Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2502.12991

On the Alleged Locality in the Schrödinger Picture

Charles Alexandre Bédard

Published Feb 18, 2025• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Vedral claims that the Schrödinger picture can describe quantum systems as locally as the Heisenberg picture, relying on a product notation for the density matrix. Here, I refute that claim. I show that the so-called `local factors' in the product notation do not correspond to individual systems and therefore fail to satisfy Einsteinian locality. Furthermore, the product notation does not track where local gates are applied. Finally, I expose internal inconsistencies in the argument: if, as is also stated, Schrödinger-picture locality ultimately depends on explicit bookkeeping of all operations, then the explanatory power of the product notation is de facto undermined.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2502.12991

Related papers

On the Alleged Locality in the Schrödinger Picture. Comment on Vedral, V. Locality in the Schrödinger Picture of Quantum Mechanics. Physics 2024, 6, 793–800

Charles Alexandre Bédard

In his recent paper, Vlatko Vedral claims that the Schrödinger picture can describe quantum systems as locally as the Heisenberg picture, relying on a product notation for the density matrix. Here, I refute that claim. I show that the so-called ‘local factors’ in the product notation do not correspond to individual systems and therefore fail to satisfy Einsteinian locality. Furthermore, the product notation does not track where local gates are applied. Finally, I expose internal inconsistencies in the argument: if, as is also stated, the Schrödinger-picture locality ultimately depends on the explicit bookkeeping of all operations, then the explanatory power of the product notation is de facto undermined.

Physics•Apr 9, 2025•0 citations

Comment on an alleged refutation of non-locality

R. L. Schafir

A recent claim (Deutsch and Hayden (2000)), that non-locality can be refuted by considering the evolution of the system in the Heisenberg picture, is denied. What they demonstrated was not the falsity of non-locality but the no-superluminal-signalling principle.

arXiv:quant-ph/0201065•Jan 16, 2002•1 citation

Interpolating between the gauge and Schrödinger pictures of quantum dynamics

Sayak Guha Roy, Kevin Slagle

Although spatial locality is explicit in the Heisenberg picture of quantum dynamics, spatial locality is not explicit in the Schrödinger picture equations of motion. The gauge picture is a modification of Schrödinger’s picture such that locality is explicit in the equations of motion. In order to achieve this explicit locality, the gauge picture utilizes (1) a distinct wavefunction associated with each patch of space, and (2) time-dependent unitary connections to relate the Hilbert spaces associated with nearby patches. In this work, we show that by adding an additional spatially-local term to the gauge picture equations of motion, we can effectively interpolate between the gauge and Schrödinger pictures, such that when this additional term has a large coefficient, all of the gauge picture wavefunctions approach the Schrödginer picture wavefunction (and the connections approach the identity).

arXiv:2307.02369•SciPost Physics Core•Nov 24, 2023•0 citations

Realism and the Inequivalence of the Two Quantum Pictures

Charles Alexandre Bédard

Abstract The standard claim that the Schrödinger and Heisenberg pictures of quantum mechanics are equivalent rests on the fact that they yield identical empirical predictions. This equivalence therefore assumes the instrumentalist worldview in which theories serve only as tools for prediction. Under scientific realism, by contrast, theories aim to describe reality. Whereas the Schrödinger picture posits a time-evolving wave function, the Heisenberg picture posits so-called descriptors, time-evolving generators of the algebra of observables. These two structures are non-isomorphic: descriptors surject onto but do not reduce to the Schrödinger state. Hence, under realism, the pictures are inequivalent. The chapter argues that this inequivalence marks an opening toward a richer, separable ontology for quantum theory. On explanatory grounds, descriptors provide genuinely local accounts of superdense coding, teleportation, branching, and Bell inequality violations—phenomena that the Schrödinger framework does not explain fully locally.

arXiv:2510.02138•Aug 26, 2026•0 citations

Locality in the Heisenberg picture

Pickering, Phil

A growing body of literature supports Deutsch and Hayden’s (2000) claim that in the Heisenberg picture, quantum entanglement can be characterised locally using objects they call descriptors. I argue that their notion of locality rests, in part, on a qualified version of the principle of separability that I call spatial separability. I show that spatial separability is not sufficient for separability simpliciter, and that the more general version, spatiotemporal separability, reveals that their claim is false. Deutsch and Hayden’s approach also has a novel implication: if descriptors represent actual physical properties, they are non-qualitative properties, which are profoundly different from the qualitative properties we have come to expect from other branches of physics.

•Feb 24, 2025•0 citations

Quantum States of Manifested Tribosystem

Dmitry N. Lyubimov, Kirill N. Dolgopolov, L.S. Pinchuk

Any quantum particle at rest has a probability amplitude that characterizes the possibility to find this system in any point of phase multidimensional space. This chapter establishes the dependencies between the energies of various states of a manifested tribosystem, which, in turn, is a product of reduction of a quantum non-local ‘properly tribosystem’. Quantum mechanism of frictional interaction is based on the assumption that the friction force may be represented as an exchange of special quasiparticles, tribons, the quanta of frictional interaction, between the surfaces. There are two approaches to the notation of the motion equation in quantum mechanics. They are called Schrodinger and Heisenberg pictures. The diagonal elements of the density matrix describe the basic state of a quantum system and the off-diagonal elements characterize the correlations inside a tribosystem. The points on the Bloch sphere surface corresponding to the pure state are localized near the poles of the system; the other points correspond to mixed quantum states.

CRC Press eBooks•Jun 5, 2017•0 citations
Vedral claims that the Schrödinger picture can describe quantum systems as locally as the Heisenberg picture, relying on a product notation for the density matrix. Here, I refute that claim. I show that the so-called `local factors' in the product notation do not correspond to individual systems and therefore fail to satisfy Einsteinian locality. Furthermore, the product notation does not track where local gates are applied. Finally, I expose internal inconsistencies in the argument: if, as is also stated, Schrödinger-picture locality ultimately depends on explicit bookkeeping of all operations, then the explanatory power of the product notation is de facto undermined.
In his recent paper, Vlatko Vedral claims that the Schrödinger picture can describe quantum systems as locally as the Heisenberg picture, relying on a product notation for the density matrix. Here, I refute that claim. I show that the so-called ‘local factors’ in the product notation do not correspond to individual systems and therefore fail to satisfy Einsteinian locality. Furthermore, the product notation does not track where local gates are applied. Finally, I expose internal inconsistencies in the argument: if, as is also stated, the Schrödinger-picture locality ultimately depends on the explicit bookkeeping of all operations, then the explanatory power of the product notation is de facto undermined.
Although spatial locality is explicit in the Heisenberg picture of quantum dynamics, spatial locality is not explicit in the Schrödinger picture equations of motion. The gauge picture is a modification of Schrödinger’s picture such that locality is explicit in the equations of motion. In order to achieve this explicit locality, the gauge picture utilizes (1) a distinct wavefunction associated with each patch of space, and (2) time-dependent unitary connections to relate the Hilbert spaces associated with nearby patches. In this work, we show that by adding an additional spatially-local term to the gauge picture equations of motion, we can effectively interpolate between the gauge and Schrödinger pictures, such that when this additional term has a large coefficient, all of the gauge picture wavefunctions approach the Schrödginer picture wavefunction (and the connections approach the identity).
Abstract The standard claim that the Schrödinger and Heisenberg pictures of quantum mechanics are equivalent rests on the fact that they yield identical empirical predictions. This equivalence therefore assumes the instrumentalist worldview in which theories serve only as tools for prediction. Under scientific realism, by contrast, theories aim to describe reality. Whereas the Schrödinger picture posits a time-evolving wave function, the Heisenberg picture posits so-called descriptors, time-evolving generators of the algebra of observables. These two structures are non-isomorphic: descriptors surject onto but do not reduce to the Schrödinger state. Hence, under realism, the pictures are inequivalent. The chapter argues that this inequivalence marks an opening toward a richer, separable ontology for quantum theory. On explanatory grounds, descriptors provide genuinely local accounts of superdense coding, teleportation, branching, and Bell inequality violations—phenomena that the Schrödinger framework does not explain fully locally.
A growing body of literature supports Deutsch and Hayden’s (2000) claim that in the Heisenberg picture, quantum entanglement can be characterised locally using objects they call descriptors. I argue that their notion of locality rests, in part, on a qualified version of the principle of separability that I call spatial separability. I show that spatial separability is not sufficient for separability simpliciter, and that the more general version, spatiotemporal separability, reveals that their claim is false. Deutsch and Hayden’s approach also has a novel implication: if descriptors represent actual physical properties, they are non-qualitative properties, which are profoundly different from the qualitative properties we have come to expect from other branches of physics.
Any quantum particle at rest has a probability amplitude that characterizes the possibility to find this system in any point of phase multidimensional space. This chapter establishes the dependencies between the energies of various states of a manifested tribosystem, which, in turn, is a product of reduction of a quantum non-local ‘properly tribosystem’. Quantum mechanism of frictional interaction is based on the assumption that the friction force may be represented as an exchange of special quasiparticles, tribons, the quanta of frictional interaction, between the surfaces. There are two approaches to the notation of the motion equation in quantum mechanics. They are called Schrodinger and Heisenberg pictures. The diagonal elements of the density matrix describe the basic state of a quantum system and the off-diagonal elements characterize the correlations inside a tribosystem. The points on the Bloch sphere surface corresponding to the pure state are localized near the poles of the system; the other points correspond to mixed quantum states.