Recent experimental breakthroughs have signalled the imminent arrival of the early fault-tolerant era. However, for a considerable period in the foreseeable future, relying solely on quantum error correction for full error suppression will remain extremely challenging due to its substantial hardware overhead. Additional help from quantum error mitigation (QEM) is essential for bridging this gap towards achieving quantum advantage. The application of QEM has so far been restricted to expectation value estimation, leaving its extension to sampling-based algorithms -- which is expected to play a pivotal role in the early fault-tolerant era -- an unresolved challenge. In this work, we present a framework for applying any QEM techniques to obtain the error-mitigated output distribution, showing that this incurs no greater cost than estimating a single observable. We also devised a way to sample from this distribution and constructed an explicit scheme for applying any QEM methods to quantum phase estimation, which can be generalised to other sampling algorithms. Numerical experiments were conducted to validate the efficacy of these methods. We believe our methods significantly broaden the scope of QEM, extending its applicability to most algorithms of practical interest and forming a crucial step towards realising quantum advantage.
Recent experimental breakthroughs have signalled the imminent arrival of the early fault-tolerant era. However, for a considerable period in the foreseeable future, relying solely on quantum error correction for full error suppression will remain extremely challenging due to its substantial hardware overhead. Additional help from quantum error mitigation (QEM) is essential for bridging this gap towards achieving quantum advantage. The application of QEM has so far been restricted to expectation value estimation, leaving its extension to sampling-based algorithms -- which is expected to play a pivotal role in the early fault-tolerant era -- an unresolved challenge. In this work, we present a framework for applying any QEM techniques to obtain the error-mitigated output distribution, showing that this incurs no greater cost than estimating a single observable. We also devised a way to sample from this distribution and constructed an explicit scheme for applying any QEM methods to quantum phase estimation, which can be generalised to other sampling algorithms. Numerical experiments were conducted to validate the efficacy of these methods. We believe our methods significantly broaden the scope of QEM, extending its applicability to most algorithms of practical interest and forming a crucial step towards realising quantum advantage.
Fault-tolerant quantum computing (FTQC) is a form of universal quantum computing that suppresses physical errors via quantum error correction (QEC). On the other hand, it is expected that the available code distance and the T-gate count will be restricted in the early years of FTQC. Meanwhile, quantum error mitigation (QEM) was recently introduced for suppressing errors in noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices; it improves the computation accuracy of near-term quantum algorithms with its overhead being a greater number of samples. In this work, we integrate QEC and QEM into an efficient FTQC architecture that effectively increases the code distance and T-gate count. Our scheme will dramatically alleviate the required qubit count by tens of percent at the cost of a constant multiplicative sampling overhead within 102 in a wide range of regimes from the post-NISQ era to early FTQC regime, which necessitates the order of from 104 to 1010 logical operations. While it has been widely believed that there do not exist useful applications in post-NISQ regimes due to a chasm between the NISQ and FTQC regimes such as overheads for encoding and T-gate distillations, our scheme can continuously bridge the two distinct regimes.
Quantum error mitigation is expected to play a crucial role in the practical applications of quantum machines for the foreseeable future. Thus it is important to put the numerous quantum error mitigation schemes proposed under a coherent framework that can highlight their underlying connections while providing guidance for their practical performance. In this article, we construct a general framework named linear quantum error mitigation that includes most of the state-of-the-art quantum error mitigation schemes. Within the framework, quantum error mitigation can be effectively viewed as extracting the error-mitigated state out of the noisy state, which introduces a new metric called extraction rate for indicating the cost-effectiveness of a given mitigation scheme. Using the framework, we have derived and compared the extraction rate, improvement in the fidelity and sampling overhead across various mitigation schemes under practical assumptions. The structure, insights and intuitions provided by the framework can serve as a basis for the further development of new schemes.
Quantum error mitigation (QEM) is typically viewed as a suite of practical techniques for today's noisy intermediate-scale quantum devices, with limited relevance once fault-tolerant quantum computers become available. In this work, we challenge this conventional wisdom by showing that QEM can continue to provide substantial benefits in the era of quantum error correction (QEC), and in an even more efficient manner than it does on current devices. We introduce a framework for logical-level QEM that leverages soft information naturally produced by QEC decoders, requiring no additional data, hardware modifications, or runtime overhead beyond what QEC protocols already provide. Within this framework, we develop and analyze three logical-level QEM techniques: post-selection and runtime abort policies, probabilistic error cancellation, and zero-noise extrapolation. Our techniques reduce logical error rates by more than 100x while discarding fewer than 0.1% of shots; they also provide in situ characterization of logical channels for QEM protocols. As a proof of principle, we benchmark our approach using a surface-code architecture and two state-of-the-art decoders based on tensor-network contraction and minimum-weight perfect matching. We evaluate logical-level QEM on random Clifford circuits and molecular simulation algorithms and find that, compared to previous approaches relying on QEC only or QEC combined with QEM, we can achieve up to 87.4% spacetime overhead savings. Our results demonstrate that logical-level QEM with QEC decoder soft information can reliably improve logical performance, underscoring the efficiency and usefulness of QEM techniques for fault-tolerant quantum computers.
As fully fault-tolerant quantum computers capable of solving useful problems remain a distant goal, we anticipate an era of during which limited error correction is available. We propose a framework for designing early fault-tolerant algorithms by trading between error-correction overhead and residual logical noise, and apply it to quantum phase estimation (QPE). We develop a quantum-Fourier-transform- (QFT) based QPE technique that is robust to global depolarizing noise and outperforms the previous state of the art at low and moderate noise rates. We further introduce the explicitly unbiased maximum-likelihood estimator (EUMLE), a data-processing technique that mitigates errors in QFT-based QPE schemes. EUMLE provides consistent asymptotically normal error-mitigated estimates, addressing the open problem of extending error mitigation beyond expectation-value estimation. Applying this scheme to the ground-state problem of the two-dimensional Hubbard model and various molecular Hamiltonians, we find that we can roughly halve the number of physical qubits with a ∼ 10 times wall-clock time overhead, but that further reduction causes a steep run-time increase. This work provides an end-to-end analysis of early fault-tolerance cost reductions and space-time trade-offs, and identifies which areas can be improved in the future.
Quantum error mitigation (EM) is a family of hybrid quantum-classical methods for eliminating or reducing the effect of noise and decoherence on quantum algorithms run on quantum hardware, without applying quantum error correction (EC). While EM has many benefits compared to EC, specifically that it requires no (or little) qubit overhead, this benefit comes with a painful price: EM seems to necessitate an overhead in quantum run time which grows as a (mild) exponent. Accordingly, recent results show that EM alone cannot enable exponential quantum advantages (QAs), for an average variant of the expectation value estimation problem. These works raised concerns regarding the role of EM in the road map towards QAs. We aim to demystify the discussion and provide a clear picture of the role of EM in achieving QAs, both in the near and long term. We first propose a clear distinction between finite QA and asymptotic QA, which is crucial to the understanding of the question, and present the notion of circuit volume boost, which we claim is an adequate way to quantify the benefits of EM. Using these notions, we can argue straightforwardly that EM is expected to have a significant role in achieving QAs. Specifically, that EM is likely to be the first error reduction method for useful finite QAs, before EC; that the first such QAs are expected to be achieved using EM in the very near future; and that EM is expected to maintain its important role in quantum computation even when EC will be routinely used - for as long as high-quality qubits remain a scarce resource.
Quantum error mitigation (QEM) bridges the gap between today's noisy NISQ hardware and fault-tolerant quantum computing by reducing the effect of hardware errors on expectation value estimates without the qubit overhead of full quantum error correction. This paper proposes the Quantum Error Mitigation Design (QEMD) framework, a systematic evaluation of six QEM techniques across four circuit families on IBM Quantum Eagle and IonQ Forte: Zero-Noise Extrapolation (ZNE), Probabilistic Error Cancellation (PEC), Clifford Data Regression (CDR), Symmetry Verification (SV), Dynamical Decoupling (DD), and a novel Adaptive Ensemble Mitigation (AEM) combining ZNE and CDR with context-aware technique selection. QEMD finds: ZNE 3-point Richardson provides the best cost-performance trade-off for QAOA and VQE circuits (4.8x overhead, 28.4pp error reduction); PEC provides the highest accuracy but at 48x shot overhead -- practical only for n <= 12; DD reduces coherence-limited errors by 18.4% on IonQ Forte at zero shot overhead; AEM outperforms all individual techniques by 6.4pp at 8.4x overhead. QEMD provides a decision guide mapping circuit type, qubit count, and shot budget to optimal QEM technique selection.