Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2505.13681 · Physical Review A

Entropic limitations on fixed causal order

Matheus Capela, Kaumudibikash Goswami

Published Apr 8, 2026• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Quantum processes can exhibit scenarios beyond a fixed order of events. We propose information inequalities that, when violated, constitute sufficient conditions to certify quantum processes without a fixed causal order -- causally separable or indefinite causal ordered processes. The inequalities hold valid for a vast class of information measures. Nevertheless, we take under scrutiny the von Neumann, $α-$Rényi entropies with parameter $α\in [1/2,1) \cup (1,\infty)$, and max- and min-entropies. We also discuss how the strong subadditivity of quantum (von Neumann) entropy, used along with the information inequality developed here, implies relevant witnesses of causally separable and indefinite causal ordered processes in marginal scenarios. Importantly, we show the violation of these inequalities for the quantum switch, a paradigmatic example of a process with indefinite causal order. Our approach contributes to the important research direction of information-theoretic characterization of quantum processes beyond fixed causal orders.

DOI
10.1103/hhkl-qb7w

Related papers

Tsirelson bounds for quantum correlations with indefinite causal order

Zixuan Liu, Giulio Chiribella

Quantum theory is in principle compatible with processes that violate causal inequalities, an analogue of Bell inequalities that constrain the correlations observed by sets of parties operating in a definite causal order. Since the introduction of causal inequalities, determining their maximum quantum violation, analogue to Tsirelson's bound for Bell inequalities, has remained an open problem. Here we provide a general method for bounding the violation of arbitrary causal inequalities, establishing limits to the correlations achievable by arbitrary local experiments and by arbitrary quantum processes with indefinite causal order. We prove that the maximum violation is generally smaller than the algebraic maximum of the corresponding correlation, and determine Tsirelson-like bounds for a class of causal inequalities including some of the most paradigmatic examples. Our results motivate a search for physical principles characterizing the boundary of the set of quantum correlations with indefinite causal order.

arXiv:2403.02749•Mar 5, 2024•0 citations

Tsirelson bounds for quantum correlations with indefinite causal order

Zixuan Liu, Giulio Chiribella

Quantum theory is in principle compatible with processes that violate causal inequalities, an analogue of Bell inequalities that constrain the correlations observed by sets of parties operating in a definite causal order. Since the introduction of causal inequalities, determining their maximum quantum violation, analogue to Tsirelson’s bound for Bell inequalities, has remained an open problem. Here we provide a general method for bounding the violation of arbitrary causal inequalities, establishing limits to the correlations achievable by arbitrary local experiments and by arbitrary quantum processes with indefinite causal order. We prove that the maximum violation is generally smaller than the algebraic maximum of the corresponding correlation, and determine Tsirelson-like bounds for a class of causal inequalities including some of the most paradigmatic examples. Our results motivate a search for physical principles characterizing the boundary of the set of quantum correlations with indefinite causal order. Quantum theory has been shown to be compatible with processes violating a definite causal order, but no detailed analysis of the maximum allowed degree of violation has been carried out so far. Here, the authors fill this gap by providing the analogue of Tsirelson’s bound for the violation of causal inequalities.

Nature Communications•Apr 7, 2025•4 citations

Indefinite causal order with output-signalling instruments

Ricardo Silveira, Patrick Andriolo, Davide Poderini +2 more

Quantum processes can exhibit indefinite causal order, allowing coherent superpositions of distinct orderings of events. Whether such processes generate genuinely noncausal statistics, however, depends not only on their global causal structure but also on the local operations available to the parties. Here, we restrict communication to the classical outcomes of local operations, yielding a causal polytope with new causal inequalities that can be violated using measure-and-reprepare, entanglement-breaking instruments requiring no coherent transmission through the laboratories. Using a semidefinite-programming framework, we bound the achievable violations and reveal noncausal correlations that satisfy all conventional input-signalling inequalities, demonstrating that restricting the information available for communication can uncover forms of indefinite causal order inaccessible under less restrictive operational assumptions.

quant-pharXiv:2609.31863•Sep 29, 2026•0 citations

Conditional entropy and information of quantum processes

Siddhartha Das, Kaumudibikash Goswami, Vivek Pandey

What would be a reasonable definition of the conditional entropy of bipartite quantum processes, and what novel insight would it provide? We develop this notion using four information-theoretic axioms and define the corresponding quantitative formulas. Our definitions of the conditional entropies of channels are based on the generalized state and channel divergences, for instance, quantum relative entropy. We find that the conditional entropy of quantum channels has potential to reveal insights for quantum processes that aren't already captured by the existing entropic functions, entropy or conditional entropy, of the states and channels. The von Neumann conditional entropy $S[A|B]_{\mathcal{N}}$ of the channel $\mathcal{N}_{A'B'\to AB}$ is based on the quantum relative entropy, with system pairs $A',A$ and $B',B$ being nonconditioning and conditioning systems, respectively. We identify a connection between the underlying causal structure of a bipartite channel and its conditional entropy. In particular, we provide a necessary and sufficient condition for a bipartite quantum channel $\mathcal{N}_{A'B'\to AB}$ in terms of its von Neumann conditional entropy $S[A|B]_{\mathcal{N}}$, to have no causal influence from $A'$ to $B$. As a consequence, if $S[A|B]_{\mathcal{N}}< -\log|A|$ then the channel necessarily has causal influence (signaling) from $A'$ to $B$. Our definition of the conditional entropy establishes the strong subadditivity of the entropy for quantum channels. We also study the total amount of correlations possible due to quantum processes by defining the multipartite mutual information of quantum channels.

arXiv:2410.01740•Oct 2, 2024•0 citations

Quantum superpositions of causal orders as an operational resource

Márcio M. Taddei, Ranieri V. Nery, Leandro Aolita

Causal nonseparability refers to processes where events take place in a coherent superposition of different causal orders.These may be the key resource for experimental violations of causal inequalities and have been recently identified as resources for concrete information-theoretic tasks.Here, we take a step forward by deriving a complete operational framework for causal nonseparability as a resource.Our first contribution is a formal definition for the specific notion of quantum control of causal orders, a stronger form of causal nonseparability-with the celebrated quantum switch as best-known example-where the causal orders of events for a target system are coherently controlled by a control system.We then build a resource theory-for both generic causal nonseparability as well as quantum control of causal orders-with a physically motivated class of free operations, based on process-matrix concatenations.We present the framework explicitly in the mindset with a control register.However, our machinery is totally versatile, being directly applicable also to scenarios with a target register alone.Moreover, an important subclass of our operations is free not only with respect to causal nonseparability and quantum control of causal orders but it also preserves the very causal structure of causal processes.Hence, our treatment contains, as a built-in feature, the basis of a resource theory of quantum causal networks too.As applications, first, we establish a simple sufficient condition for pure-process free convertibility.This imposes a hierarchy of quantum control of causal orders with the quantum switch at the top.Second, we prove that causal-nonseparability distillation exists.More precisely, we show how to convert multiple copies of a process with arbitrarily little causal nonseparability into fewer copies of a quantum switch.Our findings reveal conceptually new, unexpected phenomena, with both fundamental and practical implications.

arXiv:1903.06180•Physical Review Research•Dec 13, 2019•15 citations

No quantum advantage for violating fixed-order inequalities?

Veronika Baumann, Ämin Baumeler, Eleftherios-Ermis Tselentis

Abstract In standard quantum theory, the causal relations between operations are fixed. One can relax this notion by allowing for dynamical arrangements, where operations may influence the causal relations of future operations, as certified by violation of fixed-order inequalities, e.g. the k -cycle inequalities. Another, non-causal, departure further relaxes these limitations, and is certified by violations of causal inequalities. In this paper, we explore the interplay between dynamic and indefinite causality. We study the k -cycle inequalities and show that the quantum switch violates these inequalities without exploiting its indefinite nature. We further introduce non-adaptive strategies, which effectively remove the dynamical aspect of any process, and show that the k -cycle inequalities become novel causal inequalities; violating k -cycle inequalities under the restriction of non-adaptive strategies requires non-causal setups. The quantum switch is known to be incapable of violating causal inequalities, and it is believed that a device-independent certification of its causal indefiniteness requires extended setups incorporating spacelike separation. This work reopens the possibility for a device-independent certification of the quantum switch in isolation via fixed-order inequalities instead of causal inequalities. The inequalities we study here, however, turn out to be unsuitable for such a device-independent certification. In this work, we initiate the question posed by the title. This question, however, remains unanswered.

arXiv:2412.17551•New Journal of Physics•Oct 1, 2025•0 citations
Quantum processes can exhibit scenarios beyond a fixed order of events. We propose information inequalities that, when violated, constitute sufficient conditions to certify quantum processes without a fixed causal order -- causally separable or indefinite causal ordered processes. The inequalities hold valid for a vast class of information measures. Nevertheless, we take under scrutiny the von Neumann, α−α-α−Rényi entropies with parameter α∈[1/2,1)∪(1,∞)α\in [1/2,1) \cup (1,\infty)α∈[1/2,1)∪(1,∞), and max- and min-entropies. We also discuss how the strong subadditivity of quantum (von Neumann) entropy, used along with the information inequality developed here, implies relevant witnesses of causally separable and indefinite causal ordered processes in marginal scenarios. Importantly, we show the violation of these inequalities for the quantum switch, a paradigmatic example of a process with indefinite causal order. Our approach contributes to the important research direction of information-theoretic characterization of quantum processes beyond fixed causal orders.
Quantum theory is in principle compatible with processes that violate causal inequalities, an analogue of Bell inequalities that constrain the correlations observed by sets of parties operating in a definite causal order. Since the introduction of causal inequalities, determining their maximum quantum violation, analogue to Tsirelson's bound for Bell inequalities, has remained an open problem. Here we provide a general method for bounding the violation of arbitrary causal inequalities, establishing limits to the correlations achievable by arbitrary local experiments and by arbitrary quantum processes with indefinite causal order. We prove that the maximum violation is generally smaller than the algebraic maximum of the corresponding correlation, and determine Tsirelson-like bounds for a class of causal inequalities including some of the most paradigmatic examples. Our results motivate a search for physical principles characterizing the boundary of the set of quantum correlations with indefinite causal order.
Quantum theory is in principle compatible with processes that violate causal inequalities, an analogue of Bell inequalities that constrain the correlations observed by sets of parties operating in a definite causal order. Since the introduction of causal inequalities, determining their maximum quantum violation, analogue to Tsirelson’s bound for Bell inequalities, has remained an open problem. Here we provide a general method for bounding the violation of arbitrary causal inequalities, establishing limits to the correlations achievable by arbitrary local experiments and by arbitrary quantum processes with indefinite causal order. We prove that the maximum violation is generally smaller than the algebraic maximum of the corresponding correlation, and determine Tsirelson-like bounds for a class of causal inequalities including some of the most paradigmatic examples. Our results motivate a search for physical principles characterizing the boundary of the set of quantum correlations with indefinite causal order. Quantum theory has been shown to be compatible with processes violating a definite causal order, but no detailed analysis of the maximum allowed degree of violation has been carried out so far. Here, the authors fill this gap by providing the analogue of Tsirelson’s bound for the violation of causal inequalities.
Quantum processes can exhibit indefinite causal order, allowing coherent superpositions of distinct orderings of events. Whether such processes generate genuinely noncausal statistics, however, depends not only on their global causal structure but also on the local operations available to the parties. Here, we restrict communication to the classical outcomes of local operations, yielding a causal polytope with new causal inequalities that can be violated using measure-and-reprepare, entanglement-breaking instruments requiring no coherent transmission through the laboratories. Using a semidefinite-programming framework, we bound the achievable violations and reveal noncausal correlations that satisfy all conventional input-signalling inequalities, demonstrating that restricting the information available for communication can uncover forms of indefinite causal order inaccessible under less restrictive operational assumptions.
What would be a reasonable definition of the conditional entropy of bipartite quantum processes, and what novel insight would it provide? We develop this notion using four information-theoretic axioms and define the corresponding quantitative formulas. Our definitions of the conditional entropies of channels are based on the generalized state and channel divergences, for instance, quantum relative entropy. We find that the conditional entropy of quantum channels has potential to reveal insights for quantum processes that aren't already captured by the existing entropic functions, entropy or conditional entropy, of the states and channels. The von Neumann conditional entropy S[A∣B]NS[A|B]_{\mathcal{N}}S[A∣B]N​ of the channel NA′B′→AB\mathcal{N}_{A'B'\to AB}NA′B′→AB​ is based on the quantum relative entropy, with system pairs A′,AA',AA′,A and B′,BB',BB′,B being nonconditioning and conditioning systems, respectively. We identify a connection between the underlying causal structure of a bipartite channel and its conditional entropy. In particular, we provide a necessary and sufficient condition for a bipartite quantum channel NA′B′→AB\mathcal{N}_{A'B'\to AB}NA′B′→AB​ in terms of its von Neumann conditional entropy S[A∣B]NS[A|B]_{\mathcal{N}}S[A∣B]N​, to have no causal influence from A′A'A′ to BBB. As a consequence, if S[A∣B]N<−log⁡∣A∣S[A|B]_{\mathcal{N}}< -\log|A|S[A∣B]N​<−log∣A∣ then the channel necessarily has causal influence (signaling) from A′A'A′ to BBB. Our definition of the conditional entropy establishes the strong subadditivity of the entropy for quantum channels. We also study the total amount of correlations possible due to quantum processes by defining the multipartite mutual information of quantum channels.
Causal nonseparability refers to processes where events take place in a coherent superposition of different causal orders.These may be the key resource for experimental violations of causal inequalities and have been recently identified as resources for concrete information-theoretic tasks.Here, we take a step forward by deriving a complete operational framework for causal nonseparability as a resource.Our first contribution is a formal definition for the specific notion of quantum control of causal orders, a stronger form of causal nonseparability-with the celebrated quantum switch as best-known example-where the causal orders of events for a target system are coherently controlled by a control system.We then build a resource theory-for both generic causal nonseparability as well as quantum control of causal orders-with a physically motivated class of free operations, based on process-matrix concatenations.We present the framework explicitly in the mindset with a control register.However, our machinery is totally versatile, being directly applicable also to scenarios with a target register alone.Moreover, an important subclass of our operations is free not only with respect to causal nonseparability and quantum control of causal orders but it also preserves the very causal structure of causal processes.Hence, our treatment contains, as a built-in feature, the basis of a resource theory of quantum causal networks too.As applications, first, we establish a simple sufficient condition for pure-process free convertibility.This imposes a hierarchy of quantum control of causal orders with the quantum switch at the top.Second, we prove that causal-nonseparability distillation exists.More precisely, we show how to convert multiple copies of a process with arbitrarily little causal nonseparability into fewer copies of a quantum switch.Our findings reveal conceptually new, unexpected phenomena, with both fundamental and practical implications.
Abstract In standard quantum theory, the causal relations between operations are fixed. One can relax this notion by allowing for dynamical arrangements, where operations may influence the causal relations of future operations, as certified by violation of fixed-order inequalities, e.g. the k -cycle inequalities. Another, non-causal, departure further relaxes these limitations, and is certified by violations of causal inequalities. In this paper, we explore the interplay between dynamic and indefinite causality. We study the k -cycle inequalities and show that the quantum switch violates these inequalities without exploiting its indefinite nature. We further introduce non-adaptive strategies, which effectively remove the dynamical aspect of any process, and show that the k -cycle inequalities become novel causal inequalities; violating k -cycle inequalities under the restriction of non-adaptive strategies requires non-causal setups. The quantum switch is known to be incapable of violating causal inequalities, and it is believed that a device-independent certification of its causal indefiniteness requires extended setups incorporating spacelike separation. This work reopens the possibility for a device-independent certification of the quantum switch in isolation via fixed-order inequalities instead of causal inequalities. The inequalities we study here, however, turn out to be unsuitable for such a device-independent certification. In this work, we initiate the question posed by the title. This question, however, remains unanswered.