Quantum error mitigation (QEM) has emerged as a powerful tool for the extraction of useful quantum information from quantum devices. Here, we introduce the Subspace Noise Tailoring (SNT) algorithm, which efficiently combines the cheap cost of Symmetry Verification (SV) and low bias of Probabilistic Error Cancellation (PEC) QEM techniques. We study the performance of our method by simulating the Trotterized time evolution of the spin-1/2 Fermi-Hubbard model (FHM) using a variety of local fermion-to-qubit encodings, which define a computational subspace through a set of stabilizers, the measurement of which can be used to post-select noisy quantum data. We study different combinations of QEM and encodings and uncover a rich state diagram of optimal combinations, depending on the hardware performance, system size and available shot budget. We then demonstrate how SNT extends the reach of current noisy quantum computers in terms of the number of fermionic lattice sites and the number of Trotter steps, and quantify the required hardware performance beyond which a noisy device may compete with current state-of-the-art classical computational methods.
Quantum error mitigation (QEM) has emerged as a powerful tool for the extraction of useful quantum information from quantum devices. Here, we introduce the Subspace Noise Tailoring (SNT) algorithm, which efficiently combines the cheap cost of Symmetry Verification (SV) and low bias of Probabilistic Error Cancellation (PEC) QEM techniques. We study the performance of our method by simulating the Trotterized time evolution of the spin-1/2 Fermi-Hubbard model (FHM) using a variety of local fermion-to-qubit encodings, which define a computational subspace through a set of stabilizers, the measurement of which can be used to post-select noisy quantum data. We study different combinations of QEM and encodings and uncover a rich state diagram of optimal combinations, depending on the hardware performance, system size and available shot budget. We then demonstrate how SNT extends the reach of current noisy quantum computers in terms of the number of fermionic lattice sites and the number of Trotter steps, and quantify the required hardware performance beyond which a noisy device may compete with current state-of-the-art classical computational methods.
We show that combining quantum error detection (QED) with probabilistic error cancellation (PEC) gives more accurate and lower-variance estimates than PEC alone, provided that the symmetry measurements required for QED are carefully chosen. Because noisy symmetry measurements can negate the benefits of the PEC+QED approach, we cast the selection of measurement configurations as a classical optimization problem that systematically suppresses the impact of noise. Applying optimized PEC+QED to GHZ-state output distributions and to simulating the time-dynamics of a generalized superfast encoded Fermi-Hubbard model, we find consistent improvements over PEC. For GHZ states, the optimization over symmetry measurement configurations is essential for achieving an advantage. For the Fermi-Hubbard model, PEC+QED improves observable estimation on a 2×2 lattice and for larger systems the mitigation overheads can be reduced by measuring only subsets of stabilizers. Our results demonstrate the importance of circuit-specific tailoring of QEM techniques and that fault-tolerant design principles may already provide value for near-term devices.
Simulating real-time dynamics under a Hamiltonian is a central goal of quantum information science. While numerous Hamiltonian-simulation quantum algorithms have been proposed, the effects of physical noise have rarely been incorporated into their performance analysis, despite the non-negligible noise levels of quantum devices. We present an end-to-end complexity analysis of noisy Hamiltonian simulation combined with quantum error mitigation (QEM) to answer how many circuit runs are required to reach a given target accuracy. Because the QEM sampling overhead grows exponentially with the circuit depth while the algorithmic error decreases with it, the circuit depth becomes an optimization variable, and we derive an analytic depth-selection rule for two algorithm families. For the order-k Suzuki--Trotter formula, the optimized cost exhibits a critical error εc, below which the required number of circuit runs grows exponentially. QEM improves the noise dependence of εc from sublinear to kth-power scaling, an exponent improvement by a factor of k+1. For randomized-LCU-based simulation, optimizing the repetition number yields a square-root improvement in the simulation-time dependence of the sampling-overhead exponent over the standard parameter choice. We further quantify the noise-characterization cost required for error mitigation via gate set tomography and the recently proposed space-time noise inversion method, showing that the latter can significantly reduce this cost.
Abstract Quantum error mitigation has been extensively explored to increase the accuracy of the quantum circuits in noisy-intermediate-scale-quantum (NISQ) computation, where quantum error correction requiring additional quantum resources is not adopted. Among various error-mitigation schemes, probabilistic error cancellation (PEC) has been proposed as a general and systematic protocol that can be applied to numerous hardware platforms and quantum algorithms. However, PEC has only been tested in two-qubit systems and a superconducting multi-qubit system by learning a sparse error model. Here, we benchmark PEC using up to four trapped-ion qubits. For the benchmark, we simulate the dynamics of interacting fermions with or without spins by applying multiple Trotter steps. By tomographically reconstructing the error model and incorporating other mitigation methods such as positive probability and symmetry constraints, we are able to increase the fidelity of simulation and faithfully observe the dynamics of the Fermi–Hubbard model, including the different behavior of charge and spin of fermions. Our demonstrations can be an essential step for further extending systematic error-mitigation schemes toward practical quantum advantages.
Quantum error mitigation (QEM) bridges the gap between today's noisy NISQ hardware and fault-tolerant quantum computing by reducing the effect of hardware errors on expectation value estimates without the qubit overhead of full quantum error correction. This paper proposes the Quantum Error Mitigation Design (QEMD) framework, a systematic evaluation of six QEM techniques across four circuit families on IBM Quantum Eagle and IonQ Forte: Zero-Noise Extrapolation (ZNE), Probabilistic Error Cancellation (PEC), Clifford Data Regression (CDR), Symmetry Verification (SV), Dynamical Decoupling (DD), and a novel Adaptive Ensemble Mitigation (AEM) combining ZNE and CDR with context-aware technique selection. QEMD finds: ZNE 3-point Richardson provides the best cost-performance trade-off for QAOA and VQE circuits (4.8x overhead, 28.4pp error reduction); PEC provides the highest accuracy but at 48x shot overhead -- practical only for n <= 12; DD reduces coherence-limited errors by 18.4% on IonQ Forte at zero shot overhead; AEM outperforms all individual techniques by 6.4pp at 8.4x overhead. QEMD provides a decision guide mapping circuit type, qubit count, and shot budget to optimal QEM technique selection.
Quantum error mitigation (QEM) is typically viewed as a suite of practical techniques for today's noisy intermediate-scale quantum devices, with limited relevance once fault-tolerant quantum computers become available. In this work, we challenge this conventional wisdom by showing that QEM can continue to provide substantial benefits in the era of quantum error correction (QEC), and in an even more efficient manner than it does on current devices. We introduce a framework for logical-level QEM that leverages soft information naturally produced by QEC decoders, requiring no additional data, hardware modifications, or runtime overhead beyond what QEC protocols already provide. Within this framework, we develop and analyze three logical-level QEM techniques: post-selection and runtime abort policies, probabilistic error cancellation, and zero-noise extrapolation. Our techniques reduce logical error rates by more than 100x while discarding fewer than 0.1% of shots; they also provide in situ characterization of logical channels for QEM protocols. As a proof of principle, we benchmark our approach using a surface-code architecture and two state-of-the-art decoders based on tensor-network contraction and minimum-weight perfect matching. We evaluate logical-level QEM on random Clifford circuits and molecular simulation algorithms and find that, compared to previous approaches relying on QEC only or QEC combined with QEM, we can achieve up to 87.4% spacetime overhead savings. Our results demonstrate that logical-level QEM with QEC decoder soft information can reliably improve logical performance, underscoring the efficiency and usefulness of QEM techniques for fault-tolerant quantum computers.
Quantum error mitigation (QEM) is at the very heart of near-term quantum simulations and lattice gauge theories are no exceptions, rather their physical symmetries provide natural consistency checks on noise quantum states. In this work, we exploit the parity and fermion-number symmetries of a gauge theory, the (1+1)-dimensional Schwinger model, under depolarising noise and investigate symmetry verification under digital quantum simulation. We investigate two set-ups - symmetry- sector post-selection in adiabatic state preparation followed by real-time measurements of the chiral condensate and symmetry verification within a variational quantum eigensolver (VQE). In the first case, post-selection reduces the bias in the chiral condensate consistently removing up to 60% of the quantum noise induced error in our system. Motivated by the observed regularity of the residual bias (in the low-noise regime), we further introduce a global-noise calibration obtained from classically accessible smaller lattices and implemented on larger lattices recovering noiseless chiral condensate values within statistical uncertainty. However, in VQE, symmetry verification does not seem to generally improve the optimised parameters or the fidelity of the prepared states, although it reduces the bias in the estimated ground-state energy. This demonstates that improving a noisy cost-function estimator in variational algorithms does not necessarily improve the outcome of the algorithm. Our results show the strength of symmetry verification in different approaches while establishing that its usefulness critically depends on where it is applied in the computational workflow, and provide practical guidance for symmetry-assisted quantum error mitigation in quantum simulations of lattice gauge theories.