Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2503.04642 · IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE)

Surface Code Error Correction with Crosstalk Noise

Zeyuan Zhou, Andrew Ji, Yongshan Ding

Published Aug 30, 2025• 2 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The design and performance analysis of quantum error correction (QEC) codes are often based on incoherent and independent noise models since it is easy to simulate. However, these models fail to capture realistic hardware noise sources, such as correlated errors (crosstalk), which can significantly impact QEC code performance, especially when they occur between data and ancillary qubits. In this paper, we systematically study various types of crosstalk noise and quantify their effects on surface codes through memory and stability experiments. Based on our findings, we introduce crosstalk-robust implementations of QEC via flag qubit designs and redundant stabilizer checks. We perform both numerical and analytical studies to demonstrate the efficacy of these strategies. In addition, we analyze logical crosstalk in an$[[n, k>1, d]]$code block and establish analytical conditions under which physical crosstalk does not lead to logical crosstalk. Together, our analytical and numerical results shed light on designing QEC codes that are robust against hardware realistic crosstalk noise, paving the way for reliable experimental realization of fault-tolerant quantum computing.

DOI
10.1109/qce65121.2025.00074

Related papers

Non-Clifford Crosstalk Noise in Surface Codes Using Hybrid Stabilizer-Tensor Network Methods

Ben Harper, Azar C. Nakhl, Martin Sevior +1 more

Scalable realisation of quantum computing is reliant on the development of fault tolerant devices. Analysis of quantum error correction protocols typically considers incoherent noise models or noise-free syndrome measurements. While this is simple to simulate classically and straightforward to compute analytically, these simplifications are unable to capture the full dynamics of a noisy quantum system. In this work we use advanced hybrid stabilizer-tensor network simulation techniques to simulate coherent quantum crosstalk noise during syndrome extraction on a surface code. We show that the inclusion of coherence increases logical error rates and lowers the code threshold. In addition, we show that the specific distribution of the noise can quantitatively change logical error rates. The methods in this work allow simulation of quantum error correction with noise models previously inaccessible to classical simulation, providing new insights on the effect of crosstalk noise on quantum error correction codes.

quant-pharXiv:2605.29514•May 29, 2026•0 citations

Detrimental non-Markovian errors for surface code memory

John F Kam, Spiro Gicev, Kavan Kishore Modi +2 more

Abstract The realization of fault-tolerant quantum computers hinges on effective quantum error correction (QEC) protocols, whose performance significantly relies on the nature of the underlying noise. In this work, we directly study the structure of non-Markovian correlated errors and their impact on surface code memory performance. Specifically, we compare surface code performance under non-Markovian noise and independent circuit-level noise, while keeping marginal error rates constant. Our analysis shows that while not all temporally correlated structures are detrimental, certain structures, particularly multi-time ‘streaky’ correlations affecting syndrome qubits and two-qubit gates, can severely degrade logical error rate scaling. Furthermore, we discuss our results in the context of recent QEC experiments on physical devices. These findings underscore the importance of understanding and mitigating non-Markovian noise toward achieving practical, fault-tolerant quantum computing.

arXiv:2410.23779•Quantum Science and Technology•Jul 3, 2025•8 citations

Characterizing Quantum Error Correction Performance of Radiation-induced Errors

Paul G. Baity, Anuj K. Nayak, Lav R. Varshney +4 more

Radiation impacts are a current challenge with computing on superconducting-based quantum devices because they can lead to widespread correlated errors across the device. Such errors can be problematic for quantum error correction (QEC) codes, which are generally designed to correct independent errors. To address this, we have developed a computational model to simulate the effects of radiation impacts on QEC performance. This is achieved by building from recently developed models of quasiparticle density, mapping radiation-induced qubit error rates onto a quantum error channel and simulation of a simple surface code. We also provide a performance metric to quantify the resilience of a QEC code to radiation impacts. Additionally, we sweep various parameters of chip design to test mitigation strategies for improved QEC performance. Our model approach is holistic, allowing for modular performance testing of error mitigation strategies and chip and code designs.

quant-pharXiv:2602.06202•Feb 9, 2026•0 citations

Simulation and performance analysis of quantum error correction with a rotated surface code under a realistic noise model

Mitsuki Katsuda, Kosuke Mitarai, Keisuke Fujii

The demonstration of quantum error correction (QEC) is one of the most important milestones in the realization of fully-fledged quantum computers. Toward this, QEC experiments using the surface codes have recently been actively conducted. However, it has not yet been realized to protect logical quantum information beyond the physical coherence time. In this work, we performed a full simulation of QEC for the rotated surface codes with a code distance 5, which employs 49 qubits and is within reach of the current state-of-the-art quantum computers. In particular, we evaluate the logical error probability in a realistic noise model that incorporates not only stochastic Pauli errors but also coherent errors due to a systematic control error or unintended interactions. While a straightforward simulation of 49 qubits is not tractable within a reasonable computational time, we reduced the number of qubits required to 26 qubits by delaying the syndrome measurement in simulation. This and a fast quantum computer simulator, , implemented on GPU allows us to simulate full QEC with an arbitrary local noise within reasonable simulation time. Based on the numerical results, we also construct and verify an effective model to incorporate the effect of the coherent error into a stochastic noise model. This allows us to understand what the effect coherent error has on the logical error probability on a large scale without full simulation based on the detailed full simulation of a small scale. The present simulation framework and effective model, which can handle arbitrary local noise, will play a vital role in clarifying the physical parameters that future experimental QEC should target. Published by the American Physical Society 2024

arXiv:2204.11404•Physical Review Research•Jan 8, 2024•17 citations

Quantum Error Correction: Surface And Topological Codes

N Raji

Quantum error correction (QEC) represents a critical enabler for fault-tolerant quantum computing, protecting fragile quantum states from decoherence and operational errors. This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of leading quantum error correction schemes, focusing on surface codes and topological codes within the context of Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) era processors. We examine the theoretical foundations of stabilizer codes, compare surface code implementations with code distances ranging from d=3 to d=17, and analyze topological codes including toric codes and color codes. Our investigation encompasses syndrome extraction circuits, logical qubit encoding strategies, and threshold analysis for contemporary quantum hardware platforms. Performance metrics reveal that surface codes achieve error thresholds of approximately 1% with realistic noise models, while topological codes offer architectural advantages for specific qubit connectivity constraints. We discuss implementation challenges on current NISQ processors including IBM Quantum, Google Sycamore, and IonQ systems, addressing qubit overhead, gate fidelity requirements, and decoding algorithms. This analysis provides insights for selecting appropriate error correction schemes based on application requirements and hardware capabilities.

•Mar 12, 2026•0 citations

X-Z Round Scheduling for the Surface Code with Defects under Biased Noise

Lakshika Rathi, Pau Escofet, Joshua Viszlai +1 more

Fault-tolerant Quantum Computing (FTQC) relies on Quantum Error Correction (QEC) codes that encode logical qubits across many physical qubits to detect and correct errors. The surface code is among the most widely studied codes due to its high error threshold, the existence of efficient decoders, and hardware-friendly properties: a planar, two-dimensional layout with nearest-neighbor connectivity. In practice, however, the fabrication of solid-state quantum processors introduces hardware defects, resulting in defective qubits and couplers that must be discarded. Adapting the surface code to these defects often requires measuring the $X$- and $Z$-type checks in separate rounds rather than simultaneously. In this work, we investigate the optimal $X$-to-$Z$ checks round-scheduling ratio under biased noise systems. Our results characterize how key architectural parameters, such as noise bias, code distance, and defect rate, impact the logical error rate. We provide insights into how to determine the optimal scheduling ratio directly from device calibration data, enabling manufacturers to maximize performance without extensive simulations. Our approach reduces the logical error rate by up to $4.25\times$ at a $1\%$ defect rate and up to $8.46\times$ at a $2\%$ defect rate for a distance-$13$ surface code under moderately biased noise. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the benefits of round-scheduling extend beyond the defective-hardware setting. In biased-noise architectures subject to CNOT crosstalk, separating $X$ and $Z$ measurement rounds yields up to $4.5\times$ reduction in logical error rate.

quant-pharXiv:2608.05518•Aug 7, 2026•0 citations
The design and performance analysis of quantum error correction (QEC) codes are often based on incoherent and independent noise models since it is easy to simulate. However, these models fail to capture realistic hardware noise sources, such as correlated errors (crosstalk), which can significantly impact QEC code performance, especially when they occur between data and ancillary qubits. In this paper, we systematically study various types of crosstalk noise and quantify their effects on surface codes through memory and stability experiments. Based on our findings, we introduce crosstalk-robust implementations of QEC via flag qubit designs and redundant stabilizer checks. We perform both numerical and analytical studies to demonstrate the efficacy of these strategies. In addition, we analyze logical crosstalk in an[[n,k>1,d]][[n, k>1, d]][[n,k>1,d]]code block and establish analytical conditions under which physical crosstalk does not lead to logical crosstalk. Together, our analytical and numerical results shed light on designing QEC codes that are robust against hardware realistic crosstalk noise, paving the way for reliable experimental realization of fault-tolerant quantum computing.
Scalable realisation of quantum computing is reliant on the development of fault tolerant devices. Analysis of quantum error correction protocols typically considers incoherent noise models or noise-free syndrome measurements. While this is simple to simulate classically and straightforward to compute analytically, these simplifications are unable to capture the full dynamics of a noisy quantum system. In this work we use advanced hybrid stabilizer-tensor network simulation techniques to simulate coherent quantum crosstalk noise during syndrome extraction on a surface code. We show that the inclusion of coherence increases logical error rates and lowers the code threshold. In addition, we show that the specific distribution of the noise can quantitatively change logical error rates. The methods in this work allow simulation of quantum error correction with noise models previously inaccessible to classical simulation, providing new insights on the effect of crosstalk noise on quantum error correction codes.
Abstract The realization of fault-tolerant quantum computers hinges on effective quantum error correction (QEC) protocols, whose performance significantly relies on the nature of the underlying noise. In this work, we directly study the structure of non-Markovian correlated errors and their impact on surface code memory performance. Specifically, we compare surface code performance under non-Markovian noise and independent circuit-level noise, while keeping marginal error rates constant. Our analysis shows that while not all temporally correlated structures are detrimental, certain structures, particularly multi-time ‘streaky’ correlations affecting syndrome qubits and two-qubit gates, can severely degrade logical error rate scaling. Furthermore, we discuss our results in the context of recent QEC experiments on physical devices. These findings underscore the importance of understanding and mitigating non-Markovian noise toward achieving practical, fault-tolerant quantum computing.
Radiation impacts are a current challenge with computing on superconducting-based quantum devices because they can lead to widespread correlated errors across the device. Such errors can be problematic for quantum error correction (QEC) codes, which are generally designed to correct independent errors. To address this, we have developed a computational model to simulate the effects of radiation impacts on QEC performance. This is achieved by building from recently developed models of quasiparticle density, mapping radiation-induced qubit error rates onto a quantum error channel and simulation of a simple surface code. We also provide a performance metric to quantify the resilience of a QEC code to radiation impacts. Additionally, we sweep various parameters of chip design to test mitigation strategies for improved QEC performance. Our model approach is holistic, allowing for modular performance testing of error mitigation strategies and chip and code designs.
The demonstration of quantum error correction (QEC) is one of the most important milestones in the realization of fully-fledged quantum computers. Toward this, QEC experiments using the surface codes have recently been actively conducted. However, it has not yet been realized to protect logical quantum information beyond the physical coherence time. In this work, we performed a full simulation of QEC for the rotated surface codes with a code distance 5, which employs 49 qubits and is within reach of the current state-of-the-art quantum computers. In particular, we evaluate the logical error probability in a realistic noise model that incorporates not only stochastic Pauli errors but also coherent errors due to a systematic control error or unintended interactions. While a straightforward simulation of 49 qubits is not tractable within a reasonable computational time, we reduced the number of qubits required to 26 qubits by delaying the syndrome measurement in simulation. This and a fast quantum computer simulator, , implemented on GPU allows us to simulate full QEC with an arbitrary local noise within reasonable simulation time. Based on the numerical results, we also construct and verify an effective model to incorporate the effect of the coherent error into a stochastic noise model. This allows us to understand what the effect coherent error has on the logical error probability on a large scale without full simulation based on the detailed full simulation of a small scale. The present simulation framework and effective model, which can handle arbitrary local noise, will play a vital role in clarifying the physical parameters that future experimental QEC should target. Published by the American Physical Society 2024
Quantum error correction (QEC) represents a critical enabler for fault-tolerant quantum computing, protecting fragile quantum states from decoherence and operational errors. This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of leading quantum error correction schemes, focusing on surface codes and topological codes within the context of Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) era processors. We examine the theoretical foundations of stabilizer codes, compare surface code implementations with code distances ranging from d=3 to d=17, and analyze topological codes including toric codes and color codes. Our investigation encompasses syndrome extraction circuits, logical qubit encoding strategies, and threshold analysis for contemporary quantum hardware platforms. Performance metrics reveal that surface codes achieve error thresholds of approximately 1% with realistic noise models, while topological codes offer architectural advantages for specific qubit connectivity constraints. We discuss implementation challenges on current NISQ processors including IBM Quantum, Google Sycamore, and IonQ systems, addressing qubit overhead, gate fidelity requirements, and decoding algorithms. This analysis provides insights for selecting appropriate error correction schemes based on application requirements and hardware capabilities.
Fault-tolerant Quantum Computing (FTQC) relies on Quantum Error Correction (QEC) codes that encode logical qubits across many physical qubits to detect and correct errors. The surface code is among the most widely studied codes due to its high error threshold, the existence of efficient decoders, and hardware-friendly properties: a planar, two-dimensional layout with nearest-neighbor connectivity. In practice, however, the fabrication of solid-state quantum processors introduces hardware defects, resulting in defective qubits and couplers that must be discarded. Adapting the surface code to these defects often requires measuring the XXX- and ZZZ-type checks in separate rounds rather than simultaneously. In this work, we investigate the optimal XXX-to-ZZZ checks round-scheduling ratio under biased noise systems. Our results characterize how key architectural parameters, such as noise bias, code distance, and defect rate, impact the logical error rate. We provide insights into how to determine the optimal scheduling ratio directly from device calibration data, enabling manufacturers to maximize performance without extensive simulations. Our approach reduces the logical error rate by up to 4.25×4.25\times4.25× at a 1%1\%1% defect rate and up to 8.46×8.46\times8.46× at a 2%2\%2% defect rate for a distance-131313 surface code under moderately biased noise. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the benefits of round-scheduling extend beyond the defective-hardware setting. In biased-noise architectures subject to CNOT crosstalk, separating XXX and ZZZ measurement rounds yields up to 4.5×4.5\times4.5× reduction in logical error rate.