Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2502.19362

Estimating the Percentage of GBS Advantage in Gaussian Expectation Problems

Jørgen Ellegaard Andersen, Shan Shan

Published Feb 26, 2025• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Gaussian Boson Sampling (GBS), which can be realized with a photonic quantum computing model, perform some special kind of sampling tasks. In [4], we introduced algorithms that use GBS samples to approximate Gaussian expectation problems. We found a non-empty open subset of the problem space where these algorithms achieve exponential speedup over the standard Monte Carlo (MC) method. This speedup is defined in terms of the guaranteed sample size to reach the same accuracy $ε$ and success probability $δ$ under the $(ε, δ)$ multiplicative error approximation scheme. In this paper, we enhance our original approach by optimizing the average photon number in the GBS distribution to match the specific Gaussian expectation problem. We provide updated estimates of the guaranteed sample size for these improved algorithms and quantify the proportion of problem space where they outperform MC. Numerical results indicate that the proportion of the problem space where our improved algorithms have an advantage is substantial, and the advantage gained is significant. Notably, for certain special cases, our methods consistently outperform MC across nearly 100\% of the problem space.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2502.19362

Related papers

Using Gaussian Boson Samplers to Approximate Gaussian Expectation Problems

Jørgen Ellegaard Andersen, Shan Shan

Gaussian Boson Sampling (GBS) have shown advantages over classical methods for performing some specific sampling tasks. To fully harness the computational power of GBS, there has been great interest in identifying their practical applications. In this study, we explore the use of GBS samples for computing a numerical approximation to the Gaussian expectation problem, that is to integrate a multivariate function against a Gaussian distribution. We propose two estimators using GBS samples, and show that they both can bring an exponential speedup over the plain Monte Carlo (MC) estimator. Precisely speaking, the exponential speedup is defined in terms of the guaranteed sample size for these estimators to reach the same level of accuracy $ε$ and the same success probability $δ$ in the $(ε, δ)$ multiplicative error approximation scheme. We prove that there is an open and nonempty subset of the Gaussian expectation problem space for such computational advantage.

arXiv:2502.19336•Feb 26, 2025•0 citations

Gaussian boson sampling: Benchmarking quantum advantage

Ned Goodman, Alexander S. Dellios, Margaret D. Reid +1 more

Quantum computers solve intractable problems which classically require an exponentially long time to compute. With the development of large-scale experiments that claim quantum advantage, a vital issue has now emerged. What are the errors, and how do they affect the complexity of the problem solved? Large-scale Gaussian boson sampling (GBS) experiments give an example in which random numbers are generated. Despite classical hardness, these have computable benchmarks for checking data validity. While there are other quantum computing architectures, Gaussian boson sampling is uniquely testable at all scales. Several large, pioneering quantum computing (QC) experiments have been carried out to investigate quantum advantage. Here, we introduce a highly scalable but classical algorithm that can solve GBS approximately. Our numerical simulation of the output count data is closer to the exact solution than current experiments up to 1152 modes. This algorithm outperforms all previous classical, approximate algorithms and scales efficiently to larger experiments. Our results show that effects beyond losses can cause the errors that allow classical simulability. This work will lead to more precise algorithms and is a step towards understanding how QC quantum advantage is affected by the underlying physics.

quant-pharXiv:2604.12330•Apr 15, 2026•0 citations

Quantum computational advantage via high-dimensional Gaussian boson sampling

Abhinav Deshpande, Arthur Mehta, Trevor J. Vincent +10 more

Photonics is a promising platform for demonstrating a quantum computational advantage (QCA) by outperforming the most powerful classical supercomputers on a well-defined computational task. Despite this promise, existing proposals and demonstrations face challenges. Experimentally, current implementations of Gaussian boson sampling (GBS) lack programmability or have prohibitive loss rates. Theoretically, there is a comparative lack of rigorous evidence for the classical hardness of GBS. In this work, we make progress in improving both the theoretical evidence and experimental prospects. We provide evidence for the hardness of GBS, comparable to the strongest theoretical proposals for QCA. We also propose a QCA architecture we call high-dimensional GBS, which is programmable and can be implemented with low loss using few optical components. We show that particular algorithms for simulating GBS are outperformed by high-dimensional GBS experiments at modest system sizes. This work thus opens the path to demonstrating QCA with programmable photonic processors.

arXiv:2102.12474•Science Advances•Jan 5, 2022•106 citations

Gaussian Boson Sampling as a Calibrated Variance-Reduction Engine: A DSFL Explanation

Camilla Josephson

Gaussian Boson Sampling (GBS) generates photon-count patterns whose probabilities are governed by hafnian functionals of an encoded covariance. Recent theory shows that GBS samples can approximate Gaussian expectation problems with provable sample-complexity advantages over Monte Carlo (MC) on an open, sizable subset of instances. We give a unifying explanation via the Deterministic Statistical Feedback Law (DSFL). First, GBS acts as a calibrated, admissible map that intertwines target statistics and physical sampling. Second, tuning the mean photon number is a genuine calibration step that minimizes a DSFL residual. Third, principal-angle (Friedrichs) geometry quantifies conditioning and leakage between statistical and sampling features. Fourth, a Lyapunov envelope provides non-asymptotic error decay and design rules. From these ingredients we derive bounds that recover and sharpen known GBS scalings, predict regimes where GBS outperforms MC, and specify a practical hybrid policy that switches by degree. Experiments with simulated distributions and hardware-aligned kernels support the theory and validate the tuning and selection rules.

•Oct 27, 2025•0 citations

Solving Graph Problems Using Gaussian Boson Sampling

Yu‐Hao Deng, Si-Qiu Gong, Yi-Chao Gu +21 more

Gaussian boson sampling (GBS) is not only a feasible protocol for demonstrating quantum computational advantage, but also mathematically associated with certain graph-related and quantum chemistry problems. In particular, it is proposed that the generated samples from the GBS could be harnessed to enhance the classical stochastic algorithms in searching some graph features. Here, we use Jiǔzhāng, a noisy intermediate-scale quantum computer, to solve graph problems. The samples are generated from a 144-mode fully connected photonic processor, with photon click up to 80 in the quantum computational advantage regime. We investigate the open question of whether the GBS enhancement over the classical stochastic algorithms persists-and how it scales-with an increasing system size on noisy quantum devices in the computationally interesting regime. We experimentally observe the presence of GBS enhancement with a large photon-click number and a robustness of the enhancement under certain noise. Our work is a step toward testing real-world problems using the existing noisy intermediate-scale quantum computers and hopes to stimulate the development of more efficient classical and quantum-inspired algorithms.

arXiv:2302.00936•Physical Review Letters•May 9, 2023•60 citations

Quantum approximate optimization with Gaussian boson sampling

Juan Miguel Arrazola, Thomas R. Bromley, Patrick Rebentrost

Hard optimization problems are often approached by finding approximate solutions. Here, we highlight the concept of proportional sampling and discuss how it can be used to improve the performance of stochastic algorithms for optimization. We introduce an NP-Hard problem called Max-Haf and show that Gaussian boson sampling (GBS) can be used to enhance any stochastic algorithm for this problem. These results are applied by enhancing the random search, simulated annealing, and greedy algorithms. With numerical simulations, we confirm that all algorithms are improved when employing GBS, and that a GBS-enhanced random search performs the best despite being the one with the simplest underlying classical routine.

arXiv:1803.10731•Physical Review A•Jul 19, 2018•57 citations
Gaussian Boson Sampling (GBS), which can be realized with a photonic quantum computing model, perform some special kind of sampling tasks. In [4], we introduced algorithms that use GBS samples to approximate Gaussian expectation problems. We found a non-empty open subset of the problem space where these algorithms achieve exponential speedup over the standard Monte Carlo (MC) method. This speedup is defined in terms of the guaranteed sample size to reach the same accuracy εεε and success probability δδδ under the (ε,δ)(ε, δ)(ε,δ) multiplicative error approximation scheme. In this paper, we enhance our original approach by optimizing the average photon number in the GBS distribution to match the specific Gaussian expectation problem. We provide updated estimates of the guaranteed sample size for these improved algorithms and quantify the proportion of problem space where they outperform MC. Numerical results indicate that the proportion of the problem space where our improved algorithms have an advantage is substantial, and the advantage gained is significant. Notably, for certain special cases, our methods consistently outperform MC across nearly 100% of the problem space.
Gaussian Boson Sampling (GBS) have shown advantages over classical methods for performing some specific sampling tasks. To fully harness the computational power of GBS, there has been great interest in identifying their practical applications. In this study, we explore the use of GBS samples for computing a numerical approximation to the Gaussian expectation problem, that is to integrate a multivariate function against a Gaussian distribution. We propose two estimators using GBS samples, and show that they both can bring an exponential speedup over the plain Monte Carlo (MC) estimator. Precisely speaking, the exponential speedup is defined in terms of the guaranteed sample size for these estimators to reach the same level of accuracy εεε and the same success probability δδδ in the (ε,δ)(ε, δ)(ε,δ) multiplicative error approximation scheme. We prove that there is an open and nonempty subset of the Gaussian expectation problem space for such computational advantage.
Quantum computers solve intractable problems which classically require an exponentially long time to compute. With the development of large-scale experiments that claim quantum advantage, a vital issue has now emerged. What are the errors, and how do they affect the complexity of the problem solved? Large-scale Gaussian boson sampling (GBS) experiments give an example in which random numbers are generated. Despite classical hardness, these have computable benchmarks for checking data validity. While there are other quantum computing architectures, Gaussian boson sampling is uniquely testable at all scales. Several large, pioneering quantum computing (QC) experiments have been carried out to investigate quantum advantage. Here, we introduce a highly scalable but classical algorithm that can solve GBS approximately. Our numerical simulation of the output count data is closer to the exact solution than current experiments up to 1152 modes. This algorithm outperforms all previous classical, approximate algorithms and scales efficiently to larger experiments. Our results show that effects beyond losses can cause the errors that allow classical simulability. This work will lead to more precise algorithms and is a step towards understanding how QC quantum advantage is affected by the underlying physics.
Photonics is a promising platform for demonstrating a quantum computational advantage (QCA) by outperforming the most powerful classical supercomputers on a well-defined computational task. Despite this promise, existing proposals and demonstrations face challenges. Experimentally, current implementations of Gaussian boson sampling (GBS) lack programmability or have prohibitive loss rates. Theoretically, there is a comparative lack of rigorous evidence for the classical hardness of GBS. In this work, we make progress in improving both the theoretical evidence and experimental prospects. We provide evidence for the hardness of GBS, comparable to the strongest theoretical proposals for QCA. We also propose a QCA architecture we call high-dimensional GBS, which is programmable and can be implemented with low loss using few optical components. We show that particular algorithms for simulating GBS are outperformed by high-dimensional GBS experiments at modest system sizes. This work thus opens the path to demonstrating QCA with programmable photonic processors.
Gaussian Boson Sampling (GBS) generates photon-count patterns whose probabilities are governed by hafnian functionals of an encoded covariance. Recent theory shows that GBS samples can approximate Gaussian expectation problems with provable sample-complexity advantages over Monte Carlo (MC) on an open, sizable subset of instances. We give a unifying explanation via the Deterministic Statistical Feedback Law (DSFL). First, GBS acts as a calibrated, admissible map that intertwines target statistics and physical sampling. Second, tuning the mean photon number is a genuine calibration step that minimizes a DSFL residual. Third, principal-angle (Friedrichs) geometry quantifies conditioning and leakage between statistical and sampling features. Fourth, a Lyapunov envelope provides non-asymptotic error decay and design rules. From these ingredients we derive bounds that recover and sharpen known GBS scalings, predict regimes where GBS outperforms MC, and specify a practical hybrid policy that switches by degree. Experiments with simulated distributions and hardware-aligned kernels support the theory and validate the tuning and selection rules.
Gaussian boson sampling (GBS) is not only a feasible protocol for demonstrating quantum computational advantage, but also mathematically associated with certain graph-related and quantum chemistry problems. In particular, it is proposed that the generated samples from the GBS could be harnessed to enhance the classical stochastic algorithms in searching some graph features. Here, we use Jiǔzhāng, a noisy intermediate-scale quantum computer, to solve graph problems. The samples are generated from a 144-mode fully connected photonic processor, with photon click up to 80 in the quantum computational advantage regime. We investigate the open question of whether the GBS enhancement over the classical stochastic algorithms persists-and how it scales-with an increasing system size on noisy quantum devices in the computationally interesting regime. We experimentally observe the presence of GBS enhancement with a large photon-click number and a robustness of the enhancement under certain noise. Our work is a step toward testing real-world problems using the existing noisy intermediate-scale quantum computers and hopes to stimulate the development of more efficient classical and quantum-inspired algorithms.
Hard optimization problems are often approached by finding approximate solutions. Here, we highlight the concept of proportional sampling and discuss how it can be used to improve the performance of stochastic algorithms for optimization. We introduce an NP-Hard problem called Max-Haf and show that Gaussian boson sampling (GBS) can be used to enhance any stochastic algorithm for this problem. These results are applied by enhancing the random search, simulated annealing, and greedy algorithms. With numerical simulations, we confirm that all algorithms are improved when employing GBS, and that a GBS-enhanced random search performs the best despite being the one with the simplest underlying classical routine.