Error rates in current noisy quantum hardware are not static; they vary over time and across qubits. This temporal and spatial variation challenges the effectiveness of fixed-distance quantum error correction (QEC) codes. In this paper, we analyze 12 days of calibration data from IBM’s 127qubit device (ibm_kyiv), showing the fluctuation of Pauli-X and CNOT gate error rates. We demonstrate that fixed-distance QEC can either underperform or lead to excessive overhead, depending on the selected qubit and the error rate of the day. We then propose a simple adaptive QEC approach that selects an appropriate code distance per qubit, based on daily error rates. Using logical error rate modeling, we identify qubits that cannot be used and qubits that can be recovered with minimal resources. Our method avoids unnecessary resource overhead by excluding outlier qubits and tailoring code distances. Across 12 calibration days on ibm_kyiv, our adaptive strategy reduces physical qubit overhead by over 50% per logical qubit while maintaining access to $\mathbf{8 5 - 1 0 0 \%}$ of usable physical qubits. To further validate the method, we repeat the experiment on two additional 127qubit devices, ibm_brisbane and ibm_sherbrooke, where the overhead savings reach up to 71% while still preserving over 80% physical qubit usability. This approach offers a practical and efficient path forward for Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ)-era QEC strategies.
Error rates in current noisy quantum hardware are not static; they vary over time and across qubits. This temporal and spatial variation challenges the effectiveness of fixed-distance quantum error correction (QEC) codes. In this paper, we analyze 12 days of calibration data from IBM’s 127qubit device (ibm_kyiv), showing the fluctuation of Pauli-X and CNOT gate error rates. We demonstrate that fixed-distance QEC can either underperform or lead to excessive overhead, depending on the selected qubit and the error rate of the day. We then propose a simple adaptive QEC approach that selects an appropriate code distance per qubit, based on daily error rates. Using logical error rate modeling, we identify qubits that cannot be used and qubits that can be recovered with minimal resources. Our method avoids unnecessary resource overhead by excluding outlier qubits and tailoring code distances. Across 12 calibration days on ibm_kyiv, our adaptive strategy reduces physical qubit overhead by over 50% per logical qubit while maintaining access to 85−100% of usable physical qubits. To further validate the method, we repeat the experiment on two additional 127qubit devices, ibm_brisbane and ibm_sherbrooke, where the overhead savings reach up to 71% while still preserving over 80% physical qubit usability. This approach offers a practical and efficient path forward for Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ)-era QEC strategies.
Study of the Issue Quantum error correction (QEC) is crucial yet incurs significant qubit overhead costs. The current QEC codes lack sufficient efficiency for near-term devices. The current generation of NISQ devices, which often rely on delicate nanostructured qubit architectures, is prone to noise, decoherence, and gate faults, which severely limit their computing capability and scalability. While traditional quantum error correction codes, such as the surface code, are theoretically resilient, they often require significant qubit overhead and complex management systems that exceed the hardware capabilities of NISQ-era devices. This raises the question of whether new, resource-efficient QEC strategies or hybrid error mitigation approaches can be tailored to the limits of nanostructured NISQ designs. This document examines the constraints of existing quantum error correction (QEC) codes, which are crucial for preserving the fidelity of quantum computations yet require substantial qubit resources. This study examines the shortcomings of current Quantum Error Correction (QEC) codes in relation to Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices and explores alternative strategies to create more efficient, low-overhead QEC frameworks appropriate for imminent quantum technologies.
Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices represent current quantum computing technology with 50-1000 qubits operating without comprehensive fault-tolerant error correction. The fundamental challenge lies in balancing error correction necessity against prohibitive resource overhead. Conventional quantum error correction codes require 10:1 to 1000:1 qubit ratios and syndrome extraction circuits exceeding 50 gates, consuming entire NISQ capacities. This work presents a comprehensive low-overhead quantum error correction framework specifically designed for NISQ constraints. Our approach combines three elements: optimised stabiliser codes which get qubit ratios of 3:1 to 10:1, adaptive syndrome extraction which works with circuits with less than 20 gates and machine learning-enhanced decoding which is specific to the noise profiles of the hardware. Experimental validation on IBM Quantum (127- qubit Eagle), IonQ trapped-ion systems, and Google Sycamore simulation demonstrates successful quantum state protection achieving 2.7× error suppression with 60% overhead reduction versus conventional surface codes. The proposed code achieves logical error rates of 0.0065 using only 10 physical qubits compared to 25 qubits for equivalent surface codes. Machine learning decoder attains 94.3% accuracy with 12-microsecond inference latency, enabling real-time error correction. Break-even performance achieved at 0.8% physical error rates establishes practical pathways for near-term quantum advantage in variational algorithms and quantum simulation applications.
Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices represent current quantum computing technology with 50-1000 qubits operating without comprehensive fault-tolerant error correction. The fundamental challenge lies in balancing error correction necessity against prohibitive resource overhead. Conventional quantum error correction codes require 10:1 to 1000:1 qubit ratios and syndrome extraction circuits exceeding 50 gates, consuming entire NISQ capacities. This work presents a comprehensive low-overhead quantum error correction framework specifically designed for NISQ constraints. Our approach combines three elements: optimised stabiliser codes which get qubit ratios of 3:1 to 10:1, adaptive syndrome extraction which works with circuits with less than 20 gates and machine learning-enhanced decoding which is specific to the noise profiles of the hardware. Experimental validation on IBM Quantum (127- qubit Eagle), IonQ trapped-ion systems, and Google Sycamore simulation demonstrates successful quantum state protection achieving 2.7× error suppression with 60% overhead reduction versus conventional surface codes. The proposed code achieves logical error rates of 0.0065 using only 10 physical qubits compared to 25 qubits for equivalent surface codes. Machine learning decoder attains 94.3% accuracy with 12-microsecond inference latency, enabling real-time error correction. Break-even performance achieved at 0.8% physical error rates establishes practical pathways for near-term quantum advantage in variational algorithms and quantum simulation applications.
Quantum computing offers exponential advantages for problems in cryptography, optimization, and quantum simulation, yet the practicality of current Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices is severely constrained by decoherence, gate imperfections, and measurement noise. Conventional quantum error correction (QEC) codes such as Steane and surface codes impose large qubit overheads and require high-fidelity logical operations, making them unsuitable for near-term hardware. To address this gap, this work introduces ML-QEM, an adaptive quantum error mitigation framework that employs machine learning to identify and correct dominant Pauli error patterns in real time using only 3–5 ancillary qubits. By integrating Qiskit Aer noise modeling with a lightweight TensorFlow-based classifier, ML-QEM learns device-specific noise characteristics and applies targeted recovery operations with minimal latency. Evaluations across depolarizing, amplitude damping, and thermal relaxation noise models demonstrate a 28.4% average fidelity improvement, 60–84% lower overhead than Steane and surface codes, and a classical processing delay of only 21.7 ms. ML-QEM thus provides an effective and resource-efficient pathway toward enhancing quantum computation fidelity in the NISQ era.
QEC-C 2: Adaptive-Scaling Quantum Error Correction for NISQ Systems QEC-C 2 is a low-power quantum error correction framework tailored to noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices, in which the strength of error protection adapts dynamically to the observed noise environment. Instead of operating at a fixed code distance and fixed-cycle syndrome extraction rate, QEC-C 2 maintains an online estimate of effective noise strength and modulates the frequency and intensity of checks according to an exponential gain law beta_star(n) = A * exp(alpha n). This adaptive scaling allows near-exponential improvements in logical coherence time while keeping ancilla counts, measurement load, and classical processing within NISQ-compatible limits. Using filter-function analysis and Monte Carlo error-tracking with mixed local, correlated, and collective noise, we show that QEC-C 2 can raise effective fault-tolerance thresholds by factors of order five to six relative to unoptimized repetition-code baselines. The scheme interpolates between dynamical decoupling and full fault-tolerant quantum error correction, providing a practical pathway for stepwise protection on current hardware and a natural benchmark for comparing deterministic open-loop protocols such as Q-Loop.
Abstract Quantum computing has recently emerged as a novel paradigm for solving problems otherwise intractable on classical computers, yet the practical progress of quantum computers is severely impacted by noise, decoherence, and imperfect gate operations in Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices. Specific to IBM Quantum hardware, imperfections due to readout error, gate errors, and device drift, which depends on time, resolves limits for the accuracy of outputs from our algorithms. The mitigation strategies currently used, for example, Measurement Error Mitigation (MEM), Zero Noise Extrapolation (ZNE), and Clifford Data Regression (CDR), offer improvement over raw, unmitigated outputs, but they are static and not dynamic; the reduction of noise in within an NISQ device is temporal and can vary in patterns that are non-zero. In addition to this, using the conventional methods provides inconsistent and suboptimal results.This study will provide enhanced reliability with respect to performing quantum computation on IBM Quantum hardware with a unique mitigation framework that is adaptive and computationally efficient for a high-fidelity output. The problem taken on here is the failure of existing error mitigation strategies to provide adaptive noise compensation, as they assume a statically-distributed error, despite the performance-related characteristics already being documented in regards to calibration drift and variation over time.To achieve this, we propose a Hybrid Adaptive Error Mitigation (HAEM) approach that includes baseline measurement error mitigation and an additional correction layer that utilizes realtime calibration information, along with lightweight machine learning models. The approach can be broken down into three steps: (i) perform standard measurement error mitigation to reduce classical readout noise, (ii) execute compact calibration circuits, such as Bell states, GHZ states and Clifford benchmarks to capture then current error profile of the device, and (iii) use a lightweight machine learning model (having been trained on historical and newest calibration data) to dynamically change the mitigation weights applied for the target quantum algorithm. All implementation is done using Qiskit Runtime to ensure low-latency execution, and we completed experiments on both Qiskit Aer noisy simulators and IBM Quantum devices.Initial results suggest HAEM improved the outputs of quantum algorithms' fidelity compared to the unmitigated runs and the baseline measurement error mitigation (MEM) runs. On the noisy simulators, HAEM increased fidelity from a raw performance of 0.65 to 0.87, nearly a 34% improvement. In fairer hardware-like scenarios, fidelity-on-average was persistently 12% better than MEM, with nearly equal time duration for the additional adaptive measurements. The adaptive aspect of HAEM consistently supported subsequent calibration cycles of the device and was effective to continue providing fidelity improvements despite the static mitigation performance degrading.To sum up, the proposed HAEM framework is a modern and viable alternative for error mitigation which brings together the benefits of baseline approaches with corrections that are driven by fixed-function error-corrective, adaptive learning. As both learning-based and standard baseline approaches can only achieve fixed levels of performance, HAEM, through its use of noise mitigation both at execution time and through correlating it with standard data, provides a route towards reliable quantum computations on current IBM hardware. HAEM also presents a contribution to the NISQ error-resilient landscape, and however it is intended that it will continue to improve future applications of hybrid workflows of quantum and classical computation where error mitigation and resilience is important.