimal probability for the prover of winning k times out of n parallel repetitions. These bounds are expressed as a function of p. \n \nFinally, we connect our results to the study of error reduction for quantum interactive proofs using parallel repetition.

•Jan 1, 2011•0 citations

An Efficient Quantum Parallel Repetition Theorem and Applications

John Bostanci, Luowen Qian, Nicholas Spooner +1 more

We prove a tight parallel repetition theorem for 3-message computationally-secure quantum interactive protocols between an efficient challenger and an efficient adversary. We also prove under plausible assumptions that the security of 4-message computationally secure protocols does not generally decrease under parallel repetition. These mirror the classical results of Bellare, Impagliazzo, and Naor. Finally, we prove that all quantum argument systems can be generically compiled to an equivalent 3-message argument system, mirroring the transformation for quantum proof systems. As immediate applications, we show how to derive hardness amplification theorems for quantum bit commitment schemes (answering a question of Yan), EFI pairs (answering a question of Brakerski, Canetti, and Qian), public-key quantum money schemes (answering a question of Aaronson and Christiano), and quantum zero-knowledge argument systems. We also derive an XOR lemma for quantum predicates as a corollary.

arXiv:2311.10681•ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC)•Jun 10, 2024•5 citations

The Randomness Complexity of Parallel Repetition

Kai-Min Chung, Rafael Pass

Consider a m-round interactive protocol with soundness error 1/2. How much extra randomness is required to decrease the soundness error to δ through parallel repetition? Previous work, initiated by Bell are, Goldreich and Goldwasser, shows that for public-coin interactive protocols with statistical soundness, m · O(log (1/δ)) bits of extra randomness suffices. In this work, we initiate a more general study of the above question. We establish the first derandomized parallel repetition theorem for public-coin interactive protocols with computational soundness (a.k.a. arguments). The parameters of our result essentially matches the earlier works in the information-theoretic setting. We show that obtaining even a sub-linear dependency on the number of rounds m (i.e., o(m)·log(1/δ)) is impossible in the information-theoretic, and requires the existence of one-way functions in the computational setting. We show that non-trivial derandomized parallel repetition for private-coin protocols is impossible in the information-theoretic setting and requires the existence of one-way functions in the computational setting. These results are tight in the sense that parallel repetition theorems in the computational setting can trivially be derandomized using pseudorandom generators, which are implied by the existence of one-way functions.

Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science•Oct 1, 2011•4 citations
In this work, we show that parallel repetition of public-coin interactive arguments reduces the soundness error at an exponential rate even in the post-quantum setting. Moreover, we generalize this result to hold for threshold verifiers, where the parallel repeated verifier accepts if and only if at least t of the executions are accepted (for some threshold t). Prior to this work, these results were known only when the cheating prover was assumed to be classical.We also prove a similar result for three-message private-coin arguments. Previously, Bostanci, Qian, Spooner, and Yuen (STOC 2024) proved such a parallel repetition result in the more general setting of quantum protocols, where the verifier and communication may be quantum. We consider only protocols where the verifier is classical, but obtain a simplified analysis, and for the more general setting of threshold verifiers.
We show that assuming the existence of homomorphic encryption, parallel repetition of all interactive arguments (after being run under homomorphic encryption) reduces the soundness error at a tight exponential rate even in the post-quantum setting. Moreover, we generalize this result to hold for threshold verifiers, where the parallel repeated verifier accepts if and only if at least ttt of the executions are accepted (for some threshold ttt). Prior to this work, these results were known only when the cheating prover was assumed to be classical, and it was not known how to achieve tight bounds. As a corollary, we construct the first constant-round succinct argument for QMA\mathsf{QMA}QMA with negligible completeness and soundness errors assuming only the existence of quantum homomorphic encryption.
In this thesis, we answer several questions about the behaviour of prover-verifier interactions under parallel repetition when quantum information is allowed, and the verifier acts independently in them. We first consider the case in which a value is associated with each of the possible outcomes of an interaction. We prove that it is not possible for the prover to improve on the optimum average value per repetition by repeating the protocol multiple times in parallel. We look then at games in which the outcomes are classified into two types, winning outcomes and losing outcomes. We ask what is the optimal probability for the prover of winning at least k times out of n parallel repetitions, given that the optimal probability of winning when only one repetition is considered is ppp. A reasonable conjecture for the answer would be \sum_{m \geq k} {n \choose m} p^m (1-p)^{n-m}, as that is the answer when it is optimal for the prover to act independently. This is known to be the correct answer when k=n, and also in the classical case. It is also correct in some generalizations of the classical case that we will discuss later. We will show how this cannot be extended to all cases, presenting an example of an interaction with k=1,n=2 in which p\approx 0.85, but it is possible to always win at least once. We will then give some upper bounds on the optimal probability for the prover of winning k times out of n parallel repetitions. These bounds are expressed as a function of p. Finally, we will connect our results to the study of error reduction for quantum interactive proofs using parallel repetition.
We study interactive multiprover games and many-round protocols in which the communication between the verifier and the provers is quantum. Parallel repetition is known to suppress soundness error of classical two-prover games arbitrarily close to zero, as shown by Raz (STOC '95), even with quantum strategies as shown by Yuen (ICALP '16), and Bavarian, Vidick and Yuen (STOC '17). Yet, we show that quantum communication can have the opposite, unexpected effect. Specifically, we exhibit a one-round quantum game and two-round QMIP\mathsf{QMIP}QMIP protocols whose local (unentangled) value is strictly less than one for a single instance, yet equals one under nnn-fold parallel repetition for every n≥2n \geq 2n≥2. The key is that parallel repetition not only imposes additional winning conditions but also supplies additional quantum resources as entanglement in the exchanged states can be exploited jointly across copies. Our multiround examples build on superactivation of zero-error capacities of quantum channels. To establish this connection, we introduce quantum games and interactive protocols which capture the one-shot zero-error classical and quantum capacities, both with and without entanglement assistance. Our constructions use quantum-state verification and a teleportation-based reduction from two rounds to one. In contrast, when shared entanglement is allowed, we show that parallel repetition cannot increase the entangled value when at most 333 messages are exchanged, consistent with classical results of Bellare, Impagliazzo and Naor (FOCS '97), and that of single-prover systems by Kitaev and Watrous (STOC '00). Combining this monotonicity with our quantum game-channel correspondence, we show that entanglement-assisted zero-error classical and quantum capacities cannot be superactivated.
In this thesis, we answer several questions about the behaviour of prover-verifier interactions under parallel repetition when quantum information is allowed, and the verifier acts independently in them. \n \nWe first consider the case in which a value is associated with each of the possible outcomes of an interaction. We prove that it is not possible for the prover to improve on the optimum average value per repetition by repeating the protocol multiple times in parallel. \n \nWe look then at games in which the outcomes are classified into two types, winning outcomes and losing outcomes. We ask what is the optimal probability for the prover of winning at least k times out of n parallel repetitions, given that the optimal probability of winning when only one repetition is considered is p. A reasonable conjecture for the answer would be the answer when it is optimal for the prover to act independently. This is known to be the correct answer when k=n. We will show how this cannot be extended to the general case, presenting an example of an interaction with k=1,n=2 in which p is approximately 0.85, but it is possible to always win at least once. We will then give some upper bounds on the optimal probability for the prover of winning k times out of n parallel repetitions. These bounds are expressed as a function of p. \n \nFinally, we connect our results to the study of error reduction for quantum interactive proofs using parallel repetition.
We prove a tight parallel repetition theorem for 3-message computationally-secure quantum interactive protocols between an efficient challenger and an efficient adversary. We also prove under plausible assumptions that the security of 4-message computationally secure protocols does not generally decrease under parallel repetition. These mirror the classical results of Bellare, Impagliazzo, and Naor. Finally, we prove that all quantum argument systems can be generically compiled to an equivalent 3-message argument system, mirroring the transformation for quantum proof systems. As immediate applications, we show how to derive hardness amplification theorems for quantum bit commitment schemes (answering a question of Yan), EFI pairs (answering a question of Brakerski, Canetti, and Qian), public-key quantum money schemes (answering a question of Aaronson and Christiano), and quantum zero-knowledge argument systems. We also derive an XOR lemma for quantum predicates as a corollary.
Consider a m-round interactive protocol with soundness error 1/2. How much extra randomness is required to decrease the soundness error to δ through parallel repetition? Previous work, initiated by Bell are, Goldreich and Goldwasser, shows that for public-coin interactive protocols with statistical soundness, m · O(log (1/δ)) bits of extra randomness suffices. In this work, we initiate a more general study of the above question. We establish the first derandomized parallel repetition theorem for public-coin interactive protocols with computational soundness (a.k.a. arguments). The parameters of our result essentially matches the earlier works in the information-theoretic setting. We show that obtaining even a sub-linear dependency on the number of rounds m (i.e., o(m)·log(1/δ)) is impossible in the information-theoretic, and requires the existence of one-way functions in the computational setting. We show that non-trivial derandomized parallel repetition for private-coin protocols is impossible in the information-theoretic setting and requires the existence of one-way functions in the computational setting. These results are tight in the sense that parallel repetition theorems in the computational setting can trivially be derandomized using pseudorandom generators, which are implied by the existence of one-way functions.