Variational quantum circuits build the foundation for various classes of quantum algorithms. In a nutshell, the weights of a parametrized quantum circuit are varied until the empirical sampling distribution of the circuit is sufficiently close to a desired outcome. Numerical first-order methods are applied frequently to fit the parameters of the circuit, but most of the time, the circuit itself, that is, the actual composition of gates, is fixed. Methods for optimizing the circuit design jointly with the weights have been proposed, but empirical results are rather scarce. Here, we consider a simple evolutionary strategy that addresses the trade-off between finding appropriate circuit ar-chitectures and parameter tuning. We evaluate our method both via simulation and on actual quantum hardware. Our benchmark problems include the transverse field Ising Hamiltonian and the Sherrington-Kirkpatrick spin model. Despite the shortcomings of current noisy intermediate-scale quantum hardware, we find only a minor slowdown on actual quantum machines compared to simulations. Moreover, we investigate which mutation operations most significantly contribute to the optimization. The results provide intuition on how randomized search heuristics behave on actual quantum hardware and layout a path for further refinement of evolutionary quantum gate circuits.
Variational quantum circuits build the foundation for various classes of quantum algorithms. In a nutshell, the weights of a parametrized quantum circuit are varied until the empirical sampling distribution of the circuit is sufficiently close to a desired outcome. Numerical first-order methods are applied frequently to fit the parameters of the circuit, but most of the time, the circuit itself, that is, the actual composition of gates, is fixed. Methods for optimizing the circuit design jointly with the weights have been proposed, but empirical results are rather scarce. Here, we consider a simple evolutionary strategy that addresses the trade-off between finding appropriate circuit ar-chitectures and parameter tuning. We evaluate our method both via simulation and on actual quantum hardware. Our benchmark problems include the transverse field Ising Hamiltonian and the Sherrington-Kirkpatrick spin model. Despite the shortcomings of current noisy intermediate-scale quantum hardware, we find only a minor slowdown on actual quantum machines compared to simulations. Moreover, we investigate which mutation operations most significantly contribute to the optimization. The results provide intuition on how randomized search heuristics behave on actual quantum hardware and layout a path for further refinement of evolutionary quantum gate circuits.
Variational Quantum Eigensolvers (VQEs) have recently attracted considerable attention. Yet, in practice, they still suffer from the efforts for estimating cost function gradients for large parameter sets or resource-demanding reinforcement strategies. Here, we therefore consider recent advances in weight-agnostic learning and propose a strategy that addresses the trade-off between finding appropriate circuit architectures and parameter tuning. We investigate the use of NEAT-inspired algorithms which evaluate circuits via genetic competition and thus circumvent issues due to exceeding numbers of parameters. Our methods are tested both via simulation and on real quantum hardware and are used to solve the transverse Ising Hamiltonian and the Sherrington-Kirkpatrick spin model.
In recent years, Variational Quantum Algorithms (VQAs) have emerged as a promising approach for solving optimization problems on quantum computers in the NISQ era. However, one limitation of VQAs is their reliance on fixed-structure circuits, which may not be taylored for specific problems or hardware configurations. A leading strategy to address this issue are Adaptative VQAs, which dynamically modify the circuit structure by adding and removing gates, and optimize their parameters during the training. Several Adaptative VQAs, based on heuristics such as circuit shallowness, entanglement capability and hardware compatibility, have already been proposed in the literature, but there is still lack of a systematic comparison between the different methods. In this paper, we aim to fill this gap by analyzing three Adaptative VQAs: Evolutionary Variational Quantum Eigensolver (EVQE), Variable Ansatz (VAns), already proposed in the literature, and Random Adapt-VQE (RA-VQE), a random approach we introduce as a baseline. In order to compare these algorithms to traditional VQAs, we also include the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) in our analysis. We apply these algorithms to QUBO problems and study their performance by examining the quality of the solutions found and the computational times required. Additionally, we investigate how the choice of the hyperparameters can impact the overall performance of the algorithms, highlighting the importance of selecting an appropriate methodology for hyperparameter tuning. Our analysis sets benchmarks for Adaptative VQAs designed for near-term quantum devices and provides valuable insights to guide future research in this area.
Quantum architecture search (QAS) is desired to construct a powerful and general QAS platform which can significantly accelerate quantum advantages in error-prone and depth limited quantum circuits in today Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) era. In this paper, we propose an evolutionary-based quantum architecture search (EQAS) scheme for the optimal layout to balance the higher expressive power and the trainable ability. In EQAS, each layout of quantum circuits, i.e quantum circuit architecture(QCA), is first encoded into a binary string, which is called quantum genes later. Then, an algorithm to remove the redundant parameters in QCA is performed according to the eigenvalues of the corresponding quantum Fisher information matrix (QFIM). Later, each QCA is evaluated by the normalized fitness, so that the sampling rate could be obtained to sample the parent generation by the Roulette Wheel selection strategy. Thereafter, the mutation and crossover are applied to get the next generation. EQAS is verified by the classification task in quantum machine learning for three datasets. The results show that the proposed EQAS can search for the optimal QCA with less parameterized gates, and the higher accuracies are obtained by adopting EQAS for the classification tasks over three dataset.
Designing effective quantum circuits remains a central challenge in quantum computing, as circuit structure strongly influences expressivity, trainability, and hardware feasibility. Current approaches, whether using manually designed circuit templates, fixed heuristics, or automated rules, face limitations in scalability, flexibility, and adaptability, often producing circuits that are poorly matched to the specific problem or quantum hardware. In this work, we propose the Evolutionary eXploration of Augmenting Quantum Circuits (EXAQC), an evolutionary approach to the automated design and training of parameterized quantum circuits (PQCs) which leverages and extends on strategies from neuroevolution and genetic programming. The proposed method jointly searches over gate types, qubit connectivity, parameterization, and circuit depth while respecting hardware and noise constraints. The method supports both Qiskit and Pennylane libraries, allowing the user to configure every aspect. This work highlights evolutionary search as a critical tool for advancing quantum machine learning and variational quantum algorithms, providing a principled pathway toward scalable, problem-aware, and hardware-efficient quantum circuit design. Preliminary results demonstrate that circuits evolved on classification tasks are able to achieve over 90% accuracy on most of the benchmark datasets with a limited computational budget, and are able to emulate target circuit quantum states with high fidelity scores.
We apply a hybrid evolutionary algorithm to minimize the depth of circuits in quantum computing. More specifically, we evaluate two different variants of the algorithm. In the first approach, we combine the evolutionary algorithm with an optimization subroutine to optimize the parameters of the rotation gates present in the quantum circuit. In the second, the algorithm solely relies on evolutionary operations (i.e., mutations and crossover). We approach the problem from two sides: (1) constructing circuits from the ground up by starting with random initializations and (2) initializing individuals with a target circuit in order to optimize it further according to the fitness function. We run experiments on random circuits with 4 and 6 qubits varying in circuit depth. Our results show that the proposed methods are able to significantly reduce the depth of circuits while still retaining a high fidelity to the target state.
Abstract Designing compact and efficient quantum circuits that are compatible with Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) hardware remains a central challenge in quantum computing. Most existing optimization approaches rely on fidelity-based fitness functions that require computing the full unitary matrix of the circuit. However, this quickly becomes computationally intractable beyond 10–12 qubits due to the exponential memory and time complexity O(22n) . In this work, we propose a scalable multi-objective genetic algorithm for quantum circuit optimization tailored to NISQ devices. Although evolutionary algorithms have demonstrated strong potential for circuit synthesis, current methods generally depend on full-unitary fidelity evaluation, which severely limits scalability. To address this bottleneck, we introduce two complementary strategies: (1) an independent block-based evaluation using graph partitioning, and (2) an overlapping sliding-window decomposition approach. Both strategies reduce computational complexity from O(22n) to O(22k) , where k≪n , making it possible to optimize circuits with more than 20 qubits in practice. Our methods are integrated into the NSGA-II multi-objective framework, enabling simultaneous optimization of fidelity, circuit depth, and gate cost, while maintaining structural compatibility with NISQ hardware–without requiring full-unitary simulation. Experimental results on benchmark circuits demonstrate high fidelity (above 0.94 for small circuits up to 8 qubits, above 0.85 for medium-scale circuits of 10–16 qubits, and above 0.80 for large-scale circuits up to 32 qubits), up to 45% reduction in circuit depth, and a 10× speedup compared to exact evaluation at 14 qubits.