We apply a hybrid evolutionary algorithm to minimize the depth of circuits in quantum computing. More specifically, we evaluate two different variants of the algorithm. In the first approach, we combine the evolutionary algorithm with an optimization subroutine to optimize the parameters of the rotation gates present in the quantum circuit. In the second, the algorithm solely relies on evolutionary operations (i.e., mutations and crossover). We approach the problem from two sides: (1) constructing circuits from the ground up by starting with random initializations and (2) initializing individuals with a target circuit in order to optimize it further according to the fitness function. We run experiments on random circuits with 4 and 6 qubits varying in circuit depth. Our results show that the proposed methods are able to significantly reduce the depth of circuits while still retaining a high fidelity to the target state.
We apply a hybrid evolutionary algorithm to minimize the depth of circuits in quantum computing. More specifically, we evaluate two different variants of the algorithm. In the first approach, we combine the evolutionary algorithm with an optimization subroutine to optimize the parameters of the rotation gates present in the quantum circuit. In the second, the algorithm solely relies on evolutionary operations (i.e., mutations and crossover). We approach the problem from two sides: (1) constructing circuits from the ground up by starting with random initializations and (2) initializing individuals with a target circuit in order to optimize it further according to the fitness function. We run experiments on random circuits with 4 and 6 qubits varying in circuit depth. Our results show that the proposed methods are able to significantly reduce the depth of circuits while still retaining a high fidelity to the target state.
Variational quantum circuits build the foundation for various classes of quantum algorithms. In a nutshell, the weights of a parametrized quantum circuit are varied until the empirical sampling distribution of the circuit is sufficiently close to a desired outcome. Numerical first-order methods are applied frequently to fit the parameters of the circuit, but most of the time, the circuit itself, that is, the actual composition of gates, is fixed. Methods for optimizing the circuit design jointly with the weights have been proposed, but empirical results are rather scarce. Here, we consider a simple evolutionary strategy that addresses the trade-off between finding appropriate circuit ar-chitectures and parameter tuning. We evaluate our method both via simulation and on actual quantum hardware. Our benchmark problems include the transverse field Ising Hamiltonian and the Sherrington-Kirkpatrick spin model. Despite the shortcomings of current noisy intermediate-scale quantum hardware, we find only a minor slowdown on actual quantum machines compared to simulations. Moreover, we investigate which mutation operations most significantly contribute to the optimization. The results provide intuition on how randomized search heuristics behave on actual quantum hardware and layout a path for further refinement of evolutionary quantum gate circuits.
We investigate the potential of bio-inspired evolutionary algorithms for designing quantum circuits with specific goals, focusing on two particular tasks. The first one is motivated by the ideas of Artificial Life that are used to reproduce stochastic cellular automata with given rules. We test the robustness of quantum implementations of the cellular automata for different numbers of quantum gates The second task deals with the sampling of quantum circuits that generate highly entangled quantum states, which constitute an important resource for quantum computing. In particular, an evolutionary algorithm is employed to optimize circuits with respect to a fitness function defined with the Mayer-Wallach entanglement measure. We demonstrate that, by balancing the mutation rate between exploration and exploitation, we can find entangling quantum circuits for up to five qubits. We also discuss the trade-off between the number of gates in quantum circuits and the computational costs of finding the gate arrangements leading to a strongly entangled state. Our findings provide additional insight into the trade-off between the complexity of a circuit and its performance, which is an important factor in the design of quantum circuits.
The increasing interest, in the last two decades, of evolutionary computation community in the combination of quantum computing and evolutionary computing, has led to the definition of a novel class of quantum-inspired evolutionary algorithms which exploit the concepts of quantum bits and quantum gates with the aim of improving the efficiency of current optimization methods. In this paper, a new method which hybridizes differential evolution with quantum computing is proposed. The method consists of two phases. In the first phase, it performs a new quantum-inspired evolutionary method until it does not get stuck into a local optimum, then, in the second phase, it runs differential evolution by using as initial population that obtained at the end of the first phase. Experiments on classical benchmark functions show that the hybridization outperforms standard methods by sensibly improving the fitness value and speeding up the convergence process.
Quantum computing leverages the unique properties of qubits and quantum parallelism to solve problems intractable for classical systems, offering unparalleled computational potential. However, optimization of quantum circuits remains critical, especially for noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices with limited qubits and high error rates. Genetic algorithms (GAs) provide a promising approach for efficient quantum circuit synthesis by automating optimization tasks. This work examines the impact of various mutation strategies within a GA framework for quantum circuit synthesis. By analyzing how different mutations transform circuits, it identifies strategies that enhance efficiency and performance. Experiments utilized a fitness function emphasizing fidelity, while accounting for circuit depth and T-operations, to optimize circuits with four to six qubits. Our analysis revealed that, while the "swap, addition" strategy achieved the highest fidelity scores, it consistently increased circuit depth. In contrast, combining "swap, addition, delete" strategies offers a more balanced approach, delivering near-optimal results while also having the potential of reducing circuit depth.
Multi‐objective optimization in quantum systems poses formidable challenges stemming from the high dimensionality, complex constraints, and conflicting performance metrics inherent to quantum control tasks and circuit synthesis. This study presents a comprehensive exploration of genetic AI algorithms—evolutionary strategies inspired by natural selection—tailored specifically for multi‐objective optimization in quantum computing contexts. We propose a hybrid framework that synergistically combines the elitist, Pareto‐based selection mechanics of NSGA-II with quantum‐inspired crossover and mutation operators designed to preserve entanglement structures and exploit hardware‐specific gate sets. In this framework, candidate solutions encoding circuit topologies or control‐pulse parameters undergo iterative evolution, guided by fitness vectors that balance gate fidelity, circuit depth, and resource overhead. To benchmark performance, we apply the algorithm to canonical quantum computing problems: Fourier transform circuits, QAOA ansätze for MaxCut instances, and random Clifford+T circuits. Through extensive simulation on noise-modelled quantum devices, we evaluate Pareto front coverage, convergence speed, diversity maintenance, and robustness under decoherence. Our results demonstrate that the proposed genetic AI algorithm outperforms classical single‐objective genetic methods and established multi‐objective evolutionary algorithms (e.g., SPEA2) by achieving broader Pareto fronts and faster convergence rates, while maintaining solution diversity. Furthermore, noise-resilience experiments show graceful degradation, indicating practical applicability on near-term quantum hardware. These findings substantiate the potential of evolutionary computation paradigms—augmented with quantum‐inspired operators—to address the intricate trade-off surfaces that define NISQ-era optimization problems, paving the way toward automated quantum circuit design and control parameter tuning for real-world quantum computing applications.
Designing effective quantum circuits remains a central challenge in quantum computing, as circuit structure strongly influences expressivity, trainability, and hardware feasibility. Current approaches, whether using manually designed circuit templates, fixed heuristics, or automated rules, face limitations in scalability, flexibility, and adaptability, often producing circuits that are poorly matched to the specific problem or quantum hardware. In this work, we propose the Evolutionary eXploration of Augmenting Quantum Circuits (EXAQC), an evolutionary approach to the automated design and training of parameterized quantum circuits (PQCs) which leverages and extends on strategies from neuroevolution and genetic programming. The proposed method jointly searches over gate types, qubit connectivity, parameterization, and circuit depth while respecting hardware and noise constraints. The method supports both Qiskit and Pennylane libraries, allowing the user to configure every aspect. This work highlights evolutionary search as a critical tool for advancing quantum machine learning and variational quantum algorithms, providing a principled pathway toward scalable, problem-aware, and hardware-efficient quantum circuit design. Preliminary results demonstrate that circuits evolved on classification tasks are able to achieve over 90% accuracy on most of the benchmark datasets with a limited computational budget, and are able to emulate target circuit quantum states with high fidelity scores.